Fast Inference of Removal-Based Node Influence

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely utilized to capture the information spreading patterns in graphs. While remarkable performance has been achieved, there is a new trending topic of evaluating node influence. We propose a new method of evaluating node influence, which measures the prediction change of a trained GNN model caused by removing a node. A real-world application is, "In the task of predicting Twitter accounts' polarity, had a particular account been removed, how would others' polarity change?". We use the GNN as a surrogate model whose prediction could simulate the change of nodes or edges caused by node removal. Our target is to obtain the influence score for every node, and a straightforward way is to alternately remove every node and apply the trained GNN on the modified graph to generate new predictions. It is reliable but time-consuming, so we need an efficient method. The related lines of work, such as graph adversarial attack and counterfactual explanation, cannot directly satisfy our needs, since their problem settings are different. We propose an efficient, intuitive, and effective method, NOde-Removal-based fAst GNN inference (NORA), which uses the gradient information to approximate the node-removal influence. It only costs one forward propagation and one backpropagation to approximate the influence score for all nodes. Extensive experiments on six datasets and six GNN models verify the effectiveness of NORA. Our code is available at https://github.com/weikai-li/NORA.git.

Are All Unseen Data Out-of-Distribution?

Distributions of unseen data have been all treated as out-of-distribution (OOD), making their generalization a significant challenge. Much evidence suggests that the size increase of training data can monotonically decrease generalization errors in test data. However, this is not true from other observations and analysis. In particular, when the training data have multiple source domains and the test data contain distribution drifts, then not all generalization errors on the test data decrease monotonically with the increasing size of training data. Such a non-decreasing phenomenon is formally investigated under a linear setting with empirical verification across varying visual benchmarks. Motivated by these results, we redefine the OOD data as a type of data outside the convex hull of the training domains and prove a new generalization bound based on this new definition. It implies that the effectiveness of a well-trained model can be guaranteed for the unseen data that is within the convex hull of the training domains. But, for some data beyond the convex hull, a non-decreasing error trend can happen. Therefore, we investigate the performance of popular strategies such as data augmentation and pre-training to overcome this issue. Moreover, we propose a novel reinforcement learning selection algorithm in the source domains only that can deliver superior performance over the baseline methods.

TIDE: Test Time Few Shot Object Detection

Few-shot object detection (FSOD) aims to extract semantic knowledge from limited object instances of novel categories within a target domain. Recent advances in FSOD focus on fine-tuning the base model based on a few objects via meta-learning or data augmentation. Despite their success, the majority of them are grounded with parametric readjustment to generalize on novel objects, which face considerable challenges in Industry 5.0, such as (i) a certain amount of fine-tuning time is required, and (ii) the parameters of the constructed model being unavailable due to the privilege protection, making the fine-tuning fail. Such constraints naturally limit its application in scenarios with real-time configuration requirements or within black-box settings. To tackle the challenges mentioned above, we formalize a novel FSOD task, referred to as Test TIme Few Shot DEtection (TIDE), where the model is un-tuned in the configuration procedure. To that end, we introduce an asymmetric architecture for learning a support-instance-guided dynamic category classifier. Further, a cross-attention module and a multi-scale resizer are provided to enhance the model performance. Experimental results on multiple few-shot object detection platforms reveal that the proposed TIDE significantly outperforms existing contemporary methods. The implementation codes are available at https://github.com/deku-0621/TIDE

When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Tasks

In-context learning (ICL) has become the default method for using large language models (LLMs), making the exploration of its limitations and understanding the underlying causes crucial. In this paper, we find that ICL falls short of handling specification-heavy tasks, which are tasks with complicated and extensive task specifications, requiring several hours for ordinary humans to master, such as traditional information extraction tasks. The performance of ICL on these tasks mostly cannot reach half of the state-of-the-art results. To explore the reasons behind this failure, we conduct comprehensive experiments on 18 specification-heavy tasks with various LLMs and identify three primary reasons: inability to specifically understand context, misalignment in task schema comprehension with humans, and inadequate long-text understanding ability. Furthermore, we demonstrate that through fine-tuning, LLMs can achieve decent performance on these tasks, indicating that the failure of ICL is not an inherent flaw of LLMs, but rather a drawback of existing alignment methods that renders LLMs incapable of handling complicated specification-heavy tasks via ICL. To substantiate this, we perform dedicated instruction tuning on LLMs for these tasks and observe a notable improvement. We hope the analyses in this paper could facilitate advancements in alignment methods enabling LLMs to meet more sophisticated human demands.

KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models

The unprecedented performance of large language models (LLMs) necessitates improvements in evaluations. Rather than merely exploring the breadth of LLM abilities, we believe meticulous and thoughtful designs are essential to thorough, unbiased, and applicable evaluations. Given the importance of world knowledge to LLMs, we construct a Knowledge-oriented LLM Assessment benchmark (KoLA), in which we carefully design three crucial factors: (1) For ability modeling, we mimic human cognition to form a four-level taxonomy of knowledge-related abilities, covering $19$ tasks. (2) For data, to ensure fair comparisons, we use both Wikipedia, a corpus prevalently pre-trained by LLMs, along with continuously collected emerging corpora, aiming to evaluate the capacity to handle unseen data and evolving knowledge. (3) For evaluation criteria, we adopt a contrastive system, including overall standard scores for better numerical comparability across tasks and models and a unique self-contrast metric for automatically evaluating knowledge hallucination. We evaluate $21$ open-source and commercial LLMs and obtain some intriguing findings. The KoLA dataset and open-participation leaderboard are publicly released at https://kola.xlore.cn and will be continuously updated to provide references for developing LLMs and knowledge-related systems.

Rethinking the Setting of Semi-supervised Learning on Graphs

We argue that the present setting of semisupervised learning on graphs may result in unfair comparisons, due to its potential risk of over-tuning hyper-parameters for models. In this paper, we highlight the significant influence of tuning hyper-parameters, which leverages the label information in the validation set to improve the performance. To explore the limit of over-tuning hyperparameters, we propose ValidUtil, an approach to fully utilize the label information in the validation set through an extra group of hyper-parameters. With ValidUtil, even GCN can easily get high accuracy of 85.8% on Cora. To avoid over-tuning, we merge the training set and the validation set and construct an i.i.d. graph benchmark (IGB) consisting of 4 datasets. Each dataset contains 100 i.i.d. graphs sampled from a large graph to reduce the evaluation variance. Our experiments suggest that IGB is a more stable benchmark than previous datasets for semisupervised learning on graphs.

Jacobian Norm for Unsupervised Source-Free Domain Adaptation

Unsupervised Source (data) Free domain adaptation (USFDA) aims to transfer knowledge from a well-trained source model to a related but unlabeled target domain. In such a scenario, all conventional adaptation methods that require source data fail. To combat this challenge, existing USFDAs turn to transfer knowledge by aligning the target feature to the latent distribution hidden in the source model. However, such information is naturally limited. Thus, the alignment in such a scenario is not only difficult but also insufficient, which degrades the target generalization performance. To relieve this dilemma in current USFDAs, we are motivated to explore a new perspective to boost their performance. For this purpose and gaining necessary insight, we look back upon the origin of the domain adaptation and first theoretically derive a new-brand target generalization error bound based on the model smoothness. Then, following the theoretical insight, a general and model-smoothness-guided Jacobian norm (JN) regularizer is designed and imposed on the target domain to mitigate this dilemma. Extensive experiments are conducted to validate its effectiveness. In its implementation, just with a few lines of codes added to the existing USFDAs, we achieve superior results on various benchmark datasets.

Partial Domain Adaptation without Domain Alignment

Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to transfer knowledge from a well-labeled source domain to a different but related unlabeled target domain with identical label space. Currently, the main workhorse for solving UDA is domain alignment, which has proven successful. However, it is often difficult to find an appropriate source domain with identical label space. A more practical scenario is so-called partial domain adaptation (PDA) in which the source label set or space subsumes the target one. Unfortunately, in PDA, due to the existence of the irrelevant categories in the source domain, it is quite hard to obtain a perfect alignment, thus resulting in mode collapse and negative transfer. Although several efforts have been made by down-weighting the irrelevant source categories, the strategies used tend to be burdensome and risky since exactly which irrelevant categories are unknown. These challenges motivate us to find a relatively simpler alternative to solve PDA. To achieve this, we first provide a thorough theoretical analysis, which illustrates that the target risk is bounded by both model smoothness and between-domain discrepancy. Considering the difficulty of perfect alignment in solving PDA, we turn to focus on the model smoothness while discard the riskier domain alignment to enhance the adaptability of the model. Specifically, we instantiate the model smoothness as a quite simple intra-domain structure preserving (IDSP). To our best knowledge, this is the first naive attempt to address the PDA without domain alignment. Finally, our empirical results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that IDSP is not only superior to the PDA SOTAs by a significant margin on some benchmarks (e.g., +10% on Cl->Rw and +8% on Ar->Rw ), but also complementary to domain alignment in the standard UDA

Leave Zero Out: Towards a No-Cross-Validation Approach for Model Selection

As the main workhorse for model selection, Cross Validation (CV) has achieved an empirical success due to its simplicity and intuitiveness. However, despite its ubiquitous role, CV often falls into the following notorious dilemmas. On the one hand, for small data cases, CV suffers a conservatively biased estimation, since some part of the limited data has to hold out for validation. On the other hand, for large data cases, CV tends to be extremely cumbersome, e.g., intolerant time-consuming, due to the repeated training procedures. Naturally, a straightforward ambition for CV is to validate the models with far less computational cost, while making full use of the entire given data-set for training. Thus, instead of holding out the given data, a cheap and theoretically guaranteed auxiliary/augmented validation is derived strategically in this paper. Such an embarrassingly simple strategy only needs to train models on the entire given data-set once, making the model-selection considerably efficient. In addition, the proposed validation approach is suitable for a wide range of learning settings due to the independence of both augmentation and out-of-sample estimation on learning process. In the end, we demonstrate the accuracy and computational benefits of our proposed method by extensive evaluation on multiple data-sets, models and tasks.