Magnitude-Direction Decoupling for Fast Video Generation with Flow Matching Models

Flow matching models for video generation achieve impressive performance but suffer from high computational overhead due to iterative denoising. In fact, the original model is not necessary for all denoising steps, allowing some steps to use lightweight alternatives for faster sampling. However, directly using caching or lightweight models can deviate from the original denoising trajectory, resulting in suboptimal performance. Through empirical analysis, we find that lightweight models can robustly capture the magnitude components of the original model's output, while caching provides reliable directional guidance. Building on this insight, we propose the Magnitude-Direction Decoupling (MDD) method, which adaptively employs a direction-calibrated lightweight model as a substitute for the original model to accelerate inference and effectively correct deviations in the denoising trajectory. Moreover, MDD further reduces inference costs by reusing magnitude information under classifier-free guidance (CFG). As a result, MDD offers a more reliable and lightweight solution to accelerate sampling. Experiments show that MDD outperforms existing acceleration methods, delivering promising speedups (e.g., up to 2.95x on Wan2.1) while preserving high visual fidelity and content richness.

Static Pruning Across Sparse Retrieval Regimes: What Transfers, What Breaks, and What Still Helps

Static pruning is widely used to accelerate sparse neural retrieval, yet existing studies each validate their conclusions within a single custom pipeline, leaving it unclear which findings transfer to modern engines with different index organizations and dynamic pruning mechanisms. We present the first cross-engine pruning portability study, evaluating static pruning strategies across three engines - a controlled C++ pipeline (exhaustive inverted index), BMP (block-max pruning), and SEISMIC (clustered inverted indexes) - on two benchmarks (MS MARCO, Natural Questions) with two encoders spanning opposite query-density regimes (SPLADE: 44 avg. query terms; V3-GTE: 7 avg. query terms), totaling 1,140 experimental configurations, with an additional deep-judgment validation on TREC DL 2019/2020. We find that index-side pruning (document and posting-list) is portable: it consistently reduces latency (1.2-6.6$\times$) and index size (18-82%) across all engines because sparse retrieval is memory-bound - a conclusion we support with cache-miss, TLB, and IPC profiling. In contrast, query pruning is already internalized by modern engines: it yields 4-11$\times$ speedup on the exhaustive pipeline but is subsumed by BMP's $β$ and SEISMIC's query_cut. Static pruning complements dynamic pruning: on BMP, combining document and query reduction yields 2.5$\times$ speedup with NDCG@10 within 0.003 of the exact baseline. Finally, NDCG@10 saturates while Recall@10 is still in the ${\sim}$85-95% range across all three engines, providing a portable stopping criterion: practitioners can push pruning to this knee without visible ranking degradation. Together, these findings answer what transfers (index-side pruning), what breaks (query pruning), and what still helps (static atop dynamic pruning).

Evidence-Grounded Forensic Reasoning for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation

Fake news increasingly relies on cross-modal image-text forgeries, making transparent and verifiable reasoning chains an urgent need for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation (DGM4). Existing methods produce black-box detection results without any decision rationale, limiting their reliability in forensic practice. Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer a natural path toward explainability, but applying them to DGM4 raises two difficulties. First, models tend to generate explanations disconnected from predicted evidence locations, producing unverified attribution. Second, enforcing evidence-conclusion consistency requires active optimization, yet uniform training signals fail to distinguish localization tokens from classification tokens, making multi-head joint training unreliable. We propose a multi-modal manipulation detector based on an Evidence-Grounded Forensic Reasoning (EFR) framework. EFR introduces an Anchor-and-Verify reasoning chain that enforces modality-isolated perception before cross-modal comparison, with conclusion coordinates as explicit anchors to which downstream evidence must spatially correspond. A verifiable reward system then enforces evidence-conclusion consistency during training, while a Modality-Decoupled Advantage (MDA) routing mechanism mitigats credit misassignment across prediction tasks. Experiments show that EFR achieves state-of-the-art performance while producing structured forensic reasoning records that explicitly bind explanations to evidence.

Local Epistemic Uncertainty Guided Active Sampling for Plug-and-play Diffusive Image Restoration

Diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in image restoration tasks. However, when guiding image reconstruction, existing Diffusion Model-based Image Restoration (DMIR) methods typically rely on fixed data constraints and uniform step sizes, thereby overlooking the dynamic nature of the generative process. Such rigid designs render the models vulnerable to spatially non-uniform degradations, thus resulting in structural distortions and loss of fine details. Meanwhile, uniform step sizes introduce computational redundancy, whereas naïve step reduction strategies tend to accumulate approximation errors. To address these limitations, we propose a Local Epistemic Uncertainty Guided Active Sampling framework (LEADer). In the spatial domain, LEADer leverages pixel-wise uncertainty to dynamically modulate the prior strength within the null space, which effectively balances detail preservation and artifact suppression. In the temporal domain, it quantifies sampling stability via the uncertainty trace to enable adaptive trajectory pruning, thereby accelerating convergence. Theoretical proofs demonstrate that our framework achieves strict data consistency, while the trajectory pruning strategy admits a deterministic error bound, thereby guaranteeing stable convergence under skip sampling. Notably, our plug-and-play method can be seamlessly integrated into various DMIR baselines. Extensive experiments show that LEADer improves the performance of multiple state-of-the-art DMIR methods, while significantly reducing sampling time with negligible memory overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/JiaqiZhang-Sengoku/LEADer.

Improving the Realism of Synthetic Clinical Benchmarks Under Utility Constraints

Synthetic clinical benchmarks for enterprise AI agents can pass existing utility checks and still remain structurally unrealistic, especially in privacy-sensitive healthcare settings where operational data are hard to access. We study how to improve such benchmarks without breaking the downstream utility checks already used in practice. We formulate benchmark revision as utility-constrained realism improvement: dataset changes should increase realism while staying above an operational utility floor. We instantiate this idea on a care-gap benchmark derived from Synthea-generated patients exercised through demonstration electronic health record workflows and then processed by the same downstream pipeline as operational data. Realism is measured through missingness structure, simplicity, structural plausibility, and population alignment. The baseline benchmark is extremely thin: sampled-pair missingness is 79.44%, only 12.75% of rows are actionable, 38.94% of patients have zero actionable measures, and top-three token concentration reaches 100.0%. Two deterministic revisions improve these panels while remaining above the current utility floor, whereas a naive densification control preserves unrealistic templating. We further show that internal benchmark realism and source fidelity to an aggregate operational reference are related but distinct objectives. These results suggest that synthetic benchmark quality should be optimized explicitly, with utility treated as one constraint rather than as sufficient evidence of realism.

Deliberate Before You Fly: Vision-Guided Spatial Deliberation for UAV See-and-Reach Navigation

UAV see-and-reach navigation requires an aerial agent to approach a language-specified target visible in its initial view and stop reliably near it. Existing methods typically map vision-language representations directly to action outputs without explicitly modeling intermediate fine-grained spatial decisions. This direct mapping causes semantic-control misalignment, leading to inconsistent maneuvers and unreliable termination. To address this issue, we propose DBFly, a vision-language waypoint prediction framework that introduces explicit vision-guided spatial deliberation before waypoint generation. Specifically, DBFly introduces a spatial maneuver decision chain that progressively performs target-direction anchoring, spatial diagnosis, and maneuver decision, enabling high-level maneuver intent to explicitly guide continuous waypoint generation. DBFly further constructs an implicit flight corridor by transforming the initial target-direction prior into a persistent geometric reference and deriving an online corridor state from the UAV's current position, thereby providing soft geometric guidance for spatial diagnosis and maneuver correction. In addition, DBFly develops a terminal-convergence-aware stopping strategy that characterizes terminal states through both target proximity and short-horizon motion convergence, enabling more reliable stopping near the target. Extensive experiments across seen, unseen-object, and unseen-scene test sets demonstrate that DBFly improves the success rate over the SOTA baseline by an average of 25.07 percentage points. The project homepage is available at https://xuefanfu.github.io/DBFly-Page.

Trace, Verify, and Correct: A Training-Free Framework for Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs

Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have made substantial progress, their spatial reasoning may still produce intermediate judgments inconsistent with the input image, allowing errors to propagate through the reasoning chain and affect the final answer. Existing methods mainly improve spatial reasoning through training or additional spatial information, without considering whether the reasoning process itself is faithful to the model input. Our study shows that unfaithful reasoning chains significantly reduce final-answer accuracy. To address this issue, we propose a modular and training-free framework for spatial reasoning verification and correction. The framework constructs a Spatial Evidence Graph (SEG), which associates atomic spatial evidence extracted from Chain-of-Thought reasoning with visual entities, spatial relations, source steps, and visual evidence. Spatial Evidence Reliability Assessment (SERA) evaluates the reliability of visual evidence based on object existence, localization, and geometric measurements. The framework then identifies the earliest spatial evidence unit contradicted by reliable visual evidence and guides the original MLLM to revise the subsequent reasoning and final answer. Across 15 model-dataset settings, our method achieves an average accuracy of 68.94%, outperforming the compared baselines by 8.55 percentage points on average. Our code will be open-sourced.

ParVL: Parallel Scaling and Expandable Compute Allocation for Multimodal LLMs

Existing scaling strategies for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) typically expand either model parameters or sequential inference computation, incurring substantial memory or latency overhead. More importantly, most existing methods fail to alter the rigid, fixed computation allocation between the Vision Transformer and the Large Language Model components, limiting task-specific optimization. To address this, we introduce the Parallel Vision-Language (ParVL) scaling framework for MLLMs, which scales parallel computation by reusing the existing ViT and LLM backbone parameters across multiple vision and language branches. This framework raises a central question: given a fixed backbone parameter budget, how should additional shared-backbone computation be allocated between the vision and language modalities? We instantiate each parallel computational stream with branch-specific prefix parameters over a shared backbone, and train the entire model end-to-end via full-parameter supervised fine-tuning on roughly 13B tokens. We systematically study the computation-allocation trade-off between the ViT encoder and LLM decoder. ParVL improves overall multimodal performance over same-recipe single-branch baselines, and the best evaluated vision--language allocation varies across tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/YangYangGirl/ParVL.

CoNav-UAV: Cooperative Dual-Altitude Aerial Navigation via Stackelberg Learning

Target-oriented vision-and-language navigation (VLN) on aerial platforms is attracting growing attention for missions such as disaster rescue, infrastructure inspection, and security patrol. In this task, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) needs to locate targets given only a concise description of their appearance and surroundings. This requires global exploration and grounding as well as collision-free close-range approach, two interleaved processes difficult to reconcile within a single agent. Most existing methods transfer the ground VLN paradigm to a low-altitude UAV and compensate for its inefficient exploration with external assistance. A recent attempt deploys two UAVs at complementary altitudes yet still relies on privileged information and trains its two agents independently, precluding any mutual adaptation essential for cooperation. Here we propose CoNav-UAV, which explicitly models the task as a Stackelberg game between a high-altitude leader and a low-altitude follower, with the system operating on onboard visual and linguistic inputs alone. To solve this game, we introduce Iterative Stackelberg Learning. The leader's high-level vision-language reasoning is refined via memory-based in-context learning, while the follower's precise motion control is updated via DAgger-style expert distillation. The alternation drives both agents toward a Stackelberg equilibrium. CoNav-UAV consistently outperforms single- and dual-agent baselines across three high-fidelity urban scenes from the AerialVLN benchmark. Success rate improves by up to 30.8 points on the learning scene, and 9.0 points under cross-scene transfer while using about 3x less adaptation data. Further analyses validate the complementary gains of the leader and follower updates and reveal robust gains yet distinct learning dynamics across VLM backbones.

CraftAlign: Feature-Grounded Evaluation and Revision Guidance for AI Stories

Large language models can now generate fluent and complete stories, yet many outputs still feel formulaic and unnatural because of cliches, over-explanation, linear causal progression, and stereotyped endings, an immediately recognizable AI flavor. Existing detection and evaluation methods often stop at source labels or holistic scores, while revision methods typically target predefined issues through localized edits, limiting their ability to support multiple plausible revision strategies or guide story-wide changes in information release, causal organization, and ending treatment. We introduce CraftAlign, a framework that aligns AI stories with the craft of human storytelling by both assessing Human/AI writing patterns and providing revision guidance. CraftAlign comprises two learned modules and an inference-time guidance pipeline. A feature estimator built on Qwen3.5-9B predicts 304 explicit writing features spanning style and narrative. A class-conditional energy model scores the resulting feature configuration against Human and AI writing patterns, conditioning on the original writing prompt when available. At inference time, CraftAlign applies schema-valid structured perturbations, selects changes that move the feature configuration toward the Human writing pattern, and converts them into natural-language guidance for a separate editor to rewrite the full story. Experiments show that CraftAlign accurately distinguishes Human and AI writing patterns and that its guidance outperforms revision baselines across editors and in a human study.