Mechanist: AI as a Scientific Instrument for Discovering the Mechanisms of Intelligence

AI models have achieved remarkable success across diverse domains, yet the mechanisms underlying their capabilities and the risks they may pose remain poorly understood. As AI development becomes faster and increasingly automated, mechanistic exploration remains largely manual, widening the gap between what models can do and our ability to understand and control them. To bridge this gap, we introduce Mechanist, an agentic system that uses AI as a scientific instrument for the autonomous discovery of mechanisms underlying AI intelligence. To support autonomous mechanistic discovery, we construct an interpretability-focused knowledge graph of approximately 13,000 papers and integrate it with a multidisciplinary database of 43 million papers spanning 26 fields. We further curate a library of 32 foundational methods for mechanism analysis, causal intervention, and validation. Compared with Claude Code and existing AI-scientist systems, Mechanist generates more valuable mechanism hypotheses and executes experiments more reliably. Mechanist also demonstrates a progression from discovering model behaviors to explaining and controlling AI models. Specifically, Mechanist first uncovers a counterintuitive safety risk in scientific laboratories, showing that unsafe traits can transfer across modalities through apparently safe training data. Mechanist then develops a mechanism theory of belief, revealing how models represent world knowledge, form beliefs, infer the beliefs of others, and how these mechanisms emerge during pretraining. Finally, Mechanist translates these mechanistic insights into practical interventions that improve model performance across diverse scenarios and steer scientific foundation models toward generating DNA sequences with specified properties.

The SLT 2026 SmartGlasses Challenge: Benchmarking Egocentric Multi-Talker Speech Recognition and Understanding with Audio-Language Models

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) have created new opportunities for wearable speech interfaces, with smart glasses providing an egocentric platform for continuous audio sensing and assistance. However, speech recognition and understanding in this setting remain challenging because of dynamic acoustic conditions, speaker overlap, and the spatial ambiguity introduced by wearer-centered recording geometry. To support systematic evaluation in this setting, we introduce the IEEE SLT 2026 SmartGlasses Challenge for egocentric multi-speaker speech processing. The challenge consists of two tracks, Dyadic Dialogue Understanding and Multi-party Meeting Understanding, and jointly evaluates Time-Stamped Speaker-Attributed Automatic Speech Recognition (TSA-ASR) and Spoken Language Understanding (SLU). It is built on a 106-hour four-channel egocentric speech dataset containing 714 sessions collected in real-world scenarios. This paper describes challenge tasks, dataset construction, submissions, and summarizes the main findings from the shared evaluation. The results show that heavy speaker overlap remains a major factor affecting TSA-ASR performance, while paralinguistic acoustic understanding continues to be difficult for current audio-language models in complex SLU settings. Further details can be found on the official challenge website.

Reasoning Shortcuts and Value Symmetries: What Symmetry Permits, Architecture Realizes, and Optimization Selects

Reasoning shortcuts are solutions of a neurosymbolic system's rules that produce correct predictions through unintended concepts. A recent framework of Takemura, Inoue, and Nishino analyzes them through an automorphism group of value relabelings and asks, as its central open question, when rules pin concepts down. We first show that the framework's key definition, one shared permutation applied at every position, does not apply as stated to any of the four heterogeneous benchmarks it was evaluated on, and that the most direct embedding, padding domains to a common size, produces confident false pathology: 90.91% of solution pairs reported unexplained on CLE4EVR, where every well-defined member of the hierarchy we introduce reports 0%, and the padded verdict's content rotates with configuration-file ordering. Re-measuring eleven rule families under fifteen pre-specified predictions (thirteen confirmed), unexplained-pair rates span 0% to 99.9999% and track provable structure: six theorems give sufficient conditions for transitivity and its failure, including a Free Slot Lemma certifying Kandinsky's pathology from syntax alone. For circuit-given rules, deciding symmetry-inertness of a coordinate is coNP-complete; nontrivial-automorphism existence is coNP-hard under randomized reductions, lies in $Σ_2^p$, is not $Σ_2^p$-complete unless PH collapses, and on monotone circuits is coNP-complete outright. In the Boolean case transitivity is classified exactly: automorphisms explain everything iff the solution set is an affine coset. Weakly supervised models place all 94 observed shortcuts at the one level the componentwise theory flags and none at the 48 it certifies transitive; twelve typed-ambiguous levels produce none, separating what symmetry permits from what optimization selects, and a dual-head control replicates the geography. All numbers trace to released artifacts.

What Can Latent World Models Know? Physical Parameter Identifiability in Multimodal Predictive Representations

A central premise of latent world models is that predicting the future forces a representation to internalize the physics of its environment. Which physical quantities does a trained latent actually contain, and what decides this? We answer with controlled interventions in POKEWORLD, an interactive environment whose visually identical objects hide mass, drag, and contact stiffness. A certificate-gated protocol first certifies each parameter as recoverable from raw observations, then measures whether it enters the latent, so a null result can be attributed to the objective rather than to the environment. The resulting identifiability map has two organizing mechanisms and one frontier. Inputs limit what can be known, while prediction targets decide what is retained. Stiffness enters the latent only when touch is forecast ($R^2=0.50$, compared with $-0.02$ when the same signal is merely fused into the input), and under single-step prediction a vision-only latent discards even perfectly visible object state. Drag marks the frontier. It carries a recoverability certificate of 0.89 yet plateaus near 0.13 under every deterministic prediction objective we test, while a supervised head on the same trunk reaches 0.45. Parameters whose readout is slow and ratio-type under the sensed coordinates fall outside what these objectives acquire. On RH20T, an input-target factorial across scaling curves reproduces both mechanisms across two robots and 4,258 episodes. Every arm missing information or prediction pressure stays flat over a fivefold data range, and only the full multimodal objective forecasts force beyond a persistence baseline, with held-out gains that grow with scale. Objective structure determines which physical parameters a latent acquires, and additional data improves only the parameters it already acquires.

Collusion with Competitive Marginals: Price-Level Audits Are Blind by Construction

Empirical work on algorithmic collusion asks one question of the data: are prices supracompetitive? We show this can be answered "no" by a conspiracy that is nonetheless profitable. Consider bidding agents that couple only through the joint distribution of their unexplained bid components, leaving every agent's own bid law exactly at the competitive law. Any test whose input is a single agent's price or bid history then has power exactly equal to its false-positive rate, for every coupling strength up to comonotonicity. The published detection methodology is therefore blind to this conduct by construction rather than underpowered, and no sample size repairs it. Three empirical results follow. First, the mechanism appears in real language-model agents: twenty models from nineteen independent developers, three deployment prompts each, show residual correlation of $+0.053$ between two deployments of one model against $+0.0001$ across models, with a 95% interval clustered by developer of $[0.030, 0.078]$, under an auditor that sees every order feature and is fitted out of sample. Second, the coupling falls monotonically as sampling temperature rises ($p=0.002$), turning a deployment parameter into a candidate mitigation. Third, on 24 days of Ethereum block-building auction data covering 77,684 bids from 39 bidders, the honest population of bidder pairs is itself so dependent that a screen held at a 5% false-positive rate must sit above a floor of $+0.50$ to $+0.81$, which is 20 to 32 times the family-wise sampling threshold and does not fall as the audit window grows. Since lawful multi-identity operation and conspiracy are behaviourally indistinguishable here, the tractable regulatory target is not detection but counting: resolving 40 bidding identities into 23 operators raises the Herfindahl index by 247.5%, and adding behavioural clusters from public bid streams reaches 324.5%.

Automorphism-Induced Non-Canonicity in Top-k Explanations of Graph Neural Networks

A gradient-based GNN explainer given a molecule with two chemically equivalent nitro groups assigns them attribution scores that are equal to the last bit. It cannot do otherwise: message passing is exactly permutation equivariant, so any automorphism of the input leaves every attribution invariant. Yet the standard report, the top-k edges, names one of the two, and which one is settled by the order of an array. We show this is a structural obstruction rather than an implementation slip. When no minimal valid explanation is fixed by the input's automorphism group, no rule can be single-valued, minimal and symmetry-respecting at once. For the exact-k reports used in practice we give a parameter-free criterion, mechanised in Lean 4 with no axiom dependencies, that decides from the graph alone whether every score-optimal report of that size must split an orbit. Across 21298 instance-budget decisions the criterion agrees with a mechanical model-equivalence check without exception, and no severing case we found admitted a neutral alternative. The obstruction is common. Nontrivial automorphisms occur in 93.4% of Mutagenicity, the dataset the seminal explainability papers use, so the measure-zero dismissal of symmetric inputs, sound on the continuous domains it was made for, collapses here. At the sparsity budget those papers report, 24.0% of molecules with two interchangeable nitro groups (6 of 25) surface exactly one of them, every one arbitrary under mechanical verification. A model's blindness also manufactures symmetry: every MUTAG molecule contains atoms chemistry separates and the network provably cannot, and a matched control shows the resolution is set by what the model reads rather than how it is parameterised. Reporting orbits removes the arbitrariness at 0.11 ms and 0.43 extra edges per graph.

Koopman Dreamer: Spectrally Constrained Latent Dynamics for Stable World-Model Imagination

Latent world models improve sample efficiency in continuous control by optimizing policies over imagined latent trajectories, but common neural transitions offer limited direct control over modal persistence and error accumulation in long rollouts. We propose Koopman Dreamer, a Dreamer-style world model with a spectrally constrained deterministic latent dynamics core. Its Koopman-inspired backbone uses two-dimensional rotation--scaling blocks with bounded radii to represent damping, rotation, and near-periodic modes. Linear and low-rank bilinear action terms capture global and state-dependent control effects, while stochastic-state modulation supplies local correction information. To reduce the mismatch between posterior-conditioned training and prior-only imagination, the model combines posterior-conditioned EMA teacher targets with one-step consistency, multi-step rollout, and open-loop observation-prediction objectives. We further derive a multi-step rollout-error bound that separates amplification by the spectral backbone and bilinear interaction from the additive effects of stochastic-state mismatch and modeling residuals, clarifying the trade-off between error attenuation and long-term information retention. Experimental results on proprioceptive continuous-control tasks from the DeepMind Control Suite and UAV-LiDAR autonomous navigation demonstrate that Koopman Dreamer improves the stability of long-horizon latent rollouts and achieves stronger closed-loop control performance on tasks that rely on high-quality multi-step imagination.

Dual-Edged Homogeneous-Modality Similarity: Towards Visible-Infrared Modality-Incomplete Person Re-Identification with Modality Adaptive Matching

Visible-Infrared Person Re-Identification (VI-ReID) operates under a closed-world assumption, where queries and galleries are from heterogeneous modalities. However, in open-world scenarios, both sets are likely to contain homogeneous and heterogeneous modality images. A query may consist of visible-only, infrared-only, or mixed-modality images, while galleries present multi-modal images over long-term collection. Under these conditions, VI-ReID methods, built on a heterogeneous-modality retrieval paradigm, suffer from three trustworthiness challenges: matching conflicts due to high homogeneous-modality similarity, interference from modality uncertainty, and robustness degradation induced by unknown modality combinations. They fail to meet the requirements of trustworthy visual recognition in reliability, consistency, and dynamic adaptability. To address these challenges, we formalize the Visible-Infrared Modality-Incomplete Re-Identification (VIMI-ReID) task. We reorganize existing datasets to construct the SYSU-VIMI and RegDB-VIMI benchmarks. The unpredictable modality combinations and inherent similarity of homogeneous-modality samples in VIMI-ReID cause a significant performance drop in existing VI-ReID methods. We propose the Modality Adaptive Matching Transformer (MAMT). It employs a Divergence Transformer Module (DTM) and a Shared Transformer Module (STM) to extract modality-specific and modality-shared features, respectively. Guided by a divergence loss, the DTM enriches modality-specific features with modality-style information to enhance discriminability within the same modality. A Modality Adaptive Matching Module (MAM) dynamically fuses features according to the query-gallery modality relationship, enabling stable matching under arbitrary and uncertain modality conditions. Extensive experiments on the VIMI benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and adaptability of MAMT.

Blurring Modal Boundaries: A Unified Survey from Single- to Multi-Modal Person Re-ldentification

Person re-identification (ReID) serves as a critical component in intelligent surveillance systems, aiming to match identities across disjoint camera networks. While traditional methods primarily rely on single-modal RGB imagery, they are often constrained by environmental challenges such as low illumination and occlusion. To overcome these limitations, the field is rapidly evolving toward cross-modal and multi-modal paradigms. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of this transition, systematically reviewing key cross-modal tasks including visible-infrared (VI-ReID), text-image (TI-ReID), sketch-based (Sketch-ReID), and the emerging Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) ReID, which extends perception beyond direct visibility. Furthermore, we examine tri-spectral and multi-modal fusion ReID, discussing how complementary information from diverse sensors enhances robustness. Beyond summarizing datasets, challenges, and methodologies, we propose a Transformer-based baseline framework for visible-infrared ReID, designed to effectively capture modality-invariant features. Finally, based on the current landscape, we outline several promising directions for future research.

Cross-Resolution Semantic Transfer for Robust Text-to-Image Retrieval in Low-Resolution Surveillance

Text-to-image person re-identification (TIPR) retrieves target persons using natural language descriptions. However, existing methods largely overlook resolution variance in real-world surveillance. They characterize cross-resolution TIPR through two coupled failure modes: Evidence Reliability Collapse (ERC), where degraded visual tokens become unreliable for grounding fine-grained text, and Ranking Distribution Drift (RDD), where mixed-resolution galleries distort similarity neighborhoods and destabilize retrieval rankings. To address this challenge, we propose Cross-Resolution Semantic Transfer (CRST), a CLIP-style framework with three modules: resolution-conditioned reasoning, text-guided refinement and CR-RDA. Resolution-conditioned reasoning estimates token reliability to suppress corrupted evidence. Text-guided refinement injects semantic priors to recover discriminative cues. CR-RDA transfers HR neighborhood geometry to stabilize LR ranking under mixed resolutions. Experiments on CUHK-PEDES, ICFG-PEDES, and RSTPReid show that CRST improves ultra-low-resolution Rank-1 and mAP on average by 5.7% and 5.3%, while stabilizing mixed-resolution retrieval without sacrificing high-resolution accuracy.The code will be made publicly available.