Step-On-Feet Tuning: Scaling Self-Alignment of LLMs via Bootstrapping

Self-alignment is an effective way to reduce the cost of human annotation while ensuring promising model capability. However, most current methods complete the data collection and training steps in a single round, which may overlook the continuously improving ability of self-aligned models. This gives rise to a key query: What if we do multi-time bootstrapping self-alignment? Does this strategy enhance model performance or lead to rapid degradation? In this paper, our pioneering exploration delves into the impact of bootstrapping self-alignment on large language models. Our findings reveal that bootstrapping self-alignment markedly surpasses the single-round approach, by guaranteeing data diversity from in-context learning. To further exploit the capabilities of bootstrapping, we investigate and adjust the training order of data, which yields improved performance of the model. Drawing on these findings, we propose Step-On-Feet Tuning (SOFT) which leverages model's continuously enhanced few-shot ability to boost zero or one-shot performance. Based on easy-to-hard training recipe, we propose SOFT+ which further boost self-alignment's performance. Our experiments demonstrate the efficiency of SOFT (SOFT+) across various classification and generation tasks, highlighting the potential of bootstrapping self-alignment on continually enhancing model alignment performance.

Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models as Knowledge Generators

Large language models (LLMs) outperform information retrieval techniques for downstream knowledge-intensive tasks when being prompted to generate world knowledge. However, community concerns abound regarding the factuality and potential implications of using this uncensored knowledge. In light of this, we introduce CONNER, a COmpreheNsive kNowledge Evaluation fRamework, designed to systematically and automatically evaluate generated knowledge from six important perspectives -- Factuality, Relevance, Coherence, Informativeness, Helpfulness and Validity. We conduct an extensive empirical analysis of the generated knowledge from three different types of LLMs on two widely studied knowledge-intensive tasks, i.e., open-domain question answering and knowledge-grounded dialogue. Surprisingly, our study reveals that the factuality of generated knowledge, even if lower, does not significantly hinder downstream tasks. Instead, the relevance and coherence of the outputs are more important than small factual mistakes. Further, we show how to use CONNER to improve knowledge-intensive tasks by designing two strategies: Prompt Engineering and Knowledge Selection. Our evaluation code and LLM-generated knowledge with human annotations will be released to facilitate future research.

Towards Stable Backdoor Purification through Feature Shift Tuning

It has been widely observed that deep neural networks (DNN) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks where attackers could manipulate the model behavior maliciously by tampering with a small set of training samples. Although a line of defense methods is proposed to mitigate this threat, they either require complicated modifications to the training process or heavily rely on the specific model architecture, which makes them hard to deploy into real-world applications. Therefore, in this paper, we instead start with fine-tuning, one of the most common and easy-to-deploy backdoor defenses, through comprehensive evaluations against diverse attack scenarios. Observations made through initial experiments show that in contrast to the promising defensive results on high poisoning rates, vanilla tuning methods completely fail at low poisoning rate scenarios. Our analysis shows that with the low poisoning rate, the entanglement between backdoor and clean features undermines the effect of tuning-based defenses. Therefore, it is necessary to disentangle the backdoor and clean features in order to improve backdoor purification. To address this, we introduce Feature Shift Tuning (FST), a method for tuning-based backdoor purification. Specifically, FST encourages feature shifts by actively deviating the classifier weights from the originally compromised weights. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our FST provides consistently stable performance under different attack settings. Additionally, it is also convenient to deploy in real-world scenarios with significantly reduced computation costs. Our codes are available at https://github.com/AISafety-HKUST/stable_backdoor_purification.

Revisiting Personalized Federated Learning: Robustness Against Backdoor Attacks

In this work, besides improving prediction accuracy, we study whether personalization could bring robustness benefits to backdoor attacks. We conduct the first study of backdoor attacks in the pFL framework, testing 4 widely used backdoor attacks against 6 pFL methods on benchmark datasets FEMNIST and CIFAR-10, a total of 600 experiments. The study shows that pFL methods with partial model-sharing can significantly boost robustness against backdoor attacks. In contrast, pFL methods with full model-sharing do not show robustness. To analyze the reasons for varying robustness performances, we provide comprehensive ablation studies on different pFL methods. Based on our findings, we further propose a lightweight defense method, Simple-Tuning, which empirically improves defense performance against backdoor attacks. We believe that our work could provide both guidance for pFL application in terms of its robustness and offer valuable insights to design more robust FL methods in the future.

Boosting the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks with Reverse Adversarial Perturbation

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples, which can produce erroneous predictions by injecting imperceptible perturbations. In this work, we study the transferability of adversarial examples, which is significant due to its threat to real-world applications where model architecture or parameters are usually unknown. Many existing works reveal that the adversarial examples are likely to overfit the surrogate model that they are generated from, limiting its transfer attack performance against different target models. To mitigate the overfitting of the surrogate model, we propose a novel attack method, dubbed reverse adversarial perturbation (RAP). Specifically, instead of minimizing the loss of a single adversarial point, we advocate seeking adversarial example located at a region with unified low loss value, by injecting the worst-case perturbation (the reverse adversarial perturbation) for each step of the optimization procedure. The adversarial attack with RAP is formulated as a min-max bi-level optimization problem. By integrating RAP into the iterative process for attacks, our method can find more stable adversarial examples which are less sensitive to the changes of decision boundary, mitigating the overfitting of the surrogate model. Comprehensive experimental comparisons demonstrate that RAP can significantly boost adversarial transferability. Furthermore, RAP can be naturally combined with many existing black-box attack techniques, to further boost the transferability. When attacking a real-world image recognition system, Google Cloud Vision API, we obtain 22% performance improvement of targeted attacks over the compared method. Our codes are available at https://github.com/SCLBD/Transfer_attack_RAP.

Adaptive Smoothness-weighted Adversarial Training for Multiple Perturbations with Its Stability Analysis

Adversarial Training (AT) has been demonstrated as one of the most effective methods against adversarial examples. While most existing works focus on AT with a single type of perturbation e.g., the $\ell_\infty$ attacks), DNNs are facing threats from different types of adversarial examples. Therefore, adversarial training for multiple perturbations (ATMP) is proposed to generalize the adversarial robustness over different perturbation types (in $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$, and $\ell_\infty$ norm-bounded perturbations). However, the resulting model exhibits trade-off between different attacks. Meanwhile, there is no theoretical analysis of ATMP, limiting its further development. In this paper, we first provide the smoothness analysis of ATMP and show that $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$, and $\ell_\infty$ adversaries give different contributions to the smoothness of the loss function of ATMP. Based on this, we develop the stability-based excess risk bounds and propose adaptive smoothness-weighted adversarial training for multiple perturbations. Theoretically, our algorithm yields better bounds. Empirically, our experiments on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 achieve the state-of-the-art performance against the mixture of multiple perturbations attacks.

Theoretical Study of Random Noise Defense against Query-Based Black-Box Attacks

The query-based black-box attacks, which don't require any knowledge about the attacked models and datasets, have raised serious threats to machine learning models in many real applications. In this work, we study a simple but promising defense technique, dubbed Random Noise Defense (RND) against query-based black-box attacks, which adds proper Gaussian noise to each query. It is lightweight and can be directly combined with any off-the-shelf models and other defense strategies. However, the theoretical guarantee of random noise defense is missing, and the actual effectiveness of this defense is not yet fully understood. In this work, we present solid theoretical analyses to demonstrate that the defense effect of RND against the query-based black-box attack and the corresponding adaptive attack heavily depends on the magnitude ratio between the random noise added by the defender (i.e., RND) and the random noise added by the attacker for gradient estimation. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet verify our theoretical studies. Based on RND, we also propose a stronger defense method that combines RND with Gaussian augmentation training (RND-GT) and achieves better defense performance.