PAC-Bayesian Spectrally-Normalized Bounds for Adversarially Robust Generalization

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. It is found empirically that adversarially robust generalization is crucial in establishing defense algorithms against adversarial attacks. Therefore, it is interesting to study the theoretical guarantee of robust generalization. This paper focuses on norm-based complexity, based on a PAC-Bayes approach (Neyshabur et al., 2017). The main challenge lies in extending the key ingredient, which is a weight perturbation bound in standard settings, to the robust settings. Existing attempts heavily rely on additional strong assumptions, leading to loose bounds. In this paper, we address this issue and provide a spectrally-normalized robust generalization bound for DNNs. Compared to existing bounds, our bound offers two significant advantages: Firstly, it does not depend on additional assumptions. Secondly, it is considerably tighter, aligning with the bounds of standard generalization. Therefore, our result provides a different perspective on understanding robust generalization: The mismatch terms between standard and robust generalization bounds shown in previous studies do not contribute to the poor robust generalization. Instead, these disparities solely due to mathematical issues. Finally, we extend the main result to adversarial robustness against general non-$\ell_p$ attacks and other neural network architectures.

Adversarial Rademacher Complexity of Deep Neural Networks

Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Ideally, a robust model shall perform well on both the perturbed training data and the unseen perturbed test data. It is found empirically that fitting perturbed training data is not hard, but generalizing to perturbed test data is quite difficult. To better understand adversarial generalization, it is of great interest to study the adversarial Rademacher complexity (ARC) of deep neural networks. However, how to bound ARC in multi-layers cases is largely unclear due to the difficulty of analyzing adversarial loss in the definition of ARC. There have been two types of attempts of ARC. One is to provide the upper bound of ARC in linear and one-hidden layer cases. However, these approaches seem hard to extend to multi-layer cases. Another is to modify the adversarial loss and provide upper bounds of Rademacher complexity on such surrogate loss in multi-layer cases. However, such variants of Rademacher complexity are not guaranteed to be bounds for meaningful robust generalization gaps (RGG). In this paper, we provide a solution to this unsolved problem. Specifically, we provide the first bound of adversarial Rademacher complexity of deep neural networks. Our approach is based on covering numbers. We provide a method to handle the robustify function classes of DNNs such that we can calculate the covering numbers. Finally, we provide experiments to study the empirical implication of our bounds and provide an analysis of poor adversarial generalization.

Stability Analysis and Generalization Bounds of Adversarial Training

In adversarial machine learning, deep neural networks can fit the adversarial examples on the training dataset but have poor generalization ability on the test set. This phenomenon is called robust overfitting, and it can be observed when adversarially training neural nets on common datasets, including SVHN, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. In this paper, we study the robust overfitting issue of adversarial training by using tools from uniform stability. One major challenge is that the outer function (as a maximization of the inner function) is nonsmooth, so the standard technique (e.g., hardt et al., 2016) cannot be applied. Our approach is to consider $\eta$-approximate smoothness: we show that the outer function satisfies this modified smoothness assumption with $\eta$ being a constant related to the adversarial perturbation. Based on this, we derive stability-based generalization bounds for stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on the general class of $\eta$-approximate smooth functions, which covers the adversarial loss. Our results provide a different understanding of robust overfitting from the perspective of uniform stability. Additionally, we show that a few popular techniques for adversarial training (\emph{e.g.,} early stopping, cyclic learning rate, and stochastic weight averaging) are stability-promoting in theory.

Adaptive Smoothness-weighted Adversarial Training for Multiple Perturbations with Its Stability Analysis

Adversarial Training (AT) has been demonstrated as one of the most effective methods against adversarial examples. While most existing works focus on AT with a single type of perturbation e.g., the $\ell_\infty$ attacks), DNNs are facing threats from different types of adversarial examples. Therefore, adversarial training for multiple perturbations (ATMP) is proposed to generalize the adversarial robustness over different perturbation types (in $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$, and $\ell_\infty$ norm-bounded perturbations). However, the resulting model exhibits trade-off between different attacks. Meanwhile, there is no theoretical analysis of ATMP, limiting its further development. In this paper, we first provide the smoothness analysis of ATMP and show that $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$, and $\ell_\infty$ adversaries give different contributions to the smoothness of the loss function of ATMP. Based on this, we develop the stability-based excess risk bounds and propose adaptive smoothness-weighted adversarial training for multiple perturbations. Theoretically, our algorithm yields better bounds. Empirically, our experiments on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 achieve the state-of-the-art performance against the mixture of multiple perturbations attacks.

Understanding Adversarial Robustness Against On-manifold Adversarial Examples

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. A well-trained model can be easily attacked by adding small perturbations to the original data. One of the hypotheses of the existence of the adversarial examples is the off-manifold assumption: adversarial examples lie off the data manifold. However, recent research showed that on-manifold adversarial examples also exist. In this paper, we revisit the off-manifold assumption and want to study a question: at what level is the poor performance of neural networks against adversarial attacks due to on-manifold adversarial examples? Since the true data manifold is unknown in practice, we consider two approximated on-manifold adversarial examples on both real and synthesis datasets. On real datasets, we show that on-manifold adversarial examples have greater attack rates than off-manifold adversarial examples on both standard-trained and adversarially-trained models. On synthetic datasets, theoretically, We prove that on-manifold adversarial examples are powerful, yet adversarial training focuses on off-manifold directions and ignores the on-manifold adversarial examples. Furthermore, we provide analysis to show that the properties derived theoretically can also be observed in practice. Our analysis suggests that on-manifold adversarial examples are important, and we should pay more attention to on-manifold adversarial examples for training robust models.