Through the Lens of Character: Resolving Modality-Role Interference in Multimodal Role-Playing Agent

The advancement of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has expanded Role-Playing Agents (RPAs) into visually grounded environments. However, human vision is inherently subjective and identity-driven, whereas existing MLLMs extract objective, character-agnostic features for general tasks. In RPAs, this generic visual noise overpowers fragile character traits, causing Modality-Role Interference (MRI), where agents struggle to integrate visual grounding and character consistency. To address this, we introduce the training-free Character-Aware Visual Intervention (CAVI) framework, enabling agents to perceive the world through the lens of character. CAVI systematically targets MRI: macroscopically, Character-Guided Token Pruning (CTP) restricts the visual receptive field to role-relevant entities; microscopically, Orthogonal Feature Modulation (OFM) projects tokens onto a character-context subspace to extract aligned facts; and during decoding, Modality-Adaptive Role Steering (MARS) dynamically optimizes steering intensity based on visual reliance. Extensive experiments show CAVI effectively alleviates MRI, significantly enhancing character-consistent multimodal interactions.

Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination via Phase-wise Self-reward

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) still struggle with vision hallucination, where generated responses are inconsistent with the visual input. Existing methods either rely on large-scale annotated data for fine-tuning, which incurs massive computational overhead, or employ static post-hoc strategies that overlook the dynamic nature of hallucination emergence. To address these, we introduce a new self-rewarding framework, enabling dynamic hallucination mitigation at inference time without external supervision. On the empirical side, we reveal that visual hallucination exhibits phase-wise dynamic patterns, peaking at the onset of each semantic phase. Drawing on these insights, we propose \textbf{PSRD} (\textbf{Phase-wise \textbf{S}elf-\textbf{R}eward \textbf{D}ecoding) for online hallucination correction guided by phase-wise self-reward signals. To reduce the cost of repeated self-evaluation during decoding, we distill the hallucination guidance signal from LVLMs into a lightweight reward model. The reward model subsequently provides on-the-fly guidance for targeted intervention during the decoding process, enabling precise hallucination suppression. The proposed PSRD significantly reduces the hallucination rate of LLaVA-1.5-7B by 50.0% and consistently outperforms existing post-hoc methods across five hallucination evaluation benchmarks for four LVLMs. Further analysis confirms that PSRD effectively mitigates hallucination propagation and achieves a highly controllable trade-off between strong performance and inference efficiency.

Empowering Video Translation using Multimodal Large Language Models

Recent developments in video translation have further enhanced cross-lingual access to video content, with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) playing an increasingly important supporting role. With strong multimodal understanding, reasoning, and generation capabilities, MLLMs-based video translation systems are overcoming the limitations of traditional cascaded pipelines that separately handle automatic speech recognition, machine translation, text-to-speech and lip synchronization. These MLLM-powered approaches not only achieve competitive or superior translation quality, but also demonstrate stronger robustness in zero-shot settings and multi-speaker scenarios, while jointly modeling semantic fidelity, timing, speaker identity, and emotional consistency. However, despite the rapid progress of MLLMs and extensive surveys on general video-language understanding, a focused and systematic review of how MLLMs empower video translation tasks is still lacking. To fill this gap, we provide the first comprehensive overview of MLLMs-based video translation, organized around a three-role taxonomy: 1) Semantic Reasoner, which characterizes how MLLMs perform video understanding, temporal reasoning, and multimodal fusion; 2) Expressive Performer, which analyzes LLM-driven and LLM-augmented techniques for expressive, controllable speech generation; and 3) Visual Synthesizer, which examines different types of video generators for high-fidelity lip-sync and visual alignment. Finally, we discuss open challenges in video understanding, temporal modeling, and multimodal alignment, and outline promising future research directions for MLLMs-powered video translation.

SAT: Balancing Reasoning Accuracy and Efficiency with Stepwise Adaptive Thinking

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have revolutionized complex problem-solving, yet they exhibit a pervasive "overthinking", generating unnecessarily long reasoning chains. While current solutions improve token efficiency, they often sacrifice fine-grained control or risk disrupting the logical integrity of the reasoning process. To address this, we introduce Stepwise Adaptive Thinking (SAT), a framework that performs step-level, difficulty-aware pruning while preserving the core reasoning structure. SAT formulates reasoning as a Finite-State Machine (FSM) with distinct thinking modes (Slow, Normal, Fast, Skip). It navigates these states dynamically using a lightweight Process Reward Model (PRM), compressing easy steps while preserving depth for hard ones. Experiments across 9 LRMs and 7 benchmarks show that SAT achieves up to 40% reduction in reasoning tokens while generally maintaining or improving accuracy.

Agentic Tool Use in Large Language Models

Large language models are increasingly being deployed as autonomous agents yet their real world effectiveness depends on reliable tools for information retrieval, computation and external action. Existing studies remain fragmented across tasks, tool types, and training settings, lacking a unified view of how tool-use methods differ and evolve. This paper organizes the literature into three paradigms: prompting as plug-and-play, supervised tool learning and reward-driven tool policy learning, analyzes their methods, strengths and failure modes, reviews the evaluation landscape and highlights key challenges, aiming to address this fragmentation and provide a more structured evolutionary view of agentic tool use.

Long-form RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Long-form Generation

The widespread adoption of reinforcement learning-based alignment highlights the growing importance of reward models. Various benchmarks have been built to evaluate reward models in various domains and scenarios. However, a significant gap remains in assessing reward models for long-form generation, despite its critical role in real-world applications. To bridge this, we introduce Long-form RewardBench, the first reward modeling testbed specifically designed for long-form generation. Our benchmark encompasses five key subtasks: QA, RAG, Chat, Writing, and Reasoning. We collected instruction and preference data through a meticulously designed multi-stage data collection process, and conducted extensive experiments on 20+ mainstream reward models, including both classifiers and generative models. Our findings reveal that current models still lack long-form reward modeling capabilities. Furthermore, we designed a novel Long-form Needle-in-a-Haystack Test, which revealed a correlation between reward modeling performance and the error's position within a response, as well as the overall response length, with distinct characteristics observed between classification and generative models. Finally, we demonstrate that classifiers exhibit better generalizability compared to generative models trained on the same data. As the first benchmark for long-form reward modeling, this work aims to offer a robust platform for visualizing progress in this crucial area.

Mitigating Translationese Bias in Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge via Disentangled Information Bottleneck

Large language models (LLMs) have become a standard for multilingual evaluation, yet they exhibit a severe systematic translationese bias. In this paper, translationese bias is characterized as LLMs systematically favoring machine-translated text over human-authored references, particularly in low-resource languages. We attribute this bias to spurious correlations with (i) latent manifold alignment with English and (ii) cross-lingual predictability. To mitigate this bias, we propose DIBJudge, a robust fine-tuning framework that learns a minimally sufficient, judgment-critical representation via variational information compression, while explicitly isolating spurious factors into the dedicated bias branch. Furthermore, we incorporate a cross-covariance penalty that explicitly suppresses statistical dependence between robust and bias representations, thereby encouraging effective disentanglement. Extensive evaluations on multilingual reward modeling benchmarks and a dedicated translationese bias evaluation suite demonstrate that the proposed DIBJudge consistently outperforms strong baselines and substantially mitigates translationese bias.

Toward Robust LLM-Based Judges: Taxonomic Bias Evaluation and Debiasing Optimization

Large language model (LLM)-based judges are widely adopted for automated evaluation and reward modeling, yet their judgments are often affected by judgment biases. Accurately evaluating these biases is essential for ensuring the reliability of LLM-based judges. However, existing studies typically investigate limited biases under a single judge formulation, either generative or discriminative, lacking a comprehensive evaluation. To bridge this gap, we propose JudgeBiasBench, a benchmark for systematically quantifying biases in LLM-based judges. JudgeBiasBench defines a taxonomy of judgment biases across 4 dimensions, and constructs bias-augmented evaluation instances through a controlled bias injection pipeline, covering 12 representative bias types. We conduct extensive experiments across both generative and discriminative judges, revealing that current judges exhibit significant and diverse bias patterns that often compromise the reliability of automated evaluation. To mitigate judgment bias, we propose bias-aware training that explicitly incorporates bias-related attributes into the training process, encouraging judges to disentangle task-relevant quality from bias-correlated cues. By adopting reinforcement learning for generative judges and contrastive learning for discriminative judges, our methods effectively reduce judgment biases while largely preserving general evaluation capability.

Beyond Token-Level Policy Gradients for Complex Reasoning with Large Language Models

Existing policy-gradient methods for auto-regressive language models typically select subsequent tokens one at a time as actions in the policy. While effective for many generation tasks, such an approach may not fully capture the structure of complex reasoning tasks, where a single semantic decision is often realized across multiple tokens--for example, when defining variables or composing equations. This introduces a potential mismatch between token-level optimization and the inherently block-level nature of reasoning in these settings. To bridge this gap, we propose Multi-token Policy Gradient Optimization (MPO), a framework that treats sequences of K consecutive tokens as unified semantic actions. This block-level perspective enables our method to capture the compositional structure of reasoning trajectories and supports optimization over coherent, higher-level objectives. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and coding benchmarks show that MPO outperforms standard token-level policy gradient baselines, highlight the limitations of token-level policy gradients for complex reasoning, motivating future research to look beyond token-level granularity for reasoning-intensive language tasks.

Dynamics Within Latent Chain-of-Thought: An Empirical Study of Causal Structure

Latent or continuous chain-of-thought methods replace explicit textual rationales with a number of internal latent steps, but these intermediate computations are difficult to evaluate beyond correlation-based probes. In this paper, we view latent chain-of-thought as a manipulable causal process in representation space by modeling latent steps as variables in a structural causal model (SCM) and analyzing their effects through step-wise $\mathrm{do}$-interventions. We study two representative paradigms (i.e., Coconut and CODI) on both mathematical and general reasoning tasks to investigate three key questions: (1) which steps are causally necessary for correctness and when answers become decidable early; (2) how does influence propagate across steps, and how does this structure compare to explicit CoT; and (3) do intermediate trajectories retain competing answer modes, and how does output-level commitment differ from representational commitment across steps. We find that latent-step budgets behave less like homogeneous extra depth and more like staged functionality with non-local routing, and we identify a persistent gap between early output bias and late representational commitment. These results motivate mode-conditional and stability-aware analyses -- and corresponding training/decoding objectives -- as more reliable tools for interpreting and improving latent reasoning systems.