DSAC-T: Distributional Soft Actor-Critic with Three Refinements

Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven to be highly effective in tackling complex decision-making and control tasks. However, prevalent model-free RL methods often face severe performance degradation due to the well-known overestimation issue. In response to this problem, we recently introduced an off-policy RL algorithm, called distributional soft actor-critic (DSAC or DSAC-v1), which can effectively improve the value estimation accuracy by learning a continuous Gaussian value distribution. Nonetheless, standard DSAC has its own shortcomings, including occasionally unstable learning processes and needs for task-specific reward scaling, which may hinder its overall performance and adaptability in some special tasks. This paper further introduces three important refinements to standard DSAC in order to address these shortcomings. These refinements consist of critic gradient adjusting, twin value distribution learning, and variance-based target return clipping. The modified RL algorithm is named as DSAC with three refinements (DSAC-T or DSAC-v2), and its performances are systematically evaluated on a diverse set of benchmark tasks. Without any task-specific hyperparameter tuning, DSAC-T surpasses a lot of mainstream model-free RL algorithms, including SAC, TD3, DDPG, TRPO, and PPO, in all tested environments. Additionally, DSAC-T, unlike its standard version, ensures a highly stable learning process and delivers similar performance across varying reward scales.

LanguageMPC: Large Language Models as Decision Makers for Autonomous Driving

Existing learning-based autonomous driving (AD) systems face challenges in comprehending high-level information, generalizing to rare events, and providing interpretability. To address these problems, this work employs Large Language Models (LLMs) as a decision-making component for complex AD scenarios that require human commonsense understanding. We devise cognitive pathways to enable comprehensive reasoning with LLMs, and develop algorithms for translating LLM decisions into actionable driving commands. Through this approach, LLM decisions are seamlessly integrated with low-level controllers by guided parameter matrix adaptation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed method not only consistently surpasses baseline approaches in single-vehicle tasks, but also helps handle complex driving behaviors even multi-vehicle coordination, thanks to the commonsense reasoning capabilities of LLMs. This paper presents an initial step toward leveraging LLMs as effective decision-makers for intricate AD scenarios in terms of safety, efficiency, generalizability, and interoperability. We aspire for it to serve as inspiration for future research in this field. Project page: https://sites.google.com/view/llm-mpc

Bridging the Gap between Newton-Raphson Method and Regularized Policy Iteration

Regularization is one of the most important techniques in reinforcement learning algorithms. The well-known soft actor-critic algorithm is a special case of regularized policy iteration where the regularizer is chosen as Shannon entropy. Despite some empirical success of regularized policy iteration, its theoretical underpinnings remain unclear. This paper proves that regularized policy iteration is strictly equivalent to the standard Newton-Raphson method in the condition of smoothing out Bellman equation with strongly convex functions. This equivalence lays the foundation of a unified analysis for both global and local convergence behaviors of regularized policy iteration. We prove that regularized policy iteration has global linear convergence with the rate being $\gamma$ (discount factor). Furthermore, this algorithm converges quadratically once it enters a local region around the optimal value. We also show that a modified version of regularized policy iteration, i.e., with finite-step policy evaluation, is equivalent to inexact Newton method where the Newton iteration formula is solved with truncated iterations. We prove that the associated algorithm achieves an asymptotic linear convergence rate of $\gamma^M$ in which $M$ denotes the number of steps carried out in policy evaluation. Our results take a solid step towards a better understanding of the convergence properties of regularized policy iteration algorithms.

Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning under Adversarial Disturbances

Safety is a primary concern when applying reinforcement learning to real-world control tasks, especially in the presence of external disturbances. However, existing safe reinforcement learning algorithms rarely account for external disturbances, limiting their applicability and robustness in practice. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a robust safe reinforcement learning framework that tackles worst-case disturbances. First, this paper presents a policy iteration scheme to solve for the robust invariant set, i.e., a subset of the safe set, where persistent safety is only possible for states within. The key idea is to establish a two-player zero-sum game by leveraging the safety value function in Hamilton-Jacobi reachability analysis, in which the protagonist (i.e., control inputs) aims to maintain safety and the adversary (i.e., external disturbances) tries to break down safety. This paper proves that the proposed policy iteration algorithm converges monotonically to the maximal robust invariant set. Second, this paper integrates the proposed policy iteration scheme into a constrained reinforcement learning algorithm that simultaneously synthesizes the robust invariant set and uses it for constrained policy optimization. This algorithm tackles both optimality and safety, i.e., learning a policy that attains high rewards while maintaining safety under worst-case disturbances. Experiments on classic control tasks show that the proposed method achieves zero constraint violation with learned worst-case adversarial disturbances, while other baseline algorithms violate the safety constraints substantially. Our proposed method also attains comparable performance as the baselines even in the absence of the adversary.

SEPT: Towards Efficient Scene Representation Learning for Motion Prediction

Motion prediction is crucial for autonomous vehicles to operate safely in complex traffic environments. Extracting effective spatiotemporal relationships among traffic elements is key to accurate forecasting. Inspired by the successful practice of pretrained large language models, this paper presents SEPT, a modeling framework that leverages self-supervised learning to develop powerful spatiotemporal understanding for complex traffic scenes. Specifically, our approach involves three masking-reconstruction modeling tasks on scene inputs including agents' trajectories and road network, pretraining the scene encoder to capture kinematics within trajectory, spatial structure of road network, and interactions among roads and agents. The pretrained encoder is then finetuned on the downstream forecasting task. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SEPT, without elaborate architectural design or manual feature engineering, achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Argoverse 1 and Argoverse 2 motion forecasting benchmarks, outperforming previous methods on all main metrics by a large margin.

Safe Reinforcement Learning with Dual Robustness

Reinforcement learning (RL) agents are vulnerable to adversarial disturbances, which can deteriorate task performance or compromise safety specifications. Existing methods either address safety requirements under the assumption of no adversary (e.g., safe RL) or only focus on robustness against performance adversaries (e.g., robust RL). Learning one policy that is both safe and robust remains a challenging open problem. The difficulty is how to tackle two intertwined aspects in the worst cases: feasibility and optimality. Optimality is only valid inside a feasible region, while identification of maximal feasible region must rely on learning the optimal policy. To address this issue, we propose a systematic framework to unify safe RL and robust RL, including problem formulation, iteration scheme, convergence analysis and practical algorithm design. This unification is built upon constrained two-player zero-sum Markov games. A dual policy iteration scheme is proposed, which simultaneously optimizes a task policy and a safety policy. The convergence of this iteration scheme is proved. Furthermore, we design a deep RL algorithm for practical implementation, called dually robust actor-critic (DRAC). The evaluations with safety-critical benchmarks demonstrate that DRAC achieves high performance and persistent safety under all scenarios (no adversary, safety adversary, performance adversary), outperforming all baselines significantly.

Feasible Policy Iteration

Safe reinforcement learning (RL) aims to solve an optimal control problem under safety constraints. Existing $\textit{direct}$ safe RL methods use the original constraint throughout the learning process. They either lack theoretical guarantees of the policy during iteration or suffer from infeasibility problems. To address this issue, we propose an $\textit{indirect}$ safe RL method called feasible policy iteration (FPI) that iteratively uses the feasible region of the last policy to constrain the current policy. The feasible region is represented by a feasibility function called constraint decay function (CDF). The core of FPI is a region-wise policy update rule called feasible policy improvement, which maximizes the return under the constraint of the CDF inside the feasible region and minimizes the CDF outside the feasible region. This update rule is always feasible and ensures that the feasible region monotonically expands and the state-value function monotonically increases inside the feasible region. Using the feasible Bellman equation, we prove that FPI converges to the maximum feasible region and the optimal state-value function. Experiments on classic control tasks and Safety Gym show that our algorithms achieve lower constraint violations and comparable or higher performance than the baselines.

Smoothing Policy Iteration for Zero-sum Markov Games

Zero-sum Markov Games (MGs) has been an efficient framework for multi-agent systems and robust control, wherein a minimax problem is constructed to solve the equilibrium policies. At present, this formulation is well studied under tabular settings wherein the maximum operator is primarily and exactly solved to calculate the worst-case value function. However, it is non-trivial to extend such methods to handle complex tasks, as finding the maximum over large-scale action spaces is usually cumbersome. In this paper, we propose the smoothing policy iteration (SPI) algorithm to solve the zero-sum MGs approximately, where the maximum operator is replaced by the weighted LogSumExp (WLSE) function to obtain the nearly optimal equilibrium policies. Specially, the adversarial policy is served as the weight function to enable an efficient sampling over action spaces.We also prove the convergence of SPI and analyze its approximation error in $\infty -$norm based on the contraction mapping theorem. Besides, we propose a model-based algorithm called Smooth adversarial Actor-critic (SaAC) by extending SPI with the function approximations. The target value related to WLSE function is evaluated by the sampled trajectories and then mean square error is constructed to optimize the value function, and the gradient-ascent-descent methods are adopted to optimize the protagonist and adversarial policies jointly. In addition, we incorporate the reparameterization technique in model-based gradient back-propagation to prevent the gradient vanishing due to sampling from the stochastic policies. We verify our algorithm in both tabular and function approximation settings. Results show that SPI can approximate the worst-case value function with a high accuracy and SaAC can stabilize the training process and improve the adversarial robustness in a large margin.