When Hard Negatives Hurt: Bridging the Generative-Discriminative Gap in Hard Negative Synthesis for Retrieval

Hard negative mining has become the dominant strategy for training retrievers, yet it faces intrinsic limitations: negatives are bounded by corpus availability, selected by retriever score rather than diagnostic value, and increasingly contaminated by false positives as the retriever improves. LLM-based synthesis offers a principled alternative, where negatives that are unconstrained, targeted, and free from false positive risk. But we show that naively incorporating generated negatives into contrastive learning often degrades retrieval performance. We identify and formalize the root cause as a generative-discriminative gap: LLM generation optimizes for fluent, plausible text, while contrastive learning demands strategic violations of relevance at the decision boundary. Our analysis reveals two compounding failure modes: discriminative-agnostic generation, where the LLM lacks an explicit model of query information needs and defaults to generic or topic-drifted text that provides no contrastive signal; and source-dependent shortcuts, where distributional artifacts enable the model to distinguish negatives by origin rather than relevance, causing gradient drift that actively corrupts optimization. To close this gap, we propose CausalNeg consisting of two main modules: (1) CoT-guided counterfactual perturbation for data construction: decomposes why a document satisfies a query into explicit information requirements, then surgically violates individual requirements to construct negatives with controlled, interpretable hardness. (2) Query-view entropy maximization during training: disperses generated negatives across the similarity spectrum, minimizing the mutual information between source identity and similarity scores to suppress shortcut exploitation. We make our code publicly available at https://github.com/mzhangzhicheng/CausalNeg.

Efficient Exploration for Iterative Nash Preference Optimization

Preference alignment is central to improving large language models, but standard reward-based formulations can be restrictive when human preferences are cyclic, non-transitive, or otherwise not representable by a scalar reward. Nash Learning from Human Feedback (NLHF) addresses this limitation by modeling alignment as a preference game and targeting a Nash equilibrium rather than a reward maximizer. However, the learning-theoretic foundations of scalable NLHF remain limited. Existing regret guarantees rely on oracle-based methods that estimate a general preference model and solve KL-regularized minimax problems, while iterative NLHF methods directly optimize policy-level preference losses and are easier to implement but lack regret guarantees. We study online iterative NLHF under general preference models and identify exploration as the key obstacle. First, we show that standard iterative NLHF can suffer an exponential dependence on the KL-regularization parameter, revealing that implicit exploration through policy updates is insufficient for controlling regret. Second, we propose an explicitly exploratory iterative NLHF algorithm that combines SFT-based regularization with adversarial policy exploration. The resulting method retains the direct policy optimization structure of iterative NLHF, avoids explicit preference model estimation, and achieves an $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound without an exponential dependence on the KL-regularization parameter. We show that the regret can be improved to $O(\log(T))$ with access to a minimax oracle, clarifying the computational-statistical tradeoff in learning general preference games. Finally, we instantiate our method for LLM fine-tuning and evaluate it on \texttt{Llama-3-8B-Instruct} across multiple benchmarks, where explicit exploration yields consistent improvements over existing NLHF baselines.

V2I Work Zone Geometry Reconstruction with Pose-Conditioned UWB Range Denoising

Reliable work zone mapping is important for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) to navigate safely and smoothly through work zone areas. Cone-mounted ultra-wideband (UWB) roadside units (RSU) offer a cost-effective way for work zone layout inference, as roadside anchors and vehicle tags provide direct vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) range constraints for work zone geometry reconstruction. However, UWB range estimation is degraded by bursty outliers, non-line-of-sight (NLOS) errors, arbitrary anchor-ordering issues, and vehicle pose uncertainties in practical field deployments. To address these challenges, this study proposes a pose-conditioned, permutation-equivariant predictive denoiser for multi-anchor UWB ranging. The model employs shared anchor-wise temporal prediction to capture range dynamics, symmetric set aggregation to handle unordered and missing anchors, and pose-conditioned residual decoding to incorporate vehicle motion as a geometric prior. A two-stage training strategy first learns prediction from observed ranges, and then fine-tunes the denoiser with NLOS-weighted supervision. The method is evaluated on rare real-world V2I UWB field data collected with a CAV, as well as on controlled large-scale simulation benchmarks for ablative insights. Results show that the proposed method substantially improves range accuracy, cone localization, and work zone geometry reconstruction in challenging NLOS-dominated regimes, remains robust to anchor re-indexing and moderate anchor dropout, and reduces measurement-weighted field MSE by 66.9% relative to the raw input.

Reinforced Preference Optimization for Reasoning-Augmented Recommendations

Recommender systems are critical for delivering personalized content across digital platforms, and recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to enhance them with richer world knowledge and explicit reasoning capabilities. With the help of reasoning knowledge, recommendations can better infer users' underlying intents, adapt to evolving preferences, and leverage semantic relationships for improved accuracy and interpretability. However, existing reasoning-based recommendation methods often fail to fully align the LLM's reasoning process with recommendation-specific objectives due to structural disruption during integration and difficulties in translating free-form generation into accurate item predictions. In this paper, we introduce RPORec, a reinforced preference optimization framework that unifies an LLM backbone's reasoning ability with a dedicated recommendation head (Rechead) for precise item retrieval. RPORec comprises two stages: (1) Reasoning-Augmented Recommendation Modeling, where high-quality Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is generated and used as auxiliary knowledge to guide the Rechead in learning recommendation-specific representations; and (2) Advanced Reasoning Refinement and Alignment, in which the trained Rechead produces verifiable rewards to fine-tune the LLM backbone via reinforcement learning, enhancing reasoning quality, structural consistency, and task relevance. Extensive experiments on public benchmarks and large-scale online deployments show that RPORec consistently outperforms state-of-the-art LLM-based recommendation methods, demonstrating the effectiveness of reasoning-augmented recommendation modeling in real-world systems.

Personalized Deep Research: A User-Centric Framework, Dataset, and Hybrid Evaluation for Knowledge Discovery

Deep Research agents driven by LLMs have automated the scholarly discovery pipeline, from planning and query formulation to iterative web exploration. Yet they remain constrained by a static, ``one-size-fits-all'' retrieval paradigm. Current systems fail to adaptively adjust the depth and breadth of exploration based on the user's existing expertise or latent interests, frequently resulting in reports that are either redundant for experts or overly dense for novices. To address this, we introduce Personalized Deep Research (PDR), a framework that integrates dynamic user context into the core retrieval-reasoning loop. Rather than treating personalization as a post-hoc formatting step, PDR unifies user profile modeling with iterative query development, dual-stage (private/public) retrieval, and context-aware synthesis. This allows the system to autonomously align research sub-goals with user intent and optimize the stopping criteria for evidence collection. To facilitate benchmarking, we release the PDR Dataset, covering four realistic user tasks, and propose a hybrid evaluation framework combining lexical metrics with LLM-based judgments to assess factual accuracy and personalization alignment. Experimental results against commercial baselines demonstrate that PDR significantly improves retrieval utility and report relevance, effectively bridging the gap between generic information retrieval and personalized knowledge acquisition. The resource is available to the public at https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/SIGIR2026_PDR.

From Local Indices to Global Identifiers: Generative Reranking for Recommender Systems via Global Action Space

In modern recommender systems, list-wise reranking serves as a critical phase within the multi-stage pipeline, finalizing the exposed item sequence and directly impacting user satisfaction by modeling complex intra-list item dependencies. Existing methods typically formulate this task as selecting indices from the local input list. However, this approach suffers from a semantically inconsistent action space: the same output neuron (logits) represents different items across different samples, preventing the model from establishing a stable, intrinsic understanding of the items. To address this, we propose GloRank (Global Action Space Ranker), a generative framework that shifts reranking from selecting local indices to generating global identifiers. Specifically, we represent items as sequences of discrete tokens and reformulate reranking as a token generation task. This design effectively decouples the scoring mechanism from the variable input order, ensuring that items are evaluated against a consistent global standard. We further enhance this with a two-stage optimization pipeline: a supervised pre-training phase to initialize the model with high-quality demonstrations, followed by a reinforcement learning-based post-training phase to directly maximize list-wise utility. Extensive experiments on two public benchmarks and a large-scale industrial dataset, coupled with online A/B tests, demonstrate that GloRank consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and achieves superior robustness in cold-start scenarios.

GeoRouter: Dynamic Paradigm Routing for Worldwide Image Geolocalization

Worldwide image geolocalization aims to predict precise GPS coordinates for images captured anywhere on Earth, which is challenging due to the large visual and geographic diversity. Recent methods mainly follow two paradigms: retrieval-based approaches that match queries against a reference database, and generation-based approaches that directly predict coordinates using Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). However, we observe distinct error profiles between them: retrieval excels at fine-grained instance matching, while generation offers robust semantic reasoning. This complementary heterogeneity suggests that no single paradigm is universally superior. To harness this potential, we propose GeoRouter, a dynamic routing framework that adaptively assigns each query to the optimal paradigm. GeoRouter leverages an LVLM backbone to analyze visual content and provide routing decisions. To optimize GeoRouter, we introduce a distance-aware preference objective that converts the distance gap between paradigms into a continuous supervision signal, explicitly reflecting relative performance differences. Furthermore, we construct GeoRouting, the first large-scale dataset tailored for training routing policies with independent paradigm predictions. Extensive experiments on IM2GPS3k and YFCC4k demonstrate that GeoRouter significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

High-Slip-Ratio Control for Peak Tire-Road Friction Estimation Using Automated Vehicles

Accurate estimation of the tire-road friction coefficient (TRFC) is critical for ensuring safe vehicle control, especially under adverse road conditions. However, most existing methods rely on naturalistic driving data from regular vehicles, which typically operate under mild acceleration and braking. As a result, the data provide insufficient slip excitation and offer limited observability of the peak TRFC. This paper presents a high-slip-ratio control framework that enables automated vehicles (AVs) to actively excite the peak friction region during empty-haul operations while maintaining operational safety. A simplified Magic Formula tire model is adopted to represent nonlinear slip-force dynamics and is locally fitted using repeated high-slip measurements. To support safe execution in car-following scenarios, we formulate a constrained optimal control strategy that balances slip excitation, trajectory tracking, and collision avoidance. In parallel, a binning-based statistical projection method is introduced to robustly estimate peak TRFC under noise and local sparsity. The framework is validated through both closed-loop simulations and real-vehicle experiments, demonstrating its accuracy, safety, and feasibility for scalable, cost-effective roadway friction screening.

To Search or Not to Search: Aligning the Decision Boundary of Deep Search Agents via Causal Intervention

Deep search agents, which autonomously iterate through multi-turn web-based reasoning, represent a promising paradigm for complex information-seeking tasks. However, current agents suffer from critical inefficiency: they conduct excessive searches as they cannot accurately judge when to stop searching and start answering. This stems from outcome-centric training that prioritize final results over the search process itself. We identify the root cause as misaligned decision boundaries, the threshold determining when accumulated information suffices to answer. This causes over-search (redundant searching despite sufficient knowledge) and under-search (premature termination yielding incorrect answers). To address these errors, we propose a comprehensive framework comprising two key components. First, we introduce causal intervention-based diagnosis that identifies boundary errors by comparing factual and counterfactual trajectories at each decision point. Second, we develop Decision Boundary Alignment for Deep Search agents (DAS), which constructs preference datasets from causal feedback and aligns policies via preference optimization. Experiments on public datasets demonstrate that decision boundary errors are pervasive across state-of-the-art agents. Our DAS method effectively calibrates these boundaries, mitigating both over-search and under-search to achieve substantial gains in accuracy and efficiency. Our code and data are publicly available at: https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/WWW2026_DAS.

Reward-free Alignment for Conflicting Objectives

Direct alignment methods are increasingly used to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, many real-world alignment problems involve multiple conflicting objectives, where naive aggregation of preferences can lead to unstable training and poor trade-offs. In particular, weighted loss methods may fail to identify update directions that simultaneously improve all objectives, and existing multi-objective approaches often rely on explicit reward models, introducing additional complexity and distorting user-specified preferences. The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, we propose a Reward-free Alignment framework for Conflicted Objectives (RACO) that directly leverages pairwise preference data and resolves gradient conflicts via a novel clipped variant of conflict-averse gradient descent. We provide convergence guarantees to Pareto-critical points that respect user-specified objective weights, and further show that clipping can strictly improve convergence rate in the two-objective setting. Second, we improve our method using some heuristics and conduct experiments to demonstrate the compatibility of the proposed framework for LLM alignment. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations on multi-objective summarization and safety alignment tasks across multiple LLM families (Qwen 3, Llama 3, Gemma 3) show that our method consistently achieves better Pareto trade-offs compared to existing multi-objective alignment baselines.