VGI-BENCH: Probing Visual Intelligence in Video Generation Models

Recent studies suggest that video generation models can exhibit certain forms of zero-shot visual reasoning through generated frames. Yet reliable evaluation remains challenging: benchmarks should adopt inputs aligned with the visual priors of current video models, require valid evolving processes rather than only plausible final states, and calibrate task difficulty to remain challenging yet partly feasible. To this end, we introduce VGI-bench, containing 27 tasks and 810 instances, organized by a two-level taxonomy of task domains and skill tags for fine-grained evaluation of visual reasoning capabilities of video generation models. Our evaluations show that current generative systems can solve a subset of visually grounded reasoning tasks, but remain far from reliable, with even the strongest model, Seedance~2.0, achieving only 51.0% under our evaluation criteria. Our analysis further explore the output failure modes, input condition sensitivity, performance transfer boundary from synthetic fine-tuning, and internal denoising perspective revealing limited self-correction, where later steps mainly refine early hypotheses rather than correct reasoning errors. We hope VGI-bench will help stimulate the development of next-generation video generation models. We will release our code and data.

Robust and Efficient Feature Extraction for Spike Sorting via the Walsh-Hadamard Transform

Implantable neural interfaces require low-power real-time signal processing to remain within strict thermal and bandwidth constraints, motivating lightweight feature extraction methods for on-chip spike sorting. This work presents the Walsh-Hadamard Transform (WHT) as a hardware-efficient feature extraction method for neural spike classification. WHT can be implemented using only adders, subtractors, and registers without coefficient memory. WHT performance is compared against the Compressed Hadamard Transform (CHT) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), improving mean F1-scores from 55-60% to 70-75% on difficult high-noise datasets and from 90-95% to 95-99% on all other simulated datasets. In addition to improved classification performance, WHT demonstrates greater robustness to noise, downsampling, reduced training size, and distance metric selection, maintaining standard deviations typically below 5%, while CHT and PCA reach up to 10% under high-noise conditions.

Multimodal Large Language Models for Remote Sensing Image Understanding: Domain-Specific or General-Purpose?

The rapid development of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has introduced a flexible paradigm for remote sensing image scene understanding (RSISU), enabling natural-language interaction with remote sensing imagery. However, a systematic understanding of the capability boundaries, cross-task generalization, and task-specific limitations of existing remote sensing MLLMs (RS-MLLMs) is still lacking. This paper presents a systematic survey and diagnostic evaluation of MLLMs for RSISU. We review the technical evolution of RS-MLLMs, focusing on model design, multimodal learning, training data, and downstream capabilities. We further compare RS-MLLMs with general-purpose computer vision MLLMs (CV-MLLMs) across diverse RSISU tasks and benchmarks. RS-MLLMs remain competitive in domain-specific settings, particularly remote sensing visual grounding and high-resolution visual question answering. More notably, general-purpose CV-MLLMs can match or even outperform these specialized models on several RSISU tasks without remote sensing-specific fine-tuning. These findings demonstrate the strong transferability of general-purpose CV-MLLMs and show that current RS-MLLMs do not consistently outperform them across diverse RSISU tasks. Current MLLMs also face limitations in spatial and relational reasoning, fine-grained visual understanding, instruction diversity, and generalization across heterogeneous task formats. Based on these findings, we outline future directions toward reliable evaluation, multimodal and high-resolution reasoning, efficient deployment, and tool-augmented remote sensing agents. This survey provides a systematic reference for developing robust, generalizable, and practical MLLMs for RSISU.

Not All Patches are Equal: Sampling Matters for Visible-Infrared Pre-Training

Visible-infrared (VIS-IR) alignment is a key pre-training task for robust multi-sensor perception. Most existing methods use uniform patch-wise contrastive learning, but this can be unreliable in VIS-IR data because imaging-physics differences make some spatially paired regions inherently less comparable, and aligning them with equal strength hinders representation learning and downstream transfer. In this paper, we revisit VIS-IR pre-training from a sampling perspective and propose Importance-Aware Sampling (IAS), which adjusts training emphasis based on patch reliability. Specifically, IAS (i) derives patch weights from infrared structural cues and uses them to reweight the contrastive objective; (ii) learns a soft importance mask with a lightweight sampler, optionally warm-started from the hand-crafted prior; and (iii) employs a patch curriculum learning strategy that gradually expands from high-reliability regions to harder patches. It is worth noting that IAS is plug-and-play and works with both patch-/correlation-level alignment (e.g., UNIV-style) and image-level contrastive baselines (e.g., ImageBind-style). Extensive experiments on multiple VIS-IR benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over strong baselines, including for IR semantic segmentation, IR object detection and VIS semantic segmentation and cross-modal retrieval task. Code will be released on https://github.com/KlayMa527/IAS.

TRACER: Early Failure Detection for Task-Oriented Dialogue

Task-oriented dialogue systems often fail before the final breakdown is obvious, but most evaluation only measures failure after the conversation has already gone wrong. We present TRACER, a method for early failure detection in task-oriented dialogue. TRACER predicts from a partial dialogue whether the full conversation will eventually fail by combining simple trajectory signals from belief-state changes with text representations of the evolving dialogue state. We evaluate the method in both oracle and generated belief-state settings, and test how well it works when only 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% of the dialogue is visible. Across these settings, TRACER detects useful failure signals well before the end of the conversation and outperforms heuristic, classical, and single-stream baselines. These results suggest that early failure detection can provide a practical warning signal for dialogue systems before the interaction fully breaks down.

PromptPET: Privacy-Utility Optimized Prompt Obfuscation

Privacy is an important challenge when users interact with AI chatbots, since users may share sensitive information, explicitly or implicitly, and AI chatbots can use this information for user profiling. In this paper, we aim to protect user privacy via a user-side mechanism that transforms sensitive information in a user prompt, while preserving enough information to elicit a useful response from the chatbot. This approach faces an inherent tradeoff between protecting privacy (i.e., avoiding profiling) and preserving utility (i.e., getting personalized and task-specific responses). To that end, we consider, evaluate, and compare four different obfuscation actions, namely redaction, abstraction, replacement, and a novel noising/denoising scheme that we introduce. Additional novel insights include: utilizing a data type taxonomy to both identify and obfuscate sensitive information and explicitly taking into account the utility of chat responses in making the obfuscation decision. First, we systematically optimize and evaluate each obfuscation action independently in terms of the privacy-utility tradeoff it achieves. Second, we propose PROMPTPET, an LLM-based agent that selects the best obfuscation action for each sensitive part of the prompt, using a reinforcement-learning inspired rule optimizer, applied for the first time in this context. Using a real-world chat dataset, we show that PROMPTPET matches the best privacy-utility tradeoff attainable by any single obfuscation action and significantly outperforms prior state-of-the-art approaches.

Medical Heuristic Learning: An LLM-Driven Framework for Interpretable and Auditable Clinical Decision Rules

Predictive modeling for clinical tabular data is central to clinical decision support and therefore requires not only strong predictive performance but also transparent decision logic. Although deep learning and tree-based ensemble methods can achieve high accuracy, their black-box nature remains a major obstacle to clinical deployment. This challenge is further compounded by common characteristics of medical data, including limited sample sizes, severe class imbalance, and feature evolution arising from changes in diagnostic criteria and clinical documentation. To address these issues, we propose Medical Heuristic Learning (MHL), an instantiation of the learning-beyond-gradients paradigm for clinical tabular prediction. Instead of relying on neural network weight updates, MHL uses a large language model (LLM)-driven workflow that integrates statistical probes, medical knowledge probes, rule synthesis, and code-level iterative refinement to optimize a deterministic and executable decision system. The resulting model is expressed not as opaque parameters, but as versioned pure-Python decision rules that are explicitly interpretable, fully auditable, and clinically grounded. MHL also supports continual learning by starting from previously validated rules and iteratively revising them using updated feature information under data drift or feature evolution. Comprehensive experiments on medical datasets show that MHL achieves performance comparable to state-of-the-art methods while maintaining strong behavior in small-sample and highly imbalanced settings. The results further indicate that this explicit rule update mechanism can help alleviate catastrophic forgetting under feature evolution. Overall, these findings suggest that non-gradient-based heuristic systems offer a transparent and adaptable alternative for high-stakes clinical decision support.

Answer Presence Drives RAG Rewriting Gains

Retrieval-augmented QA pipelines often route retrieved passages through an LLM \emph{rewriter} before a smaller reader, lifting F1 by tens of points on multi-hop benchmarks; this gain is typically credited to improved evidence quality. We ask whether that lift is causally driven by the gold answer string appearing in the rewritten context rather than by curation per se, using a controlled intervention audit. For each rewritten context we re-run the reader after one of four controlled edits to the compile output: removing the gold answer span, replacing a length-matched random non-answer span (placebo), or injecting the gold into rewrites where it was absent (at the prefix or at a midpoint sentence boundary). Across twelve completed (cell, baseline) intervention runs spanning three reader families (Qwen2.5-7B, Qwen3.5-35B, GLM-4.7), two datasets (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultihopQA), and three compiler arrangements (MA-only, MB-only, MA$+$verify), removing the gold answer drops reader F1 by $28$ to $64$ points beyond the length-matched placebo on paired \texttt{answer-in-compile} strata, and prepending the gold into rewrites that lacked it raises F1 by $+0.7$ to $+9.7$ points in $10$ of $12$ (cell, baseline) combinations. A companion five-sentinel audit shows the conventional single-\texttt{[MASK]} probe is itself sentinel-fragile: on 2Wiki it reports a $+4.12$~F1 ``non-leakage residual'' that flips to $-3.33$ to $-7.81$~F1 under four alternative sentinels and fails an equivalence test for three of those four ($1/4$~pass). We do not propose a new rewriter or mitigation; we release the intervention runner and the sentinel panel so that other rewriter-gain claims can be tested against the same standard.

BiasGRPO: Stabilizing Bias Mitigation in High-Variance Reward Landscapes via Group-Relative Policy Optimization

Mitigating social bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a distinct alignment challenge: unlike verifiable tasks, bias lacks a single ground truth, creating a high-variance, subjective reward landscape. Previous preference-based fine-tuning methods have major trade-offs: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is limited by the lack of exploration inherent in offline training, while Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) can lead to training instability due to potentially unreliable critic estimates. In this paper, we propose BiasGRPO, a framework using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to stabilize alignment by normalizing rewards across a group of sampled completions. By substituting the value function with a group-relative baseline, our approach reduces instability while maintaining the exploration benefits of online training. We find that BiasGRPO outperforms DPO and PPO across multiple benchmarks, indicating its effectiveness. To adapt GRPO, we synthetically extend a dataset spanning multiple domains and contexts. We also create and release a custom bias reward model that effectively guides generation while being highly compute-efficient and avoiding knowledge degradation, providing a valuable resource that can be seamlessly integrated into multi-objective RLHF pipelines.

When Retrieval Doesn't Help: A Large-Scale Study of Biomedical RAG

Medical question answering is a high-stakes setting where factual errors can have serious consequences. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely viewed as a promising solution, and prior work has reported substantial gains for large medical QA models. We revisit this assumption across a broad range of open-weight instruction-tuned models spanning 7B to 72B parameters. Across five models, ten biomedical QA datasets, four retrieval methods, and four retrieval corpora, we find that retrieval yields only small and inconsistent improvements over a no-retrieval baseline, typically within 1-2 points. In contrast, the choice of backbone model has a much larger effect than the choice of retriever or corpus, and expert and layman retrieval sources perform similarly in most settings. These results suggest that the main bottleneck is not retrieval quality alone, but the model's limited ability to use retrieved evidence effectively.