Reasoning over Semantic IDs Enhances Generative Recommendation

Recent advances in generative recommendation have leveraged pretrained LLMs by formulating sequential recommendation as autoregressive generation over a unified token space comprising language tokens and itemic identifiers, where each item is represented by a compact sequence of discrete tokens, namely Semantic IDs (SIDs). This SID-based formulation enables efficient decoding over large-scale item corpora and provides a natural interface for LLM-based recommenders to leverage rich world knowledge. Meanwhile, breakthroughs in LLM reasoning motivate reasoning-enhanced recommendation, yet effective reasoning over SIDs remains underexplored and challenging. Itemic tokens are not natively meaningful to LLMs; moreover, recommendation-oriented SID reasoning is hard to evaluate, making high-quality supervision scarce. To address these challenges, we propose SIDReasoner, a two-stage framework that elicits reasoning over SIDs by strengthening SID--language alignment to unlock transferable LLM reasoning, rather than relying on large amounts of recommendation-specific reasoning traces. Concretely, SIDReasoner first enhances SID-language alignment via multi-task training on an enriched SID-centered corpus synthesized by a stronger teacher model, grounding itemic tokens in diverse semantic and behavioral contexts. Building on this enhanced alignment, SIDReasoner further improves recommendation reasoning through outcome-driven reinforced optimization, which guides the model toward effective reasoning trajectories without requiring explicit reasoning annotations. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our reasoning-augmented SID-based generative recommendation. Beyond accuracy, the results highlight the broader potential of large reasoning models for generative recommendation, including improved interpretability and cross-domain generalization.

Improving Safety Alignment via Balanced Direct Preference Optimization

With the rapid development and widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs), their potential safety risks have attracted widespread attention. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has been adopted to enhance the safety performance of LLMs. As a simple and effective alternative to RLHF, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is widely used for safety alignment. However, safety alignment still suffers from severe overfitting, which limits its actual performance. This paper revisits the overfitting phenomenon from the perspective of the model's comprehension of the training data. We find that the Imbalanced Preference Comprehension phenomenon exists between responses in preference pairs, which compromises the model's safety performance. To address this, we propose Balanced Direct Preference Optimization (B-DPO), which adaptively modulates optimization strength between preferred and dispreferred responses based on mutual information. A series of experimental results show that B-DPO can enhance the safety capability while maintaining the competitive general capabilities of LLMs on various mainstream benchmarks compared to state-of-the-art methods. \color{red}{Warning: This paper contains examples of harmful texts, and reader discretion is recommended.

Lightweight Fairness for LLM-Based Recommendations via Kernelized Projection and Gated Adapters

Large Language Models (LLMs) have introduced new capabilities to recommender systems, enabling dynamic, context-aware, and conversational recommendations. However, LLM-based recommender systems inherit and may amplify social biases embedded in their pre-training data, especially when demographic cues are present. Existing fairness solutions either require extra parameters fine-tuning, or suffer from optimization instability. We propose a lightweight and scalable bias mitigation method that combines a kernelized Iterative Null-space Projection (INLP) with a gated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) adapter. Our approach estimates a closed-form projection that removes single or multiple sensitive attributes from LLM representations with no additional trainable parameters. To preserve task utility, we introduce a two-level MoE adapter that selectively restores useful signals without reintroducing bias. Experiments on two public datasets show that our method reduces attribute leakage across multiple protected variables while maintaining competitive recommendation accuracy.

Adaptive Gaussian Process Search for Simulation-Based Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Prediction Models: Validation of the pmsims R Package

Background: Determining an adequate sample size is essential for developing reliable and generalisable clinical prediction models, yet practical guidance on selecting appropriate methods remains limited. Existing analytical and simulation-based approaches often rely on restrictive assumptions and focus on mean-based criteria. We present and validate pmsims, an R package that uses Gaussian process surrogate modelling to provide a flexible and computationally efficient simulation-based framework for sample size determination across diverse prediction settings. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive simulation study with two aims. First, we compared three search engines implemented in pmsims: a Gaussian process-based adaptive method, a deterministic bisection method, and a hybrid approach, across binary, continuous, and survival outcomes. Second, we benchmarked the best-performing pmsims engine against existing analytical (pmsampsize) and simulation-based (samplesizedev) methods, evaluating recommended sample sizes, computational time, and achieved performance on large independent validation datasets. Results: The Gaussian process-based method consistently produced the most stable sample size estimates, particularly in low-signal, high-dimensional settings. In benchmarking, pmsims achieved performance close to prespecified targets across all outcome types, matching simulation-based approaches and outperforming analytical methods in more challenging scenarios. Conclusions: pmsims provides an efficient and flexible framework for principled sample size planning in clinical prediction modelling, requiring fewer model evaluations than non-adaptive simulation approaches.

GateSID: Adaptive Gating for Semantic-Collaborative Alignment in Cold-Start Recommendation

In cold-start scenarios, the scarcity of collaborative signals for new items exacerbates the Matthew effect, which undermines platform diversity and remains a persistent challenge in real-world recommender systems. Existing methods typically enhance collaborative signals with semantic information, but they often suffer from a collaborative-semantic tradeoff: collaborative signals are effective for popular items but unreliable for cold-start items, whereas over-reliance on semantic information may obscure meaningful collaborative differences. To address this issue, we propose GateSID, a framework that uses an adaptive gating network to dynamically balance semantic and collaborative signals according to item maturity. Specifically, we first discretize multimodal features into hierarchical Semantic IDs using Residual Quantized VAE. Building on this representation, we design two key components: (1) Gating-Fused Shared Attention, which fuses intra-modal attention distributions with item-level gating weights derived from embeddings and statistical features; and (2) Gate-Regulated Contrastive Alignment, which adaptively calibrates cross-modal alignment, enforcing stronger semantic-behavior consistency for cold-start items while relaxing the constraint for popular items to preserve reliable collaborative signals. Extensive offline experiments on large-scale industrial datasets demonstrate that GateSID consistently outperforms strong baselines. Online A/B tests further confirm its practical value, yielding +2.6% GMV, +1.1% CTR, and +1.6% orders with less than 5 ms additional latency.

One Model, Two Markets: Bid-Aware Generative Recommendation

Generative Recommender Systems using semantic ids, such as TIGER (Rajput et al., 2023), have emerged as a widely adopted competitive paradigm in sequential recommendation. However, existing architectures are designed solely for semantic retrieval and do not address concerns such as monetization via ad revenue and incorporation of bids for commercial retrieval. We propose GEM-Rec, a unified framework that integrates commercial relevance and monetization objectives directly into the generative sequence. We introduce control tokens to decouple the decision of whether to show an ad from which item to show. This allows the model to learn valid placement patterns directly from interaction logs, which inherently reflect past successful ad placements. Complementing this, we devise a Bid-Aware Decoding mechanism that handles real-time pricing, injecting bids directly into the inference process to steer the generation toward high-value items. We prove that this approach guarantees allocation monotonicity, ensuring that higher bids weakly increase an ad's likelihood of being shown without requiring model retraining. Experiments demonstrate that GEM-Rec allows platforms to dynamically optimize for semantic relevance and platform revenue.

Programming Manufacturing Robots with Imperfect AI: LLMs as Tuning Experts for FDM Print Configuration Selection

We use fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing as a case study of how manufacturing robots can use imperfect AI to acquire process expertise. In FDM, print configuration strongly affects output quality. Yet, novice users typically rely on default configurations, trial-and-error, or recommendations from generic AI models (e.g., ChatGPT). These strategies can produce complete prints, but they do not reliably meet specific objectives. Experts iteratively tune print configurations using evidence from prior prints. We present a modular closed-loop approach that treats an LLM as a source of tuning expertise. We embed this source of expertise within a Bayesian optimization loop. An approximate evaluator scores each print configuration and returns structured diagnostics, which the LLM uses to propose natural-language adjustments that are compiled into machine-actionable guidance for optimization. On 100 Thingi10k parts, our LLM-guided loop achieves the best configuration on 78% objects with 0% likely-to-fail cases, while single-shot AI model recommendations are rarely best and exhibit 15% likely-to-fail cases. These results suggest that LLMs provide more value as constrained decision modules in evidence-driven optimization loops than as end-to-end oracles for print configuration selection. We expect this result to extend to broader LLM-based robot programming.

PreferRec: Learning and Transferring Pareto Preferences for Multi-objective Re-ranking

Multi-objective re-ranking has become a critical component of modern multi-stage recommender systems, as it tasked to balance multiple conflicting objectives such as accuracy, diversity, and fairness. Existing multi-objective re-ranking methods typically optimize aggregate objectives at the item level using static or handcrafted preference weights. This design overlooks that users inherently exhibit Pareto-optimal preferences at the intent level, reflecting personalized trade-offs among objectives rather than fixed weight combinations. Moreover, most approaches treat re-ranking task for each user as an isolated problem, and repeatedly learn the preferences from scratch. Such a paradigm not only incurs high computational cost, but also ignores the fact that users often share similar preference trade-off structures across objectives. Inspired by the existence of homogeneous multi-objective optimization spaces where Pareto-optimal patterns are transferable, we propose PreferRec, a novel framework that explicitly models and transfers Pareto preferences across users. Specifically, PreferRec is built upon three tightly coupled components: Preference-Aware Pareto Learning aims to capture user intrinsic trade-offs among multiple conflicting objectives at the intent level. By learning Pareto preference representations from re-ranking populations, this component explicitly models how users prioritize different objectives under diverse contexts. Knowledge-Guided Transfer facilitates efficient cross-user knowledge transfer by distilling shared optimization patterns across homogeneous optimization spaces. The transferred knowledge is then used to guide solution selection and personalized re-ranking, biasing the optimization process toward high-quality regions of the Pareto front while preserving user-specific preference characteristics.

TagLLM: A Fine-Grained Tag Generation Approach for Note Recommendation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising potential in E-commerce community recommendation. While LLMs and Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) are widely used to encode notes into implicit embeddings, leveraging their generative capabilities to represent notes with interpretable tags remains unexplored. In the field of tag generation, traditional close-ended methods heavily rely on the design of tag pools, while existing open-ended methods applied directly to note recommendations face two limitations: (1) MLLMs lack guidance during generation, resulting in redundant tags that fail to capture user interests; (2) The generated tags are often coarse and lack fine-grained representation of notes, interfering with downstream recommendations. To address these limitations, we propose TagLLM, a fine-grained tag generation method for note recommendation. TagLLM captures user interests across note categories through a User Interest Handbook and constructs fine-grained tag data using multimodal CoT Extraction. A Tag Knowledge Distillation method is developed to equip small models with competitive generation capabilities, enhancing inference efficiency. In online A/B test, TagLLM increases average view duration per user by 0.31%, average interactions per user by 0.96%, and page view click-through rate in cold-start scenario by 32.37%, demonstrating its effectiveness.

AgenticRec: End-to-End Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization for Ranking-Oriented Recommender Agents

Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation. However, existing recommender agents typically suffer from a disconnect between intermediate reasoning and final ranking feedback, and are unable to capture fine-grained preferences. To address this, we present AgenticRec, a ranking-oriented agentic recommendation framework that optimizes the entire decision-making trajectory (including intermediate reasoning, tool invocation, and final ranking list generation) under sparse implicit feedback. Our approach makes three key contributions. First, we design a suite of recommendation-specific tools integrated into a ReAct loop to support evidence-grounded reasoning. Second, we propose theoretically unbiased List-Wise Group Relative Policy Optimization (list-wise GRPO) to maximize ranking utility, ensuring accurate credit assignment for complex tool-use trajectories. Third, we introduce Progressive Preference Refinement (PPR) to resolve fine-grained preference ambiguities. By mining hard negatives from ranking violations and applying bidirectional preference alignment, PPR minimizes the convex upper bound of pairwise ranking errors. Experiments on benchmarks confirm that AgenticRec significantly outperforms baselines, validating the necessity of unifying reasoning, tool use, and ranking optimization.