Intuition-Guided Latent Reasoning for LLM-Based Recommendation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities in complex problem-solving tasks, motivating their use for preference reasoning in recommender systems. Latent reasoning, which operates in continuous hidden spaces rather than discrete tokens, has recently emerged as a promising paradigm for LLM-based recommendation. However, existing methods often start from unconstrained reasoning points, where hidden representations are misaligned with target item embeddings, leading to suboptimal reasoning trajectories. Inspired by cognitive neuroscience, which suggests that human multi-step reasoning is guided by intuition as a latent prior, we propose \emph{IntuRec}, a two-stage framework that anchors latent reasoning with \emph{recommendation intuition}. In the extraction stage, the LLM-based recommender generates a top-$K$ candidate set based on users' histories as the source of intuition. In the injection stage, the candidate set is transformed into a preference-aligned intuition embedding using self- and cross-attention mechanisms, which initializes the reasoning start point and guides subsequent latent reasoning. By providing a semantically grounded starting point, IntuRec efficiently explores the preference space along more accurate reasoning trajectories. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that IntuRec consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. We release our code at https://github.com/Ten-Mao/IntuRec.

Enhancing Decision-Making with Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Fictitious Play

Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have demonstrated great potential in solving tasks with execution complexity, by distributing subtasks across cooperative agents. However, this divide-and-conquer paradigm falls short on decision-making tasks that are also prevalent in the real world. These tasks require simultaneous reasoning from the stances of all involved stakeholders whose decisions are mutually dependent and thus cannot be solved in isolation. We characterize this challenge as stance entanglement, a form of decision complexity distinct from execution complexity. To address it, we propose Multi-Agent Fictitious Play (MAFP), a novel MAS paradigm that represents stakeholder stances as agents and formulates decision-making as an equilibrium-seeking process. Built on the game-theoretic principle of fictitious play, MAFP iteratively updates each agent's decision by best responding to the empirical mixture of other agents' past decisions. This enables agents to expose and address one another's weaknesses, progressively improving decision quality and robustness. We evaluate MAFP on challenging decision-making tasks that test the capability of deciding strategies for competitive scenarios prior to acting. MAFP outperforms both single-round and multi-round baselines on two complementary metrics, tournament strength and robustness, demonstrating its effectiveness in addressing stance entanglement.

PAFO: Pareto Fairness Optimization for Personalized Reward Modeling

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on reward models to align their outputs with diverse user preferences. While personalized reward models aim to capture such heterogeneity, they are often trained on imbalanced user preference data and may therefore favor users whose preferences are more common in the training population. In this paper, we identify this failure mode as personalized reward bias, where reward modeling quality varies systematically with preference support rate. We formulate its mitigation as a Pareto fairness problem over group utilities, aiming to improve under-served users without degrading other user groups. To this end, we propose PAFO, a Pareto fairness optimization framework for personalized reward modeling. PAFO first trains group-specialized reward models for majority and minority preference groups, then constructs conditional margin-level supervision to distill their heterogeneous preference boundaries into a single unified model. The resulting model uses group information only during training and requires no explicit group labels at inference time. Experiments on Personal-LLM and DSP show that PAFO improves both minority-group and majority-group accuracy while reducing user-level unfairness across multiple metrics, demonstrating its effectiveness for fairer LLM personalization.

Trustworthy Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges

The field of recommender systems (RS) is currently undergoing two profound paradigm shifts. From the perspective of objectives, the goal has shifted beyond mere recommendation accuracy to comprehensive trustworthiness, encompassing multiple dimensions such as robustness, fairness, and privacy preservation. From a technical perspective, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively integrated into RS, reshaping the foundations of recommendation through richer semantic understanding, stronger intent reasoning, and more flexible user interactions. The convergence of these two shifts prompts a timely and pivotal question: how does the integration of LLMs reshape the landscape of trustworthy recommendation? In this work, we present a systematic review of trustworthy LLM-empowered recommendation. By comprehensively analyzing over 200 recent studies, we reveal that the introduction of LLMs acts as a double-edged sword. While their advanced mechanisms and user-friendly interfaces offer unprecedented opportunities to enhance trustworthiness, they simultaneously introduce new risks, such as novel forms of bias and hallucination-induced issues. To characterize this dual impact, we systematically identify 13 opportunities and 18 challenges across six fundamental dimensions of trustworthiness, and accordingly organize the existing literature into a novel taxonomy. We also provide a comprehensive review of commonly used datasets and evaluation metrics to facilitate empirical validation. Finally, we identify critical open challenges and outline future directions, hoping to inspire future research on this emerging topic.

Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluation

As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve from general-purpose assistants to user-centric agents, personalization has become central to aligning model behavior with individual preferences, making the evaluation of personalized alignment a critical bottleneck. Existing evaluation methods-ranging from automatic metrics to LLM-as-a-judge approaches-fail to capture subjective, user-specific preferences embedded in long-term interaction histories. We identify three essential principles for reliable and effective personalized evaluation: Representativeness, User-Consistency, and Discriminativeness. To address these principles, we introduce Personalized Evaluation as Learning, a paradigm that formulates personalized evaluation as a learning problem rather than a static judgment. Under this paradigm, we propose PARL (Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluation), a framework that learns to induce preference-aware evaluation rubrics directly from raw user histories and performs a self-validation mechanism to ensure consistency with the user's preferences. PARL integrates rubric induction with a discriminative reinforcement learning objective that contrasts user-authored responses against competitive personalized model outputs, enabling the learned rubrics to capture precise, user-specific decision boundaries. Experiments on real-world personalized text generation tasks show that PARL consistently induces high-fidelity rubrics that reliably identify user-aligned responses and generalize across users and tasks, while capturing stable stylistic preferences and fine-grained evaluative patterns. To ensure reproducibility, our code is available at https://github.com/SnowCharmQ/PARL.

Know You Before You Speak: User-State Modeling for LLM Personalization in Multi-Turn Conversation

Personalized dialogue requires more than recalling explicit user histories: systems also need to infer hidden user states that evolve through interaction and shape appropriate response strategies. Existing memory- and profile-based methods primarily reuse observable user information, offering limited support for modeling user-state dynamics or selecting actions based on how they shape future user states. We propose PUMA (Prospective User-state Modeling for Action selection), a framework grounded in the Free Energy Principle (FEP) that formulates personalization as decision-making under partial observability, centered on an explicit user state model that captures latent user states and their action-conditioned dynamics. At each turn, PUMA maintains a belief over the user's hidden state, refines the user state model for observation generation and action-conditioned state transition, and selects dialogue actions by minimizing expected free energy, balancing epistemic and pragmatic objectives under a unified criterion. This formulation shifts personalization from passive memory retrieval to model-based decision-making over user evolution. We instantiate PUMA on healthcare-oriented counseling and motivational interviewing benchmarks with latent state annotations for rigorous evaluation. Experiments show that PUMA improves long-horizon dialogue outcomes while maintaining strong response quality, and a cross-dataset study demonstrates more reliable user-state estimation and next-state prediction.

Dynamic Skill Lifecycle Management for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Large language model agents increasingly rely on external skills to solve complex tasks, where skills act as modular units that extend their capabilities beyond what parametric memory alone supports. Existing methods assume external skills either accumulate as persistent guidance or internalized into the policy, eventually leading to zero-skill inference. We argue this assumption is overly restrictive, since with limited parametric capacity and uneven marginal contribution across skills, the optimal active skill set is non-monotonic, task- and stage-dependent. In this work, we propose SLIM, a framework of dynamic Skill LIfecycle Management for agentic reinforcement learning (RL), which treats the active external skill set as a dynamic optimization variable jointly updated with policy learning. Specifically, SLIM estimates each active skill's marginal external contribution through leave-one-skill-out validation, then applies three lifecycle operations: retaining high-value skills, retiring skills whose contribution becomes negligible after sufficient exposure, and expanding the skill bank when persistent failures reveal missing capability coverage. Experiments show that SLIM outperforms the best baselines by an average of 7.1% points across ALFWorld and SearchQA. Results further indicate that policy learning and external skill retention are not mutually exclusive: some skills are absorbed into the policy, while others continue to provide external value, supporting SLIM as a more general paradigm for skill-based agentic RL.

Scale over Preference: The Impact of AI-Generated Content on Online Content Ecology

The rapid proliferation of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC) is fundamentally restructuring online content ecologies, necessitating a rigorous examination of its behavioral and distributional implications. Leveraging a comprehensive longitudinal dataset comprising tens of millions of users from a leading Chinese video-sharing platform, this study elucidated the distinct creation and consumption behaviors characterizing AIGC versus Human-Generated Content (HGC). We identified a prevalent scale-over-preference dynamic, wherein AIGC creators achieve aggregate engagement comparable to HGC creators through high-volume production, despite a marked consumer preference for HGC. Deeper analysis uncovered the ability of the algorithmic content distribution mechanism in moderating these competing interests regarding AIGC. These findings advocated for the implementation of AIGC-sensitive distribution algorithms and precise governance frameworks to ensure the long-term health of the online content platforms.

SODA: Semantic-Oriented Distributional Alignment for Generative Recommendation

Generative recommendation has emerged as a scalable alternative to traditional retrieve-and-rank pipelines by operating in a compact token space. However, existing methods mainly rely on discrete code-level supervision, which leads to information loss and limits the joint optimization between the tokenizer and the generative recommender. In this work, we propose a distribution-level supervision paradigm that leverages probability distributions over multi-layer codebooks as soft and information-rich representations. Building on this idea, we introduce Semantic-Oriented Distributional Alignment (SODA), a plug-and-play contrastive supervision framework based on Bayesian Personalized Ranking, which aligns semantically rich distributions via negative KL divergence while enabling end-to-end differentiable training. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that SODA consistently improves the performance of various generative recommender backbones, validating its effectiveness and generality. Codes will be available upon acceptance.

MiniRec: Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for LLM-based Recommendation

The integration of reinforcement learning (RL) into large language models (LLMs) has opened new opportunities for recommender systems by eliciting reasoning and improving user preference modeling. However, RL-based LLM recommendation faces significant efficiency challenges, making full-data training costly. Existing data selection methods define sample value based on learnability or representativeness, yet their loss- or gradient-driven or dataset coverage-driven criteria often misalign with RL learning dynamics, resulting in suboptimal performance. To address this, we propose MiniRec, a data selection framework tailored for RL-based LLM recommendation. MiniRec evaluates sample learnability using key RL signals -- rewards -- pruning samples that are too easy (too high reward) or too difficult (consistently low reward). It assesses representativeness by aligning sample gradients with the approximated "ideal" global RL optimization trajectory, selecting samples that mainly drive model updates, and it also enforces diversity to reduce redundancy. Combined with a curriculum learning strategy from easy to hard samples, MiniRec significantly reduces training cost while largely preserving performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate MiniRec's effectiveness, highlighting the importance of reward-aligned, trajectory-informed data selection in RL-based LLM recommendation.