VC-Soup: Value-Consistency Guided Multi-Value Alignment for Large Language Models

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape content generation, interaction, and decision-making across the Web, aligning them with human values has become a central objective in trustworthy AI. This challenge becomes even more pronounced when aligning multiple, potentially conflicting human values. Although recent approaches, such as reward reweighting, prompt-based supervised fine-tuning, and model merging, attempt to tackle multi-value alignment, they still face two major limitations: (1) training separate models for each value combination is prohibitively expensive; (2) value conflicts substantially degrade alignment performance. These limitations make it difficult to achieve favorable trade-offs across diverse human values. To address these challenges, we revisit multi-value alignment from the perspective of value consistency in data and propose VC-soup, a data filtering and parameter merging framework grounded in value-consistent learning. We first design a value consistency metric based on the cosine similarity between the reward-gap vector of each preference pair and an all-ones vector, which quantifies its cross-value coherence. We then filter out low-consistency preference pairs in each value dataset and train on the remaining data to obtain smooth, value-consistent policy models that better preserve linear mode connectivity. Finally, we linearly combine these policies and apply Pareto filtering across values to obtain solutions with balanced multi-value performance. Extensive experiments and theoretical analysis demonstrate that VC-soup effectively mitigates conflicts and consistently outperforms existing multi-value alignment methods.

MOGeo: Beyond One-to-One Cross-View Object Geo-localization

Cross-View Object Geo-Localization (CVOGL) aims to locate an object of interest in a query image within a corresponding satellite image. Existing methods typically assume that the query image contains only a single object, which does not align with the complex, multi-object geo-localization requirements in real-world applications, making them unsuitable for practical scenarios. To bridge the gap between the realistic setting and existing task, we propose a new task, called Cross-View Multi-Object Geo-Localization (CVMOGL). To advance the CVMOGL task, we first construct a benchmark, CMLocation, which includes two datasets: CMLocation-V1 and CMLocation-V2. Furthermore, we propose a novel cross-view multi-object geo-localization method, MOGeo, and benchmark it against existing state-of-the-art methods. Extensive experiments are conducted under various application scenarios to validate the effectiveness of our method. The results demonstrate that cross-view object geo-localization in the more realistic setting remains a challenging problem, encouraging further research in this area.

MRGeo: Robust Cross-View Geo-Localization of Corrupted Images via Spatial and Channel Feature Enhancement

Cross-view geo-localization (CVGL) aims to accurately localize street-view images through retrieval of corresponding geo-tagged satellite images. While prior works have achieved nearly perfect performance on certain standard datasets, their robustness in real-world corrupted environments remains under-explored. This oversight causes severe performance degradation or failure when images are affected by corruption such as blur or weather, significantly limiting practical deployment. To address this critical gap, we introduce MRGeo, the first systematic method designed for robust CVGL under corruption. MRGeo employs a hierarchical defense strategy that enhances the intrinsic quality of features and then enforces a robust geometric prior. Its core is the Spatial-Channel Enhancement Block, which contains: (1) a Spatial Adaptive Representation Module that models global and local features in parallel and uses a dynamic gating mechanism to arbitrate their fusion based on feature reliability; and (2) a Channel Calibration Module that performs compensatory adjustments by modeling multi-granularity channel dependencies to counteract information loss. To prevent spatial misalignment under severe corruption, a Region-level Geometric Alignment Module imposes a geometric structure on the final descriptors, ensuring coarse-grained consistency. Comprehensive experiments on both robustness benchmark and standard datasets demonstrate that MRGeo not only achieves an average R@1 improvement of 2.92\% across three comprehensive robustness benchmarks (CVUSA-C-ALL, CVACT\_val-C-ALL, and CVACT\_test-C-ALL) but also establishes superior performance in cross-area evaluation, thereby demonstrating its robustness and generalization capability.

CLEAR: Null-Space Projection for Cross-Modal De-Redundancy in Multimodal Recommendation

Multimodal recommendation has emerged as an effective paradigm for enhancing collaborative filtering by incorporating heterogeneous content modalities. Existing multimodal recommenders predominantly focus on reinforcing cross-modal consistency to facilitate multimodal fusion. However, we observe that multimodal representations often exhibit substantial cross-modal redundancy, where dominant shared components overlap across modalities. Such redundancy can limit the effective utilization of complementary information, explaining why incorporating additional modalities does not always yield performance improvements. In this work, we propose CLEAR, a lightweight and plug-and-play cross-modal de-redundancy approach for multimodal recommendation. Rather than enforcing stronger cross-modal alignment, CLEAR explicitly characterizes the redundant shared subspace across modalities by modeling cross-modal covariance between visual and textual representations. By identifying dominant shared directions via singular value decomposition and projecting multimodal features onto the complementary null space, CLEAR reshapes the multimodal representation space by suppressing redundant cross-modal components while preserving modality-specific information. This subspace-level projection implicitly regulates representation learning dynamics, preventing the model from repeatedly amplifying redundant shared semantics during training. Notably, CLEAR can be seamlessly integrated into existing multimodal recommenders without modifying their architectures or training objectives. Extensive experiments on three public benchmark datasets demonstrate that explicitly reducing cross-modal redundancy consistently improves recommendation performance across a wide range of multimodal recommendation models.

Controllable Value Alignment in Large Language Models through Neuron-Level Editing

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values has become increasingly important as their influence on human behavior and decision-making expands. However, existing steering-based alignment methods suffer from limited controllability: steering a target value often unintentionally activates other, non-target values. To characterize this limitation, we introduce value leakage, a diagnostic notion that captures the unintended activation of non-target values during value steering, along with a normalized leakage metric grounded in Schwartz's value theory. In light of this analysis, we propose NeVA, a neuron-level editing framework for controllable value alignment in LLMs. NeVA identifies sparse, value-relevant neurons and performs inference-time activation editing, enabling fine-grained control without parameter updates or retraining. Experiments show that NeVA achieves stronger target value alignment while incurring smaller performance degradation on general capability. Moreover, NeVA significantly reduces the average leakage, with residual effects largely confined to semantically related value classes. Overall, NeVA offers a more controllable and interpretable mechanism for value alignment.

Revisiting Robustness for LLM Safety Alignment via Selective Geometry Control

Safety alignment of large language models remains brittle under domain shift and noisy preference supervision. Most existing robust alignment methods focus on uncertainty in alignment data, while overlooking optimization-induced fragility in preference-based objectives. In this work, we revisit robustness for LLM safety alignment from an optimization geometry perspective, and argue that robustness failures cannot be addressed by data-centric methods alone. We propose ShaPO, a geometry-aware preference optimization framework that enforces worst-case alignment objectives via selective geometry control over alignment-critical parameter subspace. By avoiding uniform geometry constraints, ShaPO mitigates the over-regularization that can harm robustness under distribution shift. We instantiate ShaPO at two levels: token-level ShaPO stabilizes likelihood-based surrogate optimization, while reward-level ShaPO enforces reward-consistent optimization under noisy supervision. Across diverse safety benchmarks and noisy preference settings, ShaPO consistently improves safety robustness over popular preference optimization methods. Moreover, ShaPO composes cleanly with data-robust objectives, yielding additional gains and empirically supporting the proposed optimization-geometry perspective.

From Atom to Community: Structured and Evolving Agent Memory for User Behavior Modeling

User behavior modeling lies at the heart of personalized applications like recommender systems. With LLM-based agents, user preference representation has evolved from latent embeddings to semantic memory. While existing memory mechanisms show promise in textual dialogues, modeling non-textual behaviors remains challenging, as preferences must be inferred from implicit signals like clicks without ground truth supervision. Current approaches rely on a single unstructured summary, updated through simple overwriting. However, this is suboptimal: users exhibit multi-faceted interests that get conflated, preferences evolve yet naive overwriting causes forgetting, and sparse individual interactions necessitate collaborative signals. We present STEAM (\textit{\textbf{ST}ructured and \textbf{E}volving \textbf{A}gent \textbf{M}emory}), a novel framework that reimagines how agent memory is organized and updated. STEAM decomposes preferences into atomic memory units, each capturing a distinct interest dimension with explicit links to observed behaviors. To exploit collaborative patterns, STEAM organizes similar memories across users into communities and generates prototype memories for signal propagation. The framework further incorporates adaptive evolution mechanisms, including consolidation for refining memories and formation for capturing emerging interests. Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that STEAM substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in recommendation accuracy, simulation fidelity, and diversity.

Selective Mixup for Debiasing Question Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing

Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is a widely used technology for evaluating learners' proficiency in online education platforms. By leveraging prior estimates of proficiency to select questions and updating the estimates iteratively based on responses, CAT enables personalized learner modeling and has attracted substantial attention. Despite this progress, most existing works focus primarily on improving diagnostic accuracy, while overlooking the selection bias inherent in the adaptive process. Selection Bias arises because the question selection is strongly influenced by the estimated proficiency, such as assigning easier questions to learners with lower proficiency and harder ones to learners with higher proficiency. Since the selection depends on prior estimation, this bias propagates into the diagnosis model, which is further amplified during iterative updates, leading to misalignment and biased predictions. Moreover, the imbalanced nature of learners' historical interactions often exacerbates the bias in diagnosis models. To address this issue, we propose a debiasing framework consisting of two key modules: Cross-Attribute Examinee Retrieval and Selective Mixup-based Regularization. First, we retrieve balanced examinees with relatively even distributions of correct and incorrect responses and use them as neutral references for biased examinees. Then, mixup is applied between each biased examinee and its matched balanced counterpart under label consistency. This augmentation enriches the diversity of bias-conflicting samples and smooths selection boundaries. Finally, extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets with multiple advanced diagnosis models demonstrate that our method substantially improves both the generalization ability and fairness of question selection in CAT.

Mitigating Recommendation Biases via Group-Alignment and Global-Uniformity in Representation Learning

Collaborative Filtering~(CF) plays a crucial role in modern recommender systems, leveraging historical user-item interactions to provide personalized suggestions. However, CF-based methods often encounter biases due to imbalances in training data. This phenomenon makes CF-based methods tend to prioritize recommending popular items and performing unsatisfactorily on inactive users. Existing works address this issue by rebalancing training samples, reranking recommendation results, or making the modeling process robust to the bias. Despite their effectiveness, these approaches can compromise accuracy or be sensitive to weighting strategies, making them challenging to train. In this paper, we deeply analyze the causes and effects of the biases and propose a framework to alleviate biases in recommendation from the perspective of representation distribution, namely Group-Alignment and Global-Uniformity Enhanced Representation Learning for Debiasing Recommendation (AURL). Specifically, we identify two significant problems in the representation distribution of users and items, namely group-discrepancy and global-collapse. These two problems directly lead to biases in the recommendation results. To this end, we propose two simple but effective regularizers in the representation space, respectively named group-alignment and global-uniformity. The goal of group-alignment is to bring the representation distribution of long-tail entities closer to that of popular entities, while global-uniformity aims to preserve the information of entities as much as possible by evenly distributing representations. Our method directly optimizes both the group-alignment and global-uniformity regularization terms to mitigate recommendation biases. Extensive experiments on three real datasets and various recommendation backbones verify the superiority of our proposed framework.

A Survey on Generative Recommendation: Data, Model, and Tasks

Recommender systems serve as foundational infrastructure in modern information ecosystems, helping users navigate digital content and discover items aligned with their preferences. At their core, recommender systems address a fundamental problem: matching users with items. Over the past decades, the field has experienced successive paradigm shifts, from collaborative filtering and matrix factorization in the machine learning era to neural architectures in the deep learning era. Recently, the emergence of generative models, especially large language models (LLMs) and diffusion models, have sparked a new paradigm: generative recommendation, which reconceptualizes recommendation as a generation task rather than discriminative scoring. This survey provides a comprehensive examination through a unified tripartite framework spanning data, model, and task dimensions. Rather than simply categorizing works, we systematically decompose approaches into operational stages-data augmentation and unification, model alignment and training, task formulation and execution. At the data level, generative models enable knowledge-infused augmentation and agent-based simulation while unifying heterogeneous signals. At the model level, we taxonomize LLM-based methods, large recommendation models, and diffusion approaches, analyzing their alignment mechanisms and innovations. At the task level, we illuminate new capabilities including conversational interaction, explainable reasoning, and personalized content generation. We identify five key advantages: world knowledge integration, natural language understanding, reasoning capabilities, scaling laws, and creative generation. We critically examine challenges in benchmark design, model robustness, and deployment efficiency, while charting a roadmap toward intelligent recommendation assistants that fundamentally reshape human-information interaction.