Establishing Reliability Metrics for Reward Models in Large Language Models

The reward model (RM) that represents human preferences plays a crucial role in optimizing the outputs of large language models (LLMs), e.g., through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) or rejection sampling. However, a long challenge for RM is its uncertain reliability, i.e., LLM outputs with higher rewards may not align with actual human preferences. Currently, there is a lack of a convincing metric to quantify the reliability of RMs. To bridge this gap, we propose the \textit{\underline{R}eliable at \underline{$\eta$}} (RETA) metric, which directly measures the reliability of an RM by evaluating the average quality (scored by an oracle) of the top $\eta$ quantile responses assessed by an RM. On top of RETA, we present an integrated benchmarking pipeline that allows anyone to evaluate their own RM without incurring additional Oracle labeling costs. Extensive experimental studies demonstrate the superior stability of RETA metric, providing solid evaluations of the reliability of various publicly available and proprietary RMs. When dealing with an unreliable RM, we can use the RETA metric to identify the optimal quantile from which to select the responses.

Local Data Quantity-Aware Weighted Averaging for Federated Learning with Dishonest Clients

Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of deep learning models without requiring data to leave local clients, thereby preserving client privacy. The aggregation process on the server plays a critical role in the performance of the resulting FL model. The most commonly used aggregation method is weighted averaging based on the amount of data from each client, which is thought to reflect each client's contribution. However, this method is prone to model bias, as dishonest clients might report inaccurate training data volumes to the server, which is hard to verify. To address this issue, we propose a novel secure \underline{Fed}erated \underline{D}ata q\underline{u}antity-\underline{a}ware weighted averaging method (FedDua). It enables FL servers to accurately predict the amount of training data from each client based on their local model gradients uploaded. Furthermore, it can be seamlessly integrated into any FL algorithms that involve server-side model aggregation. Extensive experiments on three benchmarking datasets demonstrate that FedDua improves the global model performance by an average of 3.17% compared to four popular FL aggregation methods in the presence of inaccurate client data volume declarations.

Understanding the Generalization of In-Context Learning in Transformers: An Empirical Study

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and LLaMA-3 utilize the powerful in-context learning (ICL) capability of Transformer architecture to learn on the fly from limited examples. While ICL underpins many LLM applications, its full potential remains hindered by a limited understanding of its generalization boundaries and vulnerabilities. We present a systematic investigation of transformers' generalization capability with ICL relative to training data coverage by defining a task-centric framework along three dimensions: inter-problem, intra-problem, and intra-task generalization. Through extensive simulation and real-world experiments, encompassing tasks such as function fitting, API calling, and translation, we find that transformers lack inter-problem generalization with ICL, but excel in intra-task and intra-problem generalization. When the training data includes a greater variety of mixed tasks, it significantly enhances the generalization ability of ICL on unseen tasks and even on known simple tasks. This guides us in designing training data to maximize the diversity of tasks covered and to combine different tasks whenever possible, rather than solely focusing on the target task for testing.

Uncertainty-Aware Explainable Federated Learning

Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative machine learning paradigm for enhancing data privacy preservation. Its privacy-preserving nature complicates the explanation of the decision-making processes and the evaluation of the reliability of the generated explanations. In this paper, we propose the Uncertainty-aware eXplainable Federated Learning (UncertainXFL) to address these challenges. It generates explanations for decision-making processes under FL settings and provides information regarding the uncertainty of these explanations. UncertainXFL is the first framework to explicitly offer uncertainty evaluation for explanations within the FL context. Explanatory information is initially generated by the FL clients and then aggregated by the server in a comprehensive and conflict-free manner during FL training. The quality of the explanations, including the uncertainty score and tested validity, guides the FL training process by prioritizing clients with the most reliable explanations through higher weights during model aggregation. Extensive experimental evaluation results demonstrate that UncertainXFL achieves superior model accuracy and explanation accuracy, surpassing the current state-of-the-art model that does not incorporate uncertainty information by 2.71% and 1.77%, respectively. By integrating and quantifying uncertainty in the data into the explanation process, UncertainXFL not only clearly presents the explanation alongside its uncertainty, but also leverages this uncertainty to guide the FL training process, thereby enhancing the robustness and reliability of the resulting models.

Can Textual Gradient Work in Federated Learning?

Recent studies highlight the promise of LLM-based prompt optimization, especially with TextGrad, which automates differentiation'' via texts and backpropagates textual feedback. This approach facilitates training in various real-world applications that do not support numerical gradient propagation or loss calculation. In this paper, we systematically explore the potential and challenges of incorporating textual gradient into Federated Learning (FL). Our contributions are fourfold. Firstly, we introduce a novel FL paradigm, Federated Textual Gradient (FedTextGrad), that allows clients to upload locally optimized prompts derived from textual gradients, while the server aggregates the received prompts. Unlike traditional FL frameworks, which are designed for numerical aggregation, FedTextGrad is specifically tailored for handling textual data, expanding the applicability of FL to a broader range of problems that lack well-defined numerical loss functions. Secondly, building on this design, we conduct extensive experiments to explore the feasibility of FedTextGrad. Our findings highlight the importance of properly tuning key factors (e.g., local steps) in FL training. Thirdly, we highlight a major challenge in FedTextGrad aggregation: retaining essential information from distributed prompt updates. Last but not least, in response to this issue, we improve the vanilla variant of FedTextGrad by providing actionable guidance to the LLM when summarizing client prompts by leveraging the Uniform Information Density principle. Through this principled study, we enable the adoption of textual gradients in FL for optimizing LLMs, identify important issues, and pinpoint future directions, thereby opening up a new research area that warrants further investigation.

Sample Weight Averaging for Stable Prediction

The challenge of Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization poses a foundational concern for the application of machine learning algorithms to risk-sensitive areas. Inspired by traditional importance weighting and propensity weighting methods, prior approaches employ an independence-based sample reweighting procedure. They aim at decorrelating covariates to counteract the bias introduced by spurious correlations between unstable variables and the outcome, thus enhancing generalization and fulfilling stable prediction under covariate shift. Nonetheless, these methods are prone to experiencing an inflation of variance, primarily attributable to the reduced efficacy in utilizing training samples during the reweighting process. Existing remedies necessitate either environmental labels or substantially higher time costs along with additional assumptions and supervised information. To mitigate this issue, we propose SAmple Weight Averaging (SAWA), a simple yet efficacious strategy that can be universally integrated into various sample reweighting algorithms to decrease the variance and coefficient estimation error, thus boosting the covariate-shift generalization and achieving stable prediction across different environments. We prove its rationality and benefits theoretically. Experiments across synthetic datasets and real-world datasets consistently underscore its superiority against covariate shift.

Error Slice Discovery via Manifold Compactness

Despite the great performance of deep learning models in many areas, they still make mistakes and underperform on certain subsets of data, i.e. error slices. Given a trained model, it is important to identify its semantically coherent error slices that are easy to interpret, which is referred to as the error slice discovery problem. However, there is no proper metric of slice coherence without relying on extra information like predefined slice labels. Current evaluation of slice coherence requires access to predefined slices formulated by metadata like attributes or subclasses. Its validity heavily relies on the quality and abundance of metadata, where some possible patterns could be ignored. Besides, current algorithms cannot directly incorporate the constraint of coherence into their optimization objective due to the absence of an explicit coherence metric, which could potentially hinder their effectiveness. In this paper, we propose manifold compactness, a coherence metric without reliance on extra information by incorporating the data geometry property into its design, and experiments on typical datasets empirically validate the rationality of the metric. Then we develop Manifold Compactness based error Slice Discovery (MCSD), a novel algorithm that directly treats risk and coherence as the optimization objective, and is flexible to be applied to models of various tasks. Extensive experiments on the benchmark and case studies on other typical datasets demonstrate the superiority of MCSD.

GAQAT: gradient-adaptive quantization-aware training for domain generalization

Research on loss surface geometry, such as Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), shows that flatter minima improve generalization. Recent studies further reveal that flatter minima can also reduce the domain generalization (DG) gap. However, existing flatness-based DG techniques predominantly operate within a full-precision training process, which is impractical for deployment on resource-constrained edge devices that typically rely on lower bit-width representations (e.g., 4 bits, 3 bits). Consequently, low-precision quantization-aware training is critical for optimizing these techniques in real-world applications. In this paper, we observe a significant degradation in performance when applying state-of-the-art DG-SAM methods to quantized models, suggesting that current approaches fail to preserve generalizability during the low-precision training process. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Gradient-Adaptive Quantization-Aware Training (GAQAT) framework for DG. Our approach begins by identifying the scale-gradient conflict problem in low-precision quantization, where the task loss and smoothness loss induce conflicting gradients for the scaling factors of quantizers, with certain layers exhibiting opposing gradient directions. This conflict renders the optimization of quantized weights highly unstable. To mitigate this, we further introduce a mechanism to quantify gradient inconsistencies and selectively freeze the gradients of scaling factors, thereby stabilizing the training process and enhancing out-of-domain generalization. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed GAQAT framework. On PACS, our 3-bit and 4-bit models outperform direct DG-QAT integration by up to 4.5%. On DomainNet, the 4-bit model achieves near-lossless performance compared to full precision, with improvements of 1.39% (4-bit) and 1.06% (3-bit) over the SOTA QAT baseline.

Double Machine Learning for Adaptive Causal Representation in High-Dimensional Data

Adaptive causal representation learning from observational data is presented, integrated with an efficient sample splitting technique within the semiparametric estimating equation framework. The support points sample splitting (SPSS), a subsampling method based on energy distance, is employed for efficient double machine learning (DML) in causal inference. The support points are selected and split as optimal representative points of the full raw data in a random sample, in contrast to the traditional random splitting, and providing an optimal sub-representation of the underlying data generating distribution. They offer the best representation of a full big dataset, whereas the unit structural information of the underlying distribution via the traditional random data splitting is most likely not preserved. Three machine learning estimators were adopted for causal inference, support vector machine (SVM), deep learning (DL), and a hybrid super learner (SL) with deep learning (SDL), using SPSS. A comparative study is conducted between the proposed SVM, DL, and SDL representations using SPSS, and the benchmark results from Chernozhukov et al. (2018), which employed random forest, neural network, and regression trees with a random k-fold cross-fitting technique on the 401(k)-pension plan real data. The simulations show that DL with SPSS and the hybrid methods of DL and SL with SPSS outperform SVM with SPSS in terms of computational efficiency and the estimation quality, respectively.

Learning from "Silly" Questions Improves Large Language Models, But Only Slightly

Constructing high-quality Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) datasets is critical for the training of large language models (LLMs). Recent studies have shown that using data from a specific source, Ruozhiba, a Chinese website where users ask "silly" questions to better understand certain topics, can lead to better fine-tuning performance. This paper aims to explore some hidden factors: the potential interpretations of its success and a large-scale evaluation of the performance. First, we leverage GPT-4 to analyze the successful cases of Ruozhiba questions from the perspective of education, psychology, and cognitive science, deriving a set of explanatory rules. Then, we construct fine-tuning datasets by applying these rules to the MMLU training set. Surprisingly, our results indicate that rules can significantly improve model performance in certain tasks, while potentially diminishing performance on others. For example, SFT data generated following the "Counterintuitive Thinking" rule can achieve approximately a 5% improvement on the "Global Facts" task, whereas the "Blurring the Conceptual Boundaries" rule leads to a performance drop of 6.14% on the "Econometrics" task. In addition, for specific tasks, different rules tend to have a consistent impact on model performance. This suggests that the differences between the extracted rules are not as significant, and the effectiveness of the rules is relatively consistent across tasks. Our research highlights the importance of considering task diversity and rule applicability when constructing SFT datasets to achieve more comprehensive performance improvements.