Exploring How Fair Model Representations Relate to Fair Recommendations

One of the many fairness definitions pursued in recent recommender system research targets mitigating demographic information encoded in model representations. Models optimized for this definition are typically evaluated on how well demographic attributes can be classified given model representations, with the (implicit) assumption that this measure accurately reflects \textit{recommendation parity}, i.e., how similar recommendations given to different users are. We challenge this assumption by comparing the amount of demographic information encoded in representations with various measures of how the recommendations differ. We propose two new approaches for measuring how well demographic information can be classified given ranked recommendations. Our results from extensive testing of multiple models on one real and multiple synthetically generated datasets indicate that optimizing for fair representations positively affects recommendation parity, but also that evaluation at the representation level is not a good proxy for measuring this effect when comparing models. We also provide extensive insight into how recommendation-level fairness metrics behave for various models by evaluating their performances on numerous generated datasets with different properties.

UniScale: Synergistic Entire Space Data and Model Scaling for Search Ranking

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have inspired a surge of scaling law research in industrial search, advertising, and recommendation systems. However, existing approaches focus mainly on architectural improvements, overlooking the critical synergy between data and architecture design. We observe that scaling model parameters alone exhibits diminishing returns, i.e., the marginal gain in performance steadily declines as model size increases, and that the performance degradation caused by complex heterogeneous data distributions is often irrecoverable through model design alone. In this paper, we propose UniScale to address these limitation, a novel co-design framework that jointly optimizes data and architecture to unlock the full potential of model scaling, which includes two core parts: (1) ES$^3$ (Entire-Space Sample System), a high-quality data scaling system that expands the training signal beyond conventional sampling strategies from both intra-domain request contexts with global supervised signal constructed by hierarchical label attribution and cross-domain samples aligning with the essence of user decision under similar content exposure environment in search domain; and (2) HHSFT (Heterogeneous Hierarchical Sample Fusion Transformer), a novel architecture designed to effectively model the complex heterogeneous distribution of scaled data and to harness the entire space user behavior data with Heterogeneous Hierarchical Feature Interaction and Entire Space User Interest Fusion, thereby surpassing the performance ceiling of structure-only model tuning. Extensive experiments on large-scale real world E-commerce search platform demonstrate that UniScale achieves significant improvements through the synergistic co-design of data and architecture and exhibits clear scaling trends, delivering substantial gains in key business metrics.

Sequence-aware Large Language Models for Explainable Recommendation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential in generating natural language explanations for recommender systems. However, existing methods often overlook the sequential dynamics of user behavior and rely on evaluation metrics misaligned with practical utility. We propose SELLER (SEquence-aware LLM-based framework for Explainable Recommendation), which integrates explanation generation with utility-aware evaluation. SELLER combines a dual-path encoder-capturing both user behavior and item semantics with a Mixture-of-Experts adapter to align these signals with LLMs. A unified evaluation framework assesses explanations via both textual quality and their effect on recommendation outcomes. Experiments on public benchmarks show that SELLER consistently outperforms prior methods in explanation quality and real-world utility.

MedAidDialog: A Multilingual Multi-Turn Medical Dialogue Dataset for Accessible Healthcare

Conversational artificial intelligence has the potential to assist users in preliminary medical consultations, particularly in settings where access to healthcare professionals is limited. However, many existing medical dialogue systems operate in a single-turn question--answering paradigm or rely on template-based datasets, limiting conversational realism and multilingual applicability. In this work, we introduce MedAidDialog, a multilingual multi-turn medical dialogue dataset designed to simulate realistic physician--patient consultations. The dataset extends the MDDial corpus by generating synthetic consultations using large language models and further expands them into a parallel multilingual corpus covering seven languages: English, Hindi, Telugu, Tamil, Bengali, Marathi, and Arabic. Building on this dataset, we develop MedAidLM, a conversational medical model trained using parameter-efficient fine-tuning on quantized small language models, enabling deployment without high-end computational infrastructure. Our framework additionally incorporates optional patient pre-context information (e.g., age, gender, allergies) to personalize the consultation process. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed system can effectively perform symptom elicitation through multi-turn dialogue and generate diagnostic recommendations. We further conduct medical expert evaluation to assess the plausibility and coherence of the generated consultations.

Lightweight Fairness for LLM-Based Recommendations via Kernelized Projection and Gated Adapters

Large Language Models (LLMs) have introduced new capabilities to recommender systems, enabling dynamic, context-aware, and conversational recommendations. However, LLM-based recommender systems inherit and may amplify social biases embedded in their pre-training data, especially when demographic cues are present. Existing fairness solutions either require extra parameters fine-tuning, or suffer from optimization instability. We propose a lightweight and scalable bias mitigation method that combines a kernelized Iterative Null-space Projection (INLP) with a gated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) adapter. Our approach estimates a closed-form projection that removes single or multiple sensitive attributes from LLM representations with no additional trainable parameters. To preserve task utility, we introduce a two-level MoE adapter that selectively restores useful signals without reintroducing bias. Experiments on two public datasets show that our method reduces attribute leakage across multiple protected variables while maintaining competitive recommendation accuracy.

Adaptive Gaussian Process Search for Simulation-Based Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Prediction Models: Validation of the pmsims R Package

Background: Determining an adequate sample size is essential for developing reliable and generalisable clinical prediction models, yet practical guidance on selecting appropriate methods remains limited. Existing analytical and simulation-based approaches often rely on restrictive assumptions and focus on mean-based criteria. We present and validate pmsims, an R package that uses Gaussian process surrogate modelling to provide a flexible and computationally efficient simulation-based framework for sample size determination across diverse prediction settings. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive simulation study with two aims. First, we compared three search engines implemented in pmsims: a Gaussian process-based adaptive method, a deterministic bisection method, and a hybrid approach, across binary, continuous, and survival outcomes. Second, we benchmarked the best-performing pmsims engine against existing analytical (pmsampsize) and simulation-based (samplesizedev) methods, evaluating recommended sample sizes, computational time, and achieved performance on large independent validation datasets. Results: The Gaussian process-based method consistently produced the most stable sample size estimates, particularly in low-signal, high-dimensional settings. In benchmarking, pmsims achieved performance close to prespecified targets across all outcome types, matching simulation-based approaches and outperforming analytical methods in more challenging scenarios. Conclusions: pmsims provides an efficient and flexible framework for principled sample size planning in clinical prediction modelling, requiring fewer model evaluations than non-adaptive simulation approaches.

Reasoning over Semantic IDs Enhances Generative Recommendation

Recent advances in generative recommendation have leveraged pretrained LLMs by formulating sequential recommendation as autoregressive generation over a unified token space comprising language tokens and itemic identifiers, where each item is represented by a compact sequence of discrete tokens, namely Semantic IDs (SIDs). This SID-based formulation enables efficient decoding over large-scale item corpora and provides a natural interface for LLM-based recommenders to leverage rich world knowledge. Meanwhile, breakthroughs in LLM reasoning motivate reasoning-enhanced recommendation, yet effective reasoning over SIDs remains underexplored and challenging. Itemic tokens are not natively meaningful to LLMs; moreover, recommendation-oriented SID reasoning is hard to evaluate, making high-quality supervision scarce. To address these challenges, we propose SIDReasoner, a two-stage framework that elicits reasoning over SIDs by strengthening SID--language alignment to unlock transferable LLM reasoning, rather than relying on large amounts of recommendation-specific reasoning traces. Concretely, SIDReasoner first enhances SID-language alignment via multi-task training on an enriched SID-centered corpus synthesized by a stronger teacher model, grounding itemic tokens in diverse semantic and behavioral contexts. Building on this enhanced alignment, SIDReasoner further improves recommendation reasoning through outcome-driven reinforced optimization, which guides the model toward effective reasoning trajectories without requiring explicit reasoning annotations. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our reasoning-augmented SID-based generative recommendation. Beyond accuracy, the results highlight the broader potential of large reasoning models for generative recommendation, including improved interpretability and cross-domain generalization.

Machine Learning Models for the Early Detection of Burnout in Software Engineering: a Systematic Literature Review

Burnout is an occupational syndrome that, like many other professions, affects the majority of software engineers. Past research studies showed important trends, including an increasing use of machine learning techniques to allow for an early detection of burnout. This paper is a systematic literature review (SLR) of the research papers that proposed machine learning (ML) approaches, and focused on detecting burnout in software developers and IT professionals. Our objective is to review the accuracy and precision of the proposed ML techniques, and to formulate recommendations for future researchers interested to replicate or extend those studies. From our SLR we observed that a majority of primary studies focuses on detecting emotions or utilise emotional dimensions to detect or predict the presence of burnout. We also performed a cross-sectional study to detect which ML approach shows a better performance at detecting emotions; and which dataset has more potential and expressivity to capture emotions. We believe that, by identifying which ML tools and datasets show a better performance at detecting emotions, and indirectly at identifying burnout, our paper can be a valuable asset to progress in this important research direction.

GateSID: Adaptive Gating for Semantic-Collaborative Alignment in Cold-Start Recommendation

In cold-start scenarios, the scarcity of collaborative signals for new items exacerbates the Matthew effect, which undermines platform diversity and remains a persistent challenge in real-world recommender systems. Existing methods typically enhance collaborative signals with semantic information, but they often suffer from a collaborative-semantic tradeoff: collaborative signals are effective for popular items but unreliable for cold-start items, whereas over-reliance on semantic information may obscure meaningful collaborative differences. To address this issue, we propose GateSID, a framework that uses an adaptive gating network to dynamically balance semantic and collaborative signals according to item maturity. Specifically, we first discretize multimodal features into hierarchical Semantic IDs using Residual Quantized VAE. Building on this representation, we design two key components: (1) Gating-Fused Shared Attention, which fuses intra-modal attention distributions with item-level gating weights derived from embeddings and statistical features; and (2) Gate-Regulated Contrastive Alignment, which adaptively calibrates cross-modal alignment, enforcing stronger semantic-behavior consistency for cold-start items while relaxing the constraint for popular items to preserve reliable collaborative signals. Extensive offline experiments on large-scale industrial datasets demonstrate that GateSID consistently outperforms strong baselines. Online A/B tests further confirm its practical value, yielding +2.6% GMV, +1.1% CTR, and +1.6% orders with less than 5 ms additional latency.

Improving Safety Alignment via Balanced Direct Preference Optimization

With the rapid development and widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs), their potential safety risks have attracted widespread attention. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has been adopted to enhance the safety performance of LLMs. As a simple and effective alternative to RLHF, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is widely used for safety alignment. However, safety alignment still suffers from severe overfitting, which limits its actual performance. This paper revisits the overfitting phenomenon from the perspective of the model's comprehension of the training data. We find that the Imbalanced Preference Comprehension phenomenon exists between responses in preference pairs, which compromises the model's safety performance. To address this, we propose Balanced Direct Preference Optimization (B-DPO), which adaptively modulates optimization strength between preferred and dispreferred responses based on mutual information. A series of experimental results show that B-DPO can enhance the safety capability while maintaining the competitive general capabilities of LLMs on various mainstream benchmarks compared to state-of-the-art methods. \color{red}{Warning: This paper contains examples of harmful texts, and reader discretion is recommended.