RoboPIN: Grounded Embodied Reasoning via Pinned Chain-of-Thought

Embodied reasoning requires models to perceive task-relevant objects and spaces in physical environments and maintain consistent visual grounding throughout multi-step reasoning. However, current vision-language models rely on text-only or coordinate-augmented chain-of-thought, where entity references remain implicit and ambiguous. This may cause the reasoning process to decouple from visual evidence, entity references to drift across steps, and a causal disconnection between the reasoning trajectory and the final answer, with these problems further amplified in multi-view scenarios due to cross-view appearance changes. To address these issues, we propose Pinned Chain-of-Thought (\pincot{}), a structured reasoning paradigm that pins every reasoning step to visual evidence. \pincot{} introduces the concept of \reasoninganchor{}, which binds each task-relevant entity to a structured visual anchor with entity name, unique identity, view index, and spatial grounding, enabling consistent entity tracking across reasoning steps and views. We build a fully automated data generation pipeline to construct \dataset{}, a high-quality \pincot{}-formatted reasoning dataset. We then train \method{} through three-stage post-training that progressively injects embodied knowledge, structured reasoning ability, and process-supervised alignment, with rewards that directly constrain both anchor localization and identity consistency during reasoning. On 14 benchmarks covering embodied spatial reasoning, multi-view reasoning, and pointing, \method{} with only 4B parameters consistently outperforms 7B level open-source embodied models, achieving a 12\% average improvement over the strongest 7B baseline, Mimo-Embodied. Further analysis shows that \pincot{} improves grounding accuracy and cross-step identity consistency, validating the effectiveness of process supervision.

Embodied-R1.5: Evolving Physical Intelligence via Embodied Foundation Models

We introduce Embodied-R1.5, a unified Embodied Foundation Model (EFM) that integrates comprehensive embodied reasoning capabilities, spanning embodied cognition, task planning, correction, and pointing, within a single architecture toward general physical intelligence. Leveraging three automated data construction pipelines to significantly expand the data coverage of critical capabilities, we build a large-scale data system of over 15B tokens, and design a multi-task balanced RL recipe to alleviate heterogeneous task conflicts. We further introduce a Planner-Grounder-Corrector (PGC) closed-loop framework that enables a single model to autonomously execute and self-correct over long-horizon tasks. With only 8B parameters, Embodied-R1.5 achieves SOTA on 16 out of 24 embodied VLM benchmarks, surpassing leading models like Gemini-Robotics-ER-1.5 and GPT-5.4. Benefiting from the internalized embodied capabilities, Embodied-R1.5 can be fine-tuned into a VLA with only a small amount of data, outperforming leading VLA models like $π_{0.5}$ across 4 popular manipulation benchmark suites. We further conduct extensive zero-shot real-robot experiments, validating performance in instruction following, affordance grounding, articulated object manipulation, and long-horizon complex tasks, demonstrating strong generalization to the physical world. We open-source model weights, datasets, training code, and EmbodiedEvalKit, an evaluation framework tailored for embodied tasks, to facilitate future research in EFMs.

JT-SAFE-V2: Safety-by-Design Foundation Model with World-Context Data

We introduce JT-Safe-V2, a large language model designed to advance the safety and trustworthiness of foundation models, extending our previous JT-Safe model toward a more comprehensive safety-by-design paradigm. JT-Safe-V2 emphasizes the joint optimization of general intelligence and safety-by-design through several key innovations: enriching pre-training data with contextual world knowledge, high-certainty pre-training procedures, and safety strengthening post-training mechanisms for enterprise-oriented agentic capabilities. Building on these safety-enhanced foundation models, we propose Safe-MoMA (Safe Mixture of Models and Agents), a framework that enables traceable and efficient inference through the orchestrated deployment of multiple models and agents. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that JT-Safe-V2 achieves state-of-the-art performance across both general intelligence and safety benchmarks. Moreover, Safe-MoMA reduces inference costs by more than 30\% compared to using the largest standalone model baseline while maintaining comparable performance. To facilitate future research on safety-by-design foundation models, we publicly release the post-trained JT-Safe-V2-35B model checkpoint.

Dual-Enhancement Product Bundling: Bridging Interactive Graph and Large Language Model

Product bundling boosts e-commerce revenue by recommending complementary item combinations. However, existing methods face two critical challenges: (1) collaborative filtering approaches struggle with cold-start items owing to dependency on historical interactions, and (2) LLMs lack inherent capability to model interactive graph directly. To bridge this gap, we propose a dual-enhancement method that integrates interactive graph learning and LLM-based semantic understanding for product bundling. Our method introduces a graph-to-text paradigm, which leverages a Dynamic Concept Binding Mechanism (DCBM) to translate graph structures into natural language prompts. The DCBM plays a critical role in aligning domain-specific entities with LLM tokenization, enabling effective comprehension of combinatorial constraints. Experiments on three benchmarks (POG, POG_dense, Steam) demonstrate 6.3%-26.5% improvements over state-of-the-art baselines.

VoxelCodeBench: Benchmarking 3D World Modeling Through Code Generation

Evaluating code generation models for 3D spatial reasoning requires executing generated code in realistic environments and assessing outputs beyond surface-level correctness. We introduce a platform VoxelCode, for analyzing code generation capabilities for 3D understanding and environment creation. Our platform integrates natural language task specification, API-driven code execution in Unreal Engine, and a unified evaluation pipeline supporting both automated metrics and human assessment. To demonstrate its utility, we construct VoxelCodeBench, a benchmark of voxel manipulation tasks spanning three reasoning dimensions: symbolic interpretation, geometric construction, and artistic composition. Evaluating leading code generation models, we find that producing executable code is far easier than producing spatially correct outputs, with geometric construction and multi-object composition proving particularly challenging. By open-sourcing our platform and benchmark, we provide the community with extensible infrastructure for developing new 3D code generation benchmarks and probing spatial reasoning in future models.

The Rank and Gradient Lost in Non-stationarity: Sample Weight Decay for Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Reinforcement Learning

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) suffers from plasticity loss severely due to the nature of non-stationarity, which impairs the ability to adapt to new data and learn continually. Unfortunately, our understanding of how plasticity loss arises, dissipates, and can be dissolved remains limited to empirical findings, leaving the theoretical end underexplored.To address this gap, we study the plasticity loss problem from the theoretical perspective of network optimization. By formally characterizing the two culprit factors in online RL process: the non-stationarity of data distributions and the non-stationarity of targets induced by bootstrapping, our theory attributes the loss of plasticity to two mechanisms: the rank collapse of the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) Gram matrix and the $Θ(\frac{1}{k})$ decay of gradient magnitude. The first mechanism echoes prior empirical findings from the theoretical perspective and sheds light on the effects of existing methods, e.g., network reset, neuron recycle, and noise injection. Against this backdrop, we focus primarily on the second mechanism and aim to alleviate plasticity loss by addressing the gradient attenuation issue, which is orthogonal to existing methods. We propose Sample Weight Decay -- a lightweight method to restore gradient magnitude, as a general remedy to plasticity loss for deep RL methods based on experience replay. In experiments, we evaluate the efficacy of \methodName upon TD3, \myadded{Double DQN} and SAC with SimBa architecture in MuJoCo, \myadded{ALE} and DeepMind Control Suite tasks. The results demonstrate that \methodName effectively alleviates plasticity loss and consistently improves learning performance across various configurations of deep RL algorithms, UTD, network architectures, and environments, achieving SOTA performance on challenging DMC Humanoid tasks.

Rethink Efficiency Side of Neural Combinatorial Solver: An Offline and Self-Play Paradigm

We propose ECO, a versatile learning paradigm that enables efficient offline self-play for Neural Combinatorial Optimization (NCO). ECO addresses key limitations in the field through: 1) Paradigm Shift: Moving beyond inefficient online paradigms, we introduce a two-phase offline paradigm consisting of supervised warm-up and iterative Direct Preference Optimization (DPO); 2) Architecture Shift: We deliberately design a Mamba-based architecture to further enhance the efficiency in the offline paradigm; and 3) Progressive Bootstrapping: To stabilize training, we employ a heuristic-based bootstrapping mechanism that ensures continuous policy improvement during training. Comparison results on TSP and CVRP highlight that ECO performs competitively with up-to-date baselines, with significant advantage on the efficiency side in terms of memory utilization and training throughput. We provide further in-depth analysis on the efficiency, throughput and memory usage of ECO. Ablation studies show rationale behind our designs.

Understanding LLM Evaluator Behavior: A Structured Multi-Evaluator Framework for Merchant Risk Assessment

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as evaluators of reasoning quality, yet their reliability and bias in payments-risk settings remain poorly understood. We introduce a structured multi-evaluator framework for assessing LLM reasoning in Merchant Category Code (MCC)-based merchant risk assessment, combining a five-criterion rubric with Monte-Carlo scoring to evaluate rationale quality and evaluator stability. Five frontier LLMs generate and cross-evaluate MCC risk rationales under attributed and anonymized conditions. To establish a judge-independent reference, we introduce a consensus-deviation metric that eliminates circularity by comparing each judge's score to the mean of all other judges, yielding a theoretically grounded measure of self-evaluation and cross-model deviation. Results reveal substantial heterogeneity: GPT-5.1 and Claude 4.5 Sonnet show negative self-evaluation bias (-0.33, -0.31), while Gemini-2.5 Pro and Grok 4 display positive bias (+0.77, +0.71), with bias attenuating by 25.8 percent under anonymization. Evaluation by 26 payment-industry experts shows LLM judges assign scores averaging +0.46 points above human consensus, and that the negative bias of GPT-5.1 and Claude 4.5 Sonnet reflects closer alignment with human judgment. Ground-truth validation using payment-network data shows four models exhibit statistically significant alignment (Spearman rho = 0.56 to 0.77), confirming that the framework captures genuine quality. Overall, the framework provides a replicable basis for evaluating LLM-as-a-judge systems in payment-risk workflows and highlights the need for bias-aware protocols in operational financial settings.

Meta-Black-Box Optimization with Bi-Space Landscape Analysis and Dual-Control Mechanism for SAEA

Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms (SAEAs) are widely used for expensive Black-Box Optimization. However, their reliance on rigid, manually designed components such as infill criteria and evolutionary strategies during the search process limits their flexibility across tasks. To address these limitations, we propose Dual-Control Bi-Space Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm (DB-SAEA), a Meta-Black-Box Optimization (MetaBBO) framework tailored for multi-objective problems. DB-SAEA learns a meta-policy that jointly regulates candidate generation and infill criterion selection, enabling dual control. The bi-space Exploratory Landscape Analysis (ELA) module in DB-SAEA adopts an attention-based architecture to capture optimization states from both true and surrogate evaluation spaces, while ensuring scalability across problem dimensions, population sizes, and objectives. Additionally, we integrate TabPFN as the surrogate model for accurate and efficient prediction with uncertainty estimation. The framework is trained via reinforcement learning, leveraging parallel sampling and centralized training to enhance efficiency and transferability across tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that DB-SAEA not only outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across diverse benchmarks, but also exhibits strong zero-shot transfer to unseen tasks with higher-dimensional settings. This work introduces the first MetaBBO framework with dual-level control over SAEAs and a bi-space ELA that captures surrogate model information.

Key Decision-Makers in Multi-Agent Debates: Who Holds the Power?

Recent studies on LLM agent scaling have highlighted the potential of Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) to enhance reasoning abilities. However, the critical aspect of role allocation strategies remains underexplored. In this study, we demonstrate that allocating roles with differing viewpoints to specific positions significantly impacts MAD's performance in reasoning tasks. Specifically, we find a novel role allocation strategy, "Truth Last", which can improve MAD performance by up to 22% in reasoning tasks. To address the issue of unknown truth in practical applications, we propose the Multi-Agent Debate Consistency (MADC) strategy, which systematically simulates and optimizes its core mechanisms. MADC incorporates path consistency to assess agreement among independent roles, simulating the role with the highest consistency score as the truth. We validated MADC across a range of LLMs (9 models), including the DeepSeek-R1 Distilled Models, on challenging reasoning tasks. MADC consistently demonstrated advanced performance, effectively overcoming MAD's performance bottlenecks and providing a crucial pathway for further improvements in LLM agent scaling.