Edu-MMBias: A Three-Tier Multimodal Benchmark for Auditing Social Bias in Vision-Language Models under Educational Contexts

As Vision-Language Models (VLMs) become integral to educational decision-making, ensuring their fairness is paramount. However, current text-centric evaluations neglect the visual modality, leaving an unregulated channel for latent social biases. To bridge this gap, we present Edu-MMBias, a systematic auditing framework grounded in the tri-component model of attitudes from social psychology. This framework diagnoses bias across three hierarchical dimensions: cognitive, affective, and behavioral. Utilizing a specialized generative pipeline that incorporates a self-correct mechanism and human-in-the-loop verification, we synthesize contamination-resistant student profiles to conduct a holistic stress test on state-of-the-art VLMs. Our extensive audit reveals critical, counter-intuitive patterns: models exhibit a compensatory class bias favoring lower-status narratives while simultaneously harboring deep-seated health and racial stereotypes. Crucially, we find that visual inputs act as a safety backdoor, triggering a resurgence of biases that bypass text-based alignment safeguards and revealing a systematic misalignment between latent cognition and final decision-making. The contributions of this paper are available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/EduMMBias-63B2.

Unified Graph Prompt Learning via Low-Rank Graph Message Prompting

Graph Data Prompt (GDP), which introduces specific prompts in graph data for efficiently adapting pre-trained GNNs, has become a mainstream approach to graph fine-tuning learning problem. However, existing GDPs have been respectively designed for distinct graph component (e.g., node features, edge features, edge weights) and thus operate within limited prompt spaces for graph data. To the best of our knowledge, it still lacks a unified prompter suitable for targeting all graph components simultaneously. To address this challenge, in this paper, we first propose to reinterpret a wide range of existing GDPs from an aspect of Graph Message Prompt (GMP) paradigm. Based on GMP, we then introduce a novel graph prompt learning approach, termed Low-Rank GMP (LR-GMP), which leverages low-rank prompt representation to achieve an effective and compact graph prompt learning. Unlike traditional GDPs that target distinct graph components separately, LR-GMP concurrently performs prompting on all graph components in a unified manner, thereby achieving significantly superior generalization and robustness on diverse downstream tasks. Extensive experiments on several graph benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of our proposed LR-GMP.

SLOW: Strategic Logical-inference Open Workspace for Cognitive Adaptation in AI Tutoring

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable fluency in educational dialogues, most generative tutors primarily operate through intuitive, single-pass generation. This reliance on fast thinking precludes a dedicated reasoning workspace, forcing multiple diagnostic and strategic signals to be processed in a conflated manner. As a result, learner cognitive diagnosis, affective perception, and pedagogical decision-making become tightly entangled, which limits the tutoring system's capacity for deliberate instructional adaptation. We propose SLOW, a theory-informed tutoring framework that supports deliberate learner-state reasoning within a transparent decision workspace. Inspired by dual-process accounts of human tutoring, SLOW explicitly separates learner-state inference from instructional action selection. The framework integrates causal evidence parsing from learner language, fuzzy cognitive diagnosis with counterfactual stability analysis, and prospective affective reasoning to anticipate how instructional choices may influence learners' emotional trajectories. These signals are jointly considered to guide pedagogically and affectively aligned tutoring strategies. Evaluation using hybrid human-AI judgments demonstrates significant improvements in personalization, emotional sensitivity, and clarity. Ablation studies further confirm the necessity of each module, showcasing how SLOW enables interpretable and reliable intelligent tutoring through a visualized decision-making process. This work advances the interpretability and educational validity of LLM-based adaptive instruction.

KVSculpt: KV Cache Compression as Distillation

KV cache compression is critical for efficient long-context LLM inference. Approaches that reduce the per-pair footprint -- quantization and low-rank decomposition -- are orthogonal to those that reduce the sequence length of the cache. Along the sequence-length dimension, existing methods range from pure eviction -- selecting which KV pairs to keep -- to merging, which combines similar pairs into fewer ones. Both remain anchored to the original cache entries. We propose KVSculpt, which moves to the other end of this spectrum: instead of selecting or combining original pairs, we optimize a smaller set of unconstrained KV pairs in continuous embedding space to preserve each layer's attention behavior. Keys are optimized via L-BFGS and values are solved in closed form via least squares, alternating every few steps. On top of this, we introduce adaptive budget allocation, which uses a cheap pilot compression run to redistribute the compression budget across layers and KV heads based on per-component difficulty. On Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct with 2048-token contexts, KVSculpt reduces KL divergence by 3.5-4.1x compared to Select+Fit -- attention-score eviction with least-squares value fitting -- across compression ratios r in {0.3, 0.5, 0.7}. Adaptive allocation provides an additional 1.3x KL reduction at no extra inference cost. Analysis reveals that compression difficulty is highly non-uniform: per-layer pilot MSE varies by up to 100x across layers, and the two KV heads within a single layer can differ by up to 467x -- demonstrating that fine-grained budget allocation is essential.

DiscoUQ: Structured Disagreement Analysis for Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agent Ensembles

Multi-agent LLM systems, where multiple prompted instances of a language model independently answer questions, are increasingly used for complex reasoning tasks. However, existing methods for quantifying the uncertainty of their collective outputs rely on shallow voting statistics that discard the rich semantic information in agents' reasoning. We introduce DiscoUQ, a framework that extracts and leverages the structure of inter-agent disagreement -- both linguistic properties (evidence overlap, argument strength, divergence depth) and embedding geometry (cluster distances, dispersion, cohesion) -- to produce well-calibrated confidence estimates. We propose three methods of increasing complexity: DiscoUQ-LLM (logistic regression on LLM-extracted structure features), DiscoUQ-Embed (logistic regression on embedding geometry), and DiscoUQ-Learn (a neural network combining all features). Evaluated on four diverse benchmarks (StrategyQA, MMLU, TruthfulQA, ARC-Challenge) with a 5-agent system using Qwen3.5-27B, DiscoUQ-LLM achieves an average AUROC of 0.802, outperforming the best baseline (LLM Aggregator, 0.791) while being substantially better calibrated (ECE 0.036 vs. 0.098). The learned features generalize across benchmarks with near-zero performance degradation and provide the largest improvements where they are most needed: in the ambiguous "weak disagreement" tier where simple vote counting fails.

Disentangle-then-Align: Non-Iterative Hybrid Multimodal Image Registration via Cross-Scale Feature Disentanglement

Multimodal image registration is a fundamental task and a prerequisite for downstream cross-modal analysis. Despite recent progress in shared feature extraction and multi-scale architectures, two key limitations remain. First, some methods use disentanglement to learn shared features but mainly regularize the shared part, allowing modality-private cues to leak into the shared space. Second, most multi-scale frameworks support only a single transformation type, limiting their applicability when global misalignment and local deformation coexist. To address these issues, we formulate hybrid multimodal registration as jointly learning a stable shared feature space and a unified hybrid transformation. Based on this view, we propose HRNet, a Hybrid Registration Network that couples representation disentanglement with hybrid parameter prediction. A shared backbone with Modality-Specific Batch Normalization (MSBN) extracts multi-scale features, while a Cross-scale Disentanglement and Adaptive Projection (CDAP) module suppresses modality-private cues and projects shared features into a stable subspace for matching. Built on this shared space, a Hybrid Parameter Prediction Module (HPPM) performs non-iterative coarse-to-fine estimation of global rigid parameters and deformation fields, which are fused into a coherent deformation field. Extensive experiments on four multimodal datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on rigid and non-rigid registration tasks. The code is available at the project website.

HindSight: Evaluating LLM-Generated Research Ideas via Future Impact

Evaluating AI-generated research ideas typically relies on LLM judges or human panels -- both subjective and disconnected from actual research impact. We introduce HindSight, a time-split evaluation framework that measures idea quality by matching generated ideas against real future publications and scoring them by citation impact and venue acceptance. Using a temporal cutoff~$T$, we restrict an idea generation system to pre-$T$ literature, then evaluate its outputs against papers published in the subsequent 30 months. Experiments across 10 AI/ML research topics reveal a striking disconnect: LLM-as-Judge finds no significant difference between retrieval-augmented and vanilla idea generation ($p{=}0.584$), while HindSight shows the retrieval-augmented system produces 2.5$\times$ higher-scoring ideas ($p{<}0.001$). Moreover, HindSight scores are \emph{negatively} correlated with LLM-judged novelty ($ρ{=}{-}0.29$, $p{<}0.01$), suggesting that LLMs systematically overvalue novel-sounding ideas that never materialize in real research.

Senna-2: Aligning VLM and End-to-End Driving Policy for Consistent Decision Making and Planning

Vision-language models (VLMs) enhance the planning capability of end-to-end (E2E) driving policy by leveraging high-level semantic reasoning. However, existing approaches often overlook the dual-system consistency between VLM's high-level decision and E2E's low-level planning. As a result, the generated trajectories may misalign with the intended driving decisions, leading to weakened top-down guidance and decision-following ability of the system. To address this issue, we propose Senna-2, an advanced VLM-E2E driving policy that explicitly aligns the two systems for consistent decision-making and planning. Our method follows a consistency-oriented three-stage training paradigm. In the first stage, we conduct driving pre-training to achieve preliminary decision-making and planning, with a decision adapter transmitting VLM decisions to E2E policy in the form of implicit embeddings. In the second stage, we align the VLM and the E2E policy in an open-loop setting. In the third stage, we perform closed-loop alignment via bottom-up Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning in 3DGS environments to reinforce the safety and efficiency. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Senna-2 achieves superior dual-system consistency (19.3% F1 score improvement) and significantly enhances driving safety in both open-loop (5.7% FDE reduction) and closed-loop settings (30.6% AF-CR reduction).

One Model Is Enough: Native Retrieval Embeddings from LLM Agent Hidden States

LLM agents that retrieve external knowledge typically generate a search query as text, then run a separate embedding model to encode it into a vector. This two-model pipeline adds infrastructure complexity and latency, yet is redundant: the LLM already encodes the full conversational context in its hidden states. We propose equipping LLM agents with native retrieval capability by adding a lightweight projection head that maps hidden states directly into the embedding space, eliminating the need for a separate embedding model. Trained with a combination of alignment, contrastive, and rank distillation losses, our method retains 97\% of baseline retrieval quality while enabling the LLM agent to search with its own representations. Experiments on the QReCC conversational search benchmark show competitive Recall@10 and MRR@10 compared to the standard generate-then-encode pipeline, with systematic ablations confirming the contribution of each loss component.

DistillGuard: Evaluating Defenses Against LLM Knowledge Distillation

Knowledge distillation from proprietary LLM APIs poses a growing threat to model providers, yet defenses against this attack remain fragmented and unevaluated. We present DistillGuard, a framework for systematically evaluating output-level defenses against LLM knowledge distillation. We introduce a taxonomy of three defense categories -- output perturbation, data poisoning, and information throttling -- and evaluate nine defense configurations using a standardized pipeline with Qwen3-14B as teacher and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct as student across three benchmarks (MATH-500, HumanEval+, MT-Bench). Our results reveal that, in a same-family distillation setting against a naive attacker, most output-level defenses are surprisingly ineffective: paraphrasing-based perturbation barely degrades distilled student quality, and data poisoning primarily impairs conversational fluency while leaving task-specific capabilities intact. Only chain-of-thought removal substantially impairs mathematical reasoning (31.4\% vs.\ 67.8\% baseline), though code generation remains unaffected. These findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of distillation defenses is highly task-dependent and that current output-level approaches are insufficient to broadly prevent knowledge theft.