When AI Shows Its Work, Is It Actually Working? Step-Level Evaluation Reveals Frontier Language Models Frequently Bypass Their Own Reasoning

Language models increasingly "show their work" by writing step-by-step reasoning before answering. But are these reasoning steps genuinely used, or decorative narratives generated after the model has already decided? Consider: a medical AI writes "The patient's eosinophilia and livedo reticularis following catheterization suggest cholesterol embolization syndrome. Answer: B." If we remove the eosinophilia observation, does the diagnosis change? For most frontier models, the answer is no - the step was decorative. We introduce step-level evaluation: remove one reasoning sentence at a time and check whether the answer changes. This simple test requires only API access -- no model weights -- and costs approximately $1-2 per model per task. Testing 10 frontier models (GPT-5.4, Claude Opus, DeepSeek-V3.2, MiniMax-M2.5, Kimi-K2.5, and others) across sentiment, mathematics, topic classification, and medical QA (N=376-500 each), the majority produce decorative reasoning: removing any step changes the answer less than 17% of the time, while any single step alone recovers the answer. This holds even on math, where smaller models (0.8-8B) show genuine step dependence (55% necessity). Two models break the pattern: MiniMax-M2.5 on sentiment (37% necessity) and Kimi-K2.5 on topic classification (39%) - but both shortcut other tasks. Faithfulness is model-specific and task-specific. We also discover "output rigidity": on the same medical questions, Claude Opus writes 11 diagnostic steps while GPT-OSS-120B outputs a single token. Mechanistic analysis (attention patterns) confirms that CoT attention drops more in late layers for decorative tasks (33%) than faithful ones (20%). Implications: step-by-step explanations from frontier models are largely decorative, per-model per-domain evaluation is essential, and training objectives - not scale - determine whether reasoning is genuine.

ViviDoc: Generating Interactive Documents through Human-Agent Collaboration

Interactive documents help readers engage with complex ideas through dynamic visualization, interactive animations, and exploratory interfaces. However, creating such documents remains costly, as it requires both domain expertise and web development skills. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents can automate content creation, but directly applying them to interactive document generation often produces outputs that are difficult to control. To address this, we present ViviDoc, to the best of our knowledge the first work to systematically address interactive document generation. ViviDoc introduces a multi-agent pipeline (Planner, Styler, Executor, Evaluator). To make the generation process controllable, we provide three levels of human control: (1) the Document Specification (DocSpec) with SRTC Interaction Specifications (State, Render, Transition, Constraint) for structured planning, (2) a content-aware Style Palette for customizing writing and interaction styles, and (3) chat-based editing for iterative refinement. We also construct ViviBench, a benchmark of 101 topics derived from real-world interactive documents across 11 domains, along with a taxonomy of 8 interaction types and a 4-dimensional automated evaluation framework validated against human ratings (Pearson r > 0.84). Experiments show that ViviDoc achieves the highest content richness and interaction quality in both automated and human evaluation. A 12-person user study confirms that the system is easy to use, provides effective control over the generation process, and produces documents that satisfy users.

SozKZ: Training Efficient Small Language Models for Kazakh from Scratch

Kazakh, a Turkic language spoken by over 22 million people, remains underserved by existing multilingual language models, which allocate minimal capacity to low-resource languages and employ tokenizers ill-suited to agglutinative morphology. We present SozKZ, a family of Llama-architecture language models (50M-600M parameters) trained entirely from scratch on 9 billion tokens of Kazakh text with a dedicated 50K BPE tokenizer. We evaluate all models on three Kazakh benchmarks -- multiple-choice cultural QA, reading comprehension (Belebele), and topic classification (SIB-200) -- alongside five multilingual baselines ranging from 500M to 3B parameters. Our 600M model achieves 30.3% accuracy on Kazakh cultural QA, approaching the 32.0% of Llama-3.2-1B (2x larger), and 25.5% on SIB-200 topic classification, surpassing all evaluated multilingual models up to 2B parameters. We observe consistent scaling from 50M to 600M, with MC QA accuracy rising from 22.8% to 30.3%, suggesting that further scaling remains beneficial. These results demonstrate that small, dedicated models trained from scratch with a language-appropriate tokenizer offer a viable path for low-resource language technology, achieving competitive performance at a fraction of the computational cost. All models and the tokenizer are released under open licenses.

Disentangling Similarity and Relatedness in Topic Models

The recent advancement of large language models has spurred a growing trend of integrating pre-trained language model (PLM) embeddings into topic models, fundamentally reshaping how topics capture semantic structure. Classical models such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) derive topics from word co-occurrence statistics, whereas PLM-augmented models anchor these statistics to pre-trained embedding spaces, imposing a prior that also favours clustering of semantically similar words. This structural difference can be captured by the psycholinguistic dimensions of thematic relatedness and taxonomic similarity of the topic words. To disentangle these dimensions in topic models, we construct a large synthetic benchmark of word pairs using LLM-based annotation to train a neural scoring function. We apply this scorer to a comprehensive evaluation across multiple corpora and topic model families, revealing that different model families capture distinct semantic structure in their topics. We further demonstrate that similarity and relatedness scores successfully predict downstream task performance depending on task requirements. This paper establishes similarity and relatedness as essential axes for topic model evaluation and provides a reliable pipeline for characterising these across model families and corpora.

LLM Benchmark-User Need Misalignment for Climate Change

Climate change is a major socio-scientific issue shapes public decision-making and policy discussions. As large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as an interface for accessing climate knowledge, whether existing benchmarks reflect user needs is critical for evaluating LLM in real-world settings. We propose a Proactive Knowledge Behaviors Framework that captures the different human-human and human-AI knowledge seeking and provision behaviors. We further develop a Topic-Intent-Form taxonomy and apply it to analyze climate-related data representing different knowledge behaviors. Our results reveal a substantial mismatch between current benchmarks and real-world user needs, while knowledge interaction patterns between humans and LLMs closely resemble those in human-human interactions. These findings provide actionable guidance for benchmark design, RAG system development, and LLM training. Code is available at https://github.com/OuchengLiu/LLM-Misalign-Climate-Change.

From Content to Audience: A Multimodal Annotation Framework for Broadcast Television Analytics

Automated semantic annotation of broadcast television content presents distinctive challenges, combining structured audiovisual composition, domain-specific editorial patterns, and strict operational constraints. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong general-purpose video understanding capabilities, their comparative effectiveness across pipeline architectures and input configurations in broadcast-specific settings remains empirically undercharacterized. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of multimodal annotation pipelines applied to broadcast television news in the Italian setting. We construct a domain-specific benchmark of clips labeled across four semantic dimensions: visual environment classification, topic classification, sensitive content detection, and named entity recognition. Two different pipeline architectures are evaluated across nine frontier models, including Gemini 3.0 Pro, LLaMA 4 Maverick, Qwen-VL variants, and Gemma 3, under progressively enriched input strategies combining visual signals, automatic speech recognition, speaker diarization, and metadata. Experimental results demonstrate that gains from video input are strongly model-dependent: larger models effectively leverage temporal continuity, while smaller models show performance degradation under extended multimodal context, likely due to token overload. Beyond benchmarking, the selected pipeline is deployed on 14 full broadcast episodes, with minute-level annotations integrated with normalized audience measurement data provided by an Italian media company. This integration enables correlational analysis of topic-level audience sensitivity and generational engagement divergence, demonstrating the operational viability of the proposed framework for content-based audience analytics.

An Experimental Comparison of the Most Popular Approaches to Fake News Detection

In recent years, fake news detection has received increasing attention in public debate and scientific research. Despite advances in detection techniques, the production and spread of false information have become more sophisticated, driven by Large Language Models (LLMs) and the amplification power of social media. We present a critical assessment of 12 representative fake news detection approaches, spanning traditional machine learning, deep learning, transformers, and specialized cross-domain architectures. We evaluate these methods on 10 publicly available datasets differing in genre, source, topic, and labeling rationale. We address text-only English fake news detection as a binary classification task by harmonizing labels into "Real" and "Fake" to ensure a consistent evaluation protocol. We acknowledge that label semantics vary across datasets and that harmonization inevitably removes such semantic nuances. Each dataset is treated as a distinct domain. We conduct in-domain, multi-domain and cross-domain experiments to simulate real-world scenarios involving domain shift and out-of-distribution data. Fine-tuned models perform well in-domain but struggle to generalize. Cross-domain architectures can reduce this gap but are data-hungry, while LLMs offer a promising alternative through zero- and few-shot learning. Given inherent dataset confounds and possible pre-training exposure, results should be interpreted as robustness evaluations within this English, text-only protocol.

Conversation Tree Architecture: A Structured Framework for Context-Aware Multi-Branch LLM Conversations

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for extended, multi-topic conversations, yet the flat, append-only structure of current conversation interfaces introduces a fundamental limitation: all context accumulates in a single unbounded window, causing topically distinct threads to bleed into one another and progressively degrade response quality. We term this failure mode logical context poisoning. In this paper, we introduce the Conversation Tree Architecture (CTA), a hierarchical framework that organizes LLM conversations as trees of discrete, context-isolated nodes. Each node maintains its own local context window; structured mechanisms govern how context flows between parent and child nodes, downstream on branch creation and upstream on branch deletion. We additionally introduce volatile nodes, transient branches whose local context must be selectively merged upward or permanently discarded before purging. We formalize the architecture's primitives, characterize the open design problems in context flow, relate our framework to prior work in LLM memory management, and describe a working prototype implementation. The CTA provides a principled foundation for structured conversational context management and extends naturally to multi-agent settings.

GUIDE: Resolving Domain Bias in GUI Agents through Real-Time Web Video Retrieval and Plug-and-Play Annotation

Large vision-language models have endowed GUI agents with strong general capabilities for interface understanding and interaction. However, due to insufficient exposure to domain-specific software operation data during training, these agents exhibit significant domain bias - they lack familiarity with the specific operation workflows (planning) and UI element layouts (grounding) of particular applications, limiting their real-world task performance. In this paper, we present GUIDE (GUI Unbiasing via Instructional-Video Driven Expertise), a training-free, plug-and-play framework that resolves GUI agent domain bias by autonomously acquiring domain-specific expertise from web tutorial videos through a retrieval-augmented automated annotation pipeline. GUIDE introduces two key innovations. First, a subtitle-driven Video-RAG pipeline unlocks video semantics through subtitle analysis, performing progressive three-stage retrieval - domain classification, topic extraction, and relevance matching - to identify task-relevant tutorial videos. Second, a fully automated annotation pipeline built on an inverse dynamics paradigm feeds consecutive keyframes enhanced with UI element detection into VLMs, inferring the required planning and grounding knowledge that are injected into the agent's corresponding modules to address both manifestations of domain bias. Extensive experiments on OSWorld demonstrate GUIDE's generality as a plug-and-play component for both multi-agent systems and single-model agents. It consistently yields over 5% improvements and reduces execution steps - without modifying any model parameters or architecture - validating GUIDE as an architecture-agnostic enhancement to bridge GUI agent domain bias.

Knowledge Access Beats Model Size: Memory Augmented Routing for Persistent AI Agents

Production AI agents frequently receive user-specific queries that are highly repetitive, with up to 47\% being semantically similar to prior interactions, yet each query is typically processed with the same computational cost. We argue that this redundancy can be exploited through conversational memory, transforming repetition from a cost burden into an efficiency advantage. We propose a memory-augmented inference framework in which a lightweight 8B-parameter model leverages retrieved conversational context to answer all queries via a low-cost inference path. Without any additional training or labeled data, this approach achieves 30.5\% F1, recovering 69\% of the performance of a full-context 235B model while reducing effective cost by 96\%. Notably, a 235B model without memory (13.7\% F1) underperforms even the standalone 8B model (15.4\% F1), indicating that for user-specific queries, access to relevant knowledge outweighs model scale. We further analyze the role of routing and confidence. At practical confidence thresholds, routing alone already directs 96\% of queries to the small model, but yields poor accuracy (13.0\% F1) due to confident hallucinations. Memory does not substantially alter routing decisions; instead, it improves correctness by grounding responses in retrieved user-specific information. As conversational memory accumulates over time, coverage of recurring topics increases, further narrowing the performance gap. We evaluate on 152 LoCoMo questions (Qwen3-8B/235B) and 500 LongMemEval questions. Incorporating hybrid retrieval (BM25 + cosine similarity) improves performance by an additional +7.7 F1, demonstrating that retrieval quality directly enhances end-to-end system performance. Overall, our results highlight that memory, rather than model size, is the primary driver of accuracy and efficiency in persistent AI agents.