Enhancing Multimodal In-Context Learning via Inductive-Deductive Reasoning

In-context learning (ICL) allows large models to adapt to tasks using a few examples, yet its extension to vision-language models (VLMs) remains fragile. Our analysis reveals that the fundamental limitation lies in an inductive gap, models often produce correct answers from flawed reasoning, while struggling to extract consistent rules across demonstrations. This gap is further exacerbated by two visual-level obstacles: an overwhelming proportion of redundant visual tokens that obscure textual cues, and a skewed attention distribution that favors the initial image at the expense of subsequent context. To address these issues, we introduce a framework that restructures multimodal ICL as a principled inductive-deductive process. The framework incorporates a similarity-based visual token compression module to filter out redundant patches, a dynamic attention rebalancing mechanism to distribute focus equitably across all images, and a chain-of-thought paradigm that explicitly guides the model to analyze individual examples, derive a generalizable rule, and then apply it to the query. An auxiliary learning pipeline combines supervised fine-tuning with reinforcement learning using verifiable rewards to reinforce faithful citation and noise filtering. Evaluations across eight benchmarks covering visual perception, logical reasoning, STEM problems, and sarcasm detection demonstrate consistent and significant improvements over standard ICL baselines for multiple open-source VLMs, highlighting the potential of equipping models with genuine inductive capabilities in multimodal settings.

On the Trainability of Masked Diffusion Language Models via Blockwise Locality

Masked diffusion language models (MDMs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to standard autoregressive large language models (AR-LLMs), yet their optimization can be substantially less stable. We study blockwise MDMs and compare them with AR-LLMs on three controlled tasks that stress different aspects of structured generation: in-context linear regression, graph path-finding, and Sudoku solving. We find that standard random-masking MDMs fail to reliably learn linear regression, exhibit high variance training dynamics on graph path-finding, while outperforming AR-LLMs on Sudoku. To mitigate these instabilities, we propose two locality aware blockwise models, namely Jigsaw and Scatter, that inject left-to-right inductive bias by enforcing autoregressive locality within blocks while preserving iterative refinement at the block level. Empirically, Jigsaw matches AR-LLM stability on linear regression and remains strong on Sudoku, while Scatter retains diffusion's planning advantage on path-finding. Our results indicate that standard random-masking MDMs, even with blockwise variants, may be a suboptimal instantiation of diffusion LMs for ordered generation, motivating models beyond random masking.

The GaoYao Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Multilingual and Multicultural Abilities of Large Language Models

Evaluating the multilingual and multicultural capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for their global utility. However, current benchmarks face three critical limitations: (1) fragmented evaluation dimensions that often neglect deep cultural nuances; (2) insufficient language coverage in subjective tasks relying on low-quality machine translation; and (3) shallow analysis that lacks diagnostic depth beyond simple rankings. To address these, we introduce GaoYao, a comprehensive benchmark with 182.3k samples, 26 languages and 51 nations/areas. First, GaoYao proposes a unified framework categorizing evaluation tasks into three cultural layers (General Multilingual, Cross-cultural, Monocultural) and nine cognitive sub-layers. Second, we achieve native-quality expansion by leveraging experts to rigorously localize subjective benchmarks into 19 languages and synthesizing cross-cultural test sets for 34 cultures, surpassing prior coverage by up to 111%. Third, we conduct an in-depth diagnostic analysis on 20+ flagship and compact LLMs. Our findings reveal significant geographical performance disparities and distinct gaps between tasks, offering a reliable map for future work. We release the benchmark (https://github.com/lunyiliu/GaoYao).

SEA-Eval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Self-Evolving Agents Beyond Episodic Assessment

Current LLM-based agents demonstrate strong performance in episodic task execution but remain constrained by static toolsets and episodic amnesia, failing to accumulate experience across task boundaries. This paper presents the first formal definition of the Self-Evolving Agent (SEA), formalizes the Evolutionary Flywheel as its minimal sufficient architecture, and introduces SEA-Eval -- the first benchmark designed specifically for evaluating SEAs. Grounded in Flywheel theory, SEA-Eval establishes $SR$ and $T$ as primary metrics and enables through sequential task stream design the independent quantification of evolutionary gain, evolutionary stability, and implicit alignment convergence. Empirical evaluation reveals that under identical success rates, token consumption differs by up to 31.2$\times$ across frameworks, with divergent evolutionary trajectories under sequential analysis -- demonstrating that success rate alone creates a capability illusion and that the sequential convergence of $T$ is the key criterion for distinguishing genuine evolution from pseudo-evolution.

RubricEval: A Rubric-Level Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Judges in Instruction Following

Rubric-based evaluation has become a prevailing paradigm for evaluating instruction following in large language models (LLMs). Despite its widespread use, the reliability of these rubric-level evaluations remains unclear, calling for meta-evaluation. However, prior meta-evaluation efforts largely focus on the response level, failing to assess the fine-grained judgment accuracy that rubric-based evaluation relies on. To bridge this gap, we introduce RubricEval. Our benchmark features: (1) the first rubric-level meta-evaluation benchmark for instruction following, (2) diverse instructions and responses spanning multiple categories and model sources, and (3) a substantial set of 3,486 quality-controlled instances, along with Easy/Hard subsets that better differentiates judge performance. Our experiments reveal that rubric-level judging remains far from solved: even GPT-4o, a widely adopted judge in instruction-following benchmarks, achieves only 55.97% on Hard subset. Considering evaluation paradigm, rubric-level evaluation outperforms checklist-level, explicit reasoning improves accuracy, and both together reduce inter-judge variance. Through our established rubric taxonomy, we further identify common failure modes and offer actionable insights for reliable instruction-following evaluation.

From AI Assistant to AI Scientist: Autonomous Discovery of LLM-RL Algorithms with LLM Agents

Discovering improved policy optimization algorithms for language models remains a costly manual process requiring repeated mechanism-level modification and validation. Unlike simple combinatorial code search, this problem requires searching over algorithmic mechanisms tightly coupled with training dynamics while reusing empirical evidence across iterations. We propose POISE, a closed-loop framework for automated discovery of policy optimization algorithms for language models. POISE maintains a structured, genealogically linked archive linking proposals, executable implementations, standardized evaluations, and natural-language reflections to support evidence-driven iteration. In mathematical reasoning experiments starting from GRPO, POISE evaluates 64 candidate algorithms and discovers improved mechanisms, including analytic-variance scaling and validity masking. The best variant improves weighted Overall from 47.8 to 52.5 (+4.6) and increases AIME25 pass@32 from 26.7% to 43.3%, demonstrating the feasibility of automated policy optimization discovery while supporting interpretable design principles.

Thinking with Constructions: A Benchmark and Policy Optimization for Visual-Text Interleaved Geometric Reasoning

Geometric reasoning inherently requires "thinking with constructions" -- the dynamic manipulation of visual aids to bridge the gap between problem conditions and solutions. However, existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are largely confined to passive inference with static diagrams, lacking the strategic knowledge of when and how to construct effective visual aids. To address this, we present a framework for Visual-Text Interleaved Chain-of-Thought. We first introduce GeoAux-Bench, the first benchmark comprising 4,334 geometry problems that aligns textual construction steps with ground-truth visual updates. Our pilot study reveals two critical insights: (1) interleaved visual-textual aids outperform single-modality counterparts, which cannot losslessly capture geometric synergy; and (2) valid constructions act as entropy reducers, strongly correlating with reduced reasoning perplexity. Building on these findings, we propose Action Applicability Policy Optimization (A2PO), a reinforcement learning paradigm for mastering strategic construction. A2PO employs Adaptive Reward Shaping to regulate the timing and quality of visual aids via counterfactual sampling to distinguish necessary from redundant constructions. Experiments demonstrate our approach enables MLLMs to leverage selective auxiliary constructions, yielding a 3.51% gain over strong baselines. Code and data are available on GitHub.

DIVE: Scaling Diversity in Agentic Task Synthesis for Generalizable Tool Use

Recent work synthesizes agentic tasks for post-training tool-using LLMs, yet robust generalization under shifts in tasks and toolsets remains an open challenge. We trace this brittleness to insufficient diversity in synthesized tasks. Scaling diversity is difficult because training requires tasks to remain executable and verifiable, while generalization demands coverage of diverse tool types, toolset combinations, and heterogeneous tool-use patterns. We propose DIVE, an evidence-driven recipe that inverts synthesis order, executing diverse, real-world tools first and reverse-deriving tasks strictly entailed by the resulting traces, thereby providing grounding by construction. DIVE scales structural diversity along two controllable axes, tool-pool coverage and per-task toolset variety, and an Evidence Collection--Task Derivation loop further induces rich multi-step tool-use patterns across 373 tools in five domains. Training Qwen3-8B on DIVE data (48k SFT + 3.2k RL) improves by +22 average points across 9 OOD benchmarks and outperforms the strongest 8B baseline by +68. Remarkably, controlled scaling analysis reveals that diversity scaling consistently outperforms quantity scaling for OOD generalization, even with 4x less data.

CODA: Difficulty-Aware Compute Allocation for Adaptive Reasoning

The emergence of large reasoning models demonstrates that scaling inference-time compute significantly enhances performance on complex tasks. However, it often falls into another trap: overthinking simple problems, where repetitive rationales yield minimal accuracy gains at a disproportionately high cost. This motivates adaptive reasoning: dynamically aligning reasoning depth with instance difficulty. In this paper, we study adaptive reasoning from an optimality perspective, formalizing it as a utility maximization problem where tokens are allocated until the marginal accuracy gain falls below the incremental cost. Based on this, we propose CODA (Compute Allocation by Difficulty Awareness), a method that operationalizes this principle by allocating tokens via a policy-internal difficulty signal. Specifically, CODA estimates difficulty via group-based rollouts and maps it to two non-negative gates that modulate a length-dependent shaping term on top of the binary base reward. The easy-side gate penalizes verbosity on simple instances, whereas the hard-side gate encourages more deliberative rollouts on challenging ones. Across model scales and benchmarks, CODA achieves adaptive reasoning without external annotations or user-provided budgets: on easy tasks, CODA reduces token costs by over 60% while maintaining strong accuracy, whereas on hard tasks it incentivizes more deliberative rollouts to maximize performance.

HER: Human-like Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning for LLM Role-playing

LLM role-playing, i.e., using LLMs to simulate specific personas, has emerged as a key capability in various applications, such as companionship, content creation, and digital games. While current models effectively capture character tones and knowledge, simulating the inner thoughts behind their behaviors remains a challenge. Towards cognitive simulation in LLM role-play, previous efforts mainly suffer from two deficiencies: data with high-quality reasoning traces, and reliable reward signals aligned with human preferences. In this paper, we propose HER, a unified framework for cognitive-level persona simulation. HER introduces dual-layer thinking, which distinguishes characters' first-person thinking from LLMs' third-person thinking. To bridge these gaps, we curate reasoning-augmented role-playing data via reverse engineering and construct human-aligned principles and reward models. Leveraging these resources, we train \method models based on Qwen3-32B via supervised and reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, our models significantly outperform the Qwen3-32B baseline, achieving a 30.26 improvement on the CoSER benchmark and a 14.97 gain on the Minimax Role-Play Bench. Our datasets, principles, and models will be released to facilitate future research.