Improving Factuality of Abstractive Summarization without Sacrificing Summary Quality

Improving factual consistency of abstractive summarization has been a widely studied topic. However, most of the prior works on training factuality-aware models have ignored the negative effect it has on summary quality. We propose EFACTSUM (i.e., Effective Factual Summarization), a candidate summary generation and ranking technique to improve summary factuality without sacrificing summary quality. We show that using a contrastive learning framework with our refined candidate summaries leads to significant gains on both factuality and similarity-based metrics. Specifically, we propose a ranking strategy in which we effectively combine two metrics, thereby preventing any conflict during training. Models trained using our approach show up to 6 points of absolute improvement over the base model with respect to FactCC on XSUM and 11 points on CNN/DM, without negatively affecting either similarity-based metrics or absractiveness.

Getting Sick After Seeing a Doctor? Diagnosing and Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in Event Temporal Reasoning

Event temporal reasoning aims at identifying the temporal relations between two or more events. However, knowledge conflicts arise when there is a mismatch between the actual temporal relations of events in the context and the prior knowledge or biases learned by the model. We first systematically define distinct kinds of bias in event temporal reasoning, which include event relation prior bias, tense bias, narrative bias, and dependency bias, as indicators to study knowledge conflicts. To mitigate such event-related knowledge conflict, we introduce a Counterfactual Data Augmentation based method that can be applied to both Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) either as additional training data or demonstrations for In-Context Learning. Experiments suggest the importance of mitigating knowledge conflicts in event temporal reasoning tasks for reducing hallucination and highlight the potential of counterfactual data augmentation for improving model performance.

Adversarial Demonstration Attacks on Large Language Models

With the emergence of more powerful large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and GPT-4, in-context learning (ICL) has gained significant prominence in leveraging these models for specific tasks by utilizing data-label pairs as precondition prompts. While incorporating demonstrations can greatly enhance the performance of LLMs across various tasks, it may introduce a new security concern: attackers can manipulate only the demonstrations without changing the input to perform an attack. In this paper, we investigate the security concern of ICL from an adversarial perspective, focusing on the impact of demonstrations. We propose an ICL attack based on TextAttack, which aims to only manipulate the demonstration without changing the input to mislead the models. Our results demonstrate that as the number of demonstrations increases, the robustness of in-context learning would decreases. Furthermore, we also observe that adversarially attacked demonstrations exhibit transferability to diverse input examples. These findings emphasize the critical security risks associated with ICL and underscore the necessity for extensive research on the robustness of ICL, particularly given its increasing significance in the advancement of LLMs.

From Shortcuts to Triggers: Backdoor Defense with Denoised PoE

Language models are often at risk of diverse backdoor attacks, especially data poisoning. Thus, it is important to investigate defense solutions for addressing them. Existing backdoor defense methods mainly focus on backdoor attacks with explicit triggers, leaving a universal defense against various backdoor attacks with diverse triggers largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end ensemble-based backdoor defense framework, DPoE (Denoised Product-of-Experts), which is inspired by the shortcut nature of backdoor attacks, to defend various backdoor attacks. DPoE consists of two models: a shallow model that captures the backdoor shortcuts and a main model that is prevented from learning the backdoor shortcuts. To address the label flip caused by backdoor attackers, DPoE incorporates a denoising design. Experiments on SST-2 dataset show that DPoE significantly improves the defense performance against various types of backdoor triggers including word-level, sentence-level, and syntactic triggers. Furthermore, DPoE is also effective under a more challenging but practical setting that mixes multiple types of trigger.

Instructions as Backdoors: Backdoor Vulnerabilities of Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models

Instruction-tuned models are trained on crowdsourcing datasets with task instructions to achieve superior performance. However, in this work we raise security concerns about this training paradigm. Our studies demonstrate that an attacker can inject backdoors by issuing very few malicious instructions among thousands of gathered data and control model behavior through data poisoning, without even the need of modifying data instances or labels themselves. Through such instruction attacks, the attacker can achieve over 90% attack success rate across four commonly used NLP datasets, and cause persistent backdoors that are easily transferred to 15 diverse datasets zero-shot. In this way, the attacker can directly apply poisoned instructions designed for one dataset on many other datasets. Moreover, the poisoned model cannot be cured by continual learning. Lastly, instruction attacks show resistance to existing inference-time defense. These findings highlight the need for more robust defenses against data poisoning attacks in instructiontuning models and underscore the importance of ensuring data quality in instruction crowdsourcing.

A Causal View of Entity Bias in (Large) Language Models

Entity bias widely affects pretrained (large) language models, causing them to excessively rely on (biased) parametric knowledge to make unfaithful predictions. Although causality-inspired methods have shown great potential to mitigate entity bias, it is hard to precisely estimate the parameters of underlying causal models in practice. The rise of black-box LLMs also makes the situation even worse, because of their inaccessible parameters and uncalibrated logits. To address these problems, we propose a specific structured causal model (SCM) whose parameters are comparatively easier to estimate. Building upon this SCM, we propose causal intervention techniques to mitigate entity bias for both white-box and black-box settings. The proposed causal intervention perturbs the original entity with neighboring entities. This intervention reduces specific biasing information pertaining to the original entity while still preserving sufficient common predictive information from similar entities. When evaluated on the relation extraction task, our training-time intervention significantly improves the F1 score of RoBERTa by 5.7 points on EntRED, in which spurious shortcuts between entities and labels are removed. Meanwhile, our in-context intervention effectively reduces the knowledge conflicts between parametric knowledge and contextual knowledge in GPT-3.5 and improves the F1 score by 9.14 points on a challenging test set derived from Re-TACRED.

Bridging Continuous and Discrete Spaces: Interpretable Sentence Representation Learning via Compositional Operations

Traditional sentence embedding models encode sentences into vector representations to capture useful properties such as the semantic similarity between sentences. However, in addition to similarity, sentence semantics can also be interpreted via compositional operations such as sentence fusion or difference. It is unclear whether the compositional semantics of sentences can be directly reflected as compositional operations in the embedding space. To more effectively bridge the continuous embedding and discrete text spaces, we explore the plausibility of incorporating various compositional properties into the sentence embedding space that allows us to interpret embedding transformations as compositional sentence operations. We propose InterSent, an end-to-end framework for learning interpretable sentence embeddings that supports compositional sentence operations in the embedding space. Our method optimizes operator networks and a bottleneck encoder-decoder model to produce meaningful and interpretable sentence embeddings. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the interpretability of sentence embeddings on four textual generation tasks over existing approaches while maintaining strong performance on traditional semantic similarity tasks.

EntRED: Benchmarking Relation Extraction with Fewer Shortcuts

Entity names play an effective role in relation extraction (RE) and often influence model performance. As a result, the entity names in the benchmarks' test sets significantly influence the evaluation of RE models. In this work, we find that the standard RE benchmarks' datasets have a large portion of incorrect entity annotations, low entity name diversity, and are prone to have shortcuts from entity names to ground-truth relations. These issues make the standard benchmarks far from reflecting the real-world scenarios. Hence, in this work, we present EntRED, a challenging RE benchmark with reduced shortcuts and higher diversity of entities. To build EntRED, we propose an end-to-end entity replacement pipeline based on causal inference (CI): ERIC. ERIC performs type-constrained replacements on entities to reduce the shortcuts from entity bias to ground-truth relations. ERIC applies CI in two aspects: 1) targeting the instances that need entity replacements, and 2) determining the candidate entities for replacements. We apply ERIC on TACRED to produce EntRED. Our EntRED evaluates whether the RE model can correctly extract the relations from the text instead of relying on entity bias. Empirical results reveal that even the strong RE model has a significant performance drop on EntRED, which memorizes entity name patterns instead of reasoning from the textual context. We release ERIC's source code and the EntRED benchmark at https://github.com/wangywUST/ENTRED.

Take a Break in the Middle: Investigating Subgoals towards Hierarchical Script Generation

Goal-oriented Script Generation is a new task of generating a list of steps that can fulfill the given goal. In this paper, we propose to extend the task from the perspective of cognitive theory. Instead of a simple flat structure, the steps are typically organized hierarchically - Human often decompose a complex task into subgoals, where each subgoal can be further decomposed into steps. To establish the benchmark, we contribute a new dataset, propose several baseline methods, and set up evaluation metrics. Both automatic and human evaluation verify the high-quality of dataset, as well as the effectiveness of incorporating subgoals into hierarchical script generation. Furthermore, We also design and evaluate the model to discover subgoal, and find that it is a bit more difficult to decompose the goals than summarizing from segmented steps.

Context-faithful Prompting for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) encode parametric knowledge about world facts and have shown remarkable performance in knowledge-driven NLP tasks. However, their reliance on parametric knowledge may cause them to overlook contextual cues, leading to incorrect predictions in context-sensitive NLP tasks (e.g., knowledge acquisition tasks). In this paper, we seek to assess and enhance LLMs' contextual faithfulness in two aspects: knowledge conflict and prediction with abstention. We demonstrate that LLMs' faithfulness can be significantly improved using carefully designed prompting strategies. In particular, we identify opinion-based prompts and counterfactual demonstrations as the most effective methods. Opinion-based prompts reframe the context as a narrator's statement and inquire about the narrator's opinions, while counterfactual demonstrations use instances containing false facts to improve faithfulness in knowledge conflict situations. Neither technique requires additional training. We conduct experiments on three datasets of two standard NLP tasks, machine reading comprehension and relation extraction, and the results demonstrate significant improvement in faithfulness to contexts.