Finite-Sample Analysis of Proximal Gradient TD Algorithms

In this paper, we analyze the convergence rate of the gradient temporal difference learning (GTD) family of algorithms. Previous analyses of this class of algorithms use ODE techniques to prove asymptotic convergence, and to the best of our knowledge, no finite-sample analysis has been done. Moreover, there has been not much work on finite-sample analysis for convergent off-policy reinforcement learning algorithms. In this paper, we formulate GTD methods as stochastic gradient algorithms w.r.t.~a primal-dual saddle-point objective function, and then conduct a saddle-point error analysis to obtain finite-sample bounds on their performance. Two revised algorithms are also proposed, namely projected GTD2 and GTD2-MP, which offer improved convergence guarantees and acceleration, respectively. The results of our theoretical analysis show that the GTD family of algorithms are indeed comparable to the existing LSTD methods in off-policy learning scenarios.

Deep Bayesian Quadrature Policy Optimization

We study the problem of obtaining accurate policy gradient estimates. This challenge manifests in how best to estimate the policy gradient integral equation using a finite number of samples. Monte-Carlo methods have been the default choice for this purpose, despite suffering from high variance in the gradient estimates. On the other hand, more sample efficient alternatives like Bayesian quadrature methods are less scalable due to their high computational complexity. In this work, we propose deep Bayesian quadrature policy gradient (DBQPG), a computationally efficient high-dimensional generalization of Bayesian quadrature, to estimate the policy gradient integral equation. We show that DBQPG can substitute Monte-Carlo estimation in policy gradient methods, and demonstrate its effectiveness on a set of continuous control benchmarks for robotic locomotion. In comparison to Monte-Carlo estimation, DBQPG provides (i) more accurate gradient estimates with a significantly lower variance, (ii) a consistent improvement in the sample complexity and average return for several on-policy deep policy gradient algorithms, and, (iii) a methodological way to quantify the uncertainty in gradient estimation that can be incorporated to further improve the performance.

Variational Model-based Policy Optimization

Model-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms allow us to combine model-generated data with those collected from interaction with the real system in order to alleviate the data efficiency problem in RL. However, designing such algorithms is often challenging because the bias in simulated data may overshadow the ease of data generation. A potential solution to this challenge is to jointly learn and improve model and policy using a universal objective function. In this paper, we leverage the connection between RL and probabilistic inference, and formulate such an objective function as a variational lower-bound of a log-likelihood. This allows us to use expectation maximization (EM) and iteratively fix a baseline policy and learn a variational distribution, consisting of a model and a policy (E-step), followed by improving the baseline policy given the learned variational distribution (M-step). We propose model-based and model-free policy iteration (actor-critic) style algorithms for the E-step and show how the variational distribution learned by them can be used to optimize the M-step in a fully model-based fashion. Our experiments on a number of continuous control tasks show that despite being more complex, our model-based (E-step) algorithm, called {\em variational model-based policy optimization} (VMBPO), is more sample-efficient and robust to hyper-parameter tuning than its model-free (E-step) counterpart. Using the same control tasks, we also compare VMBPO with several state-of-the-art model-based and model-free RL algorithms and show its sample efficiency and performance.

Control-Aware Representations for Model-based Reinforcement Learning

A major challenge in modern reinforcement learning (RL) is efficient control of dynamical systems from high-dimensional sensory observations. Learning controllable embedding (LCE) is a promising approach that addresses this challenge by embedding the observations into a lower-dimensional latent space, estimating the latent dynamics, and utilizing it to perform control in the latent space. Two important questions in this area are how to learn a representation that is amenable to the control problem at hand, and how to achieve an end-to-end framework for representation learning and control. In this paper, we take a few steps towards addressing these questions. We first formulate a LCE model to learn representations that are suitable to be used by a policy iteration style algorithm in the latent space. We call this model control-aware representation learning (CARL). We derive a loss function for CARL that has close connection to the prediction, consistency, and curvature (PCC) principle for representation learning. We derive three implementations of CARL. In the offline implementation, we replace the locally-linear control algorithm (e.g.,~iLQR) used by the existing LCE methods with a RL algorithm, namely model-based soft actor-critic, and show that it results in significant improvement. In online CARL, we interleave representation learning and control, and demonstrate further gain in performance. Finally, we propose value-guided CARL, a variation in which we optimize a weighted version of the CARL loss function, where the weights depend on the TD-error of the current policy. We evaluate the proposed algorithms by extensive experiments on benchmark tasks and compare them with several LCE baselines.

Stochastic Bandits with Linear Constraints

We study a constrained contextual linear bandit setting, where the goal of the agent is to produce a sequence of policies, whose expected cumulative reward over the course of $T$ rounds is maximum, and each has an expected cost below a certain threshold $\tau$. We propose an upper-confidence bound algorithm for this problem, called optimistic pessimistic linear bandit (OPLB), and prove an $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{d\sqrt{T}}{\tau-c_0})$ bound on its $T$-round regret, where the denominator is the difference between the constraint threshold and the cost of a known feasible action. We further specialize our results to multi-armed bandits and propose a computationally efficient algorithm for this setting. We prove a regret bound of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{\sqrt{KT}}{\tau - c_0})$ for this algorithm in $K$-armed bandits, which is a $\sqrt{K}$ improvement over the regret bound we obtain by simply casting multi-armed bandits as an instance of contextual linear bandits and using the regret bound of OPLB. We also prove a lower-bound for the problem studied in the paper and provide simulations to validate our theoretical results.

Mirror Descent Policy Optimization

We propose deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms inspired by mirror descent, a well-known first-order trust region optimization method for solving constrained convex problems. Our approach, which we call as Mirror Descent Policy Optimization (MDPO), is based on the idea of iteratively solving a `trust-region' problem that minimizes a sum of two terms: a linearization of the objective function and a proximity term that restricts two consecutive updates to be close to each other. Following this approach we derive on-policy and off-policy variants of the MDPO algorithm and analyze their performance while emphasizing important implementation details, motivated by the existing theoretical framework. We highlight the connections between on-policy MDPO and two popular trust region RL algorithms: TRPO and PPO, and conduct a comprehensive empirical comparison of these algorithms. We then derive off-policy MDPO and compare its performance to existing approaches. Importantly, we show that the theoretical framework of MDPO can be scaled to deep RL while achieving good performance on popular benchmarks.

Proximal Gradient Temporal Difference Learning: Stable Reinforcement Learning with Polynomial Sample Complexity

In this paper, we introduce proximal gradient temporal difference learning, which provides a principled way of designing and analyzing true stochastic gradient temporal difference learning algorithms. We show how gradient TD (GTD) reinforcement learning methods can be formally derived, not by starting from their original objective functions, as previously attempted, but rather from a primal-dual saddle-point objective function. We also conduct a saddle-point error analysis to obtain finite-sample bounds on their performance. Previous analyses of this class of algorithms use stochastic approximation techniques to prove asymptotic convergence, and do not provide any finite-sample analysis. We also propose an accelerated algorithm, called GTD2-MP, that uses proximal ``mirror maps'' to yield an improved convergence rate. The results of our theoretical analysis imply that the GTD family of algorithms are comparable and may indeed be preferred over existing least squares TD methods for off-policy learning, due to their linear complexity. We provide experimental results showing the improved performance of our accelerated gradient TD methods.

Finite-Sample Analysis of GTD Algorithms

In this paper, we analyze the convergence rate of the gradient temporal difference learning (GTD) family of algorithms. Previous analyses of this class of algorithms use ODE techniques to prove asymptotic convergence, and to the best of our knowledge, no finite-sample analysis has been done. Moreover, there has been not much work on finite-sample analysis for convergent off-policy reinforcement learning algorithms. In this paper, we formulate GTD methods as stochastic gradient algorithms w.r.t.~a primal-dual saddle-point objective function, and then conduct a saddle-point error analysis to obtain finite-sample bounds on their performance. Two revised algorithms are also proposed, namely projected GTD2 and GTD2-MP, which offer improved convergence guarantees and acceleration, respectively. The results of our theoretical analysis show that the GTD family of algorithms are indeed comparable to the existing LSTD methods in off-policy learning scenarios.

Automatic Policy Synthesis to Improve the Safety of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

Learning controllers merely based on a performance metric has been proven effective in many physical and non-physical tasks in both control theory and reinforcement learning. However, in practice, the controller must guarantee some notion of safety to ensure that it does not harm either the agent or the environment. Stability is a crucial notion of safety, whose violation can certainly cause unsafe behaviors. Lyapunov functions are effective tools to assess stability in nonlinear dynamical systems. In this paper, we combine an improving Lyapunov function with automatic controller synthesis to obtain control policies with large safe regions. We propose a two-player collaborative algorithm that alternates between estimating a Lyapunov function and deriving a controller that gradually enlarges the stability region of the closed-loop system. We provide theoretical results on the class of systems that can be treated with the proposed algorithm and empirically evaluate the effectiveness of our method using an exemplary dynamical system.