A Convex Relaxation Approach to Bayesian Regret Minimization in Offline Bandits

Algorithms for offline bandits must optimize decisions in uncertain environments using only offline data. A compelling and increasingly popular objective in offline bandits is to learn a policy which achieves low Bayesian regret with high confidence. An appealing approach to this problem, inspired by recent offline reinforcement learning results, is to maximize a form of lower confidence bound (LCB). This paper proposes a new approach that directly minimizes upper bounds on Bayesian regret using efficient conic optimization solvers. Our bounds build on connections among Bayesian regret, Value-at-Risk (VaR), and chance-constrained optimization. Compared to prior work, our algorithm attains superior theoretical offline regret bounds and better results in numerical simulations. Finally, we provide some evidence that popular LCB-style algorithms may be unsuitable for minimizing Bayesian regret in offline bandits.

On Dynamic Program Decompositions of Static Risk Measures

Optimizing static risk-averse objectives in Markov decision processes is challenging because they do not readily admit dynamic programming decompositions. Prior work has proposed to use a dynamic decomposition of risk measures that help to formulate dynamic programs on an augmented state space. This paper shows that several existing decompositions are inherently inexact, contradicting several claims in the literature. In particular, we give examples that show that popular decompositions for CVaR and EVaR risk measures are strict overestimates of the true risk values. However, an exact decomposition is possible for VaR, and we give a simple proof that illustrates the fundamental difference between VaR and CVaR dynamic programming properties.

Reducing Blackwell and Average Optimality to Discounted MDPs via the Blackwell Discount Factor

We introduce the Blackwell discount factor for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Classical objectives for MDPs include discounted, average, and Blackwell optimality. Many existing approaches to computing average-optimal policies solve for discounted optimal policies with a discount factor close to $1$, but they only work under strong or hard-to-verify assumptions such as ergodicity or weakly communicating MDPs. In this paper, we show that when the discount factor is larger than the Blackwell discount factor $\gamma_{\mathrm{bw}}$, all discounted optimal policies become Blackwell- and average-optimal, and we derive a general upper bound on $\gamma_{\mathrm{bw}}$. The upper bound on $\gamma_{\mathrm{bw}}$ provides the first reduction from average and Blackwell optimality to discounted optimality, without any assumptions, and new polynomial-time algorithms for average- and Blackwell-optimal policies. Our work brings new ideas from the study of polynomials and algebraic numbers to the analysis of MDPs. Our results also apply to robust MDPs, enabling the first algorithms to compute robust Blackwell-optimal policies.

On the Convergence of Policy Gradient in Robust MDPs

Robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs) are promising models that provide reliable policies under ambiguities in model parameters. As opposed to nominal Markov decision processes (MDPs), however, the state-of-the-art solution methods for RMDPs are limited to value-based methods, such as value iteration and policy iteration. This paper proposes Double-Loop Robust Policy Gradient (DRPG), the first generic policy gradient method for RMDPs with a global convergence guarantee in tabular problems. Unlike value-based methods, DRPG does not rely on dynamic programming techniques. In particular, the inner-loop robust policy evaluation problem is solved via projected gradient descent. Finally, our experimental results demonstrate the performance of our algorithm and verify our theoretical guarantees.

On the convex formulations of robust Markov decision processes

Robust Markov decision processes (MDPs) are used for applications of dynamic optimization in uncertain environments and have been studied extensively. Many of the main properties and algorithms of MDPs, such as value iteration and policy iteration, extend directly to RMDPs. Surprisingly, there is no known analog of the MDP convex optimization formulation for solving RMDPs. This work describes the first convex optimization formulation of RMDPs under the classical sa-rectangularity and s-rectangularity assumptions. We derive a convex formulation with a linear number of variables and constraints but large coefficients in the constraints by using entropic regularization and exponential change of variables. Our formulation can be combined with efficient methods from convex optimization to obtain new algorithms for solving RMDPs with uncertain probabilities. We further simplify the formulation for RMDPs with polyhedral uncertainty sets. Our work opens a new research direction for RMDPs and can serve as a first step toward obtaining a tractable convex formulation of RMDPs.

RASR: Risk-Averse Soft-Robust MDPs with EVaR and Entropic Risk

Prior work on safe Reinforcement Learning (RL) has studied risk-aversion to randomness in dynamics (aleatory) and to model uncertainty (epistemic) in isolation. We propose and analyze a new framework to jointly model the risk associated with epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in finite-horizon and discounted infinite-horizon MDPs. We call this framework that combines Risk-Averse and Soft-Robust methods RASR. We show that when the risk-aversion is defined using either EVaR or the entropic risk, the optimal policy in RASR can be computed efficiently using a new dynamic program formulation with a time-dependent risk level. As a result, the optimal risk-averse policies are deterministic but time-dependent, even in the infinite-horizon discounted setting. We also show that particular RASR objectives reduce to risk-averse RL with mean posterior transition probabilities. Our empirical results show that our new algorithms consistently mitigate uncertainty as measured by EVaR and other standard risk measures.

Robust Phi-Divergence MDPs

In recent years, robust Markov decision processes (MDPs) have emerged as a prominent modeling framework for dynamic decision problems affected by uncertainty. In contrast to classical MDPs, which only account for stochasticity by modeling the dynamics through a stochastic process with a known transition kernel, robust MDPs additionally account for ambiguity by optimizing in view of the most adverse transition kernel from a prescribed ambiguity set. In this paper, we develop a novel solution framework for robust MDPs with s-rectangular ambiguity sets that decomposes the problem into a sequence of robust Bellman updates and simplex projections. Exploiting the rich structure present in the simplex projections corresponding to phi-divergence ambiguity sets, we show that the associated s-rectangular robust MDPs can be solved substantially faster than with state-of-the-art commercial solvers as well as a recent first-order solution scheme, thus rendering them attractive alternatives to classical MDPs in practical applications.

Policy Gradient Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation Learning

The difficulty in specifying rewards for many real-world problems has led to an increased focus on learning rewards from human feedback, such as demonstrations. However, there are often many different reward functions that explain the human feedback, leaving agents with uncertainty over what the true reward function is. While most policy optimization approaches handle this uncertainty by optimizing for expected performance, many applications demand risk-averse behavior. We derive a novel policy gradient-style robust optimization approach, PG-BROIL, that optimizes a soft-robust objective that balances expected performance and risk. To the best of our knowledge, PG-BROIL is the first policy optimization algorithm robust to a distribution of reward hypotheses which can scale to continuous MDPs. Results suggest that PG-BROIL can produce a family of behaviors ranging from risk-neutral to risk-averse and outperforms state-of-the-art imitation learning algorithms when learning from ambiguous demonstrations by hedging against uncertainty, rather than seeking to uniquely identify the demonstrator's reward function.