Who Grades the Grader? Co-Evolving Evaluation Metrics and Skills for Self-Improving LLM Agents

Self-evolving agent systems improve by creating, revising, and retiring their own skills, but every such loop rests on a hidden assumption: a reliable evaluation metric already exists. In many real applications it does not. We make three claims. First, metrics can be \emph{evolved}: our metric loop searches compositions of small drawback detectors under a full evolutionary lifecycle, trained to agree with a ten-item anchored reference set, regularized by consensus over unlabeled outputs, and audited against a held-out anchor it never reads, yielding a transparent, inspectable metric rather than an opaque judge. Second, since no metric exists to beat, the yardstick is recovering what an accurate metric would have enabled, and \emph{Double Ratchet}, our co-evolution of the metric with a lifecycle-managed skill loop, does so: across code generation (MBPP+), enterprise text-to-SQL (Spider~2.0-Snow), and reference-free report generation, it retains 88--110\% of the held-out lift achieved by the same skill loop driven by ground truth or the best available rubric. Third, safety comes from anchor discipline plus outer audits: removing anchor guards collapses the metric into a vacuous detector while removing the lifecycle does not; and when evolved skills gamed the report rubric, an independent judge caught it, one detector repaired it, and a task-aware judge then preferred the evolved outputs over the pre-evolution baseline in 77\% of decided pairs. We argue this failure-expecting architecture is the right default wherever no reliable automatic verifier exists.

The Blind Curator: How a Biased Judge Silently Disables Skill Retirement in Self-Evolving Agents

A self-evolving agent retires its bad skills by watching them fail, so what happens when the judge cannot see the failures? Skill retirement is the structural constraint that keeps a growing library from drifting below the no-skill baseline, but its guarantee assumes an unbiased reward, which is false for the LLM judges that reference-free tasks force upon us. We show that a biased judge does not merely add noise; it \emph{silently switches off the curator}. We make this precise with a corrupted-reward analysis and, isolating the causal channel by injecting corruption on top of a deterministic reward, a behavioral study on a reference-free report-writing testbed with a code-generation cross-check. Symmetric noise leaves retirement intact, but \emph{false-pass} bias (failures slipping through as passes) disables contribution-based retirement past a sharp threshold that no amount of data can cross. Separating genuine retirement from cap-eviction churn shows this \emph{mechanism} failure is universal, holding across domains and failure rates and sparing only near-zero-false-pass, verifier-like graders. The downstream \emph{outcome}, though, is regime-dependent: eval quality degrades only where the same corruption also starves skill synthesis, and otherwise holds steady, so the disabled curator is \emph{silent}, surfacing in no aggregate metric. The contribution is a behavioral safety result, not a performance one. A cheap defect-injection audit then tells an operator, before deployment, which side of the threshold their judge occupies.

DNN Koopman-Based Deviation Compensation for UGV Path Tracking Control on Coupled Slope and Potholed Road

Unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) operating in off-road scenarios are confronted with complex terrain disturbances that can substantially degrade path tracking performance. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a deep neural network (DNN) Koopman-based deviation compensation strategy for UGV path tracking control. Firstly, based on the vehicle dynamic function on coupled slope, an adaptive forgetting recursive least squares method with decoupled error terms is designed to estimate tire cornering stiffness. On this basis, a Laguerre model predictive control (LMPC) path tracking control strategy is designed by incorporating Laguerre functions, which can reduce computational resource usage while maintaining reliable tracking performance across different coupled slope scenarios. Then, by integrating Koopman operator theory with DNN, a DNN Koopman (DK) path deviation compensation method is proposed, which significantly improves the path tracking accuracy of UGV under potholed road disturbances. Furthermore, an event-triggered parallel cooperative (EPC) compensation mechanism that couples LMPC with DK is established based on compensation activation criteria and credibility verification. This mechanism improves path tracking accuracy on potholed road while ensuring the feasibility of overall steering command and stability of vehicle after DK compensation. Finally, a hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) experimental platform is constructed for validation. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed UGV path tracking strategy improves tracking performance by more than 11.5% across multiple operating conditions.

Geometrically Constrained Decentralized Independent Vector Analysis for Distributed Microphone Arrays

This paper proposes a geometrically constrained decentralized independent vector analysis (GC-Dec-IVA) method for distributed microphone arrays. Recently proposed Dec-IVA method enables source separation by exchanging only power-related statistics to exploit cross-array information. However, this initial attempt often provides negligible improvement over applying IVA locally at each array, mainly due to the potential permutation inconsistency among arrays and the strong cross-array dependency implied by its source model. To address these limitations, we incorporate direction-of-arrival (DOA) information to derive GC-Dec-IVA, which mitigates permutation mismatch across arrays and enhances source alignment. Furthermore, a new source model is introduced to weaken cross-array dependency, improving robustness against permutation inconsistency in noisy environments. Experiments show the proposed method improves both the separation performance and cross-array permutation consistency.

Ratchet: A Minimal Hygiene Recipe for Self-Evolving LLM Agents

Self-evolving skill libraries, pioneered by Voyager, let frozen LLM agents accumulate reusable knowledge without weight updates, yet recent evaluation shows that LLM-authored skills deliver $+0.0$pp over no-skill baselines while human-curated ones deliver $+16.2$pp: the bottleneck is not skill authoring but lifecycle management. We introduce \textbf{Ratchet}, a single-agent loop in which a frozen LLM writes, retrieves, curates, and retires its own natural-language skills. Ratchet integrates four candidate hygiene mechanisms: outcome-driven retirement, a bounded active-cap, meta-skill authoring guidance, and pattern canonicalisation. On MBPP+ hard-100 with Claude Opus 4.7, Ratchet lifts held-out pass@1 from a $0.258 \pm 0.047$ baseline to a late-window rolling mean of $0.584$ (peak $0.658 \pm 0.042$) across 100 rounds and 3 seeds, a $+0.328 \pm 0.018$ rolling-mean gain where the no-skill control drifts at $+0.002 \pm 0.005$; the same recipe transfers to an agentic solver on SWE-bench Verified ($+0.22$ peak lift over 20 rounds). Eight ablations (A1--A8) reveal that the minimal working recipe is smaller than our design suggests: retirement and the meta-skill authoring prior are load-bearing, while explicit deduplication (canonicalisation, cover-guard) is subsumed by the meta-skill itself. A non-divergence proposition shows that bounded cap and retirement threshold together prevent expected performance from drifting below the no-skills floor.

RCGDet3D: Rethinking 4D Radar-Camera Fusion-based 3D Object Detection with Enhanced Radar Feature Encoding

4D automotive radar is indispensable for autonomous driving due to its low cost and robustness, yet its point cloud sparsity challenges 3D object detection. Existing 4D radar-camera fusion methods focus on complex fusion strategies, trading inference speed for marginal gains. This trade-off hinders real-time deployment due to heavy computation on dense feature maps. In contrast, feature extraction from sparse radar points is less time-consuming but remains under-explored. This work uncovers that simply enhancing radar feature extraction can achieve comparable or even higher performance than elaborate fusion modules, while maintaining real-time performance. Based on this finding, we propose RCGDet3D, which centers on radar feature encoding and simplifies multi-modal fusion. Its encoder inherits from the efficient Gaussian Splatting-based Point Gaussian Encoder (PGE) in RadarGaussianDet3D with two key improvements. First, the Ray-centric PGE (R-PGE) predicts Gaussian attributes in ray-aligned coordinate systems before unifying them to Bird's-Eye View (BEV) space, significantly improving geometric consistency and reducing learning difficulty by decoupling the coordinate transformation from representation learning. Second, a Semantic Injection (SI) module incorporates visual cues from images, producing more geometrically accurate and semantically enriched radar features. Experiments on View-of-Delft (VoD) and TJ4DRadSet show that RCGDet3D outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both accuracy and speed, setting a new benchmark for real-time deployment.

Library Drift: Diagnosing and Fixing a Silent Failure Mode in Self-Evolving LLM Skill Libraries

Self-evolving skill libraries face a silent failure mode we term \emph{library drift}: unbounded skill accumulation without outcome-driven lifecycle management causes retrieval degradation, false-positive injections, and performance stagnation. Recent evaluation confirms the symptom--LLM-authored skills deliver +0.0pp gain while human-curated ones deliver +16.2pp (SkillsBench)--yet the underlying mechanism has not been isolated. We provide (1) a reproducible trigger: ablations that isolate drift--one disables skill injection (flat floor, +0.002), one imposes premature retirement (active harm, $-$0.019); (2) trace-level diagnostics: an append-only evidence log with per-skill contribution scores, attribution verdicts, and router engagement metrics that make the failure visible before it reaches end-task scores; and (3) a verified fix: a minimal governance recipe (outcome-driven retirement + bounded active-cap + meta-skill authoring prior) that lifts held-out pass@1 from a 0.258 baseline to a late-window mean of 0.584 (rolling gain $+$0.328) on MBPP+ hard-100 over 100 rounds. Eight ablations decompose which governance mechanisms are load-bearing and which are subsumed, providing a concrete playbook for diagnosing library drift in any self-evolving agent.

Hindsight Preference Optimization for Financial Time Series Advisory

Time series models predict numbers; decision-makers need advisory -- directional signals with reasoning, actionable suggestions, and risk management. Training language models for such predictive advisory faces a fundamental challenge: quality depends on outcomes unknown at prediction time. We bridge two ideas from reinforcement learning -- using information unavailable during execution to retrospectively generate training signal, and preference alignment -- and propose Hindsight Preference Optimization: observed outcomes let an LLM judge rank candidate advisories on dimensions that scalar metrics cannot capture, producing preference pairs for DPO without human annotation. We apply this to Vision-Language-Model-based predictive advisories on S&P 500 equity time series, demonstrated by a 4B model outperforming its 235B teacher on both accuracy and advisory quality.

Prompt Optimization Is a Coin Flip: Diagnosing When It Helps in Compound AI Systems

Prompt optimization in compound AI systems is statistically indistinguishable from a coin flip: across 72 optimization runs on Claude Haiku (6 methods $\times$ 4 tasks $\times$ 3 repeats), 49% score below zero-shot; on Amazon Nova Lite, the failure rate is even higher. Yet on one task, all six methods improve over zero-shot by up to $+6.8$ points. What distinguishes success from failure? We investigate with 18,000 grid evaluations and 144 optimization runs, testing two assumptions behind end-to-end optimization tools like TextGrad and DSPy: (A) individual prompts are worth optimizing, and (B) agent prompts interact, requiring joint optimization. Interaction effects are never significant ($p > 0.52$, all $F < 1.0$), and optimization helps only when the task has exploitable output structure -- a format the model can produce but does not default to. We provide a two-stage diagnostic: an \$80 ANOVA pre-test for agent coupling, and a 10-minute headroom test that predicts whether optimization is worthwhile -- turning a coin flip into an informed decision.

Do Agent Rules Shape or Distort? Guardrails Beat Guidance in Coding Agents

Developers increasingly guide AI coding agents through natural language instruction files (e.g., CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules), yet no controlled study has measured whether these rules actually improve agent performance or which properties make a rule beneficial. We scrape 679 such files (25,532 rules) from GitHub and conduct the first large-scale empirical evaluation, running over 5,000 agent runs with a state-of-the-art coding agent on SWE-bench Verified. Rules improve performance by 7--14 percentage points, but random rules help as much as expert-curated ones -- suggesting rules work through context priming rather than specific instruction. Negative constraints ("do not refactor unrelated code") are the only individually beneficial rule type, while positive directives ("follow code style") actively hurt -- a pattern we analyze through the lens of potential-based reward shaping (PBRS). Moreover, individual rules are mostly harmful in isolation yet collectively helpful, with no degradation up to 50 rules. These findings expose a hidden reliability risk -- well-intentioned rules routinely degrade agent performance -- and provide a clear principle for safe agent configuration: constrain what agents must not do, rather than prescribing what they should.