Adversarial Feeds Steer LLM Agent Decisions Against Their Defaults

LLM agents increasingly act after consuming ranked external information streams such as social feeds, search results, retrieval contexts, and email queues, yet safety evaluations almost always test the model or the user prompt in isolation, never the upstream ranker that decides what the agent reads just before it acts. We introduce a controlled protocol that holds the model, persona, topic, and final decision prompt fixed and varies only the composition and ordering of the posts an agent encounters during a preceding ten-turn "scrolling" phase, isolating the causal effect of feed curation on a downstream decision. Across 2,785 decision rollouts on four modern open instruct LLMs from three independent labs, we identify three response regimes: adversarial capitulation, default saturation, and a default-direction asymmetry in which a one-sided feed tips a decision the model was genuinely uncertain about (in the clearest cases from 5% to 100%; Fisher p as low as 3 x 10^-10) but cannot dislodge one it already favors or holds firmly. The effect follows a dose-response curve, survives a generator swap that rules out a writing-style artifact, generalizes across several decision domains including security-relevant choices such as removing a deployment approval gate or relaxing access controls, and is partly mitigated by two simple feed-level defenses; a frontier model retains its default. We characterize the recommender as a practical, default-bounded control surface for LLM agents, and argue that agent evaluations must audit the feed layer rather than the final prompt alone.

COPF: An Online Framework for Deployment-Stable Counterfactual Fairness in Evolving Graphs

Online link recommendation on evolving graphs is performative: by choosing which candidate links to show users, the system changes which links form and what feedback it later observes. Consequently, fairness estimates from logged outcomes can be misleading and may drift after deployment when the recommendation policy is updated. We introduce COPF (Counterfactual Online Performative Fairness), a decision-layer framework for deployment-stable fairness monitoring and control in online link recommendation. COPF (i) defines group-level opportunity gaps over exposure (shown vs. not shown) counterfactuals, (ii) makes them estimable by explicit exploration and by logging the probability (propensity) that each candidate is shown, and (iii) audits and controls fairness using residual outcome indistinguishability (OI) over a configurable auditor family with graph-aware doubly robust (GA-DR) estimators. We provide a noisy transfer theorem showing that Residual-OI on estimated GA-DR residuals implies bounds on exposure-counterfactual group gaps under temporal mixing and bounded local interference, and we instantiate an online multicalibration auditor together with a primal-dual controller. Experiments on two TGB streams and a controlled synthetic bipartite stream show that COPF reduces worst-case spikes in exposure-counterfactual group disparities with modest impact on ranking utility. Our code is available at https://github.com/lsnnnnnnnn/COPF.

Quality Audio Prototyping: a prototype system for unified sound retrieval and procedural generation

Sound design workflows frequently oscillate between time-consuming library searches and the complexity of procedural synthesis, with practitioners typically relying on disconnected tools to address each challenge separately. This paper introduces Quality Audio Prototyping (QuAP), a working prototype that unifies content-based audio retrieval and procedural sound generation within a single interface, reducing the procedural distance between a narrative concept and its sonic realisation. QuAP integrates a similarity-based retrieval engine with real-time procedural audio models, complemented by a rule-based assistant that provides perceptually informed parameter guidance, offering definitions and recommendations derived from empirical optimisation rather than requiring prior synthesis knowledge. Preliminary evaluation confirms the viability of this approach: subjective assessment demonstrated statistically significant quality improvements in five of six embedded synthesis models, and an encoder ablation study established the preferred retrieval architecture on a sound effect dataset. A user evaluation with 16 practitioners confirmed the tool's workflow utility, with all participants agreeing that the parameter assistant preserved creative agency while lowering the barrier to procedural interaction.

Synthetic Data from Cross-Domain Events for Large-Scale Recommendation Systems

Large-scale recommendation systems operate across diverse domains, yet they face the challenges of data sparsity and noisy implicit feedback. Traditional approaches mitigate this via model-specific knowledge distillation from source domains to a target domain. Inspired by the transformative success of synthetic data generation in large language models (LLMs), we introduce Synthetic Cross-domain Augmentation and Learning for Recommendation (SCALR), a framework that generates synthetic user-item interaction events for a target recommendation domain by leveraging observed events from a source domain. SCALR decomposes cross-domain learning into two modular stages. First, it translates observed user events in source domains by framing event generation as estimating the likelihood that a user would interact with a target-domain item, conditioned on their observed interactions in a source domain. Second, downstream models train on these synthetic events as cross-domain learning objectives, where the synthetic events augment the target domain's training data in a model-agnostic manner. Our approach yields statistically significant improvements in online A/B tests on an industrial recommendation platform. To the best of our knowledge, this is among the first works to explicitly frame cross-domain event transfer as synthetic data generation for recommendation systems.

Fine-grained Verification via Diagnostic Reasoning Supervision for Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction

Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction (ASTE) aims to identify aspect terms, opinion terms, and sentiment polarities as structured triplets, providing essential inputs for downstream information system applications such as opinion mining, explainable recommendations, and review summarization. Prior work mainly focuses on end-to-end extraction, while post hoc verification of extracted triplets remains comparatively underexplored. This gap limits the reliability of ASTE systems, since predicted triplets may be locally plausible while being globally invalid. Moreover, candidate invalidity is multi-faceted and candidate usability is inherently graded, motivating a fine-grained verification mechanism that can filter or re-rank outputs from diverse extractors. In this paper, we propose FiVeD, a framework for Fine-grained Verification with Diagnostic reasoning supervision. Specifically, the verifier is trained with multiple complementary objectives, including validity classification and quality score estimation as primary tasks, with error type classification and rationale generation as auxiliary tasks. We define hierarchical error categories and construct plausible incorrect triplets under semantic and syntactic constraints, and leverage an off-the-shelf LLM with task-specific rubrics to produce quality scores and diagnostic rationales. During inference, the resulting quality scores are used to filter candidate outputs, supporting adjustable precision-recall tradeoffs. Experiments across multiple ASTE baselines demonstrate that FiVeD consistently improves extraction performance by up to 3.53 F1 points as a plug-and-play verification module.

Beyond Instance-Level Alignment and Uniformity: Semantic Factor Learning for Collaborative Filtering

Collaborative filtering (CF) is widely used in recommender systems (RecSys) due to its simplicity and efficiency. However, existing CF methods follow an instance-level learning paradigm. During the instance learning stage, a large number of uninteracted user-item instances, of which items are potential interested by the user, are incorrectly treated as true negative samples resulting in a severe limitation to the generalization and scalability of models. Moreover, mainstream graph convolutional networks (GCNs) inherently suffer from high computational cost and over-smoothing issues, which limit the ability in capturing higher-order connectivity and lead to a poor generalization under sparse supervision signals. To address the above limitations, we propose Semantic Factor enhanced Alignment and Uniformity (SaFeAU), a novel framework that augments interacted instances with semantic factors, thereby mitigating false negative labeling and enabling matrix factorization (MF) to capture high-order CF signals without graph neighborhood aggregation. Specifically, SaFeAU consists of three tightly coupled components. First, Semantic Factor Routing (SFR) disentangles item representations into independent and global semantic factors. Building on these factors, Semantic Factor Matching (SFM) identifies uninteracted items, which share the same semantic factors with interacted ones, as potential positive pairs for enriching sparse supervision signals. Finally, Semantic Pairs Alignment (SPA) aligns both observed and potential positive pairs while promoting uniformity of user and item representations. Extensive experiments on four sparse real-world datasets show that SaFeAU consistently outperforms GCN-based and MF-based state-of-the-art CF methods in both recommendation accuracy and computational efficiency, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed semantic enhanced learning paradigm.

LLM Judges Inconsistently Disagree Across Safety Criteria and Harm Categories

We evaluate the consistency of automated judges in conducting a multi-dimensional safety evaluation in a reference-free setup. Our results indicate that Large Language Models are unreliable judges in identifying safety issues related to machine-generated advice in regulated domains such as finance, although they are more reliable at identifying more overt forms of unsafe/harmful content such as violence. The degree of inconsistency in a model's judgments can vary significantly by the chosen safety criteria and can be impacted by the language of the content and its linguistic style as well. Finally, there is high disagreement among different judges for the same output, across domains, safety criteria, and languages. These findings provide new insights on the practice of using LLMs as evaluators and offer several recommendations for practitioners on how to use automated judges in practical scenarios.

Wall-Clock Complexity for Zeroth-Order Optimization with Tunable Oracle Fidelity

Zeroth-order (black-box) optimization is applied when gradients are unavailable and objective evaluations rely on expensive simulations. In many such applications, the oracle fidelity is tunable: higher-accuracy queries reduce noise but incur higher computational costs. To capture this trade-off, we study an accuracy-aware wall-clock model where each query with fidelity $δ$ has a cost $c(δ)$, and we minimize the total time $T_{\mathrm{total}} = \sum_{k=1}^{N} c(δ_k)$, subject to a target accuracy constraint. We show how the choice of oracle type, noise model, and optimization scheme induces explicit wall-clock-optimal choices for the algorithmic parameters. For instance, we demonstrate that accelerated methods can be wall-clock inferior to non-accelerated schemes. Furthermore, we characterize the conditions under which a constant fidelity strategy is optimal in the Big-O sense. Our framework provides a unified methodology to translate convergence guarantees into practical fidelity and batching recommendations.

Contextual Scalarisation Thompson Sampling for multi-objective decisions in public media

Recommender systems may operate under multiple, competing objectives. For example, audience reach, cultural values, public service mandate, and operational constraints must be balanced in editorial decisions of public service media. Existing approaches relying on fixed combinations of objectives or Pareto-based optimisation do not adapt to changing priorities across situations. In this paper, we propose Contextual Scalarisation Thompson Sampler (CSTS), a multi-objective contextual bandit method that learns to weight objectives as a function of the observed context. We evaluate CSTS on real programming data from Radio Télévision Suisse, the Swiss national broadcaster, showing improved contextual relevance and better alignment with expert curation practices compared to fixed weight and standard contextual bandit approaches.

Developing a novel Comorbidities Index for predicting 10-year mortality in Prostate Cancer patients: A computational data-driven approach

The Charlson Comorbidities Index (CCI) is a weighted additive index widely used to estimate ten-year mortality risk, but its original weights may not reflect contemporary prognoses. This limitation is critical in Prostate Cancer (PCa), where radical treatment is recommended only for patients with a life expectancy of at least ten years. For candidates eligible for Radical Prostatectomy (RP), accurate estimation of ten-year other-cause mortality is essential to balance oncological benefit against competing risks and avoid overtreatment. We propose a data-driven framework to derive a comorbidity index tailored to PCa patients considered for RP. Using a retrospective single-institution cohort, we apply Population-Based Bio-Inspired Algorithms (PBBIAs) to recalibrate comorbidity weights and evolve alternative symbolic formulations optimized for ten-year survival discrimination. We compared six optimization strategies, including symbolic regression approaches based on Genetic Programming (GP), population-based metaheuristics, clinically validated baselines, and survival prediction models. Results show that GA, FST-PSO, and SLIM outperform both the original CCI and the PCCI, particularly when PCa-specific variables are included, improving the Concordance Index by up to 0.1. GPLearn yields compact and interpretable models with competitive performance. Overall, the proposed approach provides an updated and interpretable tool to improve patient selection for RP.