From graphemic dependence to lexical structure: a Markovian perspective on Dante's Commedia

This study investigates the structural organisation of Dante's Divina Commedia through a symbolic representation based on vowel-consonant (V/C) encoding. Modelling the resulting sequence as a four-state Markov chain yields a parsimonious index of graphemic memory, capturing the balance between persistence and alternation patterns. Across the poem, this index exhibits a slight but consistent increase from the Inferno to the Paradiso, indicating a directional shift in local dependency structure. Trigram-level analysis shows that this trend is driven by a restricted set of recurrent configurations, interpreted as graphemic probes linking the Markov representation to identifiable lexical environments in the text. These probes display distinct behaviours: configurations involving two transitions more frequently emerge across word boundaries, reflecting interactions between adjacent tokens, whereas configurations with fewer transitions are largely confined to intra-lexical structures. Part of the signal is further shaped by orthographic phenomena, particularly apostrophised forms, highlighting the role of writing conventions alongside phonological and lexical organisation. A complementary classification analysis identifies cantica-specific terms, providing lexical anchors through which graphemic probes can be related to the structure of the poem. This organisation is reflected not only in the separation of the three cantiche, but also in a continuous trajectory across the text. Overall, the results show that simple probabilistic models applied to symbolic text representations can uncover structured interactions between local dependencies, lexical distribution, orthographic encoding, and large-scale organisation, providing an interpretable framework for linking local symbolic dynamics to higher-level textual organisation.

Differentially Private De-identification of Dutch Clinical Notes: A Comparative Evaluation

Protecting patient privacy in clinical narratives is essential for enabling secondary use of healthcare data under regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA. While manual de-identification remains the gold standard, it is costly and slow, motivating the need for automated methods that combine privacy guarantees with high utility. Most automated text de-identification pipelines employed named entity recognition (NER) to identify protected entities for redaction. Although methods based on differential privacy (DP) provide formal privacy guarantees, more recently also large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for text de-identification in the clinical domain. In this work, we present the first comparative study of DP, NER, and LLMs for Dutch clinical text de-identification. We investigate these methods separately as well as hybrid strategies that apply NER or LLM preprocessing prior to DP, and assess performance in terms of privacy leakage and extrinsic evaluation (entity and relation classification). We show that DP mechanisms alone degrade utility substantially, but combining them with linguistic preprocessing, especially LLM-based redaction, significantly improves the privacy-utility trade-off.

Projected Gradient Unlearning for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models: Defending Against Concept Revival Attacks

Machine unlearning for text-to-image diffusion models aims to selectively remove undesirable concepts from pre-trained models without costly retraining. Current unlearning methods share a common weakness: erased concepts return when the model is fine-tuned on downstream data, even when that data is entirely unrelated. We adapt Projected Gradient Unlearning (PGU) from classification to the diffusion domain as a post-hoc hardening step. By constructing a Core Gradient Space (CGS) from the retain concept activations and projecting gradient updates into its orthogonal complement, PGU ensures that subsequent fine-tuning cannot undo the achieved erasure. Applied on top of existing methods (ESD, UCE, Receler), the approach eliminates revival for style concepts and substantially delays it for object concepts, running in roughly 6 minutes versus the ~2 hours required by Meta-Unlearning. PGU and Meta-Unlearning turn out to be complementary: which performs better depends on how the concept is encoded, and retain concept selection should follow visual feature similarity rather than semantic grouping.

Text-Guided Multimodal Unified Industrial Anomaly Detection

Industrial anomaly detection based on RGB-3D multimodal data has emerged as a mainstream paradigm for intelligent quality inspection. However, existing unsupervised methods suffer from two critical limitations: ambiguous cross-modal alignment caused by the lack of high-level semantic guidance and insufficient geometric modeling for RGB-to-3D feature mapping. To address these issues, we propose a unified multimodal industrial anomaly detection framework guided by text semantics. The framework consists of two core modules: a Geometry-Aware Cross-Modal Mapper to preserve geometric structure during modality conversion, and an Object-Conditioned Textual Feature Adaptor to align multimodal features with semantic priors. Furthermore, we establish a unified learning paradigm for multimodal industrial anomaly detection, which breaks the one-model-one-class constraint and enables accurate anomaly detection across diverse classes using a single model. Extensive experiments on the MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in classification and localization under unsupervised settings.

Evaluating Assurance Cases as Text-Attributed Graphs for Structure and Provenance Analysis

An assurance case is a structured argument document that justifies claims about a system's requirements or properties, which are supported by evidence. In regulated domains, these are crucial for meeting compliance and safety requirements to industry standards. We propose a graph diagnostic framework for analysing the structure and provenance of assurance cases. We focus on two main tasks: (1) link prediction, to learn and identify connections between argument elements, and (2) graph classification, to differentiate between assurance cases created by a state-of-the-art large language model and those created by humans, aiming to detect bias. We compiled a publicly available dataset of assurance cases, represented as graphs with nodes and edges, supporting both link prediction and provenance analysis. Experiments show that graph neural networks (GNNs) achieve strong link prediction performance (ROC-AUC 0.760) on real assurance cases and generalise well across domains and semi-supervised settings. For provenance detection, GNNs effectively distinguish human-authored from LLM-generated cases (F1 0.94). We observed that LLM-generated assurance cases have different hierarchical linking patterns compared to human-authored cases. Furthermore, existing GNN explanation methods show only moderate faithfulness, revealing a gap between predicted reasoning and the true argument structure.

ComplianceNLP: Knowledge-Graph-Augmented RAG for Multi-Framework Regulatory Gap Detection

Financial institutions must track over 60,000 regulatory events annually, overwhelming manual compliance teams; the industry has paid over USD 300 billion in fines and settlements since the 2008 financial crisis. We present ComplianceNLP, an end-to-end system that automatically monitors regulatory changes, extracts structured obligations, and identifies compliance gaps against institutional policies. The system integrates three components: (1) a knowledge-graph-augmented RAG pipeline grounding generations in a regulatory knowledge graph of 12,847 provisions across SEC, MiFID II, and Basel III; (2) multi-task obligation extraction combining NER, deontic classification, and cross-reference resolution over a shared LEGAL-BERT encoder; and (3) compliance gap analysis that maps obligations to internal policies with severity-aware scoring. On our benchmark, ComplianceNLP achieves 87.7 F1 on gap detection, outperforming GPT-4o+RAG by +3.5 F1, with 94.2% grounding accuracy ($r=0.83$ vs. human judgments) and 83.4 F1 under realistic end-to-end error propagation. Ablations show that knowledge-graph re-ranking contributes the largest marginal gain (+4.6 F1), confirming that structural regulatory knowledge is critical for cross-reference-heavy tasks. Domain-specific knowledge distillation (70B $\to$ 8B) combined with Medusa speculative decoding yields $2.8\times$ inference speedup; regulatory text's low entropy ($H=2.31$ bits vs. $3.87$ general text) produces 91.3% draft-token acceptance rates. In four months of parallel-run deployment processing 9,847 updates at a financial institution, the system achieved 96.0% estimated recall and 90.7% precision, with a $3.1\times$ sustained analyst efficiency gain. We report deployment lessons on trust calibration, GRC integration, and distributional shift monitoring for regulated-domain NLP.

AUDITA: A New Dataset to Audit Humans vs. AI Skill at Audio QA

Existing audio question answering benchmarks largely emphasize sound event classification or caption-grounded queries, often enabling models to succeed through shortcut strategies, short-duration cues, lexical priors, dataset-specific biases, or even bypassing audio via metadata and captions rather than genuine reasoning Thus, we present AUDITA (Audio Understanding from Diverse Internet Trivia Authors), a large-scale, real-world benchmark to rigorously evaluate audio reasoning beyond surface-level acoustic recognition. AUDITA comprises carefully curated, human-authored trivia questions grounded in real-world audio, designed to stress robust auditory reasoning through challenging distractors and long-range temporal dependencies, using probing queries that cannot be answered from isolated text or sound cues alone. Human average accuracy of 32.13% shows both the challenge of the task while demonstrating meaningful comprehension of the audio. In stark contrast, state of-the-art audio question answering models perform poorly, with average accuracy below 8.86%. Beyond raw accuracy, we apply Item Response Theory (IRT) to estimate latent proficiency, question difficulty, and expose systematic deficiencies of the models and data.

Cross-Model Consistency of AI-Generated Exercise Prescriptions: A Repeated Generation Study Across Three Large Language Models

This study compared repeated generation consistency of exercise prescription outputs across three large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4.1, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 2.5 Flash, under temperature=0 conditions. Each model generated prescriptions for six clinical scenarios 20 times, yielding 360 total outputs analyzed across four dimensions: semantic similarity, output reproducibility, FITT classification, and safety expression. Mean semantic similarity was highest for GPT-4.1 (0.955), followed by Gemini 2.5 Flash (0.950) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (0.903), with significant inter-model differences confirmed (H = 458.41, p < .001). Critically, these scores reflected fundamentally different generative behaviors: GPT-4.1 produced entirely unique outputs (100%) with stable semantic content, while Gemini 2.5 Flash showed pronounced output repetition (27.5% unique outputs), indicating that its high similarity score derived from text duplication rather than consistent reasoning. Identical decoding settings thus yielded fundamentally different consistency profiles, a distinction that single-output evaluations cannot capture. Safety expression reached ceiling levels across all models, confirming its limited utility as a differentiating metric. These results indicate that model selection constitutes a clinical rather than merely technical decision, and that output behavior under repeated generation conditions should be treated as a core criterion for reliable deployment of LLM-based exercise prescription systems.

Weakly-Supervised Referring Video Object Segmentation through Text Supervision

Referring video object segmentation (RVOS) aims to segment the target instance in a video, referred by a text expression. Conventional approaches are mostly supervised learning, requiring expensive pixel-level mask annotations. To tackle it, weakly-supervised RVOS has recently been proposed to replace mask annotations with bounding boxes or points, which are however still costly and labor-intensive. In this paper, we design a novel weakly-supervised RVOS method, namely WSRVOS, to train the model with only text expressions. Given an input video and the referring expression, we first design a contrastive referring expression augmentation scheme that leverages the captioning capabilities of a multimodal large language model to generate both positive and negative expressions. We extract visual and linguistic features from the input video and generated expressions, then perform bi-directional vision-language feature selection and interaction to enable fine-grained multimodal alignment. Next, we propose an instance-aware expression classification scheme to optimize the model in distinguishing positive from negative expressions. Also, we introduce a positive-prediction fusion strategy to generate high-quality pseudo-masks, which serve as additional supervision to the model. Last, we design a temporal segment ranking constraint such that the overlaps between mask predictions of temporally neighboring frames are required to conform to specific orders. Extensive experiments on four publicly available RVOS datasets, including A2D Sentences, J-HMDB Sentences, Ref-YouTube-VOS, and Ref-DAVIS17, demonstrate the superiority of our method. Code is available at https://github.com/viscom-tongji/WSRVOS.

Representational Harms in LLM-Generated Narratives Against Global Majority Nationalities

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for text generation tasks from everyday use to high-stakes enterprise and government applications, including simulated interviews with asylum seekers. While many works highlight the new potential applications of LLMs, there are risks of LLMs encoding and perpetuating harmful biases about non-dominant communities across the globe. To better evaluate and mitigate such harms, more research examining how LLMs portray diverse individuals is needed. In this work, we study how national origin identities are portrayed by widely-adopted LLMs in response to open-ended narrative generation prompts. Our findings demonstrate the presence of persistent representational harms by national origin, including harmful stereotypes, erasure, and one-dimensional portrayals of Global Majority identities. Minoritized national identities are simultaneously underrepresented in power-neutral stories and overrepresented in subordinated character portrayals, which are over fifty times more likely to appear than dominant portrayals. The degree of harm is amplified when US nationality cues (e.g., ``American'') are present in input prompts. Notably, we find that the harms we identify cannot be explained away via sycophancy, as US-centric biases persist even when replacing US nationality cues with non-US national identities in the prompts. Based on our findings, we call for further exploration of cultural harms in LLMs through methodologies that center Global Majority perspectives and challenge the uncritical adoption of US-based LLMs for the classification, surveillance, and misrepresentation of the majority of our planet.