Bug-Report-Driven Fault Localization: Industrial Benchmarking and Lesson Learned at ABB Robotics

Software quality assurance remains a major challenge in industrial environments, where large-scale and long-lived systems inevitably accumulate defects. Identifying the location of a fault is often time-consuming and costly, particularly during maintenance phases when developers must rely primarily on textual bug reports rather than complete runtime or code-level context. In this study, we investigated if artificial intelligence can support fault localization using only the natural-language content of bug reports. By relying only on textual information, our approach requires no access to source code, execution traces, or static analysis artifacts, making it directly deployable within existing industrial maintenance workflows. We framed fault localization as a supervised text classification problem and evaluated three traditional machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest) and two fine-tuned transformer-based language models (RoBERTa-Base and Distil-RoBERTa). Our evaluation used proprietary data from ABB Robotics in Sweden, comprising five years of resolved industrial bug reports, each linked to its verified code fix. This setting allowed us to assess model effectiveness under realistic industrial constraints. Our results showed that traditional models using term frequency-inverse document features consistently outperformed the fine-tuned language models on this dataset, while data augmentation improved Random Forest performance. These findings challenge the assumption that transformer-based models universally outperform classical approaches in industrial contexts with domain-specific data. We demonstrated that historical bug reports can be systematically used for text-based, artificial intelligence-assisted fault localization, providing a scalable, low-cost, and empirically grounded complement to common debugging practices in industry.

GeoFlowVLM: Geometry-Aware Joint Uncertainty for Frozen Vision-Language Embedding

Standard dual-encoder vision-language models that map images and text to deterministic points on a shared unit hypersphere through $\ell_2$ normalization typically expose neither \emph{aleatoric} uncertainty (cross-modal ambiguity) nor \emph{epistemic} uncertainty (lack of training-distribution support). Existing post-hoc methods either recover at most one of the two uncertainty components, or ignore the hyperspherical geometry of these models' embeddings. We propose \textbf{GeoFlowVLM} as a post-hoc adapter that learns the joint distribution of paired $\ell_2$-normalised dual-encoder VLM embeddings on the product hypersphere $\mathbb{S}^{d-1} \times \mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ via Riemannian flow matching with a single masked velocity field. A consistency result shows that, in the population limit, the trained network exposes the joint flow and both cross-modal conditional flows as valid Riemannian flow-matching velocity fields on their respective domains. We derive two quantities from this single model: a conditional retrieval entropy that quantifies aleatoric ambiguity with a decision-theoretic interpretation via a Fano-type bound, and a marginal-typicality epistemic score justified by an exact chain-rule decomposition of the joint NLL. This decomposition isolates a cross-modal pointwise-mutual-information term that is structurally discriminative rather than epistemic, and is empirically the only consistently uninformative standalone component. Empirically, the entropy tracks Recall@1 with near-ideal monotonic calibration across three retrieval benchmarks in both directions, and the marginal-typicality sum yields consistently calibrated selective accuracy across four zero-shot classification benchmarks.

TabEmbed: Benchmarking and Learning Generalist Embeddings for Tabular Understanding

Foundation models have established unified representations for natural language processing, yet this paradigm remains largely unexplored for tabular data. Existing methods face fundamental limitations: LLM-based approaches lack retrieval-compatible vector outputs, whereas text embedding models often fail to capture tabular structure and numerical semantics. To bridge this gap, we first introduce the Tabular Embedding Benchmark (TabBench), a comprehensive suite designed to evaluate the tabular understanding capability of embedding models. We then propose TabEmbed, the first generalist embedding model that unifies tabular classification and retrieval within a shared embedding space. By reformulating diverse tabular tasks as semantic matching problems, TabEmbed leverages large-scale contrastive learning with positive-aware hard negative mining to discern fine-grained structural and numerical nuances. Experimental results on TabBench demonstrate that TabEmbed significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text embedding models, establishing a new baseline for universal tabular representation learning. Code and datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/qiangminjie27/TabEmbed and https://huggingface.co/datasets/qiangminjie27/TabBench.

Adaptive Head Budgeting for Efficient Multi-Head Attention

Transformers have become the dominant architecture across a wide range of domains, largely due to the effectiveness of multi-head attention in capturing diverse representation subspaces. However, standard multi-head attention activates all heads uniformly for every input, regardless of task requirements or input complexity. In many scenarios, particularly for coarse-grained tasks such as text classification, the relevant information is often global and does not require the full diversity of attention heads. As a consequence, using a fixed number of heads can introduce unnecessary computational cost or lead to suboptimal performance when the allocation does not match the input. To address this limitation, we introduce BudgetFormer, a Transformer architecture equipped with an adaptive multi-head attention mechanism that dynamically allocates computational resources. Our approach learns, for each input, both a head budget corresponding to the number of attention heads required, and a relevance distribution that selects the most informative heads. We also propose a training strategy based on an exploration and exploitation trade-off, allowing the model to discover effective head configurations before converging to efficient usage patterns. Experiments on text classification tasks of varying complexity show that our method reduces inference cost in terms of FLOPs and memory, while also achieving performance that can surpass standard full multi-head attention. These results highlight the potential of adaptive head allocation as a principled approach to improving both efficiency and effectiveness in Transformer models.

ADE: Adaptive Dictionary Embeddings -- Scaling Multi-Anchor Representations to Large Language Models

Word embeddings are fundamental to natural language processing, yet traditional approaches represent each word with a single vector, creating representational bottlenecks for polysemous words and limiting semantic expressiveness. While multi-anchor representations have shown promise by representing words as combinations of multiple vectors, they have been limited to small-scale models due to computational inefficiency and lack of integration with modern transformer architectures. We introduce Adaptive Dictionary Embeddings (ADE), a framework that successfully scales multi-anchor word representations to large language models. ADE makes three key contributions: (1) Vocabulary Projection (VP), which transforms the costly two-stage anchor lookup into a single efficient matrix operation; (2) Grouped Positional Encoding (GPE), a novel positional encoding scheme where anchors of the same word share positional information, preserving semantic coherence while enabling anchor-level variation; and (3) context-aware anchor reweighting, which leverages self-attention to dynamically compose anchor contributions based on sequence context. We integrate these components into the Segment-Aware Transformer (SAT), which provides context-aware reweighting of anchor contributions at inference time. We evaluate ADE on AG News and DBpedia-14 text classification benchmarks. With 98.7% fewer trainable parameters than DeBERTa-v3-base, ADE surpasses DeBERTa on DBpedia-14 (98.06% vs. 97.80%) and approaches it on AG News (90.64% vs. 94.50%), while compressing the embedding layer over 40x -- demonstrating that multi-anchor representations are a practical and parameter-efficient alternative to single-vector embeddings in modern transformer architectures.

Metric Unreliability in Multimodal Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Analysis and Principled Unified Score

Machine unlearning in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is required for compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), yet current evaluation practices are inconsistent. We present the first systematic study of metric reliability in multimodal unlearning. Five standard metrics, Forget Accuracy (FA), Retain Accuracy (RA), Membership Inference Attack (MIA), Activation Distance (AD), and JS divergence (JS), yield conflicting method rankings across three VQA benchmarks (MLLMU-Bench, UnLOK-VQA, MMUBench). Kendall tau analysis over 36 unlearned LLaVA-1.5-7B models reveals two opposing clusters, {FA, RA, MIA} and {AD, JS}, with tau_FA_AD = -0.26, reproduced on BLIP-2 OPT-2.7B. Agreement is lower in multimodal VQA (average tau = 0.086) than in unimodal classification (average tau = 0.158; difference = 0.072), indicating that dual image-and-text pathways amplify inconsistency. We introduce the Unified Quality Score (UQS), a composite metric with weights derived from each metric's Spearman correlation with the oracle distance d(M_hat, M_star), where M_star is the oracle model retrained only on the retain set. RA shows the strongest reliability (rho = 0.484, p = 0.003), while FA is negatively correlated (rho = -0.418, p = 0.011). UQS yields stable rankings under 100 random weight perturbations (tau = 0.647 +- 0.262). We release the benchmark, 36 checkpoints, and an interactive leaderboard. Code and pre-computed results are available at https://github.com/neurips26/UnifiedUnl.

SKG-VLA: Scene Knowledge Graph Priors for Structured Scene Semantics and Multimodal Reasoning for Decision Making

Decision making in large-scale complaint handling systems increasingly relies on heterogeneous evidence, including complaint narratives, screenshots, order metadata, historical interactions, and platform policies. Existing complaint understanding systems mainly perform shallow classification or template matching over isolated modalities, while underutilizing explicit scene structure, rule knowledge, and cross-evidence dependencies. To address this limitation, we present SKG-VLA for multimodal complaint decision making. The core idea is to model each case as a structured complaint scene and represent its decision-relevant semantics with a \emph{Scene Knowledge Graph} (SKG), which organizes complaint entities, evidence items, policy clauses, temporal events, transactional states, and action-relevant relations into a unified graph. Based on SKG, we build a data synthesis pipeline that generates complaint scene descriptions, rule-consistent graph generalizations, question-answer supervision, and decision recommendations. We further construct a large-scale complaint scene dataset with both text-only and multimodal in-domain benchmarks. Finally, we adopt a three-stage training strategy -- domain-adaptive pre-training, task-oriented instruction fine-tuning, and end-to-end multimodal alignment -- to inject structured scene priors into a multimodal decision model. Experiments show that SKG-VLA consistently improves policy-grounded reasoning, complaint decision accuracy, long-tail generalization, and robustness under incomplete evidence.

Predicting Post Virality with Temporal Cross-Attention over Trend Signals

Current models for predicting social media virality rely heavily on static textual and structural features, effectively ignoring the highly dynamic nature of trend signals. We study whether real-world attention signals can improve the prediction of social-media virality beyond what post text alone reveals. We introduce ViralityNet, an architecture that predicts Reddit post virality by fusing internal platform representations with exogenous temporal signals derived from Wikipedia pageview spikes. We frame virality as a binary classification task that accounts for differences in subreddit scale, labeling posts as viral if they exceed the 90th percentile of per-subreddit engagement and a minimum absolute score threshold. ViralityNet combines four post-level streams: title embeddings, body embeddings, structural metadata, and learned subreddit embeddings with a cross-attention block that queries a daily sliding-window trends matrix encoding the top-512 Wikipedia spike terms from the preceding seven days. Empirical results suggest that incorporating external attention signals yields consistent gains, outperforming text-only baselines by +0.015 AUC-PR and achieving an overall AUC-ROC of 0.836. Overall, we provide evidence that incorporating external attention signals yields measurable improvements over text-only baselines, highlighting the importance of real-world dynamics in shaping online virality.

An Analysis of Active Learning Algorithms using Real-World Crowd-sourced Text Annotations

Active learning algorithms automatically identify the most informative samples from large amounts of unlabeled data and tremendously reduce human annotation effort in inducing a machine learning model. In a conventional active learning setup, the labeling oracles are assumed to be infallible, that is, they always provide correct answers (in terms of class labels) to the queried unlabeled instances, which cannot be guaranteed in real-world applications. To this end, a body of research has focused on the development of active learning algorithms in the presence of imperfect / noisy oracles. Existing research on active learning with noisy oracles typically simulate the oracles using machine learning models; however, real-world situations are much more challenging, and using ML models to simulate the annotation patterns may not appropriately capture the nuances of real-world annotation challenges. In this research, we first collect annotations of text samples (from 3 benchmark text classification datasets) from crowd-sourced workers through a crowd-sourcing platform. We then conduct extensive empirical studies of 8 commonly used active learning techniques (in conjunction with deep neural networks) using the obtained annotations. Our analyses sheds light on the performance of these techniques under real-world challenges, where annotators can provide incorrect labels, and can also refuse to provide labels. We hope this research will provide valuable insights that will be useful for the deployment of deep active learning systems in real-world applications. The obtained annotations can be accessed at https://github.com/varuntotakura/al_rcta/.

Instance-Level Costs for Nuanced Classifier Evaluation

Standard classification treats all errors equally, but in content moderation, medical screening, and safety-critical applications, mistakes on clear-cut cases are far more costly than errors on ambiguous ones. We propose normalized excess cost (NEC), a metric that weights classification errors by per-example costs and reduces to standard error rate when costs are uniform. Costs can derive from annotator vote margins, distance from decision thresholds, or confidence ratings. Across text, image, and tabular benchmarks, we find that NEC is often substantially lower than error rate -- models with 5\% error rate can achieve 1.8\% NEC -- revealing that most mistakes concentrate on ambiguous, low-cost examples. However, incorporating costs into training via loss weighting, sampling strategies, or regression yields inconsistent benefits: improvements appear only when costs are predictable from input features, as in our synthetic control, while real-world datasets show mixed or negligible gains. Our framework provides a practical methodology for deriving and evaluating instance-level misclassification costs, even when cost-sensitive training offers limited benefit.