Three Models of RLHF Annotation: Extension, Evidence, and Authority

Preference-based alignment methods, most prominently Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), use the judgments of human annotators to shape large language model behaviour. However, the normative role of these judgments is rarely made explicit. I distinguish three conceptual models of that role. The first is extension: annotators extend the system designers' own judgments about what outputs should be. The second is evidence: annotators provide independent evidence about some facts, whether moral, social or otherwise. The third is authority: annotators have some independent authority (as representatives of the broader population) to determine system outputs. I argue that these models have implications for how RLHF pipelines should solicit, validate and aggregate annotations. I survey landmark papers in the literature on RLHF and related methods to illustrate how they implicitly draw on these models, describe failure modes that come from unintentionally or intentionally conflating them, and offer normative criteria for choosing among them. My central recommendation is that RLHF pipeline designers should decompose annotation into separable dimensions and tailor each pipeline to the model most appropriate for that dimension, rather than seeking a single unified pipeline.

Action-Aware Generative Sequence Modeling for Short Video Recommendation

With the rapid development of the Internet, users have increasingly higher expectations for the recommendation accuracy of online content consumption platforms. However, short videos often contain diverse segments, and users may not hold the same attitude toward all of them. Traditional binary-classification recommendation models, which treat a video as a single holistic entity, face limitations in accurately capturing such nuanced preferences. Considering that user consumption is a temporal process, this paper demonstrates that the timing of user actions can represent diverse intentions through statistical analysis and examination of action patterns. Based on this insight, we propose a novel modeling paradigm: Action-Aware Generative Sequence Network (A2Gen), which refines user actions along the temporal dimension and chains them into sequences for unified processing and prediction. First, we introduce the Context-aware Attention Module (CAM) to model action sequences enriched with item-specific contextual features. Building upon this, we develop the Hierarchical Sequence Encoder (HSE) to learn temporal action patterns from users' historical actions. Finally, through leveraging CAM, we design a module for action sequence generation: the Action-seq Autoregressive Generator (AAG). Extensive offline experiments on the Kuaishou's dataset and the Tmall public dataset demonstrate the superiority of our proposed model. Furthermore, through large-scale online A/B testing deployed on Kuaishou's platform, our model achieves significant improvements over baseline methods in multi-task prediction by leveraging sequential information. Specifically, it yields increases of 0.34% in user watch time, 8.1% in interaction rate, and 0.162% in overall user retention (LifeTime-7), leading to successful deployment across all traffic, serving over 400 million users every day.

Harmonizing Generative Retrieval and Ranking in Chain-of-Recommendation

Generative recommender systems have recently emerged as a promising paradigm by formulating next-item prediction as an auto-regressive semantic IDs generation, such as OneRec series works. However, with the next-item-agnostic prediction paradigm, its could beam out some next potential items via Semantic IDs but hard to estimate which items are better from them, e.g., select the top-10 from beam-256 items, leading to a gap between generation and ranking performance. To fulfill this gap, we propose RecoChain, a unified generative retrieval and ranking framework that integrates candidate generation and ranking within a single Transformer backbone. Specifically, in inference, the model first generates candidate items via hierarchical semantic ID prediction, then performs the SIM-based ranking process to estimate the click possibility of corresponding item candidate continuously. Extensive experiments on large-scale real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach effectively bridges the gap between generative retrieval and ranking, achieving improved Top-K recommendation performance while maintaining strong generative capability.

Personalized Multi-Interest Modeling for Cross-Domain Recommendation to Cold-Start Users

Cross-domain recommendation (CDR) has demonstrated to be an effective solution for alleviating the user cold-start issue. By leveraging rich user-item interactions available in a richly informative source domain, CDR could improve the recommendation performance for cold-start users in the target domain. Previous CDR approaches mostly adhere the Embedding and Mapping (EMCDR) paradigm, which learns a user-shared mapping function to transfer users' preference from the source domain to the target domain, neglecting users' personalized preference. Recent CDR approaches further leverage the meta-learning paradigm, considering the CDR task for each user independently and learning user-specific mapping functions for each user. However, they mostly learn representations for each user individually, which ignores the common preference between different users, neglecting valuable information for CDR. In addition, all these approaches usually summarize the user's preference into an overall representation, which can hardly capture the user's multi-interest preference. To this end, we propose a personalized multi-interest modeling framework for CDR to cold-start users, termed as NF-NPCDR. Specifically, we propose a personalized preference encoder that enhances the neural process (NP) with the normalizing flow (NF) to convert the Gaussian (unimodal) distribution to a multimodal distribution, providing a novel way to capture the user's personalized multi-interest preference. Then, we propose a common preference encoder with a preference pool to capture the common preference between different users. Furthermore, we introduce a stochastic adaptive decoder to incorporate both the personalized and common preference for cold-start users, adaptively modulating both preference for better recommendation.

Spreadsheet Modeling Experiments Using GPTs on Small Problem Statements and the Wall Task

This paper investigates how GPT-based tools can assist in building reusable analytical spreadsheet models. After a screening, we evaluate five GPT extensions and select Excel AI by pulsrai.com for detailed testing. Through structured experiments on simple problem statements, we assess Excel AI's performance against the ERFR criteria (each input in a cell; cell formulas; no hardwired numbers; labels; accurate). Results show that while Excel AI can produce well-structured models, it is inconsistent and often non-reproducible. We identify two central challenges - "the problem of confidence" and "the problem of workflow" - which highlight the need for skilled users to verify and adapt GPT-generated spreadsheets. Though GPTs show promise for generating draft models that may reduce development time or lower skill requirements, current tools remain unreliable for professional use. We conclude with recommendations for future research into prompt engineering, reproducibility, and larger-scale modeling tasks.

An Investigation of Linguistic Biases in LLM-Based Recommendations

We investigate linguistic biases in LLM-based restaurant and product recommendations given prompts varying across Southern American English (AE), Indian English (IE), and Code-Switched Hindi-English dialects, using the Yelp Open dataset (Yelp Inc., 2023) and Walmart product reviews dataset (PromptCloud,2020). We add lists of restaurant and product names balanced by cuisine type and product category to the prompts given to the LLM, and we zero-shot prompt the LLMs in a cold-start setting to select the top-20 restaurant and product recommendations from these lists for each of the dialect-varied prompts. We prompt LLMs using different list samples across 20 seeds for better generalization, and aggregate per cuisine-type and per category response counts for each seed, question/prompt, and LLM model. We run mixed-effects regression models for each model family and topic (restaurant/product) with the aggregate response counts as the dependent, and conduct likelihood ratio tests for the fixed effects with post-hoc pairwise testing of estimated marginal means differences, to investigate group-level differences in recommendation counts by model size and dialect type. Results show that dialect plays a role in the type of restaurant selected across the models tested with the mistral-small-3.1 model and both the llama-3.1 family models tested showing more sensitivity to Indian English and Code-Switched prompts. In terms of product recommendations, the llama-3.1-70B-model is particularly sensitive to Code-Switched prompts in four out of seven categories, and more beauty and home category recommendations are seen when using the Indian English and Code-Switched prompts for larger and smaller models, respectively. No broad trends are seen in the model-size based differences, with differing recommendations based on model sizes conditioned by the type of dialect.

Stop Using the Wilcoxon Test: Myth, Misconception and Misuse in IR Research

In benchmarking of Information Retrieval systems, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test is often treated as a safer alternative to the t-test. This belief is fueled by textbooks and recommendations that portray Wilcoxon as the proper non-parametric alternative because metric scores are not normally distributed. We argue that this narrative is misleading and harmful. A careful review of Statistics textbooks reveals inconsistencies and omissions in how the assumptions underlying these tests are presented, fostering confusion that has propagated into IR research. As a result, Wilcoxon has been routinely misapplied for decades, creating a false sense of safety against a threat that was never there to begin with, while introducing another one so severe that it virtually guarantees the test will break down and mislead researchers. Through a combination of systematic literature review, analysis and empirical demonstrations with TREC data, we show how and why the Wilcoxon test easily loses control of its Type I error rate in IR settings. We conclude that the continued use of Wilcoxon in IR evaluation is unjustified and that abandoning it would improve the methodological soundness of our field.

From Local Indices to Global Identifiers: Generative Reranking for Recommender Systems via Global Action Space

In modern recommender systems, list-wise reranking serves as a critical phase within the multi-stage pipeline, finalizing the exposed item sequence and directly impacting user satisfaction by modeling complex intra-list item dependencies. Existing methods typically formulate this task as selecting indices from the local input list. However, this approach suffers from a semantically inconsistent action space: the same output neuron (logits) represents different items across different samples, preventing the model from establishing a stable, intrinsic understanding of the items. To address this, we propose GloRank (Global Action Space Ranker), a generative framework that shifts reranking from selecting local indices to generating global identifiers. Specifically, we represent items as sequences of discrete tokens and reformulate reranking as a token generation task. This design effectively decouples the scoring mechanism from the variable input order, ensuring that items are evaluated against a consistent global standard. We further enhance this with a two-stage optimization pipeline: a supervised pre-training phase to initialize the model with high-quality demonstrations, followed by a reinforcement learning-based post-training phase to directly maximize list-wise utility. Extensive experiments on two public benchmarks and a large-scale industrial dataset, coupled with online A/B tests, demonstrate that GloRank consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and achieves superior robustness in cold-start scenarios.

Spectral bandits

Smooth functions on graphs have wide applications in manifold and semi-supervised learning. In this work, we study a bandit problem where the payoffs of arms are smooth on a graph. This framework is suitable for solving online learning problems that involve graphs, such as content-based recommendation. In this problem, each item we can recommend is a node of an undirected graph and its expected rating is similar to the one of its neighbors. The goal is to recommend items that have high expected ratings. We aim for the algorithms where the cumulative regret with respect to the optimal policy would not scale poorly with the number of nodes. In particular, we introduce the notion of an effective dimension, which is small in real-world graphs, and propose three algorithms for solving our problem that scale linearly and sublinearly in this dimension. Our experiments on content recommendation problem show that a good estimator of user preferences for thousands of items can be learned from just tens of node evaluations.

Offline Evaluation Measures of Fairness in Recommender Systems

The evaluation of recommender system fairness has become increasingly important, especially with recent legislation that emphasises the development of fair and responsible artificial intelligence. This has led to the emergence of various fairness evaluation measures, which quantify fairness based on different definitions. However, many of such measures are simply proposed and used without further analysis on their robustness. As a result, there is insufficient understanding and awareness of the measures' limitations. Among other issues, it is not known what kind of model outputs produce the (un)fairest score, how the measure scores are empirically distributed, and whether there are cases where the measures cannot be computed (e.g., due to division by zero). These issues cause difficulty in interpreting the measure scores and confusion on which measure(s) should be used for a specific case. This thesis presents a series of papers that assess and overcome various theoretical, empirical, and conceptual limitations of existing recommender system fairness evaluation measures. We investigate a wide range of offline evaluation measures for different fairness notions, divided based on the evaluation subjects (users and items) and for different evaluation granularities (groups of subjects and individual subjects). Firstly, we perform theoretical and empirical analysis on the measures, exposing flaws that limit their interpretability, expressiveness, or applicability. Secondly, we contribute novel evaluation approaches and measures that overcome these limitations. Finally, considering the measures' limitations, we recommend guidelines for the appropriate measure usage, thereby allowing for more precise selection of fairness evaluation measures in practical scenarios. Overall, this thesis contributes to advancing the state-of-the-art offline evaluation of fairness in recommender systems.