The Janus Interface: How Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models Amplifies the Privacy Risks

The era post-2018 marked the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), with innovations such as OpenAI's ChatGPT showcasing prodigious linguistic prowess. As the industry galloped toward augmenting model parameters and capitalizing on vast swaths of human language data, security and privacy challenges also emerged. Foremost among these is the potential inadvertent accrual of Personal Identifiable Information (PII) during web-based data acquisition, posing risks of unintended PII disclosure. While strategies like RLHF during training and Catastrophic Forgetting have been marshaled to control the risk of privacy infringements, recent advancements in LLMs, epitomized by OpenAI's fine-tuning interface for GPT-3.5, have reignited concerns. One may ask: can the fine-tuning of LLMs precipitate the leakage of personal information embedded within training datasets? This paper reports the first endeavor to seek the answer to the question, particularly our discovery of a new LLM exploitation avenue, called the Janus attack. In the attack, one can construct a PII association task, whereby an LLM is fine-tuned using a minuscule PII dataset, to potentially reinstate and reveal concealed PIIs. Our findings indicate that, with a trivial fine-tuning outlay, LLMs such as GPT-3.5 can transition from being impermeable to PII extraction to a state where they divulge a substantial proportion of concealed PII. This research, through its deep dive into the Janus attack vector, underscores the imperative of navigating the intricate interplay between LLM utility and privacy preservation.

Gradient Shaping: Enhancing Backdoor Attack Against Reverse Engineering

Most existing methods to detect backdoored machine learning (ML) models take one of the two approaches: trigger inversion (aka. reverse engineer) and weight analysis (aka. model diagnosis). In particular, the gradient-based trigger inversion is considered to be among the most effective backdoor detection techniques, as evidenced by the TrojAI competition, Trojan Detection Challenge and backdoorBench. However, little has been done to understand why this technique works so well and, more importantly, whether it raises the bar to the backdoor attack. In this paper, we report the first attempt to answer this question by analyzing the change rate of the backdoored model around its trigger-carrying inputs. Our study shows that existing attacks tend to inject the backdoor characterized by a low change rate around trigger-carrying inputs, which are easy to capture by gradient-based trigger inversion. In the meantime, we found that the low change rate is not necessary for a backdoor attack to succeed: we design a new attack enhancement called \textit{Gradient Shaping} (GRASP), which follows the opposite direction of adversarial training to reduce the change rate of a backdoored model with regard to the trigger, without undermining its backdoor effect. Also, we provide a theoretic analysis to explain the effectiveness of this new technique and the fundamental weakness of gradient-based trigger inversion. Finally, we perform both theoretical and experimental analysis, showing that the GRASP enhancement does not reduce the effectiveness of the stealthy attacks against the backdoor detection methods based on weight analysis, as well as other backdoor mitigation methods without using detection.

Selective Amnesia: On Efficient, High-Fidelity and Blind Suppression of Backdoor Effects in Trojaned Machine Learning Models

In this paper, we present a simple yet surprisingly effective technique to induce "selective amnesia" on a backdoored model. Our approach, called SEAM, has been inspired by the problem of catastrophic forgetting (CF), a long standing issue in continual learning. Our idea is to retrain a given DNN model on randomly labeled clean data, to induce a CF on the model, leading to a sudden forget on both primary and backdoor tasks; then we recover the primary task by retraining the randomized model on correctly labeled clean data. We analyzed SEAM by modeling the unlearning process as continual learning and further approximating a DNN using Neural Tangent Kernel for measuring CF. Our analysis shows that our random-labeling approach actually maximizes the CF on an unknown backdoor in the absence of triggered inputs, and also preserves some feature extraction in the network to enable a fast revival of the primary task. We further evaluated SEAM on both image processing and Natural Language Processing tasks, under both data contamination and training manipulation attacks, over thousands of models either trained on popular image datasets or provided by the TrojAI competition. Our experiments show that SEAM vastly outperforms the state-of-the-art unlearning techniques, achieving a high Fidelity (measuring the gap between the accuracy of the primary task and that of the backdoor) within a few minutes (about 30 times faster than training a model from scratch using the MNIST dataset), with only a small amount of clean data (0.1% of training data for TrojAI models).