When Poison Fails After Retrieval: Revisiting Corpus Poisoning under Chunking and Reranking Pipelines

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are vulnerable to corpus poisoning attacks that manipulate downstream model outputs through malicious knowledge injection. Existing studies mainly evaluate poisoning under simplified retrieval settings, overlooking practical RAG pipelines involving document chunking, dense retrieval, reranking, and grounded generation. In this paper, we revisit corpus poisoning under realistic multi-stage retrieval pipelines and show that many existing attacks substantially degrade after reranking despite achieving high retrieval-stage relevance. We identify retrieval granularity mismatch as a key reason for this failure: document-level adversarial signals are often fragmented during chunking, while rerankers favor locally coherent and answer-bearing passages rather than globally optimized semantic similarity. Based on this observation, we propose Chunk-aware and Rerank-Consistent Poisoning (CRCP), a poisoning framework that jointly optimizes retrieval relevance, reranker consistency, and chunk-boundary robustness. CRCP explicitly models chunking transformations during optimization to generate locally self-contained adversarial passages that remain effective under varying chunking configurations. Experiments on standard RAG benchmarks with multiple retrievers and rerankers show that existing poisoning methods are highly sensitive to chunk size and reranking strategies, whereas CRCP achieves substantially higher attack success rates and stronger robustness across realistic retrieval pipelines. Our findings highlight an important realism gap in current RAG security evaluation and suggest that poisoning in modern RAG systems should be studied as a multi-stage retrieval consistency problem rather than a retrieval-only problem.

Agents' Last Exam

Recent AI systems have achieved strong results on a wide range of benchmarks, yet these gains have not translated into economically meaningful deployment across many professional domains. We argue that this gap is largely an evaluation problem: widely used benchmarks lack sustained performance measurement on real and economically valuable workflows. This paper introduces Agents' Last Exam (ALE), a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on long-horizon, economically valuable, real-world tasks with verifiable outcomes. Developed in collaboration with 250+ industry experts, ALE covers non-physical industries defined with reference to O*NET / SOC 2018 (the U.S. federal occupational taxonomy). It is organized around a task taxonomy with 55 subfields grouped into 13 industry clusters covering 1K+ tasks. Current results show that the hardest tier remains far from saturated: across mainstream harness and backbone configurations, the average full pass rate is 2.6%. ALE is designed as a living benchmark: its task pool grows continuously as new workflows and industries are onboarded. More broadly, ALE is intended not merely as another leaderboard, but as an instrument for closing the gap between benchmark success and GDP-relevant impact.

From 'What' to 'How' and 'Why': Sharing LLM-Generated Retrospective Summaries of Older Adults' Passive Tracking Data with Remote Family Members

With the growing prevalence of modern ubiquitous computing technologies, multi-modal tracking systems hold promise for providing timely awareness and reassurance to stakeholders such as remote family members (RFMs) of older adults, who play a central role in care coordination. However, combining heterogeneous data streams into high-level, meaningful content - such as retrospective summaries - remains challenging. While recent work has demonstrated the promise of large language models (LLMs) for interpreting multi-modal tracking data, less attention has been given to generating narrative accounts for stakeholders like RFMs, who possess rich personal knowledge of older adults and strong emotional responsibility, yet have limited visibility into their daily lives and limited capacity for caregiving. In this work, we explore how LLMs can be used to generate retrospective summaries from multi-modal tracking data for RFMs of older adults. We leveraged and customized an existing system, Vital Insight, to generate initial summaries on different dates and data availability scenarios as technology probes, and conducted interviews with 11 RFMs to gather feedback. Based on these insights, we redesigned the system into a multi-layer, multi-agent, insight-driven summary approach that builds from objective statistics and descriptions to enriched, context-aware narratives. We then compared the redesigned summaries with the initial versions through a survey with the same 11 RFMs and found significant improvements in satisfaction, perceived helpfulness, trust, and willingness to receive the summaries. We conclude by presenting design implications for AI-generated summaries for RFMs and broader contexts, emphasizing the need to support RFMs' sensemaking shift from simply presenting ''What'' data were collected, to explaining ''How'' is my loved one doing and ''Why''.

Large Language Models in Transportation Systems Management and Operations: From Text Reasoning to Multi-modal Decision Support

Transportation systems management and operations (TSMO) increasingly depends on timely interpretation of heterogeneous data, from various sensor streams, incident reports, traveler feedback, and visual observations. Large language models (LLMs), including emerging multi-modal large language models (MM-LLMs), provide a new mechanism for integrating these structured and unstructured inputs into operator-facing decision support. This survey paper reviews LLM- and MM-LLM-based applications in TSMO across three domains: transportation operations & services (supply), mobility & fleet services (demand), and data, modeling & decision support. Using a PRISMA-guided screening process, we synthesize current studies while distinguishing operationally oriented applications from prototype and emerging concepts. We further identify recurring challenges in data heterogeneity, real-time inference, explainability, multi-modal fusion, and governance. Finally, we outline existing gaps and future directions in localized adaptation, edge deployment, benchmarking, and cross-agency collaboration. Overall, LLM-based systems appear most promising as a decision-support layer, with MM-LLMs offering particular value when heterogeneous text, visual, and sensor inputs must be integrated.

EvoNav: Evolutionary Reward Function Design for Robot Navigation with Large Language Models

Robot navigation is a crucial task with applications to social robots in dynamic human environments. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown great promise for this problem, the policy quality is highly sensitive to the specification of reward functions. Hand-crafted rewards require substantial domain expertise and embed inductive biases that are difficult to audit or adapt, limiting their effectiveness and leading to suboptimal performance. In this paper, we propose EvoNav, an evolutionary framework that automates the design of robot navigation reward functions via large language models (LLMs). To overcome prohibitively costly policy training, EvoNav evaluates each candidate proposal from the LLM via a progressive three-stage warm-up-boost procedure. EvoNav advances from analytical proxies with low-cost surrogates, such as small datasets and analytic rules, to lightweight rollouts and, finally, to full policy training, enabling computationally efficient exploration under effective feedback. Experiment results show that EvoNav produces more effective navigation policies than manually designed RL rewards and state-of-the-art reward design methods.

Cooperative Informative Sensing for Monitoring Dynamic Indoor Environments via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Monitoring human activity in indoor environments is important for applications such as facility management, safety assessment, and space utilization analysis. While mobile robot teams offer the potential to actively improve observation quality, existing multi-robot monitoring and active perception approaches typically rely on coverage or visitation based objectives that are weakly aligned with the accuracy requirements of human-centric monitoring tasks. In this work, we formulate cooperative active observation as a decentralized control problem in which multiple robots adjust their motion to directly optimize monitoring accuracy under partial observability. We propose a learning-based framework for cooperative policies from decentralized observations using multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), supported by an architecture that handles variable numbers of humans and temporal dependencies. Simulation results across diverse indoor environments and monitoring tasks show that the proposed approach consistently outperforms classical coverage, persistent monitoring, and learning-free multi-robot baselines, while remaining robust to changes in the number of observed humans.

A Wearable ECG Device for Differentiating Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Acquired Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic heart disease affecting approximately 1 in 500 people and is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young athletes. Current diagnostic methods -- cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), echocardiography, and genetic testing -- are limited by high costs, operator dependency, or insufficient accuracy, while standard electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis cannot reliably distinguish HCM from acquired left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). This paper presents a wearable ECG device paired with a classification algorithm that differentiates HCM from acquired LVH using ECG signals alone. The portable device integrates a 3-lead electrode system, an AD8232 signal conditioning module, an Arduino Nano 33 BLE microcontroller, and a lithium polymer battery. The algorithm extracts two quantitative indices -- HCM Index~1 and HCM Index~2 -- from each heartbeat and classifies patients via dual statistical thresholds. Validation on 483 LVH patients (PhysioNet) and 29 HCM patients (digitized clinical records) yields 75.86\% sensitivity, 99.17\% specificity, and an F1-score of 80.00\%. Leave-one-out cross-validation confirms generalizability, with cross-validated sensitivity of 72.41\%, specificity of 98.96\%, and F1-score of 76.36\% (95\% confidence intervals reported). A digitization confound analysis demonstrates that the classification is driven by physiological cardiac features rather than data source artifacts. A simulated device acquisition chain analysis confirms that the wearable hardware's signal characteristics are compatible with the classification algorithm. The system offers a promising tool for affordable HCM screening in resource-limited settings.

VLM-in-the-Loop: A Plug-In Quality Assurance Module for ECG Digitization Pipelines

ECG digitization could unlock billions of archived clinical records, yet existing methods collapse on real-world images despite strong benchmark numbers. We introduce \textbf{VLM-in-the-Loop}, a plug-in quality assurance module that wraps any digitization backend with closed-loop VLM feedback via a standardized interface, requiring no modification to the underlying digitizer. The core mechanism is \textbf{tool grounding}: anchoring VLM assessment in quantitative evidence from domain-specific signal analysis tools. In a controlled ablation on 200 records with paired ground truth, tool grounding raises verdict consistency from 71\% to 89\% and doubles fidelity separation ($Δ$PCC 0.03 $\rightarrow$ 0.08), with the effect replicating across three VLMs (Claude Opus~4, GPT-4o, Gemini~2.5 Pro), confirming a pattern-level rather than model-specific gain. Deployed across four backends, the module improves every one: 29.4\% of borderline leads improved on our pipeline; 41.2\% of failed limb leads recovered on ECG-Digitiser; valid leads per image doubled on Open-ECG-Digitizer (2.5 $\rightarrow$ 5.8). On 428 real clinical HCM images, the integrated system reaches 98.0\% Excellent quality. Both the plug-in architecture and tool-grounding mechanism are domain-parametric, suggesting broader applicability wherever quality criteria are objectively measurable.

Behavioral Score Diffusion: Model-Free Trajectory Planning via Kernel-Based Score Estimation from Data

Diffusion-based trajectory optimization has emerged as a powerful planning paradigm, but existing methods require either learned score networks trained on large datasets or analytical dynamics models for score computation. We introduce \emph{Behavioral Score Diffusion} (BSD), a training-free and model-free trajectory planner that computes the diffusion score function directly from a library of trajectory data via kernel-weighted estimation. At each denoising step, BSD retrieves relevant trajectories using a triple-kernel weighting scheme -- diffusion proximity, state context, and goal relevance -- and computes a Nadaraya-Watson estimate of the denoised trajectory. The diffusion noise schedule naturally controls kernel bandwidths, creating a multi-scale nonparametric regression: broad averaging of global behavioral patterns at high noise, fine-grained local interpolation at low noise. This coarse-to-fine structure handles nonlinear dynamics without linearization or parametric assumptions. Safety is preserved by applying shielded rollout on kernel-estimated state trajectories, identical to existing model-based approaches. We evaluate BSD on four robotic systems of increasing complexity (3D--6D state spaces) in a parking scenario. BSD with fixed bandwidth achieves 98.5\% of the model-based baseline's average reward across systems while requiring no dynamics model, using only 1{,}000 pre-collected trajectories. BSD substantially outperforms nearest-neighbor retrieval (18--63\% improvement), confirming that the diffusion denoising mechanism is essential for effective data-driven planning.

Gradient-Based Data Valuation Improves Curriculum Learning for Game-Theoretic Motion Planning

We demonstrate that gradient-based data valuation produces curriculum orderings that significantly outperform metadata-based heuristics for training game-theoretic motion planners. Specifically, we apply TracIn gradient-similarity scoring to GameFormer on the nuPlan benchmark and construct a curriculum that weights training scenarios by their estimated contribution to validation loss reduction. Across three random seeds, the TracIn-weighted curriculum achieves a mean planning ADE of $1.704\pm0.029$\,m, significantly outperforming the metadata-based interaction-difficulty curriculum ($1.822\pm0.014$\,m; paired $t$-test $p=0.021$, Cohen's $d_z=3.88$) while exhibiting lower variance than the uniform baseline ($1.772\pm0.134$\,m). Our analysis reveals that TracIn scores and scenario metadata are nearly orthogonal (Spearman $ρ=-0.014$), indicating that gradient-based valuation captures training dynamics invisible to hand-crafted features. We further show that gradient-based curriculum weighting succeeds where hard data selection fails: TracIn-curated 20\% subsets degrade performance by $2\times$, whereas full-data curriculum weighting with the same scores yields the best results. These findings establish gradient-based data valuation as a practical tool for improving sample efficiency in game-theoretic planning.