From Classification to Recommendation: Empirical Analysis of Audio Embedding Models Application for Content-Based Music Recommendation

Pretrained audio representation models learned from large-scale corpora have achieved strong performance in audio classification and understanding. However, most existing models are optimized for objectives such as masked prediction, contrastive learning, or audio-text alignment, which do not necessarily produce representation spaces well-suited to recommender systems. Unlike classification, music recommender systems must capture item relationships shaped by subjective and behavior-dependent listener preferences. Although pretrained audio embeddings have been explored in conventional recommender systems, their effectiveness in the rapidly emerging paradigm of generative recommender systems remains underexplored. To address this gap, we systematically evaluate six representative audio encoders across three types of music recommender systems: content-based, sequential, and Semantic-ID-based generative recommender systems. We further investigate how residual-quantization design, including codebook width, quantization depth, and retained Semantic-ID prefixes, affects the preservation of recommendation-relevant information. Experiments on two music recommendation datasets show that audio-text-aligned and music-domain representations are generally more effective when pretrained embedding geometry is used directly, whereas interaction-based sequential training substantially reduces performance differences among encoders. We also find that increasing Semantic-ID capacity does not consistently improve generative recommender systems and may introduce substantial instability. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting audio encoders and designing audio-derived Semantic IDs for modern music recommender systems.

Seeing and Reflecting: Multimodal Memory-Enhanced Agent Collaboration for Recommendation

Large language model (LLM)-based agentic recommender systems show promise in modeling user preferences through natural-language reasoning, yet they remain limited by text-centric inputs and coarse-grained memory updates, making agents prone to missing visual evidence, semantic noise, and preference drift. To address these limitations, we propose MMEACR, a Multimodal Memory-Enhanced Agent Collaboration framework for recommendation. MMEACR introduces a dual-track memory architecture that separates interpretable agent reasoning from fine-grained multimodal matching. In the reasoning track, collaborative User and Item Memory Agents maintain persistent multimodal memories and update them through an attribute-guided reinforcement-and-reflection mechanism. In the matching track, a decoupled multi-modal embedding memory is built from raw interaction narratives and item images to preserve detailed cross-modal signals beyond structured memory updates. The two tracks are integrated through weighted Reciprocal Rank Fusion to produce robust and interpretable rankings. Experiments on three real-world domains show that MMEACR achieves strong overall performance against competitive LLM-based and agent-based baselines, with notable gains in visually grounded recommendation scenarios.

Beyond Item Order: Temporal Gap Tokenization for Generative Recommendation with Semantic IDs

Semantic-ID-based generative recommendation has recently emerged as a scalable paradigm for sequential recommendation, where each item is represented by a compact sequence of discrete codes and next-item prediction is formulated as code generation. Existing methods, however, typically construct user histories as sequences of static item identifiers, leaving the elapsed time between consecutive interactions outside the generative input. This temporal blindness is problematic because inter-interaction gaps provide useful cues about interest continuity and preference drift. In this paper, we propose ChronoSID, a lightweight temporal augmentation framework for semantic-ID-based generative recommendation. ChronoSID injects temporal signals into the standard three-stage semantic-ID pipeline from two complementary perspectives. First, we introduce Time-Aware Field-Aware Masked Auto-Encoding (TA-FAMAE), which regularizes item representation learning with an auxiliary time-gap prediction objective. Second, we discretize historical interaction intervals into fixed log-scale gap tokens and interleave them with semantic ID tuples as the encoder input of the sequence-to sequence generator. This design preserves the compact SID generation paradigm while enabling the model to capture time-aware transition patterns. Experiments on Amazon review benchmarks show that ChronoSID consistently improves over ReSID and other competitive generative recommendation baselines. Ablation studies further verify the contribution of both temporal components, and diagnostic analyses show clearer gains under long-gap scenarios where user interests are more likely to drift.

FERA: Uncertainty-Aware Federated Reasoning for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities when guided by high-quality demonstrations, yet such data is often distributed across organizations that cannot centralize it due to regulatory, proprietary, or institutional constraints. We study federated reasoning, where a server improves multi-step reasoning by coordinating with heterogeneous clients holding private demonstrations, without centralized training or raw data sharing. The key challenge is that client reliability is query-dependent, while the server cannot inspect client data to determine which contributions are trustworthy. To address this, we propose Uncertainty-Aware Federated Reasoning (FERA), a training-free framework based on iterative server-client co-refinement. Across communication rounds, clients generate reasoning traces with lightweight uncertainty estimates, and the server synthesizes them into improved reasoning that is redistributed as context for the next round, progressively improving both server outputs and client-side reasoning. Within each round, Uncertainty-Aware Self-Critique Aggregation (UA-SCA) resolves conflicts among heterogeneous client traces through query-dependent trust weighting and structured cross-client verification. Rather than simply discarding low-quality traces, UA-SCA revises flawed reasoning steps to recover useful information. We provide theoretical guarantees showing that the proposed iterative protocol converges and that uncertainty-aware weighting accelerates convergence. Experiments on multiple reasoning benchmarks show that FERA consistently outperforms both federated training and training-free baselines, achieving progressively higher accuracy across rounds while maintaining communication and computational efficiency.

MEG-RAG: Quantifying Multi-modal Evidence Grounding for Evidence Selection in RAG

Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) addresses key limitations of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), such as hallucination and outdated knowledge. However, current MRAG systems struggle to distinguish whether retrieved multimodal data truly supports the semantic core of an answer or merely provides superficial relevance. Existing metrics often rely on heuristic position-based confidence, which fails to capture the informational density of multimodal entities. To address this, we propose Multi-modal Evidence Grounding (MEG), a semantic-aware metric that quantifies the contribution of retrieved evidence. Unlike standard confidence measures, MEG utilizes Semantic Certainty Anchoring, focusing on high-IDF information-bearing tokens that better capture the semantic core of the answer. Building on MEG, we introduce MEG-RAG, a framework that trains a multimodal reranker to align retrieved evidence with the semantic anchors of the ground truth. By prioritizing high-value content based on semantic grounding rather than token probability distributions, MEG-RAG improves the accuracy and multimodal consistency of generated outputs. Extensive experiments on the M$^2$RAG benchmark show that MEG-RAG consistently outperforms strong baselines and demonstrates robust generalization across different teacher models.

Doctor-RAG: Failure-Aware Repair for Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Agentic RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for multi-hop question answering and complex knowledge reasoning, where retrieval and reasoning are interleaved at inference time. As reasoning trajectories grow longer, failures become increasingly common. Existing approaches typically address such failures by either stopping at diagnostic analysis or rerunning the entire retrieval-reasoning pipeline, which leads to substantial computational overhead and redundant reasoning. In this paper, we propose Doctor-RAG (DR-RAG), a unified diagnose-and-repair framework that corrects failures in Agentic RAG through explicit error localization and prefix reuse, enabling minimal-cost intervention. DR-RAG decomposes failure handling into two consecutive stages: (i) trajectory-level failure diagnosis and localization, which attributes errors to a coverage-gated taxonomy and identifies the earliest failure point in the reasoning trajectory; and (ii) tool-conditioned local repair, which intervenes only at the diagnosed failure point while maximally reusing validated reasoning prefixes and retrieved evidence. By explicitly separating error attribution from correction, DR-RAG enables precise error localization, thereby avoiding expensive full-pipeline reruns and enabling targeted, efficient repair. We evaluate DR-RAG across three multi-hop question answering benchmarks, multiple agentic RAG baselines, and different backbone models. Experimental results demonstrate that DR-RAG substantially improves answer accuracy while significantly reducing reasoning token consumption compared to rerun-based repair strategies.

Learning to Retrieve Navigable Candidates for Efficient Vision-and-Language Navigation

Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to follow natural-language instructions and navigate through previously unseen environments. Recent approaches increasingly employ large language models (LLMs) as high-level navigators due to their flexibility and reasoning capability. However, prompt-based LLM navigation often suffers from inefficient decision-making, as the model must repeatedly interpret instructions from scratch and reason over noisy and verbose navigable candidates at each step. In this paper, we propose a retrieval-augmented framework to improve the efficiency and stability of LLM-based VLN without modifying or fine-tuning the underlying language model. Our approach introduces retrieval at two complementary levels. At the episode level, an instruction-level embedding retriever selects semantically similar successful navigation trajectories as in-context exemplars, providing task-specific priors for instruction grounding. At the step level, an imitation-learned candidate retriever prunes irrelevant navigable directions before LLM inference, reducing action ambiguity and prompt complexity. Both retrieval modules are lightweight, modular, and trained independently of the LLM. We evaluate our method on the Room-to-Room (R2R) benchmark. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in Success Rate, Oracle Success Rate, and SPL on both seen and unseen environments. Ablation studies further show that instruction-level exemplar retrieval and candidate pruning contribute complementary benefits to global guidance and step-wise decision efficiency. These results indicate that retrieval-augmented decision support is an effective and scalable strategy for enhancing LLM-based vision-and-language navigation.

MemWeaver: Weaving Hybrid Memories for Traceable Long-Horizon Agentic Reasoning

Large language model-based agents operating in long-horizon interactions require memory systems that support temporal consistency, multi-hop reasoning, and evidence-grounded reuse across sessions. Existing approaches largely rely on unstructured retrieval or coarse abstractions, which often lead to temporal conflicts, brittle reasoning, and limited traceability. We propose MemWeaver, a unified memory framework that consolidates long-term agent experiences into three interconnected components: a temporally grounded graph memory for structured relational reasoning, an experience memory that abstracts recurring interaction patterns from repeated observations, and a passage memory that preserves original textual evidence. MemWeaver employs a dual-channel retrieval strategy that jointly retrieves structured knowledge and supporting evidence to construct compact yet information-dense contexts for reasoning. Experiments on the LoCoMo benchmark demonstrate that MemWeaver substantially improves multi-hop and temporal reasoning accuracy while reducing input context length by over 95\% compared to long-context baselines.

Generative Chain of Behavior for User Trajectory Prediction

Modeling long-term user behavior trajectories is essential for understanding evolving preferences and enabling proactive recommendations. However, most sequential recommenders focus on next-item prediction, overlooking dependencies across multiple future actions. We propose Generative Chain of Behavior (GCB), a generative framework that models user interactions as an autoregressive chain of semantic behaviors over multiple future steps. GCB first encodes items into semantic IDs via RQ-VAE with k-means refinement, forming a discrete latent space that preserves semantic proximity. On top of this space, a transformer-based autoregressive generator predicts multi-step future behaviors conditioned on user history, capturing long-horizon intent transitions and generating coherent trajectories. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that GCB consistently outperforms state-of-the-art sequential recommenders in multi-step accuracy and trajectory consistency. Beyond these gains, GCB offers a unified generative formulation for capturing user preference evolution.

PruneRAG: Confidence-Guided Query Decomposition Trees for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a powerful framework for enhancing large language models in knowledge-intensive and reasoning tasks. However, as reasoning chains deepen or search trees expand, RAG systems often face two persistent failures: evidence forgetting, where retrieved knowledge is not effectively used, and inefficiency, caused by uncontrolled query expansions and redundant retrieval. These issues reveal a critical gap between retrieval and evidence utilization in current RAG architectures. We propose PruneRAG, a confidence-guided query decomposition framework that builds a structured query decomposition tree to perform stable and efficient reasoning. PruneRAG introduces three key mechanisms: adaptive node expansion that regulates tree width and depth, confidence-guided decisions that accept reliable answers and prune uncertain branches, and fine-grained retrieval that extracts entity-level anchors to improve retrieval precision. Together, these components preserve salient evidence throughout multi-hop reasoning while significantly reducing retrieval overhead. To better analyze evidence misuse, we define the Evidence Forgetting Rate as a metric to quantify cases where golden evidence is retrieved but not correctly used. Extensive experiments across various multi-hop QA benchmarks show that PruneRAG achieves superior accuracy and efficiency over state-of-the-art baselines.