Text classification is the process of categorizing text documents into predefined categories or labels.
Textual Emotion Classification (TEC) is one of the most difficult NLP tasks. State of the art approaches rely on Large language models (LLMs) and multi-model ensembles. In this study, we challenge the assumption that larger scale or more complex models are necessary for improved performance. In order to improve logical consistency, We introduce CMHL, a novel single-model architecture that explicitly models the logical structure of emotions through three key innovations: (1) multi-task learning that jointly predicts primary emotions, valence, and intensity, (2) psychologically-grounded auxiliary supervision derived from Russell's circumplex model, and (3) a novel contrastive contradiction loss that enforces emotional consistency by penalizing mutually incompatible predictions (e.g., simultaneous high confidence in joy and anger). With just 125M parameters, our model outperforms 56x larger LLMs and sLM ensembles with a new state-of-the-art F1 score of 93.75\% compared to (86.13\%-93.2\%) on the dair-ai Emotion dataset. We further show cross domain generalization on the Reddit Suicide Watch and Mental Health Collection dataset (SWMH), outperforming domain-specific models like MentalBERT and MentalRoBERTa with an F1 score of 72.50\% compared to (68.16\%-72.16\%) + a 73.30\% recall compared to (67.05\%-70.89\%) that translates to enhanced sensitivity for detecting mental health distress. Our work establishes that architectural intelligence (not parameter count) drives progress in TEC. By embedding psychological priors and explicit consistency constraints, a well-designed single model can outperform both massive LLMs and complex ensembles, offering a efficient, interpretable, and clinically-relevant paradigm for affective computing.
This work describes an automatic text classification method implemented in a software tool called NETHIC, which takes advantage of the inner capabilities of highly-scalable neural networks combined with the expressiveness of hierarchical taxonomies. As such, NETHIC succeeds in bringing about a mechanism for text classification that proves to be significantly effective as well as efficient. The tool had undergone an experimentation process against both a generic and a domain-specific corpus, outputting promising results. On the basis of this experimentation, NETHIC has been now further refined and extended by adding a document embedding mechanism, which has shown improvements in terms of performance on the individual networks and on the whole hierarchical model.
Scientific papers do more than report results $-$ they advance $\textit{claims}$ that later work supports, extends, or sometimes refutes. Yet existing methods for citation and claim analysis capture only fragments of this dialogue. In this work, we make these interactions explicit at the level of individual scientific claims. We introduce $\texttt{ClaimFlow}$, a claim-centric view of the NLP literature, built from $304$ ACL Anthology papers (1979$-$2025) that are manually annotated with $1{,}084$ claims and $832$ cross-paper claim relations, indicating whether a citing paper $\textit{supports}$, $\textit{extends}$, $\textit{qualifies}$, $\textit{refutes}$, or references a claim as $\textit{background}$. Using $\texttt{ClaimFlow}$, we define a new task $-$ $\textit{Claim Relation Classification}$ $-$ which requires models to infer the scientific stance toward a cited claim from the text and citation context. Evaluating strong neural models and large language models on this task, we report baseline performance of $0.78$ macro-F1, highlighting that claim-relation classification is feasible but challenging. We further apply our model to $\sim$$13k$ NLP papers to analyze how claims evolve across decades of NLP research. Our analysis reveals that $63.5$% claims are never reused; only $11.1$% are ever challenged; meanwhile, widely propagated claims are more often $\textit{reshaped}$ through qualification and extension than directly confirmed or refuted. Overall, $\texttt{ClaimFlow}$ offers a lens for examining how ideas shift and mature within NLP, and a foundation for assessing whether models can interpret scientific argumentation.
Material classification has emerged as a critical task in computer vision and graphics, supporting the assignment of accurate material properties to a wide range of digital and real-world applications. While traditionally framed as an image classification task, this domain faces significant challenges due to the scarcity of annotated data, limiting the accuracy and generalizability of trained models. Recent advances in vision-language foundation models (VLMs) offer promising avenues to address these issues, yet existing solutions leveraging these models still exhibit unsatisfying results in material recognition tasks. In this work, we propose a novel framework that effectively harnesses foundation models to overcome data limitations and enhance classification accuracy. Our method integrates two key innovations: (a) a robust image generation and auto-labeling pipeline that creates a diverse and high-quality training dataset with material-centric images, and automatically assigns labels by fusing object semantics and material attributes in text prompts; (b) a prior incorporation strategy to distill information from VLMs, combined with a joint fine-tuning method that optimizes a pre-trained vision foundation model alongside VLM-derived priors, preserving broad generalizability while adapting to material-specific features.Extensive experiments demonstrate significant improvements on multiple datasets. We show that our synthetic dataset effectively captures the characteristics of real world materials, and the integration of priors from vision-language models significantly enhances the final performance. The source code and dataset will be released.
Medical anomaly detection (MAD) and segmentation play a critical role in assisting clinical diagnosis by identifying abnormal regions in medical images and localizing pathological regions. Recent CLIP-based studies are promising for anomaly detection in zero-/few-shot settings, and typically rely on global representations and weak supervision, often producing coarse localization and limited segmentation quality. In this work, we study supervised adaptation of CLIP for MAD under a realistic clinical setting where a limited yet meaningful amount of labeled abnormal data is available. Our model MedSAD-CLIP leverages fine-grained text-visual cues via the Token-Patch Cross-Attention(TPCA) to improve lesion localization while preserving the generalization capability of CLIP representations. Lightweight image adapters and learnable prompt tokens efficiently adapt the pretrained CLIP encoder to the medical domain while preserving its rich semantic alignment. Furthermore, a Margin-based image-text Contrastive Loss is designed to enhance global feature discrimination between normal and abnormal representations. Extensive experiments on four diverse benchmarks-Brain, Retina, Lung, and Breast datasets-demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, achieving superior performance in both pixel-level segmentation and image-level classification over state-of-the-art methods. Our results highlight the potential of supervised CLIP adaptation as a unified and scalable paradigm for medical anomaly understanding. Code will be made available at https://github.com/thuy4tbn99/MedSAD-CLIP
The classification of mental health is challenging for a variety of reasons. For one, there is overlap between the mental health issues. In addition, the signs of mental health issues depend on the context of the situation, making classification difficult. Although fine-tuning transformers has improved the performance for mental health classification, standard cross-entropy training tends to create entangled feature spaces and fails to utilize all the information the transformers contain. We present a new framework that focuses on representations to improve mental health classification. This is done using two methods. First, \textbf{layer-attentive residual aggregation} which works on residual connections to to weigh and fuse representations from all transformer layers while maintaining high-level semantics. Second, \textbf{supervised contrastive feature learning} uses temperature-scaled supervised contrastive learning with progressive weighting to increase the geometric margin between confusable mental health problems and decrease class overlap by restructuring the feature space. With a score of \textbf{74.36\%}, the proposed method is the best performing on the SWMH benchmark and outperforms models that are domain-specialized, such as \textit{MentalBERT} and \textit{MentalRoBERTa} by margins of (3.25\% - 2.2\%) and 2.41 recall points over the highest achieving model. These findings show that domain-adaptive pretraining for mental health text classification can be surpassed by carefully designed representation geometry and layer-aware residual integration, which also provide enhanced interpretability through learnt layer importance.
Despite recent advances in deep generative modeling, skin lesion classification systems remain constrained by the limited availability of large, diverse, and well-annotated clinical datasets, resulting in class imbalance between benign and malignant lesions and consequently reduced generalization performance. We introduce DermaFlux, a rectified flow-based text-to-image generative framework that synthesizes clinically grounded skin lesion images from natural language descriptions of dermatological attributes. Built upon Flux.1, DermaFlux is fine-tuned using parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) on a large curated collection of publicly available clinical image datasets. We construct image-text pairs using synthetic textual captions generated by Llama 3.2, following established dermatological criteria including lesion asymmetry, border irregularity, and color variation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DermaFlux generates diverse and clinically meaningful dermatology images that improve binary classification performance by up to 6% when augmenting small real-world datasets, and by up to 9% when classifiers are trained on DermaFlux-generated synthetic images rather than diffusion-based synthetic images. Our ImageNet-pretrained ViT fine-tuned with only 2,500 real images and 4,375 DermaFlux-generated samples achieves 78.04% binary classification accuracy and an AUC of 0.859, surpassing the next best dermatology model by 8%.
Object-goal navigation has traditionally been limited to ground robots with closed-set object vocabularies. Existing multi-agent approaches depend on precomputed probabilistic graphs tied to fixed category sets, precluding generalization to novel goals at test time. We present GoalVLM, a cooperative multi-agent framework for zero-shot, open-vocabulary object navigation. GoalVLM integrates a Vision-Language Model (VLM) directly into the decision loop, SAM3 for text-prompted detection and segmentation, and SpaceOM for spatial reasoning, enabling agents to interpret free-form language goals and score frontiers via zero-shot semantic priors without retraining. Each agent builds a BEV semantic map from depth-projected voxel splatting, while a Goal Projector back-projects detections through calibrated depth into the map for reliable goal localization. A constraint-guided reasoning layer evaluates frontiers through a structured prompt chain (scene captioning, room-type classification, perception gating, multi-frontier ranking), injecting commonsense priors into exploration. We evaluate GoalVLM on GOAT-Bench val_unseen (360 multi-subtask episodes, 1032 sequential object-goal subtasks, HM3D scenes), where each episode requires navigating to a chain of 5-7 open-vocabulary targets. GoalVLM with N=2 agents achieves 55.8% subtask SR and 18.3% SPL, competitive with state-of-the-art methods while requiring no task-specific training. Ablation studies confirm the contributions of VLM-guided frontier reasoning and depth-projected goal localization.
The success of CLIP-like vision-language models (VLMs) on natural images has inspired medical counterparts, yet existing approaches largely fall into two extremes: specialist models trained on single-domain data, which capture domain-specific details but generalize poorly, and generalist medical VLMs trained on multi-domain data, which retain broad semantics but dilute fine-grained diagnostic cues. Bridging this specialization-generalization trade-off remains challenging. To address this problem, we propose ACE-LoRA, a parameter-efficient adaptation framework for generalist medical VLMs that maintains robust zero-shot generalization. ACE-LoRA integrates Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) modules into frozen image-text encoders and introduces an Attention-based Context Enhancement Hypergraph Neural Network (ACE-HGNN) module that captures higher-order contextual interactions beyond pairwise similarity to enrich global representations with localized diagnostic cues, addressing a key limitation of prior Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods that overlook fine-grained details. To further enhance cross-modal alignment, we formulate a label-guided InfoNCE loss to effectively suppress false negatives between semantically related image-text pairs. Despite adding only 0.95M trainable parameters, ACE-LoRA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art medical VLMs and PEFT baselines across zero-shot classification, segmentation, and detection benchmarks spanning multiple domains. Our code is available at https://github.com/icon-lab/ACE-LoRA.
Zero-shot text classification (ZSC) offers the promise of eliminating costly task-specific annotation by matching texts directly to human-readable label descriptions. While early approaches have predominantly relied on cross-encoder models fine-tuned for natural language inference (NLI), recent advances in text-embedding models, rerankers, and instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) have challenged the dominance of NLI-based architectures. Yet, systematically comparing these diverse approaches remains difficult. Existing evaluations, such as MTEB, often incorporate labeled examples through supervised probes or fine-tuning, leaving genuine zero-shot capabilities underexplored. To address this, we introduce BTZSC, a comprehensive benchmark of 22 public datasets spanning sentiment, topic, intent, and emotion classification, capturing diverse domains, class cardinalities, and document lengths. Leveraging BTZSC, we conduct a systematic comparison across four major model families, NLI cross-encoders, embedding models, rerankers and instruction-tuned LLMs, encompassing 38 public and custom checkpoints. Our results show that: (i) modern rerankers, exemplified by Qwen3-Reranker-8B, set a new state-of-the-art with macro F1 = 0.72; (ii) strong embedding models such as GTE-large-en-v1.5 substantially close the accuracy gap while offering the best trade-off between accuracy and latency; (iii) instruction-tuned LLMs at 4--12B parameters achieve competitive performance (macro F1 up to 0.67), excelling particularly on topic classification but trailing specialized rerankers; (iv) NLI cross-encoders plateau even as backbone size increases; and (v) scaling primarily benefits rerankers and LLMs over embedding models. BTZSC and accompanying evaluation code are publicly released to support fair and reproducible progress in zero-shot text understanding.