RAGOCR: Optical Compression of Retrieval-Augmented Text via Visual Representation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become essential for knowledge-intensive question answering, yet scaling RAG pipelines remains challenging due to the prohibitive computational cost of processing lengthy retrieved contexts. Existing compression approaches face a fundamental trade-off: hard compression methods operate online in a query-aware fashion but achieve only modest compression rates and typically require fine-tuning the generative model, while soft compression methods attain higher ratios but rely on costly offline encoding that is entirely agnostic to the input query. To bridge this gap, we introduce RAGOCR, a novel framework that compresses retrieved documents into compact visual representations conditioned on the input query. To further balance compression rate and information fidelity, we introduce a query-aware dynamic resolution mechanism that adaptively allocates visual granularity based on each document's estimated relevance and complexity: highly relevant passages are rendered at higher resolution to preserve fine-grained details, while peripheral documents are aggressively compressed at lower resolution. Experiments on five QA benchmarks using the MedOmniKB retrieval corpus demonstrate that RAGOCR surpasses naive RAG by over 15\% in accuracy while requiring only one-eighth the number of input tokens, and consistently outperforms both hard and soft compression baselines across varying retrieval depths.

RAPID: A Reproducible Multi-Agent Pipeline for Interpretable Disaster Damage Assessment from Satellite and Street-View Imagery

Due to the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme climate events, there is a clear demand for intelligent, scalable, and autonomous approaches to disaster damage assessment. Existing methods, largely based on supervised learning and task-specific fine-tuning, struggle to generalize under domain shifts, long-tailed data distributions, and heterogeneous geospatial data sources, especially in disaster scenarios. They also often lack the ability to integrate and reason across multimodal geospatial information, such as satellite images and street-view images. In this paper, we introduce RAPID, a reproducible multi-agent pipeline for interpretable disaster damage assessment, including damage-level assessment, damage-type interpretation, and actionable suggestions for response, remediation, and recovery. RAPID coordinates specialized agents to perform cross-view understanding, image restoration, structured damage recognition, and geographical reasoning across heterogeneous data modalities. Without task-specific fine-tuning, RAPID supports zero-shot damage assessment by jointly using complementary information from remote sensing and ground-level perspectives. The system produces fine-grained, interpretable assessments and automatically generates location-specific, decision-relevant disaster reports to support early-stage emergency response. We evaluate RAPID across hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and earthquakes using multiple cross-view imagery inputs, including pre- and post-disaster street-view images, post-disaster remote sensing imagery, and street-view image pairs. Experiments show that RAPID achieves 0.92 overall accuracy for multi-disaster type classification and up to 0.627 for cross-view damage severity prediction, highlighting its potential as a foundational framework for autonomous disaster intelligence.

GIScholarBench: Benchmarking LLM Overconfidence in GIS Research

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in academic research workflows, but scholarly tasks require high factual precision and therefore expose a key weakness: overconfidence. Here, overconfidence is defined behaviorally as the tendency to produce confident, assertive, and well-formatted outputs even when the underlying knowledge is incomplete or unverifiable, rather than as a calibration gap between stated confidence and accuracy. To examine this issue, we introduce GIScholarBench, a benchmark built from 10,865 papers published in 25 core GIScience journals between 2020 and 2025. The benchmark covers three tasks with increasing cognitive complexity: metadata retrieval, literature linking, and research direction generation. We evaluate Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3, and ChatGPT 5.3 through their native web interfaces under real-world user-facing conditions. Results show consistent overconfidence across all tasks. In metadata retrieval, ChatGPT 5.3 achieves the highest accuracy, but all models still generate definitive titles and DOIs when predictions are wrong. In literature linking, Claude Sonnet 4.5 recovers the most references, but all models show a clear gap between top-ranked retrieval and longer citation lists, suggesting that references are extended beyond reliable retrieval capacity. In research direction generation, AI-generated directions show lower topic coverage, higher novel miss rates, and lower semantic diversity than real future-citing papers. These findings suggest that LLM overconfidence is task-invariant but takes different forms: factual overgeneration in retrieval, unreliable citation expansion in literature linking, and overconfidence in output completeness during research ideation.

Satellite-to-Street: Synthesizing Post-Disaster Views from Satellite Imagery via Generative Vision Models

In the immediate aftermath of natural disasters, rapid situational awareness is critical. Traditionally, satellite observations are widely used to estimate damage extent. However, they lack the ground-level perspective essential for characterizing specific structural failures and impacts. Meanwhile, ground-level data (e.g., street-view imagery) remains largely inaccessible during time-sensitive events. This study investigates Satellite-to-Street View Synthesis to bridge this data gap. We introduce two generative strategies to synthesize post-disaster street views from satellite imagery: a Vision-Language Model (VLM)-guided approach and a damage-sensitive Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) method. We benchmark these against general-purpose baselines (Pix2Pix, ControlNet) using a proposed Structure-Aware Evaluation Framework. This multi-tier protocol integrates (1) pixel-level quality assessment, (2) ResNet-based semantic consistency verification, and (3) a novel VLM-as-a-Judge for perceptual alignment. Experiments on 300 disaster scenarios reveal a critical realism--fidelity trade-off: while diffusion-based approaches (e.g., ControlNet) achieve high perceptual realism, they often hallucinate structural details. Quantitative results show that standard ControlNet achieves the highest semantic accuracy, 0.71, whereas VLM-enhanced and MoE models excel in textural plausibility but struggle with semantic clarity. This work establishes a baseline for trustworthy cross-view synthesis, emphasizing that visually realistic generations may still fail to preserve critical structural information required for reliable disaster assessment.

DamageArbiter: A CLIP-Enhanced Multimodal Arbitration Framework for Hurricane Damage Assessment from Street-View Imagery

Analyzing street-view imagery with computer vision models for rapid, hyperlocal damage assessment is becoming popular and valuable in emergency response and recovery, but traditional models often act like black boxes, lacking interpretability and reliability. This study proposes a multimodal disagreement-driven Arbitration framework powered by Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) models, DamageArbiter, to improve the accuracy, interpretability, and robustness of damage estimation from street-view imagery. DamageArbiter leverages the complementary strengths of unimodal and multimodal models, employing a lightweight logistic regression meta-classifier to arbitrate cases of disagreement. Using 2,556 post-disaster street-view images, paired with both manually generated and large language model (LLM)-generated text descriptions, we systematically compared the performance of unimodal models (including image-only and text-only models), multimodal CLIP-based models, and DamageArbiter. Notably, DamageArbiter improved the accuracy from 74.33% (ViT-B/32, image-only) to 82.79%, surpassing the 80% accuracy threshold and achieving an absolute improvement of 8.46% compared to the strongest baseline model. Beyond improvements in overall accuracy, compared to visual models relying solely on images, DamageArbiter, through arbitration of discrepancies between unimodal and multimodal predictions, mitigates common overconfidence errors in visual models, especially in situations where disaster visual cues are ambiguous or subject to interference, reducing overconfidence but incorrect predictions. We further mapped and analyzed geo-referenced predictions and misclassifications to compare model performance across locations. Overall, this work advances street-view-based disaster assessment from coarse severity classification toward a more reliable and interpretable framework.

Towards Effective and Efficient Graph Alignment without Supervision

Unsupervised graph alignment aims to find the node correspondence across different graphs without any anchor node pairs. Despite the recent efforts utilizing deep learning-based techniques, such as the embedding and optimal transport (OT)-based approaches, we observe their limitations in terms of model accuracy-efficiency tradeoff. By focusing on the exploitation of local and global graph information, we formalize them as the ``local representation, global alignment'' paradigm, and present a new ``global representation and alignment'' paradigm to resolve the mismatch between the two phases in the alignment process. We then propose \underline{Gl}obal representation and \underline{o}ptimal transport-\underline{b}ased \underline{Align}ment (\texttt{GlobAlign}), and its variant, \texttt{GlobAlign-E}, for better \underline{E}fficiency. Our methods are equipped with the global attention mechanism and a hierarchical cross-graph transport cost, able to capture long-range and implicit node dependencies beyond the local graph structure. Furthermore, \texttt{GlobAlign-E} successfully closes the time complexity gap between representative embedding and OT-based methods, reducing OT's cubic complexity to quadratic terms. Through extensive experiments, our methods demonstrate superior performance, with up to a 20\% accuracy improvement over the best competitor. Meanwhile, \texttt{GlobAlign-E} achieves the best efficiency, with an order of magnitude speedup against existing OT-based methods.

Predicting Healthcare System Visitation Flow by Integrating Hospital Attributes and Population Socioeconomics with Human Mobility Data

Healthcare visitation patterns are influenced by a complex interplay of hospital attributes, population socioeconomics, and spatial factors. However, existing research often adopts a fragmented approach, examining these determinants in isolation. This study addresses this gap by integrating hospital capacities, occupancy rates, reputation, and popularity with population SES and spatial mobility patterns to predict visitation flows and analyze influencing factors. Utilizing four years of SafeGraph mobility data and user experience data from Google Maps Reviews, five flow prediction models, Naive Regression, Gradient Boosting, Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs), Deep Gravity, and Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks (HGNN),were trained and applied to simulate visitation flows in Houston, Texas, U.S. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) analysis and the Partial Dependence Plot (PDP) method were employed to examine the combined impacts of different factors on visitation patterns. The findings reveal that Deep Gravity outperformed other models. Hospital capacities, ICU occupancy rates, ratings, and popularity significantly influence visitation patterns, with their effects varying across different travel distances. Short-distance visits are primarily driven by convenience, whereas long-distance visits are influenced by hospital ratings. White-majority areas exhibited lower sensitivity to hospital ratings for short-distance visits, while Asian populations and those with higher education levels prioritized hospital rating in their visitation decisions. SES further influence these patterns, as areas with higher proportions of Hispanic, Black, under-18, and over-65 populations tend to have more frequent hospital visits, potentially reflecting greater healthcare needs or limited access to alternative medical services.

Does Memory Need Graphs? A Unified Framework and Empirical Analysis for Long-Term Dialog Memory

Graph structures are increasingly used in dialog memory systems, but empirical findings on their effectiveness remain inconsistent, making it unclear which design choices truly matter. We present an experimental, system-oriented analysis of long-term dialog memory architectures. We introduce a unified framework that decomposes dialog memory systems into core components and supports both graph-based and non-graph approaches. Under this framework, we conduct controlled, stage-wise experiments on LongMemEval and HaluMem, comparing common design choices in memory representation, organization, maintenance, and retrieval. Our results show that many performance differences are driven by foundational system settings rather than specific architectural innovations. Based on these findings, we identify stable and reliable strong baselines for future dialog memory research.

Detecting Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Semantic-level Internal Reasoning Graph

The Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system based on Large language model (LLM) has made significant progress. It can effectively reduce factuality hallucinations, but faithfulness hallucinations still exist. Previous methods for detecting faithfulness hallucinations either neglect to capture the models' internal reasoning processes or handle those features coarsely, making it difficult for discriminators to learn. This paper proposes a semantic-level internal reasoning graph-based method for detecting faithfulness hallucination. Specifically, we first extend the layer-wise relevance propagation algorithm from the token level to the semantic level, constructing an internal reasoning graph based on attribution vectors. This provides a more faithful semantic-level representation of dependency. Furthermore, we design a general framework based on a small pre-trained language model to utilize the dependencies in LLM's reasoning for training and hallucination detection, which can dynamically adjust the pass rate of correct samples through a threshold. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves better overall performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines on RAGTruth and Dolly-15k.

GILT: An LLM-Free, Tuning-Free Graph Foundational Model for In-Context Learning

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful tools for precessing relational data but often struggle to generalize to unseen graphs, giving rise to the development of Graph Foundational Models (GFMs). However, current GFMs are challenged by the extreme heterogeneity of graph data, where each graph can possess a unique feature space, label set, and topology. To address this, two main paradigms have emerged. The first leverages Large Language Models (LLMs), but is fundamentally text-dependent, thus struggles to handle the numerical features in vast graphs. The second pre-trains a structure-based model, but the adaptation to new tasks typically requires a costly, per-graph tuning stage, creating a critical efficiency bottleneck. In this work, we move beyond these limitations and introduce \textbf{G}raph \textbf{I}n-context \textbf{L}earning \textbf{T}ransformer (GILT), a framework built on an LLM-free and tuning-free architecture. GILT introduces a novel token-based framework for in-context learning (ICL) on graphs, reframing classification tasks spanning node, edge and graph levels in a unified framework. This mechanism is the key to handling heterogeneity, as it is designed to operate on generic numerical features. Further, its ability to understand class semantics dynamically from the context enables tuning-free adaptation. Comprehensive experiments show that GILT achieves stronger few-shot performance with significantly less time than LLM-based or tuning-based baselines, validating the effectiveness of our approach.