From Pixels to Semantics: A Multi-Stage AI Framework for Structural Damage Detection in Satellite Imagery

Rapid and accurate structural damage assessment following natural disasters is critical for effective emergency response and recovery. However, remote sensing imagery often suffers from low spatial resolution, contextual ambiguity, and limited semantic interpretability, reducing the reliability of traditional detection pipelines. In this work, we propose a novel hybrid framework that integrates AI-based super-resolution, deep learning object detection, and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for comprehensive post-disaster building damage assessment. First, we enhance pre- and post-disaster satellite imagery using a Video Restoration Transformer (VRT) to upscale images from 1024x1024 to 4096x4096 resolution, improving structural detail visibility. Next, a YOLOv11-based detector localizes buildings in pre-disaster imagery, and cropped building regions are analyzed using VLMs to semantically assess structural damage across four severity levels. To ensure robust evaluation in the absence of ground-truth captions, we employ CLIPScore for reference-free semantic alignment and introduce a multi-model VLM-as-a-Jury strategy to reduce individual model bias in safety-critical decision making. Experiments on subsets of the xBD dataset, including the Moore Tornado and Hurricane Matthew events, demonstrate that the proposed framework enhances the semantic interpretation of damaged buildings. In addition, our framework provides helpful recommendations to first responders for recovery based on damage analysis.

One Model, Two Markets: Bid-Aware Generative Recommendation

Generative Recommender Systems using semantic ids, such as TIGER (Rajput et al., 2023), have emerged as a widely adopted competitive paradigm in sequential recommendation. However, existing architectures are designed solely for semantic retrieval and do not address concerns such as monetization via ad revenue and incorporation of bids for commercial retrieval. We propose GEM-Rec, a unified framework that integrates commercial relevance and monetization objectives directly into the generative sequence. We introduce control tokens to decouple the decision of whether to show an ad from which item to show. This allows the model to learn valid placement patterns directly from interaction logs, which inherently reflect past successful ad placements. Complementing this, we devise a Bid-Aware Decoding mechanism that handles real-time pricing, injecting bids directly into the inference process to steer the generation toward high-value items. We prove that this approach guarantees allocation monotonicity, ensuring that higher bids weakly increase an ad's likelihood of being shown without requiring model retraining. Experiments demonstrate that GEM-Rec allows platforms to dynamically optimize for semantic relevance and platform revenue.

Programming Manufacturing Robots with Imperfect AI: LLMs as Tuning Experts for FDM Print Configuration Selection

We use fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing as a case study of how manufacturing robots can use imperfect AI to acquire process expertise. In FDM, print configuration strongly affects output quality. Yet, novice users typically rely on default configurations, trial-and-error, or recommendations from generic AI models (e.g., ChatGPT). These strategies can produce complete prints, but they do not reliably meet specific objectives. Experts iteratively tune print configurations using evidence from prior prints. We present a modular closed-loop approach that treats an LLM as a source of tuning expertise. We embed this source of expertise within a Bayesian optimization loop. An approximate evaluator scores each print configuration and returns structured diagnostics, which the LLM uses to propose natural-language adjustments that are compiled into machine-actionable guidance for optimization. On 100 Thingi10k parts, our LLM-guided loop achieves the best configuration on 78% objects with 0% likely-to-fail cases, while single-shot AI model recommendations are rarely best and exhibit 15% likely-to-fail cases. These results suggest that LLMs provide more value as constrained decision modules in evidence-driven optimization loops than as end-to-end oracles for print configuration selection. We expect this result to extend to broader LLM-based robot programming.

PreferRec: Learning and Transferring Pareto Preferences for Multi-objective Re-ranking

Multi-objective re-ranking has become a critical component of modern multi-stage recommender systems, as it tasked to balance multiple conflicting objectives such as accuracy, diversity, and fairness. Existing multi-objective re-ranking methods typically optimize aggregate objectives at the item level using static or handcrafted preference weights. This design overlooks that users inherently exhibit Pareto-optimal preferences at the intent level, reflecting personalized trade-offs among objectives rather than fixed weight combinations. Moreover, most approaches treat re-ranking task for each user as an isolated problem, and repeatedly learn the preferences from scratch. Such a paradigm not only incurs high computational cost, but also ignores the fact that users often share similar preference trade-off structures across objectives. Inspired by the existence of homogeneous multi-objective optimization spaces where Pareto-optimal patterns are transferable, we propose PreferRec, a novel framework that explicitly models and transfers Pareto preferences across users. Specifically, PreferRec is built upon three tightly coupled components: Preference-Aware Pareto Learning aims to capture user intrinsic trade-offs among multiple conflicting objectives at the intent level. By learning Pareto preference representations from re-ranking populations, this component explicitly models how users prioritize different objectives under diverse contexts. Knowledge-Guided Transfer facilitates efficient cross-user knowledge transfer by distilling shared optimization patterns across homogeneous optimization spaces. The transferred knowledge is then used to guide solution selection and personalized re-ranking, biasing the optimization process toward high-quality regions of the Pareto front while preserving user-specific preference characteristics.

TagLLM: A Fine-Grained Tag Generation Approach for Note Recommendation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising potential in E-commerce community recommendation. While LLMs and Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) are widely used to encode notes into implicit embeddings, leveraging their generative capabilities to represent notes with interpretable tags remains unexplored. In the field of tag generation, traditional close-ended methods heavily rely on the design of tag pools, while existing open-ended methods applied directly to note recommendations face two limitations: (1) MLLMs lack guidance during generation, resulting in redundant tags that fail to capture user interests; (2) The generated tags are often coarse and lack fine-grained representation of notes, interfering with downstream recommendations. To address these limitations, we propose TagLLM, a fine-grained tag generation method for note recommendation. TagLLM captures user interests across note categories through a User Interest Handbook and constructs fine-grained tag data using multimodal CoT Extraction. A Tag Knowledge Distillation method is developed to equip small models with competitive generation capabilities, enhancing inference efficiency. In online A/B test, TagLLM increases average view duration per user by 0.31%, average interactions per user by 0.96%, and page view click-through rate in cold-start scenario by 32.37%, demonstrating its effectiveness.

AgenticRec: End-to-End Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization for Ranking-Oriented Recommender Agents

Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation. However, existing recommender agents typically suffer from a disconnect between intermediate reasoning and final ranking feedback, and are unable to capture fine-grained preferences. To address this, we present AgenticRec, a ranking-oriented agentic recommendation framework that optimizes the entire decision-making trajectory (including intermediate reasoning, tool invocation, and final ranking list generation) under sparse implicit feedback. Our approach makes three key contributions. First, we design a suite of recommendation-specific tools integrated into a ReAct loop to support evidence-grounded reasoning. Second, we propose theoretically unbiased List-Wise Group Relative Policy Optimization (list-wise GRPO) to maximize ranking utility, ensuring accurate credit assignment for complex tool-use trajectories. Third, we introduce Progressive Preference Refinement (PPR) to resolve fine-grained preference ambiguities. By mining hard negatives from ranking violations and applying bidirectional preference alignment, PPR minimizes the convex upper bound of pairwise ranking errors. Experiments on benchmarks confirm that AgenticRec significantly outperforms baselines, validating the necessity of unifying reasoning, tool use, and ranking optimization.

Holistic Scaling Laws for Optimal Mixture-of-Experts Architecture Optimization

Scaling laws for Large Language Models govern macroscopic resource allocation, yet translating them into precise Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectural configurations remains an open problem due to the combinatorially vast design space. Existing MoE scaling studies are constrained by experimental budgets to either augment scaling formulas with extra MoE variables, risking unreliable fits, or fix all non-MoE factors, ignoring global interactions. We propose a reusable framework for holistic MoE architectural optimization that bridges this gap. We first show that FLOPs per token alone is an inadequate fairness metric for MoE models because differing computational densities across layer types can inflate parameters without proportional compute cost, and establish a joint constraint triad of FLOPs per token, active parameters, and total parameters. We then reduce the 16-dimensional architectural search space to two sequential low-dimensional phases through algebraic constraints and a rank-preserving property of the hidden dimension. Validated across hundreds of MoE models spanning six orders of magnitude in compute, our framework yields robust scaling laws that map any compute budget to a complete, optimal MoE architecture. A key finding is that the near-optimal configuration band widens with scale, giving practitioners quantitative flexibility to balance scaling law recommendations against infrastructure constraints.

A Job I Like or a Job I Can Get: Designing Job Recommender Systems Using Field Experiments

Recommendation systems (RSs) are increasingly used to guide job seekers on online platforms, yet the algorithms currently deployed are typically optimized for predictive objectives such as clicks, applications, or hires, rather than job seekers' welfare. We develop a job-search model with an application stage in which the value of a vacancy depends on two dimensions: the utility it delivers to the worker and the probability that an application succeeds. The model implies that welfare-optimal RSs rank vacancies by an expected-surplus index combining both, and shows why rankings based solely on utility, hiring probabilities, or observed application behavior are generically suboptimal, an instance of the inversion problem between behavior and welfare. We test these predictions and quantify their practical importance through two randomized field experiments conducted with the French public employment service. The first experiment, comparing existing algorithms and their combinations, provides behavioral evidence that both dimensions shape application decisions. Guided by the model and these results, the second experiment extends the comparison to an RS designed to approximate the welfare-optimal ranking. The experiments generate exogenous variation in the vacancies shown to job seekers, allowing us to estimate the model, validate its behavioral predictions, and construct a welfare metric. Algorithms informed by the model-implied optimal ranking substantially outperform existing approaches and perform close to the welfare-optimal benchmark. Our results show that embedding predictive tools within a simple job-search framework and combining it with experimental evidence yields recommendation rules with substantial welfare gains in practice.

Probabilistic modeling over permutations using quantum computers

Quantum computers provide a super-exponential speedup for performing a Fourier transform over the symmetric group, an ability for which practical use cases have remained elusive so far. In this work, we leverage this ability to unlock spectral methods for machine learning over permutation-structured data, which appear in applications such as multi-object tracking and recommendation systems. It has been shown previously that a powerful way of building probabilistic models over permutations is to use the framework of non-Abelian harmonic analysis, as the model's group Fourier spectrum captures the interaction complexity: "low frequencies" correspond to low order correlations, and "high frequencies" to more complex ones. This can be used to construct a Markov chain model driven by alternating steps of diffusion (a group-equivariant convolution) and conditioning (a Bayesian update). However, this approach is computationally challenging and hence limited to simple approximations. Here we construct a quantum algorithm that encodes the exact probabilistic model -- a classically intractable object -- into the amplitudes of a quantum state by making use of the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) over the symmetric group. We discuss the scaling, limitations, and practical use of such an approach, which we envision to be a first step towards useful applications of non-Abelian QFTs.

Behavioural feasible set: Value alignment constraints on AI decision support

When organisations adopt commercial AI systems for decision support, they inherit value judgements embedded by vendors that are neither transparent nor renegotiable. The governance puzzle is not whether AI can support decisions but which recommendations the system can actually produce given how its vendor has configured it. I formalise this as a behavioural feasible set, the range of recommendations reachable under vendor-imposed alignment constraints, and characterise diagnostic thresholds for when organisational requirements exceed the system's flexibility. In scenario-based experiments using binary decision scenarios and multi-stakeholder ranking tasks, I show that alignment materially compresses this set. Comparing pre- and post-alignment variants of an open-weight model isolates the mechanism: alignment makes the system substantially less able to shift its recommendation even under legitimate contextual pressure. Leading commercial models exhibit comparable or greater rigidity. In multi-stakeholder tasks, alignment shifts implied stakeholder priorities rather than neutralising them, meaning organisations adopt embedded value orientations set upstream by the vendor. Organisations thus face a governance problem that better prompting cannot resolve: selecting a vendor partially determines which trade-offs remain negotiable and which stakeholder priorities are structurally embedded.