Unrequited Emotions: Investigating the Gaps in Motivation and Practice in Speech Emotion Recognition Research

Critical analyses of emotion recognition technology have raised ethical concerns around task validity and potential downstream impacts, urging researchers to ensure alignment between their stated motivations and practice. However, these discussions have not adequately influenced or drawn from research on speech emotion recognition (SER). We address this gap by conducting a systematic survey of SER research to uncover what stated motivations drive this work and if they align with the datasets and emotions studied. We find that while SER research identifies appealing goals, such as well-situated voice-activated systems or healthcare applications, commonly-used datasets do not reflect these proposed deployment contexts, thus presenting a gap between motivations and research practices. We argue that such gaps engender ethical concerns, and that SER research should reassert itself with concrete use-cases to prevent misinterpretations, misuse, and downstream harms.

Evaluation of Automatic Speech Recognition Using Generative Large Language Models

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is traditionally evaluated using Word Error Rate (WER), a metric that is insensitive to meaning. Embedding-based semantic metrics are better correlated with human perception, but decoder-based Large Language Models (LLMs) remain underexplored for this task. This paper evaluates their relevance through three approaches: (1) selecting the best hypothesis between two candidates, (2) computing semantic distance using generative embeddings, and (3) qualitative classification of errors. On the HATS dataset, the best LLMs achieve 92--94\% agreement with human annotators for hypothesis selection, compared to 63\% for WER, also outperforming semantic metrics. Embeddings from decoder-based LLMs show performance comparable to encoder models. Finally, LLMs offer a promising direction for interpretable and semantic ASR evaluation.

Identifying and typifying demographic unfairness in phoneme-level embeddings of self-supervised speech recognition models

Modern automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems have been observed to function better for certain speaker groups (SGs) than others, despite recent gains in overall performance. One potential impediment to progress towards fairer ASR is a more nuanced understanding of the types of modeling errors that speech encoder models make, and in particular the difference between the structure of embeddings for high-performance and low-performance SGs. This paper proposes a framework typifying two types of error that can occur in modeling phonemes in ASR systems: random error/high variance in phoneme embedding, vs systematic error/embedding bias. We find that training phoneme classification probes only on a single, typically disadvantaged SG, sometimes improves performance for that SG, which is evidence for the existence of SG-level bias in phoneme embeddings. On the other hand, we find that speakers and SGs with higher levels of phoneme variance are the same as those with worse phoneme prediction accuracy. We conclude that both types of error are present in phoneme embeddings and both are candidate causes for SG-level unfairness in ASR, though random error is likely a greater hindrance to fairness than systematic error. Furthermore, we find that finetuning encoder models using a fairness-enhancing algorithm (domain enhancing and adversarial training) changes neither the benefits of in-domain phoneme classification probe training, nor measured levels of random embedding error.

Advancing automatic speech recognition using feature fusion with self-supervised learning features: A case study on Fearless Steps Apollo corpus

Using self-supervised learning (SSL) models has significantly improved performance for downstream speech tasks, surpassing the capabilities of traditional hand-crafted features. This study investigates the amalgamation of SSL models, with the aim to leverage both their individual strengths and refine extracted features to achieve improved speech recognition models for naturalistic scenarios. Our research investigates the massive naturalistic Fearless Steps (FS) APOLLO resource, with particular focus on the FS Challenge (FSC) Phase-4 corpus, providing the inaugural analysis of this dataset. Additionally, we incorporate the CHiME-6 dataset to evaluate performance across diverse naturalistic speech scenarios. While exploring previously proposed Feature Refinement Loss and fusion methods, we found these methods to be less effective on the FSC Phase-4 corpus. To address this, we introduce a novel deep cross-attention (DCA) fusion method, designed to elevate performance, especially for the FSC Phase-4 corpus. Our objective is to foster creation of superior FS APOLLO community resources, catering to the diverse needs of researchers across various disciplines. The proposed solution achieves an absolute +1.1% improvement in WER, providing effective meta-data creation for the massive FS APOLLO community resource.

Do LLM Decoders Listen Fairly? Benchmarking How Language Model Priors Shape Bias in Speech Recognition

As pretrained large language models replace task-specific decoders in speech recognition, a critical question arises: do their text-derived priors make recognition fairer or more biased across demographic groups? We evaluate nine models spanning three architectural generations (CTC with no language model, encoder-decoder with an implicit LM, and LLM-based with an explicit pretrained decoder) on about 43,000 utterances across five demographic axes (ethnicity, accent, gender, age, first language) using Common Voice 24 and Meta's Fair-Speech, a controlled-prompt dataset that eliminates vocabulary confounds. On clean audio, three findings challenge assumptions: LLM decoders do not amplify racial bias (Granite-8B has the best ethnicity fairness, max/min WER = 2.28); Whisper exhibits pathological hallucination on Indian-accented speech with a non-monotonic insertion-rate spike to 9.62% at large-v3; and audio compression predicts accent fairness more than LLM scale. We then stress-test these findings under 12 acoustic degradation conditions (noise, reverberation, silence injection, chunk masking) across both datasets, totaling 216 inference runs. Severe degradation paradoxically compresses fairness gaps as all groups converge to high WER, but silence injection amplifies Whisper's accent bias up to 4.64x by triggering demographic-selective hallucination. Under masking, Whisper enters catastrophic repetition loops (86% of 51,797 insertions) while explicit-LLM decoders produce 38x fewer insertions with near-zero repetition; high-compression audio encoding (Q-former) reintroduces repetition pathology even in LLM decoders. These results suggest that audio encoder design, not LLM scaling, is the primary lever for equitable and robust speech recognition.

2nd of the 5th PVUW MeViS-Audio Track: ASR-SaSaSa2VA

Audio-based video object segmentation aims to locate and segment objects in videos conditioned on audio cues, requiring precise understanding of both appearance and motion. Recent audio-driven video segmentation methods extend MLLMs by fusing audio and visual features for end-to-end localization. Despite their promise, these approaches are computationally intensive, struggle with aligning temporal audio cues to dynamic video content, and depend on large paired audio-video datasets. To address these challenges, we present ASR-SaSaSa2VA, a resource-efficient framework for audio-guided video segmentation. The key idea is to convert audio inputs into textual motion descriptions via automatic speech recognition (ASR) models and then leverage pre-trained text-based referring video segmentation models (e.g., SaSaSa2VA) for pixel-level predictions. To further enhance robustness, we incorporate a no-target expression detection module, implemented by a fine-tuned audio-based MLLM, which filters out audio clips that do not refer to any target object. This design allows the system to exploit strong pre-trained models while effectively handling ambiguous or irrelevant audio inputs. Our approach achieves a final score of 80.7 in the 5th PVUW Challenge (MeViS-v2-Audio track), earning the second-place ranking.

UNet-Based Fusion and Exponential Moving Average Adaptation for Noise-Robust Speaker Recognition

The joint training of speech enhancement and speaker embedding networks for speaker recognition is widely adopted under noisy acoustic environments. While effective, this paradigm often fails to leverage the generalization and robustness benefits inherent in large-scale speech enhancement pre-training. Moreover, maintaining the speaker information in the denoised speech is not an explicit objective of the speech enhancement process. To address these limitations, we proposed a scalable \textbf{U}Net-based \textbf{F}usion framework (UF-EMA) that considers the noisy and enhanced speech as a multi-channel input, thereby enabling the speaker encoder to exploit speaker information effectively. In addition, an \textbf{E}xponential \textbf{M}oving \textbf{A}verage strategy is applied to a speaker encoder pre-trained on clean speech to mitigate overfitting and facilitate a smooth transition from clean to noisy conditions. Experimental results on multiple noise-contaminated test sets showcase the superiority of the proposed approach.

Au-M-ol: A Unified Model for Medical Audio and Language Understanding

In this work, we present Au-M-ol, a novel multimodal architecture that extends Large Language Models (LLMs) with audio processing. It is designed to improve performance on clinically relevant tasks such as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). Au-M-ol has three main components: (1) an audio encoder that extracts rich acoustic features from medical speech, (2) an adaptation layer that maps audio features into the LLM input space, and (3) a pretrained LLM that performs transcription and clinical language understanding. This design allows the model to interpret spoken medical content directly, improving both accuracy and robustness. In experiments, Au-M-ol reduces Word Error Rate (WER) by 56\% compared to state-of-the-art baselines on medical transcription tasks. The model also performs well in challenging conditions, including noisy environments, domain-specific terminology, and speaker variability. These results suggest that Au-M-ol is a strong candidate for real-world clinical applications, where reliable and context-aware audio understanding is essential.

Voice of India: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Real-World Speech Recognition in India

Existing Indic ASR benchmarks often use scripted, clean speech and leaderboard driven evaluation that encourages dataset specific overfitting. In addition, strict single reference WER penalizes natural spelling variation in Indian languages, including non standardized spellings of code-mixed English origin words. To address these limitations, we introduce Voice of India, a closed source benchmark built from unscripted telephonic conversations covering 15 major Indian languages across 139 regional clusters. The dataset contains 306230 utterances, totaling 536 hours of speech from 36691 speakers with transcripts accounting for spelling variations. We also analyze performance geographically at the district level, revealing disparities. Finally, we provide detailed analysis across factors such as audio quality, speaking rate, gender, and device type, highlighting where current ASR systems struggle and offering insights for improving real world Indic ASR systems.

Aligning Stuttered-Speech Research with End-User Needs: Scoping Review, Survey, and Guidelines

Atypical speech is receiving greater attention in speech technology research, but much of this work unfolds with limited interdisciplinary dialogue. For stuttered speech in particular, it is widely recognised that current speech recognition systems fall short in practice, and current evaluation methods and research priorities are not systematically grounded in end-user experiences and needs. In this work, we analyse these gaps through 1) a scoping review of papers that deal with stuttered speech and 2) a survey of 70 stakeholders, including adults who stutter and speech-language pathologists. By analysing these two perspectives, we propose a taxonomy of stuttered-speech research, identify where current research directions diverge from the needs articulated by stakeholders, and conclude by outlining concrete guidelines and directions towards addressing the real needs of the stuttering community.