Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generation

Multi-dimensional evaluation is the dominant paradigm for human evaluation in Natural Language Generation (NLG), i.e., evaluating the generated text from multiple explainable dimensions, such as coherence and fluency. However, automatic evaluation in NLG is still dominated by similarity-based metrics, and we lack a reliable framework for a more comprehensive evaluation of advanced models. In this paper, we propose a unified multi-dimensional evaluator UniEval for NLG. We re-frame NLG evaluation as a Boolean Question Answering (QA) task, and by guiding the model with different questions, we can use one evaluator to evaluate from multiple dimensions. Furthermore, thanks to the unified Boolean QA format, we are able to introduce an intermediate learning phase that enables UniEval to incorporate external knowledge from multiple related tasks and gain further improvement. Experiments on three typical NLG tasks show that UniEval correlates substantially better with human judgments than existing metrics. Specifically, compared to the top-performing unified evaluators, UniEval achieves a 23% higher correlation on text summarization, and over 43% on dialogue response generation. Also, UniEval demonstrates a strong zero-shot learning ability for unseen evaluation dimensions and tasks. Source code, data and all pre-trained evaluators are available on our GitHub repository (https://github.com/maszhongming/UniEval).

CiteSum: Citation Text-guided Scientific Extreme Summarization and Low-resource Domain Adaptation

Scientific extreme summarization (TLDR) aims to form ultra-short summaries of scientific papers. Previous efforts on curating scientific TLDR datasets failed to scale up due to the heavy human annotation and domain expertise required. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective approach to automatically extracting TLDR summaries for scientific papers from their citation texts. Based on the proposed approach, we create a new benchmark CiteSum without human annotation, which is around 30 times larger than the previous human-curated dataset SciTLDR. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of CiteSum, examining its data characteristics and establishing strong baselines. We further demonstrate the usefulness of CiteSum by adapting models pre-trained on CiteSum (named CITES) to new tasks and domains with limited supervision. For scientific extreme summarization, CITES outperforms most fully-supervised methods on SciTLDR without any fine-tuning and obtains state-of-the-art results with only 128 examples. For news extreme summarization, CITES achieves significant gains on XSum over its base model (not pre-trained on CiteSum), e.g., +7.2 ROUGE-1 zero-shot performance and state-of-the-art few-shot performance. For news headline generation, CITES performs the best among unsupervised and zero-shot methods on Gigaword.

Unsupervised Summarization with Customized Granularities

Text summarization is a personalized and customized task, i.e., for one document, users often have different preferences for the summary. As a key aspect of customization in summarization, granularity is used to measure the semantic coverage between summary and source document. Coarse-grained summaries can only contain the most central event in the original text, while fine-grained summaries cover more sub-events and corresponding details. However, previous studies mostly develop systems in the single-granularity scenario. And models that can generate summaries with customizable semantic coverage still remain an under-explored topic. In this paper, we propose the first unsupervised multi-granularity summarization framework, GranuSum. We take events as the basic semantic units of the source documents and propose to rank these events by their salience. We also develop a model to summarize input documents with given events as anchors and hints. By inputting different numbers of events, GranuSum is capable of producing multi-granular summaries in an unsupervised manner. Meanwhile, to evaluate multi-granularity summarization models, we annotate a new benchmark GranuDUC, in which we write multiple summaries of different granularities for each document cluster. Experimental results confirm the substantial superiority of GranuSum on multi-granularity summarization over several baseline systems. Furthermore, by experimenting on conventional unsupervised abstractive summarization tasks, we find that GranuSum, by exploiting the event information, can also achieve new state-of-the-art results under this scenario, outperforming strong baselines.

UniPELT: A Unified Framework for Parameter-Efficient Language Model Tuning

Conventional fine-tuning of pre-trained language models tunes all model parameters and stores a full model copy for each downstream task, which has become increasingly infeasible as the model size grows larger. Recent parameter-efficient language model tuning (PELT) methods manage to match the performance of fine-tuning with much fewer trainable parameters and perform especially well when the training data is limited. However, different PELT methods may perform rather differently on the same task, making it nontrivial to select the most appropriate method for a specific task, especially considering the fast-growing number of new PELT methods and downstream tasks. In light of model diversity and the difficulty of model selection, we propose a unified framework, UniPELT, which incorporates different PELT methods as submodules and learns to activate the ones that best suit the current data or task setup. Remarkably, on the GLUE benchmark, UniPELT consistently achieves 1~3pt gains compared to the best individual PELT method that it incorporates and even outperforms fine-tuning under different setups. Moreover, UniPELT often surpasses the upper bound when taking the best performance of all its submodules used individually on each task, indicating that a mixture of multiple PELT methods may be inherently more effective than single methods.

SAIS: Supervising and Augmenting Intermediate Steps for Document-Level Relation Extraction

Stepping from sentence-level to document-level relation extraction, the research community confronts increasing text length and more complicated entity interactions. Consequently, it is more challenging to encode the key sources of information--relevant contexts and entity types. However, existing methods only implicitly learn to model these critical information sources while being trained for relation extraction. As a result, they suffer the problems of ineffective supervision and uninterpretable model predictions. In contrast, we propose to explicitly teach the model to capture relevant contexts and entity types by supervising and augmenting intermediate steps (SAIS) for relation extraction. Based on a broad spectrum of carefully designed tasks, our proposed SAIS method not only extracts relations of better quality due to more effective supervision, but also retrieves the corresponding supporting evidence more accurately so as to enhance interpretability. By assessing model uncertainty, SAIS further boosts the performance via evidence-based data augmentation and ensemble inference while reducing the computational cost. Eventually, SAIS delivers state-of-the-art relation extraction results on three benchmarks (DocRED, CDR, and GDA) and achieves 5.04% relative gains in F1 score compared to the runner-up in evidence retrieval on DocRED.

Eider: Evidence-enhanced Document-level Relation Extraction

Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims at extracting the semantic relations among entity pairs in a document. In DocRE, a subset of the sentences in a document, called the evidence sentences, might be sufficient for predicting the relation between a specific entity pair. To make better use of the evidence sentences, in this paper, we propose a three-stage evidence-enhanced DocRE framework consisting of joint relation and evidence extraction, evidence-centered relation extraction (RE), and fusion of extraction results. We first jointly train an RE model with a simple and memory-efficient evidence extraction model. Then, we construct pseudo documents based on the extracted evidence sentences and run the RE model again. Finally, we fuse the extraction results of the first two stages using a blending layer and make a final prediction. Extensive experiments show that our proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on the DocRED dataset, outperforming the second-best method by 0.76/0.82 Ign F1/F1. In particular, our method significantly improves the performance on inter-sentence relations by 1.23 Inter F1.

Extract, Denoise, and Enforce: Evaluating and Predicting Lexical Constraints for Conditional Text Generation

Recently, pre-trained language models (PLMs) have dominated conditional text generation tasks. Given the impressive performance and prevalence of the PLMs, it is seemingly natural to assume that they could figure out what to attend to in the input and what to include in the output via seq2seq learning without more guidance than the training input/output pairs. However, a rigorous study regarding the above assumption is still lacking. In this paper, we present a systematic analysis of conditional generation to study whether current PLMs are good enough for preserving important concepts in the input and to what extent explicitly guiding generation with lexical constraints is beneficial. We conduct extensive analytical experiments on a range of conditional generation tasks and try to answer in what scenarios guiding generation with lexical constraints works well and why. We then propose a framework for automatic constraint extraction, denoising, and enforcement that is shown to perform comparably or better than unconstrained generation. We hope that our findings could serve as a reference when determining whether it is appropriate and worthwhile to use explicit constraints for a specific task or dataset.\footnote{Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/morningmoni/LCGen-eval}.}

Taxonomy Completion via Triplet Matching Network

Automatically constructing taxonomy finds many applications in e-commerce and web search. One critical challenge is as data and business scope grow in real applications, new concepts are emerging and needed to be added to the existing taxonomy. Previous approaches focus on the taxonomy expansion, i.e. finding an appropriate hypernym concept from the taxonomy for a new query concept. In this paper, we formulate a new task, "taxonomy completion", by discovering both the hypernym and hyponym concepts for a query. We propose Triplet Matching Network (TMN), to find the appropriate <hypernym, hyponym> pairs for a given query concept. TMN consists of one primal scorer and multiple auxiliary scorers. These auxiliary scorers capture various fine-grained signals (e.g., query to hypernym or query to hyponym semantics), and the primal scorer makes a holistic prediction on <query, hypernym, hyponym> triplet based on the internal feature representations of all auxiliary scorers. Also, an innovative channel-wise gating mechanism that retains task-specific information in concept representations is introduced to further boost model performance. Experiments on four real-world large-scale datasets show that TMN achieves the best performance on both taxonomy completion task and the previous taxonomy expansion task, outperforming existing methods.

Reader-Guided Passage Reranking for Open-Domain Question Answering

Current open-domain question answering (QA) systems often follow a Retriever-Reader (R2) architecture, where the retriever first retrieves relevant passages and the reader then reads the retrieved passages to form an answer. In this paper, we propose a simple and effective passage reranking method, Reader-guIDEd Reranker (Rider), which does not involve any training and reranks the retrieved passages solely based on the top predictions of the reader before reranking. We show that Rider, despite its simplicity, achieves 10 to 20 absolute gains in top-1 retrieval accuracy and 1 to 4 Exact Match (EM) score gains without refining the retriever or reader. In particular, Rider achieves 48.3 EM on the Natural Questions dataset and 66.4 on the TriviaQA dataset when only 1,024 tokens (7.8 passages on average) are used as the reader input.