Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuning

We study the problem of few-sample fine-tuning of BERT contextual representations, and identify three sub-optimal choices in current, broadly adopted practices. First, we observe that the omission of the gradient bias correction in the BERTAdam optimizer results in fine-tuning instability. We also find that parts of the BERT network provide a detrimental starting point for fine-tuning, and simply re-initializing these layers speeds up learning and improves performance. Finally, we study the effect of training time, and observe that commonly used recipes often do not allocate sufficient time for training. In light of these findings, we re-visit recently proposed methods to improve few-sample fine-tuning with BERT and re-evaluate their effectiveness. Generally, we observe a decrease in their relative impact when modifying the fine-tuning process based on our findings.

What is Learned in Visually Grounded Neural Syntax Acquisition

Visual features are a promising signal for learning bootstrap textual models. However, blackbox learning models make it difficult to isolate the specific contribution of visual components. In this analysis, we consider the case study of the Visually Grounded Neural Syntax Learner (Shi et al., 2019), a recent approach for learning syntax from a visual training signal. By constructing simplified versions of the model, we isolate the core factors that yield the model's strong performance. Contrary to what the model might be capable of learning, we find significantly less expressive versions produce similar predictions and perform just as well, or even better. We also find that a simple lexical signal of noun concreteness plays the main role in the model's predictions as opposed to more complex syntactic reasoning.

Evaluating NLP Models via Contrast Sets

Standard test sets for supervised learning evaluate in-distribution generalization. Unfortunately, when a dataset has systematic gaps (e.g., annotation artifacts), these evaluations are misleading: a model can learn simple decision rules that perform well on the test set but do not capture a dataset's intended capabilities. We propose a new annotation paradigm for NLP that helps to close systematic gaps in the test data. In particular, after a dataset is constructed, we recommend that the dataset authors manually perturb the test instances in small but meaningful ways that (typically) change the gold label, creating contrast sets. Contrast sets provide a local view of a model's decision boundary, which can be used to more accurately evaluate a model's true linguistic capabilities. We demonstrate the efficacy of contrast sets by creating them for 10 diverse NLP datasets (e.g., DROP reading comprehension, UD parsing, IMDb sentiment analysis). Although our contrast sets are not explicitly adversarial, model performance is significantly lower on them than on the original test sets---up to 25\% in some cases. We release our contrast sets as new evaluation benchmarks and encourage future dataset construction efforts to follow similar annotation processes.

Retouchdown: Adding Touchdown to StreetLearn as a Shareable Resource for Language Grounding Tasks in Street View

The Touchdown dataset (Chen et al., 2019) provides instructions by human annotators for navigation through New York City streets and for resolving spatial descriptions at a given location. To enable the wider research community to work effectively with the Touchdown tasks, we are publicly releasing the 29k raw Street View panoramas needed for Touchdown. We follow the process used for the StreetLearn data release (Mirowski et al., 2019) to check panoramas for personally identifiable information and blur them as necessary. These have been added to the StreetLearn dataset and can be obtained via the same process as used previously for StreetLearn. We also provide a reference implementation for both of the Touchdown tasks: vision and language navigation (VLN) and spatial description resolution (SDR). We compare our model results to those given in Chen et al. (2019) and show that the panoramas we have added to StreetLearn fully support both Touchdown tasks and can be used effectively for further research and comparison.

Interactive Classification by Asking Informative Questions

Natural language systems often rely on a single, potentially ambiguous input to make one final prediction, which may simplify the problem but degrade end user experience. Instead of making predictions with the natural language query only, we ask the user for additional information using a small number of binary and multiple-choice questions in order to better help users accomplish their goals while minimizing their effort. At each turn, our system decides between asking the most informative question or making the final classification prediction. Our approach enables bootstrapping the system using simple crowdsourcing annotations without expensive human-to-human interaction data. Evaluation demonstrates that our method substantially increases classification accuracy, while effectively balancing the number of questions with the improvement to final accuracy.

Learning to Map Natural Language Instructions to Physical Quadcopter Control using Simulated Flight

We propose a joint simulation and real-world learning framework for mapping navigation instructions and raw first-person observations to continuous control. Our model estimates the need for environment exploration, predicts the likelihood of visiting environment positions during execution, and controls the agent to both explore and visit high-likelihood positions. We introduce Supervised Reinforcement Asynchronous Learning (SuReAL). Learning uses both simulation and real environments without requiring autonomous flight in the physical environment during training, and combines supervised learning for predicting positions to visit and reinforcement learning for continuous control. We evaluate our approach on a natural language instruction-following task with a physical quadcopter, and demonstrate effective execution and exploration behavior.

Executing Instructions in Situated Collaborative Interactions

We study a collaborative scenario where a user not only instructs a system to complete tasks, but also acts alongside it. This allows the user to adapt to the system abilities by changing their language or deciding to simply accomplish some tasks themselves, and requires the system to effectively recover from errors as the user strategically assigns it new goals. We build a game environment to study this scenario, and learn to map user instructions to system actions. We introduce a learning approach focused on recovery from cascading errors between instructions, and modeling methods to explicitly reason about instructions with multiple goals. We evaluate with a new evaluation protocol using recorded interactions and online games with human users, and observe how users adapt to the system abilities.