OGG-FR: Orthogonal Gradient Gaming and Frequency Rectification for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Infrared Image Super-Resolution

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) infrared image super-resolution aims to recover weak thermal structures for deployment on resource-constrained platforms; lightweight models are therefore preferred, but multi-loss training can be unstable. A common strategy combines pixel-domain and frequency-domain objectives; however, low contrast, limited high-frequency content, and sensor-specific noise often make their gradients weakly aligned or conflicting. To address this optimization ambiguity, we propose Orthogonal Gradient Gaming and Frequency Rectification (OGG-FR), a plug-and-play optimization framework that decomposes the frequency gradient into a redundant parallel component and an orthogonal innovation component relative to the pixel gradient. In the conflict regime, OGG-FR computes a safe base gradient using the Multiple Gradient Descent Algorithm (MGDA) and adds a variance-rectified orthogonal innovation; in the compatible regime, it discards redundant parallel information and injects the orthogonal innovation according to a confidence score estimated from the high-frequency residual. Experimental results on the UAV thermal benchmark show broad gains under BI and BD degradations at $\times 4$ and $\times 8$ scales, while gradient analyses support the effectiveness of the proposed conflict-aware update rule.

Right Answer, Wrong Heat: Explanation-Aware Evaluation and Thermal-Grounded Feedback for MLLMs on Infrared Images

General-purpose multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly applied to infrared images, where they are commonly scored by answer accuracy alone. However, a correct answer does not ensure that the model's explanation is grounded in infrared thermal evidence. We introduce an explanation-aware evaluation framework that separates answer correctness, output-level explanation groundedness, and thermal grounding for infrared visual questions. Using a Dual-LLM Consensus Judge with a preliminary human-anchor calibration check, we find that correct answers can still rely on weak or visible-light evidence; withholding the original infrared image and showing only a visible-like rendering erodes thermal grounding with little accuracy change; and this erosion is observed most strongly for more capable models but disappears when infrared remains available. We further propose Thermal-Grounded Feedback (TGF), a training-free feedback loop that diagnoses explanation-side failures and revises the explanation while preserving the selected answer. On local paired-input validation, TGF improves explanation-side grounding without changing answers. These findings suggest that future trustworthy MLLMs for infrared scene understanding should be evaluated and developed to produce thermally grounded explanations rather than merely accurate answers.

Objective-Aligned Direct Answer SFT for Robust Multi-Frame Medical VQA

Multi-frame medical VQA appears to reward increasingly complex adaptation: controller-style inference, localization-aware reranking, static hard-negative mixing, and staged continuation all appear plausible from first principles. We test a simpler competing hypothesis on MedFrameQA: methods that remain tightly aligned with the benchmark's final answer objective should be the strongest \emph{robust} adaptation family once evaluation is controlled across fixed splits, matched budgets, repeated seeds, and calibration. We compare controller-based methods, scaffold evolution, static mixed supervision, continuation-heavy variants, and direct answer-only supervised fine-tuning (SFT). The strongest robust family is direct decoder-only answer SFT on MedGemma-1.5-4B. Empirically, this family yields substantial improvements in held-out report accuracy over frozen baselines while remaining remarkably stable across repeated seeds and matched controls, ensuring our claims reflect true family-level robustness rather than an isolated hyperparameter peak. Furthermore, post-hoc calibration effectively repairs confidence estimation without compromising accuracy, and the core approach transfers consistently to secondary backbones like Qwen2.5-VL-3B. The main result is therefore not that a complex auxiliary mechanism wins, but that objective-aligned direct answer SFT is the strongest robust adaptation family we found for MedFrameQA. By establishing this strong, minimalist baseline, we hope to redirect community focus toward fundamentally robust optimization rather than architectural complexity.

Inference-Time Agentic Decision Rules Beat Longer Evolving Search for Multi-Image Medical Reasoning

Multi-image medical VQA is not merely a prompt-length problem; it is a fundamental challenge of agentic decision-making. Medical vision-language agents must aggregate evidence across ordered images, remain robust to answer-order perturbations, and avoid overfitting to noisy search-time feedback. We study MedFrameQA through a controlled comparison of five inference-time agentic strategies, optimized using the same high-budget ShinkaEvolve configuration and evaluated on a reproducible internal frozen split (1,331 evolution, 665 holdout, 855 final test). Across five independent repeated runs, the strongest method emerges as the simplest robust aggregator: the \textbf{order-vote} policy achieves $57.89 \pm 0.65\%$ final-test accuracy, significantly outperforming the fixed baseline ($52.73 \pm 0.42\%$) and the more complex, albeit brittle, order-rerank variant ($55.79 \pm 0.43\%$). Paired bootstrap analysis confirms these significant gains. Extending the evolutionary search budget from 50 to 100 generations yields no generalization benefit: while holdout performance marginally increases, final-test accuracy drops from $57.89\%$ to $56.02\%$. Our findings suggest that for multi-image medical reasoning, defining the correct agentic decision rule is substantially more impactful than expanding the optimization search budget.

Medical world models in healthcare: foundations, applications, and challenges for trustworthy clinical translation

Medical world models offer a framework for extending medical artificial intelligence beyond static prediction by representing evolving patient states and modelling how they change over time and in response to clinical interventions. This Review defines the conceptual boundaries, technical foundations, application domains, and evidence requirements of the field through a structured narrative synthesis with reproducible evidence mapping.We screened 1,455 unique records and assembled a corpus of 98 sources, including 14 studies that met a strict empirical definition of a medical world model. The field is organised around four capabilities: patient state representation, temporal dynamics modelling, intervention-conditioned simulation, and clinician-supervised planning. Evidence spans medical imaging, longitudinal electronic health records, treatment response modelling, physiological and multimodal state modelling, ultrasound and surgical interaction, and population and health-system simulation; clinical digital twins are treated as a cross-cutting integration framework.Current studies provide early evidence of technical feasibility for trajectory forecasting and comparison of candidate interventions, but most remain retrospective, task-specific, or preclinical. The evidence base is further limited by incomplete longitudinal intervention data, inconsistent action semantics, limited causal identifiability, long-horizon error accumulation, inadequate uncertainty estimation, and limited external validation. Clinical translation will therefore depend on precise intervention representations, robust causal and mechanistic grounding, calibrated trajectory-level uncertainty, safety-constrained planning, and prospective multicentre validation against clinically meaningful endpoints.

Agentic AI in medicine: architectures, applications, evaluation, and challenges for clinical translation

Large language models and multimodal foundation models are enabling medical artificial intelligence (AI) systems to move beyond isolated prediction and undertake multistep clinical tasks that require planning, tool use, memory, iterative correction, and coordination among specialized agents. However, the scope of agentic AI in medicine remains unsettled, and current evaluation practices are not yet aligned with the requirements of clinical use. We conducted a scoping review with systematic evidence mapping across five electronic sources, screened 1,649 exportable records, and provisionally included 557 unique studies that met predefined criteria for goal-directed task execution, tool use, interaction with external resources, feedback-based refinement, or multi-agent collaboration. The included studies describe single agents that use external tools, workflows supported by retrieval and external knowledge, multimodal agents, and multi-agent systems applied to medical question answering, image interpretation, electronic health record analysis, drug safety, and clinical trial prediction. The evidence base remains dominated by public benchmarks, simulated settings, retrospective datasets, and small-scale expert evaluation. Process reliability, evidence traceability, uncertainty, safety, workflow impact, and external validity are evaluated less consistently. Clinical translation will depend on clearer definitions, reproducible evaluation, auditable oversight, interoperable system design, and prospective validation in real-world clinical workflows.

SHTA: Semantic Hard Token Correction and Center Alignment for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation

Recent advances in semi-supervised medical image segmentation have achieved remarkable performance through prediction consistency, pseudo-label supervision, and hard-region supervision. However, these methods primarily improve supervision quality rather than explicitly enforcing semantic consistency in the learned representations of hard regions. Consequently, even under increasingly stronger prediction-level supervision, difficult regions exhibiting unstable semantic assignment often fail to establish semantically consistent representations during training, thereby limiting further segmentation improvement. To address this issue, we propose SHTA (Semantic Hard Token Correction and Center Alignment), a lightweight training-time semantic representation branch. Instead of introducing additional prediction supervision, SHTA refines intermediate semantic representations through Semantic Assignment, Hard Token Refinement, and Semantic Center Alignment, thereby improving semantic consistency in hard regions while preserving the original prediction pathway and introducing no additional inference cost. We integrate SHTA into representative semi-supervised segmentation frameworks, including GA-CPS, CPS, URPC, and MagicNet, and conduct evaluations on the Synapse and AMOS datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that SHTA delivers consistent paired improvements across frameworks, with especially clear gains in segmentation accuracy, weak-organ recovery, and semantic ambiguity reduction, while incurring only training-time overhead. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/release_SHTA-42D5/.

HPR-SAM: Hierarchical Probabilistic Representation Learning for Prompt-free SAM-based Medical Image Segmentation

Prompt-free adaptation of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) has emerged as a promising paradigm for automatic medical image segmentation. Existing methods mainly focus on prompt generation, while overlooking that prompt quality is fundamentally constrained by the expressiveness of anatomical representations. However, deterministic prototypes or semantic tokens are insufficient to jointly capture global anatomical priors, intra-structure diversity, and local structural reliability. To address this limitation, we propose the Hierarchical Probabilistic Representation (HPR) framework, which learns complementary anatomical representations through Distributional Anatomical Representation (DAR), Multi-component Anatomical Representation (MAR), and Local Reliability Representation (LRR), and integrates their predictions via Hierarchical Prediction Fusion (HPF) while remaining compatible with the original SAM decoder. Experiments on the Synapse, LA, and PROMISE12 datasets demonstrate that HPR-SAM achieves state-of-the-art performance on Synapse and the best performance under few-shot settings on LA and PROMISE12, validating the effectiveness of the proposed hierarchical probabilistic representation learning framework for prompt-free medical image segmentation. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/HPR-SAM-E4AF.

VCDP: Variation-Conditioned Distributional Proxy Learning for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation

Semi-supervised 3D medical image segmentation reduces the need for dense voxel-level annotations by exploiting unlabeled volumes. Although existing methods such as consistency regularization, pseudo-labeling, and co-training improve prediction-level robustness, they often provide insufficient feature-space organization for anatomically complex structures, especially small organs and ambiguous boundary regions with large intra-class variations. To address this issue, we propose Variation-Conditioned Distributional Proxy Learning (VCDP), a plug-and-play training-only regularization module for semi-supervised 3D medical image segmentation. VCDP represents each class with a learnable Gaussian distribution for shared class semantics and multiple variation prototypes for fine-grained intra-class patterns. A unified variation-conditioned compatibility score is further formulated to fuse distributional similarity and soft variation aggregation, guiding voxel embeddings to align with both global organ identity and local anatomical variations. VCDP is attached to decoder features during training and removed during inference, introducing no additional inference cost. Experiments on multi-organ segmentation benchmarks show that VCDP improves most evaluated baselines, particularly for small, ambiguous, and highly variable organs. Our anonymous code is released at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/VCDP_code-41ED.

Attention Consistent Longitudinal Medical Visual Question Answering Guided by Vision Foundation Models

Longitudinal medical visual question answering (VQA) requires reasoning about anatomical differences between an image of a current time point and an image of a referred time point. We propose an attention-guided encoder-decoder for this task with chest X-rays. Instead of conventional direct contrast, we propose to include a lightweight affine registration module to reduce nuisance motion by co-registering the current image to the reference image with a small registration regularizer. The registered image pair is fed into the image encoder, followed by a frozen DINO-based mask generator and a trainable adaptive mask generator to produce masks applied to the original image pairs. The masked image pairs are again fed into the image encoder and concatenated with text features as the input to a multimodal transformer-based decoder to generate final answers. To facilitate learning stabilization and clarify the change signal, inspired by DINO-v3, we include additional auxiliary objectives, including a mask rebuilding loss, a pairwise Gram-style consistency loss, and a KoLeo uniformity loss, which enhances the geometry of the representation. On the Medical-Diff-VQA benchmark, the model delivers strong BLEU, ROUGE-L, CIDEr, and METEOR scores while offering intrinsic interpretability through the shared saliency mask. These results support saliency-conditioned generation with mild pre-alignment as a principled framework for longitudinal reasoning in medical VQA. Our training strategy also illustrates the potential of a paradigm in utilizing image foundation models in biomedicine: optimizing both supervised and unsupervised learning objectives simultaneously.