Autonomous cars are self-driving vehicles that use artificial intelligence (AI) and sensors to navigate and operate without human intervention, using high-resolution cameras and lidars that detect what happens in the car's immediate surroundings. They have the potential to revolutionize transportation by improving safety, efficiency, and accessibility.
Long-term human path forecasting in crowds is critical for autonomous moving platforms (like autonomous driving cars and social robots) to avoid collision and make high-quality planning. Although the current research take into account social interactions for prediction, they don't reveal the exact kinds of social interactions happened among people and how the social interactions affect the decision-making process of pedestrians, which further limits its robustness. Social interactions in pedestrian walking are intuitively massive and hard to label and quantify. In this paper, we explore creatively to quantify and interpret how pedestrians interact with others by proposing Learn to Cluster. Our clustering social interactions is probabilistic latent variable generative, learning directly from sequential trajectory observations, scalable to arbitrary number of pedestrians. Learn to cluster is label-free and can be naturally integrated into the training process of the prediction model. The latent variables will then serve as 'labels' to categorize social interactions. Extensive experiments over several trajectory prediction benchmarks demonstrate that our method is able to learn the patterns of social interactions and effectively integrate the patterns to pedestrian trajectory prediction.
Accurate and interpretable motion prediction for heterogeneous traffic spaces, including pedestrians, bicycles, cars, and trucks, is essential for safe autonomous navigation. Nevertheless, state-of-the-art approaches remain predominantly black-box, lacking explicit encoding of the regulatory and behavioral constraints of real-world mobility. We propose Trajectory Compliance-Shaping (TraCS), a neuro-symbolic framework that augments existing black-box motion prediction backbones with interpretable and probabilistic first-order logic. To do so, TraCS employs an agentic code-generation pipeline to bridge the gap between natural-language descriptions of traffic regulations and probabilistic motion prediction. Furthermore, TraCS employs a reactive data-streaming inference engine that maintains and efficiently updates compliance landscapes as scenes evolve. To prevent TraCS from overconfidently steering the backbone's predictions in the wrong direction, we propose a neural confidence rating learned as a context-aware attenuation of the compliance signal. We demonstrate on the Argoverse 2 benchmark how TraCS consistently improves state-of-the-art prediction backbones, showing that probabilistic and symbolic compliance reasoning is a broadly applicable and computationally efficient complement to purely neural motion predictors.
State estimation is the closed-loop core of every real-time tracking system, from radar surveillance and counter-UAV defense to autonomous driving and robotics. These deployments run on edge platforms, where defense systems mount on vehicles and drones, and civilian pipelines live on cars and handheld devices. Here, every additional watt of compute erodes mission duration or operational range. Two hard constraints follow: each new measurement must be fused before the next control cycle, and the total compute must fit within a strict battery and thermal power envelope. The Linear and Extended Kalman Filters (LKF, EKF) are dominant estimators on these systems, but today they execute almost exclusively on CPUs, which serialize multi-object tracking (MOT) updates, or on custom FPGA/ASIC accelerators that lengthen design cycles. Contemporary AI-PC SoCs, like the Intel Core Ultra Series 1 and 2, integrate a low-power, data-parallel Neural Processing Unit (NPU). We therefore ask whether the Kalman filter can be mapped onto this existing matrix engine to meet real-time and low-power budgets simultaneously, avoiding a dedicated accelerator and keeping the CPU and GPU free for primary workloads. We present KATANA, an NPU-aware optimization framework delivering the first end-to-end mapping of the LKF and EKF onto a commercial NPU, alongside a cross-platform characterization on shipping AI-PC silicon. KATANA applies three algebraic graph rewrites: subtract-to-add reformulation via a precomputed negative-projection matrix H_neg, static-shape tensor fusion, and block-diagonal batched parallelization, ensuring 100% of operations execute on the DPU matrix engine. On the Series 2, the optimized batched EKF reaches 223.35 FPS at 13.43 W active power, and the LKF reaches 408.73 FPS at 14.05 W, delivering up to a 97.9% reduction in dynamic energy versus the CPU implementation.
Autonomous race cars, such as in Formula Student Driverless, operate close to their physical handling limits. The resulting highly nonlinear vehicle behavior increases the path tracking complexity, especially on narrow tracks. Model Predictive Control (MPC) is commonly used to address this issue, a method whose performance is closely tied to the accuracy of the underlying prediction model. This paper presents a novel, real-time capable prediction model for autonomous race cars that adjusts to changing conditions by combining information from past runs and the current driving situation. Our model is divided into three consecutive submodels: a nominal Kinematic Bicycle Model, an offline Bayesian Linear Regression (BLR) model, and an online Sparse Gaussian Process Regression (SGPR) model. The proposed approach enables efficient integration of all available data without significantly increasing computational cost, ensuring high prediction accuracy and a quantitative uncertainty assessment right from the start of the run. Compared to existing approaches, an improvement in prediction accuracy of up to 57% was achieved. Further, we successfully demonstrated the practical applicability of the model within an MPC-based path tracking controller on a real Formula Student race car.
We present NOVA, an autonomous symbolic regression framework that identifies interpretable car-following and lane-change structures from raw trajectory data with minimal behavioral priors. Applied to 4,765,788 active driving observations from the NGSIM I-80 and US-101 datasets, NOVA's deterministic Rust-powered search engine evaluates over 10,000 candidate algebraic structures and identifies a compact two-term acceleration model under a forward-shifted rolling-mean prediction target. Evaluated under two complementary preprocessing pipelines, NOVA achieves $RMSE = 1.376 m/s^2$ ($R^2 = 15.57\%$) on the intent-forecasting benchmark, outperforming the best recalibrated symbolic-regression baseline (SR-LLM, PNAS~2025) by 0.135 m/s$^2$ in RMSE under an identical evaluation protocol. Across eight independent experiments, a single dominant nonlinear term emerges as a robust backbone of human car-following; a residual-guided extension further links the selected structure to an established psychophysical theory of collision avoidance. The discovered feature operators transfer zero-shot between freeway sites with under 3 pp $R^2$ loss. Extended to lane-change modelling within a multinomial logit framework, NOVA achieves 67.4\% balanced accuracy under strict vehicle-ID holdout on 502 unseen drivers, surpassing existing lane-changing baselines by +29.8 percentage points on a three-class problem.
In autonomous racing, especially in competitions such as Formula Student Driverless, precise planning of the target velocity of a race car is crucial for competitive lap times and stable driving behavior. Especially at high speeds, Velocity Planning (VP) is a significant challenge as it has to be performed in real time, taking into account track layouts, environmental influences, mechanical tolerances, and the resulting control inaccuracies. In this paper, we present a novel approach to VP that dynamically adapts to such changing conditions. Instead of estimating the physical Tire-Road Friction Coefficient (TRFC), a continuous scaling factor is inferred indirectly from vehicle stability. This factor not only reflects the effective tire-road interaction but also captures effects of control inaccuracies. From this, we generate a continuous friction map, which serves as a robust, adaptive basis for computing the optimal target speed, accounting for both vehicle and environmental limits. Our proposed approach was evaluated on a real Formula Student race car, showing a lap time improvement of 35 % over ten laps and an average increase of 8 % compared to a non-adaptive approach.
Persistent maps used by autonomous robots increasingly fuse a geometric perception stack whose assertions are well-characterized with a foundation-model channel that produces semantic claims without calibrated reliability about the same scene. Contemporary mapping systems integrate the two channels by treating the foundation-model channel as an additional voter into a per-element posterior, uncalibrated for its own per-class reliability and without machinery to flag when the two channels contradict each other at a given moment. We propose an update operator with two cooperating mechanisms: a per-class calibrated commit gate, and a per-event conflict-drop window that refuses to commit foundation-model claims contradicted by the geometric channel at the moment of the claim. We evaluate on KITTI-360 and ScanNet, with an oracle geometric channel (panoptic ground truth) and an off-the-shelf online semantic segmenter (Mask2Former) to demonstrate real-world performance. The operator produces substantially more accurate committed maps (KITTI is car commit precision 99.7% vs. 43.9% for the calibration-only operator; mean per-class IoU 0.522 vs. 0.180), retains more compositional true positives at higher precision than a monolithic compositional VLM prompt. The framework operates at deployment quality across both oracle and off-the-shelf-segmenter geometric channels, and is invariant under foundation-model substitution.
3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has shown great potential in autonomous driving simulation and data generation, enabling photorealistic reconstruction and flexible scene manipulation. However, existing 3DGS scene editing methods have limited support for road geometry editing (e.g., inserting speed humps or sunken roads), and generally do not couple such edits with plausible vehicle-road interaction dynamics. Such editing is essential for generating training data under extreme driving scenarios or evaluating system reliability under these road irregularities. Moreover, many optimization-based methods require minutes of per-edit refinement, while existing efficient alternatives mainly focus on appearance-level or object-level manipulation rather than physics-aware road irregularity editing. To address these limitations, we propose RoVES, a Road-and-Vehicle Editing System for physics-aware 3D Gaussian editing in driving scenes. RoVES enables single-image-driven road geometry insertion and couples the edited road profile with a 4-DOF half-car vehicle dynamics model to achieve physics-aware vehicle pose correction in vertical displacement and pitch. RoVES inserts road elements in a one-shot, optimization-free pipeline (1.84s), and the full pipeline (including color transfer and vehicle-dynamics-based pose correction) completes in 6.24s; it edits dynamic vehicles via pose editing and corrects poses frame-by-frame to approximate dynamics-consistent vertical displacement and pitch responses. Experiments on the Waymo dataset show that RoVES provides practical efficiency and competitive visual consistency for physics-aware driving scene generation.
Simulation-based testing of self-driving cars (SDCs) typically relies on scripted or simplified pedestrian models that do not capture the heterogeneity and uncertainty of real human crossing behavior. This limits the realism of safety assessments, especially in scenarios involving jaywalking, which is governed by latent personality traits that the vehicle cannot observe. We hypothesize that jointly training pedestrians and the SDC with multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) produces more realistic interaction scenarios than training the SDC against fixed pedestrian policies, and that the resulting behavior gap between predictable and unpredictable crossings can be measured directly from trajectories. This paper describes a MARL environment in which an SDC and 12 pedestrians are co-trained using Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO). Pedestrian locomotion follows scripted Dijkstra pathfinding, while an RL policy controls high-level go/wait decisions. Jaywalking probability depends on a per-pedestrian personality trait sampled at episode start and hidden from the SDC. In 500-episode evaluations, the co-trained SDC reached 78% of goals with a 14% collision rate, compared to 35% goals and 33% collisions for the best rule-based baseline. A speed differential metric shows that the SDC traveled 2.65 m/s faster near jaywalkers than near crosswalk users at close range (0-3 m), indicating that jaywalking encounters were not anticipated. Jaywalking accounted for 13% of crossing events but was associated with 62% of collisions. Co-training with MARL pedestrians reduced collisions by 30% relative to single-agent RL, as pedestrians learned to wait when the SDC approached at speed.
Establishing trustworthy safety assurance for autonomous driving systems (ADSs) requires evidence that failures arise from avoidable system deficiencies rather than unavoidable traffic conflicts. Current adversarial simulation methods can efficiently expose collisions, but generally lack mechanisms to distinguish these fundamentally different failure modes. Here we present CARS (Context-Aware, Responsibility-attributed Scenario generation), a framework that integrates responsibility attribution directly into adversarial scenario generation. CARS combines context-aware adversary selection with a generative adversarial policy optimized in closed-loop simulation to construct collision scenarios that are both physically feasible and diagnostically attributable. Across benchmark datasets spanning heterogeneous national traffic environments, CARS consistently discovers feasible collision scenarios with high attribution rates under multiple regulation-prescribed careful and competent driver models. By coupling adversarial generation with normative responsibility assessment, CARS moves simulation testing beyond collision discovery toward the construction of interpretable, regulation-aligned safety evidence for scalable ADS validation.