In-Loop Model Adaptation with Coupled Latent-Noise Guidance for High-Fidelity Subject-Driven Text-to-Image Generation

Text-to-image diffusion models have achieved remarkable success in generating high-quality images from a given text prompt. Subject-driven generation aims to synthesize customized images to mimic the appearance of subjects in given reference images within different visual contexts specified by the text prompts. The central challenge here is that, when the reference image changes, the diffusion model cannot efficiently adapt to different visual contexts while consistently maintaining the subject identity. Existing methods either train the model with a large domain-specific dataset or fine-tune the model using the reference image for hundreds of iterations before actual image generation. In this work, we explore a new approach, called \textit{In-Loop Model Adaptation} (IMA), which adapts the core diffusion model at each generation step during the actual process of image generation, without being trained on the reference image before the generation process. To this end, we establish a DDIM inversion chain that maps the reference image to a sequence of latent, as well as a text-to-image generation chain which generates the image from the text prompt only. We then introduce a masked latent consistency loss and a noise regularization loss to characterize the latent-noise difference between the diffusion model and these two chains at each generation step. This coupled latent-noise loss is used to guide the in-loop model adaptation to preserve the subject identity specified by the reference image while maintaining accurate alignment with the text prompt, resulting in high-fidelity text-to-image generation. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed IMA method significantly improves the performance of subject-driven text-to-image generation.

LEDGERMIND: Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger

Multimodal agents for visual question answering increasingly operate as multi-step trajectories that interleave perception, retrieval, and reasoning, yet evaluation still largely reduces to final-answer accuracy. This aggregate signal cannot tell whether a correct answer was reached through grounded evidence, language priors, or accidental error cancellation. We propose to treat a multimodal agent trajectory as a provenance-constrained state machine: tool outputs are normalized into a Structured Evidence Ledger that serves as the trajectory state, downstream reasoning and decision claims may cite only active ledger entries, grounding is checked at the entity and numeric level, and repair is realized as typed state transitions that cannot introduce content without tool-produced provenance. We instantiate this design as LedgerMind (Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger), augmented by a Three-Layer Grounding Protocol, an Adaptive Dual-Path Dispatcher that matches reasoning depth to question complexity, and an Event-Triggered Verification-and-Repair engine with a formal provenance non-amplification guarantee. We use LedgerMind to target four recurring failure patterns that final-answer accuracy tends to obscure: unsupported intermediate reasoning, citation-backed entity hallucination (Phantom Grounding), over-reasoning on simple queries, and repair-time amplification. Experiments across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks and backbone MLLMs show that LedgerMind improves both answer accuracy and trajectory-level faithfulness.

Beyond But-for Test: Counterfactual Explanation in Abstract Argumentation via Actual Causality (Extended Version)

Counterfactual explanation in abstract argumentation calls for an answer to the what-if query: would the topic argument still be accepted if the status of certain other arguments were changed? Existing approaches are limited to the but-for test and fail to accommodate more refined counterfactual conditions. To overcome these limitations, we introduce an intervention-based counterfactual reasoning framework in abstract argumentation. Our approach encodes the acceptance conditions of arguments as equations, then defines an intervention operator that supports (1) changing sets of arguments simultaneously, and (2) fixing witness arguments to their actual labels. Guided by the refined counterfactual condition introduced in the Halpern-Pearl definition, our method goes beyond the but-for test, thereby correctly identifying causes in argumentation structures such as Preemption and Overdetermination. Through comparison, we show that our method surpasses prior methods in both expressiveness and reliability.

ConflictScore: Identifying and Measuring How Language Models Handle Conflicting Evidence

Existing metrics for factuality and faithfulness evaluate whether an answer is supported or contradicted by its grounding documents, but they fail to capture when both supporting and contradicting evidence coexist. We introduce ConflictScore, a novel metric that quantifies how well a model's response acknowledges conflicting evidence in its grounding documents. Our framework decomposes responses into atomic claims, labels each claim against each grounding document, and then aggregates these labels into two complementary measures: ConflictScore-Count (CS-C), the proportion of claims exhibiting conflicts, and ConflictScore-Ratio (CS-R), the balance between supporting and contradicting evidence. We develop ConflictBench, a benchmark covering diverse forms of conflicts such as ambiguity, contradiction, and divergent opinions, to systematically evaluate our metric. Experiments show that ConflictScore effectively detects overconfident claims across domains and can serve as a corrective feedback mechanism that improves truthfulness on TruthfulQA.

Graphs of Research: Citation Evolution Graphs as Supervision for Research Idea Generation

Research idea generation is the innovation-driving step of automated scientific research. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown potential for automating idea generation at scale. However, existing methods mainly condition LLMs on eliciting idea generation through static retrieval of relevant literature or complex prompt engineering, without discarding the structural relations among references. We propose Graphs of Research (GoR), a supervised fine-tuning method that extracts a 2-hop reference neighborhood for each seed paper, derives the relations among those references from citation position, frequency, predecessor links, and publication time, and organizes them into a paper-evolution directed acyclic graph (DAG). We construct an automated extraction pipeline that draws data from five major ML/NLP venues, comprising 498/50/50 train/validation/test seed papers and approximately 7,600 cited references. Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-1M is fine-tuned on a structured-text prompt that includes the citation graph, edge signals, reference information, and task definition to predict the idea for the seed paper. Across head-to-head LLM-judge tournaments against gpt-4o-driven baselines, GoR-SFT achieves SOTA, demonstrating the effectiveness of citation-evolution graphs as supervision signal for LLM-based idea generation. We hope that this reduces the barrier for citation evolution graphs as a supervision, accelerating automated scientific innovation.

Rethinking Token-Level Credit Assignment in RLVR: A Polarity-Entropy Analysis

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has substantially improved the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, its sparse outcome-based rewards pose a fundamental credit assignment problem. We analyze this problem through the joint lens of reward polarity and token entropy. Our diagnostic tool, the Four Quadrant Decomposition, isolates token updates by polarity and entropy, and controlled ablations show that reasoning improvements concentrate in the high-entropy quadrants. To justify this observation theoretically, we adapt Conditional Mutual Information to the autoregressive RLVR setting and prove that the credit a token can carry is upper-bounded by its entropy. This view yields testable predictions that reasoning gains arise primarily from high-entropy tokens, with unique roles for positive and negative updates. A gradient analysis of GRPO further reveals how uniform reward broadcast dilutes signal at high-entropy positions while over-crediting deterministic tokens. Grounded in these insights, we propose Entropy-Aware Policy Optimization (EAPO) that modulates token-level learning signals accordingly. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EAPO outperforms strong baselines across two model families.

Latent Bias Alignment for High-Fidelity Diffusion Inversion in Real-World Image Reconstruction and Manipulation

Recent research has shown that text-to-image diffusion models are capable of generating high-quality images guided by text prompts. But can they be used to generate or approximate real-world images from the seed noise? This is known as the diffusion inversion problem, which serves as a fundamental building block for bridging diffusion models and real-world scenarios. However, existing diffusion inversion methods often suffer from low reconstruction quality or weak robustness. Two major challenges need to be carefully addressed: (1) the misalignment between the inversion and generation trajectories during the diffusion process, and (2) the mismatch between the diffusion inversion process and the VQ autoencoder (VQAE) reconstruction. To address these challenges, we introduce a latent bias vector at each inversion step, which is learned to reduce the misalignment between inversion and generation trajectories. We refer to this strategy as Latent Bias Optimization (LBO). Furthermore, we perform an approximate joint optimization of the diffusion inversion and VQAE reconstruction processes by learning to adjust the image latent representation, which serves as the connecting interface between them. We refer to this technique as Image Latent Boosting (ILB). Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves the image reconstruction quality of the diffusion model, as well as the performance of downstream tasks, including image editing and rare concept generation.

CoCoEmo: Composable and Controllable Human-Like Emotional TTS via Activation Steering

Emotional expression in human speech is nuanced and compositional, often involving multiple, sometimes conflicting, affective cues that may diverge from linguistic content. In contrast, most expressive text-to-speech systems enforce a single utterance-level emotion, collapsing affective diversity and suppressing mixed or text-emotion-misaligned expression. While activation steering via latent direction vectors offers a promising solution, it remains unclear whether emotion representations are linearly steerable in TTS, where steering should be applied within hybrid TTS architectures, and how such complex emotion behaviors should be evaluated. This paper presents the first systematic analysis of activation steering for emotional control in hybrid TTS models, introducing a quantitative, controllable steering framework, and multi-rater evaluation protocols that enable composable mixed-emotion synthesis and reliable text-emotion mismatch synthesis. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that emotional prosody and expressive variability are primarily synthesized by the TTS language module instead of the flow-matching module, and also provide a lightweight steering approach for generating natural, human-like emotional speech.

Retrieval-Infused Reasoning Sandbox: A Benchmark for Decoupling Retrieval and Reasoning Capabilities

Despite strong performance on existing benchmarks, it remains unclear whether large language models can reason over genuinely novel scientific information. Most evaluations score end-to-end RAG pipelines, where reasoning is confounded with retrieval and toolchain choices, and the signal is further contaminated by parametric memorization and open-web volatility. We introduce DeR2, a controlled deep-research sandbox that isolates document-grounded reasoning while preserving core difficulties of deep search: multi-step synthesis, denoising, and evidence-based conclusion making. DeR2 decouples evidence access from reasoning via four regimes--Instruction-only, Concepts (gold concepts without documents), Related-only (only relevant documents), and Full-set (relevant documents plus topically related distractors)--yielding interpretable regime gaps that operationalize retrieval loss vs. reasoning loss and enable fine-grained error attribution. To prevent parametric leakage, we apply a two-phase validation that requires parametric failure without evidence while ensuring oracle-concept solvability. To ensure reproducibility, each instance provides a frozen document library (drawn from 2023-2025 theoretical papers) with expert-annotated concepts and validated rationales. Experiments across a diverse set of state-of-the-art foundation models reveal substantial variation and significant headroom: some models exhibit mode-switch fragility, performing worse with the Full-set than with Instruction-only, while others show structural concept misuse, correctly naming concepts but failing to execute them as procedures.

Unbiased Visual Reasoning with Controlled Visual Inputs

End-to-end Vision-language Models (VLMs) often answer visual questions by exploiting spurious correlations instead of causal visual evidence, and can become more shortcut-prone when fine-tuned. We introduce VISTA (Visual-Information Separation for Text-based Analysis), a modular framework that decouples perception from reasoning via an explicit information bottleneck. A frozen VLM sensor is restricted to short, objective perception queries, while a text-only LLM reasoner decomposes each question, plans queries, and aggregates visual facts in natural language. This controlled interface defines a reward-aligned environment for training unbiased visual reasoning with reinforcement learning. Instantiated with Qwen2.5-VL and Llama3.2-Vision sensors, and trained with GRPO from only 641 curated multi-step questions, VISTA significantly improves robustness to real-world spurious correlations on SpuriVerse (+16.29% with Qwen-2.5-VL-7B and +6.77% with Llama-3.2-Vision-11B), while remaining competitive on MMVP and a balanced SeedBench subset. VISTA transfers robustly across unseen VLM sensors and is able to recognize and recover from VLM perception failures. Human analysis further shows that VISTA's reasoning traces are more neutral, less reliant on spurious attributes, and more explicitly grounded in visual evidence than end-to-end VLM baselines.