Decomposing and Reducing Hidden Measurement Error in LLM Evaluation Pipelines

LLM evaluations drive which models get deployed, which safety standards get adopted, and which research conclusions get published. Yet these scores carry hidden uncertainty: rephrasing the prompt, switching the judge model, or changing the temperature can shift results enough to flip rankings and reverse conclusions. Standard confidence intervals ignore this variance, producing under-coverage that worsens with more data. The unmeasured variance also creates an exploitable surface: model developers can optimize against measurement noise rather than genuine capability. This paper decomposes LLM pipeline uncertainty into its sources, distinguishes variance that shrinks with more data from sensitivity to researcher design choices, and projects the most efficient path to reducing total error. For benchmark builders, the same decomposition identifies which design choices contribute exploitable surface for gaming and prescribes designs that minimize it. Across ideology annotation, safety classification, MMLU benchmarking, and a human-validated propaganda audit, projection-optimized pipelines outperform 73\% of possible naive pipelines against a human baseline. On MMLU, optimized budget allocation halves estimation error compared to standard single-prompt evaluation at equivalent cost. A small-sample variance estimation exercise is sufficient to derive confidence intervals that approach nominal coverage when the model includes the relevant pipeline facets, and to generate recommendations for reducing measurement error and improving benchmark robustness.

Polyglot Teachers: Evaluating Language Models for Multilingual Synthetic Data Generation

Synthesizing supervised finetuning (SFT) data from language models (LMs) to teach smaller models multilingual tasks has become increasingly common. However, teacher model selection is often ad hoc, typically defaulting to the largest available option, even though such models may have significant capability gaps in non-English languages. This practice can result in poor-quality synthetic data and suboptimal student downstream performance. In this work, we systematically characterize what makes an effective multilingual teacher. We measure intrinsic measures of data quality with extrinsic student model performance in a metric we call Polyglot Score; evaluating 10 LMs across 6 typologically diverse languages, generating over 1.4M SFT examples and training 240 student models. Among the models tested, Gemma 3 27B and Aya Expanse 32B emerge as consistently effective teachers across different student base model families. Further analyses reveal that model scale alone does not significantly predict teacher effectiveness; instead, data qualities such as prompt diversity, length, and response fluency capture over 93.3% of variance in intrinsic data quality and predict student performance. Finally, we provide practical recommendations, including matching the model families of teacher-student pairs and translating from or responding to existing prompts, which can yield improvements for less-resourced languages. We hope that our work advances data-centric research in multilingual synthetic data and LM development.

Use of AI Tools: Guidelines to Maintain Academic Integrity in Computing Colleges

The rapid adoption of AI tools such as ChatGPT has significantly transformed academic practices, offering considerable benefits for both students and faculty in computing disciplines. These tools have been shown to enhance learning efficiency, academic self-efficacy, and confidence. However, their increasing use also raises pressing concerns regarding the preservation of academic integrity -- an essential pillar of the educational process. This paper explores the implications of widespread AI tool usage within computing colleges, with a particular focus on how to align their use with the principles of academic honesty. We begin by classifying common assessment techniques employed in computing education and examine how each may be impacted by AI-assisted tools. Building on this foundation, we propose a set of general guidelines applicable across various assessment formats to help instructors responsibly integrate AI tools into their pedagogy. Furthermore, we provide targeted, assessment-specific recommendations designed to uphold educational objectives while mitigating risks of academic misconduct. These guidelines serve as a practical framework for instructors aiming to balance the pedagogical advantages of AI tools with the imperative of maintaining academic integrity in computing education. Finally, we introduce a formal model that provides a structured mathematical framework for evaluating student assessments in the presence of AI-assisted tools.

SOLARIS: Speculative Offloading of Latent-bAsed Representation for Inference Scaling

Recent advances in recommendation scaling laws have led to foundation models of unprecedented complexity. While these models offer superior performance, their computational demands make real-time serving impractical, often forcing practitioners to rely on knowledge distillation-compromising serving quality for efficiency. To address this challenge, we present SOLARIS (Speculative Offloading of Latent-bAsed Representation for Inference Scaling), a novel framework inspired by speculative decoding. SOLARIS proactively precomputes user-item interaction embeddings by predicting which user-item pairs are likely to appear in future requests, and asynchronously generating their foundation model representations ahead of time. This approach decouples the costly foundation model inference from the latency-critical serving path, enabling real-time knowledge transfer from models previously considered too expensive for online use. Deployed across Meta's advertising system serving billions of daily requests, SOLARIS achieves 0.67% revenue-driving top-line metrics gain, demonstrating its effectiveness at scale.

DreamKG: A KG-Augmented Conversational System for People Experiencing Homelessness

People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face substantial barriers to accessing timely, accurate information about community services. DreamKG addresses this through a knowledge graph-augmented conversational system that grounds responses in verified, up-to-date data about Philadelphia organizations, services, locations, and hours. Unlike standard large language models (LLMs) prone to hallucinations, DreamKG combines Neo4j knowledge graphs with structured query understanding to handle location-aware and time-sensitive queries reliably. The system performs spatial reasoning for distance-based recommendations and temporal filtering for operating hours. Preliminary evaluation shows 59% superiority over Google Search AI on relevant queries and 84% rejection of irrelevant queries. This demonstration highlights the potential of hybrid architectures that combines LLM flexibility with knowledge graph reliability to improve service accessibility for vulnerable populations effectively.

WiseOWL: A Methodology for Evaluating Ontological Descriptiveness and Semantic Correctness for Ontology Reuse and Ontology Recommendations

The Semantic Web standardizes concept meaning for humans and machines, enabling machine-operable content and consistent interpretation that improves advanced analytics. Reusing ontologies speeds development and enforces consistency, yet selecting the optimal choice is challenging because authors lack systematic selection criteria and often rely on intuition that is difficult to justify, limiting reuse. To solve this, WiseOWL is proposed, a methodology with scoring and guidance to select ontologies for reuse. It scores four metrics: (i) Well-Described, measuring documentation coverage; (ii) Well-Defined, using state-of-the-art embeddings to assess label-definition alignment; (iii) Connection, capturing structural interconnectedness; and (iv) Hierarchical Breadth, reflecting hierarchical balance. WiseOWL outputs normalized 0-10 scores with actionable feedback. Implemented as a Streamlit app, it ingests OWL format, converts to RDF Turtle, and provides interactive visualizations. Evaluation across six ontologies, including the Plant Ontology (PO), Gene Ontology (GO), Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO), Food Ontology (FoodON), Dublin Core (DC), and GoodRelations, demonstrates promising effectiveness.

Topology-Aware PAC-Bayesian Generalization Analysis for Graph Neural Networks

Graph neural networks have demonstrated excellent applicability to a wide range of domains, including social networks, biological systems, recommendation systems, and wireless communications. Yet a principled theoretical understanding of their generalization behavior remains limited, particularly for graph classification tasks where complex interactions between model parameters and graph structure play a crucial role. Among existing theoretical tools, PAC-Bayesian norm-based generalization bounds provide a flexible and data-dependent framework; however, current results for GNNs often restrict the exploitation of graph structures. In this work, we propose a topology-aware PAC-Bayesian norm-based generalization framework for graph convolutional networks (GCNs) that extends a previously developed framework to graph-structured models. Our approach reformulates the derivation of generalization bounds as a stochastic optimization problem and introduces sensitivity matrices that measure the response of classification outputs with respect to structured weight perturbations. By imposing different structures on sensitivity matrices from both spatial and spectral perspectives, we derive a family of generalization error bounds with graph structures explicitly embedded. Such bounds could recover existing results as special cases, while yielding bounds that are tighter than state-of-the-art PAC-Bayesian bounds for GNNs. Notably, the proposed framework explicitly integrates graph structural properties into the generalization analysis, enabling a unified inspection of GNN generalization behavior from both spatial aggregation and spectral filtering viewpoints.

Towards an Appropriate Level of Reliance on AI: A Preliminary Reliance-Control Framework for AI in Software Engineering

How software developers interact with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools, including Large Language Models (LLMs), plays a vital role in how these AI-powered tools impact them. While overreliance on AI may lead to long-term negative consequences (e.g., atrophy of critical thinking skills); underreliance might deprive software developers of potential gains in productivity and quality. Based on twenty-two interviews with software developers on using LLMs for software development, we propose a preliminary reliance-control framework where the level of control can be used as a way to identify AI overreliance and underreliance. We also use it to recommend future research to further explore the different control levels supported by the current and emergent LLM-driven tools. Our paper contributes to the emerging discourse on AI overreliance and provides an understanding of the appropriate degree of reliance as essential to developers making the most of these powerful technologies. Our findings can help practitioners, educators, and policymakers promote responsible and effective use of AI tools.

MOSAIC: Multi-Domain Orthogonal Session Adaptive Intent Capture for Prescient Recommendations

Capturing user intent across heterogeneous behavioral domains stands as a fundamental challenge in session-based recommender systems. Yet, existing multi-domain approaches frequently fail to isolate the distinct contribution of cross-domain interactions from those arising within individual domains, limiting their ability to build rich and transferable user representations. In this work, we propose MOSAIC, a Multi-Domain Orthogonal Session Adaptive Intent Capture framework that explicitly factorizes user preferences into three orthogonal components: domain-specific, domain-common, and cross-sequence-exclusive representations. Our approach employs a triple-encoder architecture, where each encoder is dedicated to one preference type, enforced through domain masking objectives and adversarial training via a gradient reversal layer. Representational alignment and mutual independence constraints are jointly optimized to ensure clean preference separation. Additionally, a dynamic gating mechanism modulates the relative contribution of each component at every timestep, yielding a unified and temporally adaptive session-level user representation. We conduct extensive experiments on two large-scale real-world benchmarks spanning multiple domains and interaction types. The ablation study validates that each component domain-specific encoding, domain-common modeling, cross-sequence representation, and dynamic gating contributes meaningfully to the overall performance. Experimental results demonstrate that MOSAIC consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in recommendation accuracy, while simultaneously providing interpretable insights into the interplay between domain-specific and cross-domain preference signals. These findings highlight the potential of orthogonal preference decomposition as a principled strategy for next-generation multi-domain recommender systems.

HARPO: Hierarchical Agentic Reasoning for User-Aligned Conversational Recommendation

Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) operate under incremental preference revelation, requiring systems to make recommendation decisions under uncertainty. While recent approaches particularly those built on large language models achieve strong performance on standard proxy metrics such as Recall@K and BLEU, they often fail to deliver high-quality, user-aligned recommendations in practice. This gap arises because existing methods primarily optimize for intermediate objectives like retrieval accuracy, fluent generation, or tool invocation, rather than recommendation quality itself. We propose HARPO (Hierarchical Agentic Reasoning with Preference Optimization), an agentic framework that reframes conversational recommendation as a structured decision-making process explicitly optimized for multi-dimensional recommendation quality. HARPO integrates hierarchical preference learning that decomposes recommendation quality into interpretable dimensions (relevance, diversity, predicted user satisfaction, and engagement) and learns context-dependent weights over these dimensions; (ii) deliberative tree-search reasoning guided by a learned value network that evaluates candidate reasoning paths based on predicted recommendation quality rather than task completion; and (iii) domain-agnostic reasoning abstractions through Virtual Tool Operations and multi-agent refinement, enabling transferable recommendation reasoning across domains. We evaluate HARPO on ReDial, INSPIRED, and MUSE, demonstrating consistent improvements over strong baselines on recommendation-centric metrics while maintaining competitive response quality. These results highlight the importance of explicit, user-aligned quality optimization for conversational recommendation.