MasterSet: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Must-Cite Citation Recommendation in the AI/ML Literature

The explosive growth of AI and machine learning literature -- with venues like NeurIPS and ICLR now accepting thousands of papers annually -- has made comprehensive citation coverage increasingly difficult for researchers. While citation recommendation has been studied for over a decade, existing systems primarily focus on broad relevance rather than identifying the critical set of ``must-cite'' papers: direct experimental baselines, foundational methods, and core dependencies whose omission would misrepresent a contribution's novelty or undermine reproducibility. We introduce MasterSet, a large-scale benchmark specifically designed to evaluate must-cite recommendation in the AI/ML domain. MasterSet incorporates over 150,000 papers collected from official conference proceedings/websites of 15 leading venues, serving as a comprehensive candidate pool for retrieval. We annotate citations with a three-tier labeling scheme: (I) experimental baseline status, (II) core relevance (1--5 scale), and (III) intra-paper mention frequency. Our annotation pipeline leverages an LLM-based judge, validated by human experts on a stratified sample. The benchmark task requires retrieving must-cite papers from the candidate pool given only a query paper's title and abstract, evaluated by Recall@$K$. We establish baselines using sparse retrieval, dense scientific embeddings, and graph-based methods, demonstrating that must-cite retrieval remains a challenging open problem.

HABIT: Chrono-Synergia Robust Progressive Learning Framework for Composed Image Retrieval

Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is a flexible image retrieval paradigm that enables users to accurately locate the target image through a multimodal query composed of a reference image and modification text. Although this task has demonstrated promising applications in personalized search and recommendation systems, it encounters a severe challenge in practical scenarios known as the Noise Triplet Correspondence (NTC) problem. This issue primarily arises from the high cost and subjectivity involved in annotating triplet data. To address this problem, we identify two central challenges: the precise estimation of composed semantic discrepancy and the insufficient progressive adaptation to modification discrepancy. To tackle these challenges, we propose a cHrono-synergiA roBust progressIve learning framework for composed image reTrieval (HABIT), which consists of two core modules. First, the Mutual Knowledge Estimation Module quantifies sample cleanliness by calculating the Transition Rate of mutual information between the composed feature and the target image, thereby effectively identifying clean samples that align with the intended modification semantics. Second, the Dual-consistency Progressive Learning Module introduces a collaborative mechanism between the historical and current models, simulating human habit formation to retain good habits and calibrate bad habits, ultimately enabling robust learning under the presence of NTC. Extensive experiments conducted on two standard CIR datasets demonstrate that HABIT significantly outperforms most methods under various noise ratios, exhibiting superior robustness and retrieval performance. Codes are available at https://github.com/Lee-zixu/HABIT

FedCRF: A Federated Cross-domain Recommendation Method with Semantic-driven Deep Knowledge Fusion

As user behavior data becomes increasingly scattered across different platforms, achieving cross-domain knowledge fusion while preserving privacy has become a critical issue in recommender systems. Existing PPCDR methods usually rely on overlapping users or items as a bridge, making them inapplicable to non-overlapping scenarios. They also suffer from limitations in the collaborative modeling of global and local semantics. To this end, this paper proposes a Federated Cross-domain Recommendation method with deep knowledge Fusion (FedCRF). Using textual semantics as a cross-domain bridge, FedCRF achieves cross-domain knowledge transfer via federated semantic learning under the non-overlapping scenario. Specifically, FedCRF constructs global semantic clusters on the server side to extract shared semantic information, and designs a FGSAT module on the client side to dynamically adapt to local data distributions and alleviate cross-domain distribution shift. Meanwhile, it builds a semantic graph based on textual features to learn representations that integrate both structural and semantic information, and introduces contrastive learning constraints between global and local semantic representations to enhance semantic consistency and promote deep knowledge fusion. In this framework, only item semantic representations are shared, while user interaction data remains locally stored, effectively mitigating privacy leakage risks. Experimental results on multiple real-world datasets show that FedCRF significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of Recall@20 and NDCG@20, validating its effectiveness and superiority in non-overlapping cross-domain recommendation scenarios.

Multi-LLM Token Filtering and Routing for Sequential Recommendation

Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promise in recommendation by providing rich semantic knowledge. While most existing approaches rely on external textual corpora to align LLMs with recommender systems, we revisit a more fundamental yet underexplored question: Can recommendation benefit from LLM token embeddings alone without textual input? Through a systematic empirical study, we show that directly injecting token embeddings from a single LLM into sequential recommenders leads to unstable or limited gains, due to semantic misalignment, insufficient task adaptation, and the restricted coverage of individual LLMs. To address these challenges, we propose MLTFR, a Multi-LLM Token Filtering and Routing framework for corpus-free sequential recommendation. MLTFR follows an interaction-guided LLM knowledge integration paradigm, where task-relevant token embeddings are selected via user-guided token filtering to suppress noisy and irrelevant vocabulary signals. To overcome the limitations of single-LLM representations, MLTFR integrates multiple LLM token spaces through a Mixture-of-Experts architecture, with a Fisher-weighted semantic consensus expert to balance heterogeneous experts and prevent domination during training. By jointly filtering informative tokens and aggregating complementary semantic knowledge across multiple LLMs, MLTFR enables stable and effective utilization of LLM token embeddings without textual inputs or backbone modification. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MLTFR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art sequential recommendation baselines and existing alignment methods. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ccwwhhh/MLTFR.

Scripts Through Time: A Survey of the Evolving Role of Transliteration in NLP

Cross-lingual transfer in NLP is often hindered by the ``script barrier'' where differences in writing systems inhibit transfer learning between languages. Transliteration, the process of converting the script, has emerged as a powerful technique to bridge this gap by increasing lexical overlap. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the application of transliteration in cross-lingual NLP. We present a taxonomy of key motivations to utilize transliterations in language models, and provide an overview of different approaches of incorporating transliterations as input. We analyze the evolution and effectiveness of these methods, discussing the critical trade-offs involved, and contextualize their need in modern LLMs. The review explores various settings that show how transliteration is beneficial, including handling code-mixed text, leveraging language family relatedness, and pragmatic gains in inference efficiency. Based on this analysis, we provide concrete recommendations for researchers on selecting and implementing the most appropriate transliteration strategy based on their specific language, task, and resource constraints.

Spectral bandits for smooth graph functions

Smooth functions on graphs have wide applications in manifold and semi-supervised learning. In this paper, we study a bandit problem where the payoffs of arms are smooth on a graph. This framework is suitable for solving online learning problems that involve graphs, such as content-based recommendation. In this problem, each item we can recommend is a node and its expected rating is similar to its neighbors. The goal is to recommend items that have high expected ratings. We aim for the algorithms where the cumulative regret with respect to the optimal policy would not scale poorly with the number of nodes. In particular, we introduce the notion of an effective dimension, which is small in real-world graphs, and propose two algorithms for solving our problem that scale linearly and sublinearly in this dimension. Our experiments on real-world content recommendation problem show that a good estimator of user preferences for thousands of items can be learned from just tens of nodes evaluations.

Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents

Decision-making is a cognitively intensive task that requires synthesizing relevant information from multiple unstructured sources, weighing competing factors, and incorporating subjective user preferences. Existing methods, including large language models and traditional decision-support systems, fall short: they often overwhelm users with information or fail to capture nuanced preferences accurately. We present Decisive, an interactive decision-making framework that combines document-grounded reasoning with Bayesian preference inference. Our approach grounds decisions in an objective option-scoring matrix extracted from source documents, while actively learning a user's latent preference vector through targeted elicitation. Users answer pairwise tradeoff questions adaptively selected to maximize information gain over the final decision. This process converges efficiently, minimizing user effort while ensuring recommendations remain transparent and personalized. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms both general-purpose LLMs and existing decision-making frameworks achieving up to 20% improvement in decision accuracy over strong baselines across domains.

Community-Led AI Integration for Wildfire Risk Assessment: A Participatory AI Literacy and Explainability Integration (PALEI) Framework in Los Angeles, CA

Climate-driven wildfires are intensifying, particularly in urban regions such as Southern California. Yet, traditional fire risk communication tools often fail to gain public trust due to inaccessible design, non-transparent outputs, and limited contextual relevance. These challenges are especially critical in high-risk communities, where trust depends on how clearly and locally information is presented. Neighborhoods such as Pacific Palisades, Pasadena, and Altadena in Los Angeles exemplify these conditions. This study introduces a community-led approach for integrating AI into wildfire risk assessment using the Participatory AI Literacy and Explainability Integration (PALEI) framework. PALEI emphasizes early literacy building, value alignment, and participatory evaluation before deploying predictive models, prioritizing clarity, accessibility, and mutual learning between developers and residents. Early engagement findings show strong acceptance of visual, context-specific risk communication, positive fairness perceptions, and clear adoption interest, alongside privacy and data security concerns that influence trust. Participants emphasized localized imagery, accessible explanations, neighborhood-specific mitigation guidance, and transparent communication of uncertainty. The outcome is a mobile application co-designed with users and stakeholders, enabling residents to scan visible property features and receive interpretable fire risk scores with tailored recommendations. By embedding local context into design, the tool becomes an everyday resource for risk awareness and preparedness. This study argues that user experience is central to ethical and effective AI deployment and provides a replicable, literacy-first pathway for applying the PALEI framework to climate-related hazards.

Co-Located Tests, Better AI Code: How Test Syntax Structure Affects Foundation Model Code Generation

AI coding assistants increasingly generate code alongside tests. How developers structure test code, whether inline with the implementation or in separate blocks, has traditionally been a matter of testing philosophy. We investigate whether this choice affects AI code generation quality. We conduct a large-scale empirical study (830+ generated files, 12 models, 3 providers) using SEGA, a three-dimensional evaluation framework measuring Determinism, Preservation, and Correctness. Comparing inline test syntax (Python doctests) against separated test syntax (Rust #[test] blocks) on a d-ary heap implementation, we find that: (1) inline tests yield near-perfect preservation (100%) and correctness (92-100%) across all models; (2) separated tests expose stark model-tier gaps (0-100% correctness) and independence between preservation and correctness; (3) model behavior evolves across generations, and notably one model breaks the test suppression pattern of its three predecessors; (4) mechanistic analysis on 7 open-source architectures (6 transformers and a gated-linear Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)) reveals inline test markers receive 2.8-4.4$\times$ stronger attention in 5/7 models, with causal validation via knockout and steering experiments on the 4 code-specialized transformers and RWKV-6; the co-location mechanism extends to a non-transformer architecture, suggesting the design recommendation is robust to future architectural shifts. In the Foundation Model era, test syntax structure is a software design concern: co-locating tests with implementation code produces measurably better AI-generated code. This arxiv long version includes appendices that further qualify the effect as bounded by both model capability and programming language.

Transparent and Controllable Recommendation Filtering via Multimodal Multi-Agent Collaboration

While personalized recommender systems excel at content discovery, they frequently expose users to undesirable or discomforting information, highlighting the critical need for user-centric filtering tools. Current methods leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with two major bottlenecks: they lack multimodal awareness to identify visually inappropriate content, and they are highly prone to "over-association" -- incorrectly generalizing a user's specific dislike (e.g., anxiety-inducing marketing) to block benign, educational materials. These unconstrained hallucinations lead to a high volume of false positives, ultimately undermining user agency. To overcome these challenges, we introduce a novel framework that integrates end-to-cloud collaboration, multimodal perception, and multi-agent orchestration. Our system employs a fact-grounded adjudication pipeline to eliminate inferential hallucinations. Furthermore, it constructs a dynamic, two-tier preference graph that allows for explicit, human-in-the-loop modifications (via Delta-adjustments), explicitly preventing the algorithm from catastrophically forgetting fine-grained user intents. Evaluated on an adversarial dataset comprising 473 highly confusing samples, the proposed architecture effectively curbed over-association, decreasing the false positive rate by 74.3% and achieving nearly twice the F1-Score of traditional text-only baselines. Additionally, a 7-day longitudinal field study with 19 participants demonstrated robust intent alignment and enhanced governance efficiency. User feedback confirmed that the framework drastically improves algorithmic transparency, rebuilds user control, and alleviates the fear of missing out (FOMO), paving the way for transparent human-AI co-governance in personalized feeds.