Explaining CLIP Zero-shot Predictions Through Concepts

Large-scale vision-language models such as CLIP have achieved remarkable success in zero-shot image recognition, yet their predictions remain largely opaque to human understanding. In contrast, Concept Bottleneck Models provide interpretable intermediate representations by reasoning through human-defined concepts, but they rely on concept supervision and lack the ability to generalize to unseen classes. We introduce EZPC that bridges these two paradigms by explaining CLIP's zero-shot predictions through human-understandable concepts. Our method projects CLIP's joint image-text embeddings into a concept space learned from language descriptions, enabling faithful and transparent explanations without additional supervision. The model learns this projection via a combination of alignment and reconstruction objectives, ensuring that concept activations preserve CLIP's semantic structure while remaining interpretable. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets, CIFAR-100, CUB-200-2011, Places365, ImageNet-100, and ImageNet-1k, demonstrate that our approach maintains CLIP's strong zero-shot classification accuracy while providing meaningful concept-level explanations. By grounding open-vocabulary predictions in explicit semantic concepts, our method offers a principled step toward interpretable and trustworthy vision-language models. Code is available at https://github.com/oonat/ezpc.

ARGENT: Adaptive Hierarchical Image-Text Representations

Large-scale Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP learn powerful semantic representations but operate in Euclidean space, which fails to capture the inherent hierarchical structure of visual and linguistic concepts. Hyperbolic geometry, with its exponential volume growth, offers a principled alternative for embedding such hierarchies with low distortion. However, existing hyperbolic VLMs use entailment losses that are unstable: as parent embeddings contract toward the origin, their entailment cones widen toward a half-space, causing catastrophic cone collapse that destroys the intended hierarchy. Additionally, hierarchical evaluation of these models remains unreliable, being largely retrieval-based and correlation-based metrics and prone to taxonomy dependence and ambiguous negatives. To address these limitations, we propose an adaptive entailment loss paired with a norm regularizer that prevents cone collapse without heuristic aperture clipping. We further introduce an angle-based probabilistic entailment protocol (PEP) for evaluating hierarchical understanding, scored with AUC-ROC and Average Precision. This paper introduces a stronger hyperbolic VLM baseline ARGENT, Adaptive hieRarchical imaGe-tExt represeNTation. ARGENT improves the SOTA hyperbolic VLM by 0.7, 1.1, and 0.8 absolute points on image classification, text-to-image retrieval, and proposed hierarchical metrics, respectively.

Explaining, Verifying, and Aligning Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Model Embeddings

Vision-language model (VLM) encoders such as CLIP enable strong retrieval and zero-shot classification in a shared image-text embedding space, yet the semantic organization of this space is rarely inspected. We present a post-hoc framework to explain, verify, and align the semantic hierarchies induced by a VLM over a given set of child classes. First, we extract a binary hierarchy by agglomerative clustering of class centroids and name internal nodes by dictionary-based matching to a concept bank. Second, we quantify plausibility by comparing the extracted tree against human ontologies using efficient tree- and edge-level consistency measures, and we evaluate utility via explainable hierarchical tree-traversal inference with uncertainty-aware early stopping (UAES). Third, we propose an ontology-guided post-hoc alignment method that learns a lightweight embedding-space transformation, using UMAP to generate target neighborhoods from a desired hierarchy. Across 13 pretrained VLMs and 4 image datasets, our method finds systematic modality differences: image encoders are more discriminative, while text encoders induce hierarchies that better match human taxonomies. Overall, the results reveal a persistent trade-off between zero-shot accuracy and ontological plausibility and suggest practical routes to improve semantic alignment in shared embedding spaces.

LGSE: Lexically Grounded Subword Embedding Initialization for Low-Resource Language Adaptation

Adapting pretrained language models to low-resource, morphologically rich languages remains a significant challenge. Existing vocabulary expansion methods typically rely on arbitrarily segmented subword units, resulting in fragmented lexical representations and loss of critical morphological information. To address this limitation, we propose the Lexically Grounded Subword Embedding Initialization (LGSE) framework, which introduces morphologically informed segmentation for initializing embeddings of novel tokens. Instead of using random vectors or arbitrary subwords, LGSE decomposes words into their constituent morphemes and constructs semantically coherent embeddings by averaging pretrained subword or FastText-based morpheme representations. When a token cannot be segmented into meaningful morphemes, its embedding is constructed using character n-gram representations to capture structural information. During Language-Adaptive Pretraining, we apply a regularization term that penalizes large deviations of newly introduced embeddings from their initialized values, preserving alignment with the original pretrained embedding space while enabling adaptation to the target language. To isolate the effect of initialization, we retain the original pre-trained model vocabulary and tokenizer and update only the new embeddings during adaptation. We evaluate LGSE on three NLP tasks: Question Answering, Named Entity Recognition, and Text Classification, in two morphologically rich, low-resource languages: Amharic and Tigrinya, where morphological segmentation resources are available. Experimental results show that LGSE consistently outperforms baseline methods across all tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of morphologically grounded embedding initialization for improving representation quality in underrepresented languages. Project resources are available in the GitHub link.

TextReasoningBench: Does Reasoning Really Improve Text Classification in Large Language Models?

Eliciting explicit, step-by-step reasoning traces from large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a dominant paradigm for enhancing model capabilities. Although such reasoning strategies were originally designed for problems requiring explicit multi-step reasoning, they have increasingly been applied to a broad range of NLP tasks. This expansion implicitly assumes that deliberative reasoning uniformly benefits heterogeneous tasks. However, whether such reasoning mechanisms truly benefit classification tasks remains largely underexplored, especially considering their substantial token and time costs. To fill this gap, we introduce TextReasoningBench, a systematic benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of reasoning strategies for text classification with LLMs. We compare seven reasoning strategies, namely IO, CoT, SC-CoT, ToT, GoT, BoC, and long-CoT across ten LLMs on five text classification datasets. Beyond traditional metrics such as accuracy and macro-F1, we introduce two cost-aware evaluation metrics that quantify the performance gain per reasoning token and the efficiency of performance improvement relative to token cost growth. Experimental results reveal three notable findings: (1) Reasoning does not universally improve classification performance: while moderate strategies such as CoT and SC-CoT yield consistent but limited gains (typically +1% to +3% on big models), more complex methods (e.g., ToT and GoT) often fail to outperform simpler baselines and can even degrade performance, especially on small models; (2) Reasoning is often inefficient: many reasoning strategies increase token consumption by 10$\times$ to 100$\times$ (e.g., SC-CoT and ToT) while providing only marginal performance improvements.

An Experimental Comparison of the Most Popular Approaches to Fake News Detection

In recent years, fake news detection has received increasing attention in public debate and scientific research. Despite advances in detection techniques, the production and spread of false information have become more sophisticated, driven by Large Language Models (LLMs) and the amplification power of social media. We present a critical assessment of 12 representative fake news detection approaches, spanning traditional machine learning, deep learning, transformers, and specialized cross-domain architectures. We evaluate these methods on 10 publicly available datasets differing in genre, source, topic, and labeling rationale. We address text-only English fake news detection as a binary classification task by harmonizing labels into "Real" and "Fake" to ensure a consistent evaluation protocol. We acknowledge that label semantics vary across datasets and that harmonization inevitably removes such semantic nuances. Each dataset is treated as a distinct domain. We conduct in-domain, multi-domain and cross-domain experiments to simulate real-world scenarios involving domain shift and out-of-distribution data. Fine-tuned models perform well in-domain but struggle to generalize. Cross-domain architectures can reduce this gap but are data-hungry, while LLMs offer a promising alternative through zero- and few-shot learning. Given inherent dataset confounds and possible pre-training exposure, results should be interpreted as robustness evaluations within this English, text-only protocol.

Enhancing Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL) Representations via Attention-Based Pooling for Text Classification

The Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL) model relies on global word co-occurrence matrices to construct distributional semantic representations. While these representations capture lexical relationships effectively, aggregating them into sentence-level embeddings via standard mean pooling often results in information loss. Mean pooling assigns equal weight to all tokens, thereby diluting the impact of contextually salient words with uninformative structural tokens. In this paper, we address this limitation by integrating a learnable, temperature-scaled additive attention mechanism into the HAL representation pipeline. To mitigate the sparsity and high dimensionality of the raw co-occurrence matrices, we apply Truncated Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to project the vectors into a dense latent space prior to the attention layer. We evaluate the proposed architecture on the IMDB sentiment analysis dataset. Empirical results demonstrate that the attention-based pooling approach achieves a test accuracy of 82.38%, yielding an absolute improvement of 6.74 percentage points over the traditional mean pooling baseline (75.64%). Furthermore, qualitative analysis of the attention weights indicates that the mechanism successfully suppresses stop-words and selectively attends to sentiment-bearing tokens, improving both classification performance and model interpretability.

Argument Mining as a Text-to-Text Generation Task

Argument Mining(AM) aims to uncover the argumentative structures within a text. Previous methods require several subtasks, such as span identification, component classification, and relation classification. Consequently, these methods need rule-based postprocessing to derive argumentative structures from the output of each subtask. This approach adds to the complexity of the model and expands the search space of the hyperparameters. To address this difficulty, we propose a simple yet strong method based on a text-to-text generation approach using a pretrained encoder-decoder language model. Our method simultaneously generates argumentatively annotated text for spans, components, and relations, eliminating the need for task-specific postprocessing and hyperparameter tuning. Furthermore, because it is a straightforward text-to-text generation method, we can easily adapt our approach to various types of argumentative structures. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, as it achieves state-of-the-art performance on three different types of benchmark datasets: the Argument-annotated Essays Corpus(AAEC), AbstRCT, and the Cornell eRulemaking Corpus(CDCP)

Is AI Catching Up to Human Expression? Exploring Emotion, Personality, Authorship, and Linguistic Style in English and Arabic with Six Large Language Models

The advancing fluency of LLMs raises important questions about their ability to emulate complex human traits, including emotional expression and personality, across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. This study investigates whether LLMs can convincingly mimic emotional nuance in English and personality markers in Arabic, a critical under-resourced language with unique linguistic and cultural characteristics. We conduct two tasks across six models:Jais, Mistral, LLaMA, GPT-4o, Gemini, and DeepSeek. First, we evaluate whether machine classifiers can reliably distinguish between human-authored and AI-generated texts. Second, we assess the extent to which LLM-generated texts exhibit emotional or personality traits comparable to those of humans. Our results demonstrate that AI-generated texts are distinguishable from human-authored ones (F1>0.95), though classification performance deteriorates on paraphrased samples, indicating a reliance on superficial stylistic cues. Emotion and personality classification experiments reveal significant generalization gaps: classifiers trained on human data perform poorly on AI-generated texts and vice versa, suggesting LLMs encode affective signals differently from humans. Importantly, augmenting training with AI-generated data enhances performance in the Arabic personality classification task, highlighting the potential of synthetic data to address challenges in under-resourced languages. Model-specific analyses show that GPT-4o and Gemini exhibit superior affective coherence. Linguistic and psycholinguistic analyses reveal measurable divergences in tone, authenticity, and textual complexity between human and AI texts. These findings have implications for affective computing, authorship attribution, and responsible AI deployment, particularly within underresourced language contexts where generative AI detection and alignment pose unique challenges.

CrossHGL: A Text-Free Foundation Model for Cross-Domain Heterogeneous Graph Learning

Heterogeneous graph representation learning (HGRL) is essential for modeling complex systems with diverse node and edge types. However, most existing methods are limited to closed-world settings with shared schemas and feature spaces, hindering cross-domain generalization. While recent graph foundation models improve transferability, they often target homogeneous graphs, rely on domain-specific schemas, or require rich textual attributes. Consequently, text-free and few-shot cross-domain HGRL remains underexplored. To address this, we propose CrossHGL, a foundation framework that preserves and transfers multi-relational structural semantics without external textual supervision. Specifically, a semantic-preserving transformation strategy homogenizes heterogeneous graphs while encoding interaction semantics into edge features. Based on this, a prompt-aware multi-domain pre-training framework with a Tri-Prompt mechanism captures transferable knowledge across feature, edge, and structure perspectives via self-supervised contrastive learning. For target-domain adaptation, we develop a parameter-efficient fine-tuning strategy that freezes the pre-trained backbone and performs few-shot classification via prompt composition and prototypical learning. Experiments on node-level and graph-level tasks show that CrossHGL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, yielding average relative improvements of 25.1% and 7.6% in Micro-F1 for node and graph classification, respectively, while remaining competitive in challenging feature-degenerated settings.