Most testbeds for omni-modal models assess multimodal understanding via textual outputs, leaving it unclear whether these models can properly speak their answers. To study this, we introduce OmniACBench, a benchmark for evaluating context-grounded acoustic control in omni-modal models. Given a spoken instruction, a text script, and an image, a model must read the script aloud with an appropriate tone and manner. OmniACBench comprises 3,559 verified instances covering six acoustic features: speech rate, phonation, pronunciation, emotion, global accent, and timbre. Extensive experiments on eight models reveal their limitations in the proposed setting, despite their strong performance on prior textual-output evaluations. Our analyses show that the main bottleneck lies not in processing individual modalities, but in integrating multimodal context for faithful speech generation. Moreover, we identify three common failure modes-weak direct control, failed implicit inference, and failed multimodal grounding-providing insights for developing models that can verbalize responses effectively.
Current multimodal toxicity benchmarks typically use a single binary hatefulness label. This coarse approach conflates two fundamentally different characteristics of expression: tone and content. Drawing on communication science theory, we introduce a fine-grained annotation scheme that distinguishes two separable dimensions: incivility (rude or dismissive tone) and intolerance (content that attacks pluralism and targets groups or identities) and apply it to 2,030 memes from the Hateful Memes dataset. We evaluate different vision-language models under coarse-label training, transfer learning across label schemes and a joint learning approach that combines the coarse hatefulness label with our fine-grained annotations. Our results show that fine-grained annotations complement existing coarse labels and, when used jointly, improve overall model performance. Moreover, models trained with the fine-grained scheme exhibit more balanced moderation-relevant error profiles and are less prone to under-detection of harmful content than models trained on hatefulness labels alone (FNR-FPR, the difference between false negative and false positive rates: 0.74 to 0.42 for LLaVA-1.6-Mistral-7B; 0.54 to 0.28 for Qwen2.5-VL-7B). This work contributes to data-centric approaches in content moderation by improving the reliability and accuracy of moderation systems through enhanced data quality. Overall, combining both coarse and fine-grained labels provides a practical route to more reliable multimodal moderation.
Near-field integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) enables object-level sensing from distance-dependent array responses, yet most existing near-field methods still rely on point-target models and realistic extended targets remain largely unexplored. In this paper, joint target classification and range-azimuth localization are studied from channel responses of realistic extended targets. A dual-branch inference framework is proposed. Semantic and geometric branches are used for classification and localization, respectively. Cross-task attention is introduced after task-specific encoding so that complementary cues can be exchanged without forcing full feature sharing from the input stage. To improve localization on the same backbone, uncertainty-aware regression and a physics-guided structured objective are adopted, including planar consistency, peak-response regularization, and geometry-coupling constraints. Training and evaluation data are generated from full-wave electromagnetic scattering simulations of voxelized vehicle targets with randomized heading angles, material contrasts, and placements. The compared variants show that cross-task attention mainly benefits classification, while uncertainty-aware and structured supervision are needed to recover strong localization performance on the same backbone. Under the adopted shared-OFDM benchmark, the proposed framework reaches the best joint operating point with fewer sensing tones for the same target performance region.
The advancing fluency of LLMs raises important questions about their ability to emulate complex human traits, including emotional expression and personality, across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. This study investigates whether LLMs can convincingly mimic emotional nuance in English and personality markers in Arabic, a critical under-resourced language with unique linguistic and cultural characteristics. We conduct two tasks across six models:Jais, Mistral, LLaMA, GPT-4o, Gemini, and DeepSeek. First, we evaluate whether machine classifiers can reliably distinguish between human-authored and AI-generated texts. Second, we assess the extent to which LLM-generated texts exhibit emotional or personality traits comparable to those of humans. Our results demonstrate that AI-generated texts are distinguishable from human-authored ones (F1>0.95), though classification performance deteriorates on paraphrased samples, indicating a reliance on superficial stylistic cues. Emotion and personality classification experiments reveal significant generalization gaps: classifiers trained on human data perform poorly on AI-generated texts and vice versa, suggesting LLMs encode affective signals differently from humans. Importantly, augmenting training with AI-generated data enhances performance in the Arabic personality classification task, highlighting the potential of synthetic data to address challenges in under-resourced languages. Model-specific analyses show that GPT-4o and Gemini exhibit superior affective coherence. Linguistic and psycholinguistic analyses reveal measurable divergences in tone, authenticity, and textual complexity between human and AI texts. These findings have implications for affective computing, authorship attribution, and responsible AI deployment, particularly within underresourced language contexts where generative AI detection and alignment pose unique challenges.
RAW images captured by different camera sensors exhibit substantial domain shifts due to varying spectral responses, noise characteristics, and tone behaviors, complicating their direct use in downstream computer vision tasks. Prior methods address this problem by training domain-specific RAW-to-RAW translators for each source-target pair, but such approaches do not scale to real-world scenarios involving multiple types of commercial cameras. In this work, we introduce MERIT, the first unified framework for multi-domain RAW image translation, which leverages a single model to perform translations across arbitrary camera domains. To address domain-specific noise discrepancies, we propose a sensor-aware noise modeling loss that explicitly aligns the signal-dependent noise statistics of the generated images with those of the target domain. We further enhance the generator with a conditional multi-scale large kernel attention module for improved context and sensor-aware feature modeling. To facilitate standardized evaluation, we introduce MDRAW, the first dataset tailored for multi-domain RAW image translation, comprising both paired and unpaired RAW captures from five diverse camera sensors across a wide range of scenes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MERIT outperforms prior models in both quality (5.56 dB improvement) and scalability (80% reduction in training iterations).
Mosquito-borne diseases affect more than one billion people each year and cause close to one million deaths. Traditional surveillance methods rely on traps and manual identification that are slow, labor-intensive, and difficult to scale. Audio-based mosquito monitoring offers a non-destructive, lower-cost, and more scalable complement to trap-based surveillance, but reliable species classification remains difficult under real-world recording conditions. Mosquito flight tones are narrow-band, often low in signal-to-noise ratio, and easily masked by background noise, and recordings for several epidemiologically relevant species remain limited, creating pronounced class imbalance. Variation across devices, environments, and collection protocols further increases the difficulty of robust classification. Such variation can cause models to rely on domain-specific recording artefacts rather than species-relevant acoustic cues, which makes transfer to new acquisition settings difficult. The BioDCASE 2026 Cross-Domain Mosquito Species Classification (CD-MSC) challenge is designed around this deployment problem by evaluating performance on both seen and unseen domains. This paper presents the official baseline system and evaluation pipeline as a simple, fully reproducible reference for the CD-MSC challenge task. The baseline uses log-mel features and a multitemporal resolution convolutional neural network (MTRCNN) with species and auxiliary domain outputs, together with complete training and test scripts. The baseline system performs strongly on seen domains but degrades markedly on unseen domains, showing that cross-domain generalisation, rather than within-domain recognition, is the central challenge for practical mosquito species classification from multi-source bioacoustic recordings.
Persona prompting can steer LLM generation towards a domain-specific tone and pattern. This behavior enables use cases in multi-agent systems where diverse interactions are crucial and human-centered tasks require high-level human alignment. Prior works provide mixed opinions on their utility: some report performance gains when using expert personas for certain domains and their contribution to data diversity in synthetic data creation, while others find near-zero or negative impact on general utility. To fully leverage the benefits of the LLM persona and avoid its harmfulness, a more comprehensive investigation of the mechanism is crucial. In this work, we study how model optimization, task type, prompt length, and placement can impact expert persona effectiveness across instruction-tuned and reasoning LLMs, and provide insight into conditions under which expert personas fail and succeed. Based on our findings, we developed a pipeline to fully leverage the benefits of an expert persona, named PRISM (Persona Routing via Intent-based Self-Modeling), which self-distills an intent-conditioned expert persona into a gated LoRA adapter through a bootstrapping process that requires no external data, models, or knowledge. PRISM enhances human preference and safety alignment on generative tasks while maintaining accuracy on discriminative tasks across all models, with minimal memory and computing overhead.
Colour is one of the most perceptually salient yet least controllable attributes in image generation. Although recent diffusion models can modify object colours from user instructions, their results often deviate from the intended hue, especially for fine-grained and local edits. Early text-driven methods rely on discrete language descriptions that cannot accurately represent continuous chromatic variations. To overcome this limitation, we propose ColourCrafter, a unified diffusion framework that transforms colour editing from global tone transfer into a structured, region-aware generation process. Unlike traditional colour driven methods, ColourCrafter performs token-level fusion of RGB colour tokens and image tokens in latent space, selectively propagating colour information to semantically relevant regions while preserving structural fidelity. A perceptual Lab-space Loss further enhances pixel-level precision by decoupling luminance and chrominance and constraining edits within masked areas. Additionally, we build ColourfulSet, a largescale dataset of high-quality image pairs with continuous and diverse colour variations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ColourCrafter achieves state-of-the-art colour accuracy, controllability and perceptual fidelity in fine-grained colour editing. Our project is available at https://yangyuqi317.github.io/ColourCrafter.github.io/.
The widespread sharing of face images on social media platforms and in large-scale datasets raises pressing privacy concerns, as biometric identifiers can be exploited without consent. Face anonymization seeks to generate realistic facial images that irreversibly conceal the subject's identity while preserving their usefulness for downstream tasks. However, most existing generative approaches focus on identity removal and image realism, often neglecting facial expressions as well as photometric consistency -- specifically attributes such as illumination and skin tone -- that are critical for applications like relighting, color constancy, and medical or affective analysis. In this work, we propose a feature-preserving anonymization framework that extends DeepPrivacy by incorporating dense facial landmarks to better retain expressions, and by introducing lightweight post-processing modules that ensure consistency in lighting direction and skin color. We further establish evaluation metrics specifically designed to quantify expression fidelity, lighting consistency, and color preservation, complementing standard measures of image realism, pose accuracy, and re-identification resistance. Experiments on the CelebA-HQ dataset demonstrate that our method produces anonymized faces with improved realism and significantly higher fidelity in expression, illumination, and skin tone compared to state-of-the-art baselines. These results underscore the importance of feature-aware anonymization as a step toward more useful, fair, and trustworthy privacy-preserving facial data.
Large language models (LLMs) are used by over a billion people globally, most often to assist with writing. In this work, we demonstrate that LLMs not only alter the voice and tone of human writing, but also consistently alter the intended meaning. First, we conduct a human user study to understand how people actually interact with LLMs when using them for writing. Our findings reveal that extensive LLM use led to a nearly 70% increase in essays that remained neutral in answering the topic question. Significantly more heavy LLM users reported that the writing was less creative and not in their voice. Next, using a dataset of human-written essays that was collected in 2021 before the widespread release of LLMs, we study how asking an LLM to revise the essay based on the human-written feedback in the dataset induces large changes in the resulting content and meaning. We find that even when LLMs are prompted with expert feedback and asked to only make grammar edits, they still change the text in a way that significantly alters its semantic meaning. We then examine LLM-generated text in the wild, specifically focusing on the 21% of AI-generated scientific peer reviews at a recent top AI conference. We find that LLM-generated reviews place significantly less weight on clarity and significance of the research, and assign scores that, on average, are a full point higher.These findings highlight a misalignment between the perceived benefit of AI use and an implicit, consistent effect on the semantics of human writing, motivating future work on how widespread AI writing will affect our cultural and scientific institutions.