Reweighting Augmented Samples by Minimizing the Maximal Expected Loss

Data augmentation is an effective technique to improve the generalization of deep neural networks. However, previous data augmentation methods usually treat the augmented samples equally without considering their individual impacts on the model. To address this, for the augmented samples from the same training example, we propose to assign different weights to them. We construct the maximal expected loss which is the supremum over any reweighted loss on augmented samples. Inspired by adversarial training, we minimize this maximal expected loss (MMEL) and obtain a simple and interpretable closed-form solution: more attention should be paid to augmented samples with large loss values (i.e., harder examples). Minimizing this maximal expected loss enables the model to perform well under any reweighting strategy. The proposed method can generally be applied on top of any data augmentation methods. Experiments are conducted on both natural language understanding tasks with token-level data augmentation, and image classification tasks with commonly-used image augmentation techniques like random crop and horizontal flip. Empirical results show that the proposed method improves the generalization performance of the model.

BN-invariant sharpness regularizes the training model to better generalization

It is arguably believed that flatter minima can generalize better. However, it has been pointed out that the usual definitions of sharpness, which consider either the maxima or the integral of loss over a $\delta$ ball of parameters around minima, cannot give consistent measurement for scale invariant neural networks, e.g., networks with batch normalization layer. In this paper, we first propose a measure of sharpness, BN-Sharpness, which gives consistent value for equivalent networks under BN. It achieves the property of scale invariance by connecting the integral diameter with the scale of parameter. Then we present a computation-efficient way to calculate the BN-sharpness approximately i.e., one dimensional integral along the "sharpest" direction. Furthermore, we use the BN-sharpness to regularize the training and design an algorithm to minimize the new regularized objective. Our algorithm achieves considerably better performance than vanilla SGD over various experiment settings.

Towards Accelerating Training of Batch Normalization: A Manifold Perspective

Batch normalization (BN) has become a crucial component across diverse deep neural networks. The network with BN is invariant to positively linear re-scaling of weights, which makes there exist infinite functionally equivalent networks with various scales of weights. However, optimizing these equivalent networks with the first-order method such as stochastic gradient descent will converge to different local optima owing to different gradients across training. To alleviate this, we propose a quotient manifold \emph{PSI manifold}, in which all the equivalent weights of the network with BN are regarded as the same one element. Then, gradient descent and stochastic gradient descent on the PSI manifold are also constructed. The two algorithms guarantee that every group of equivalent weights (caused by positively re-scaling) converge to the equivalent optima. Besides that, we give the convergence rate of the proposed algorithms on PSI manifold and justify that they accelerate training compared with the algorithms on the Euclidean weight space. Empirical studies show that our algorithms can consistently achieve better performances over various experimental settings.

Non-Asymptotic Analysis of Excess Risk via Empirical Risk Landscape

In this paper, we provide a unified analysis of the excess risk of the model trained by some proper algorithms in both convex and non-convex regime. In contrary to the existing results in the literature that depends on iteration steps, our bounds to the excess risk do not diverge with the number of iterations. This underscores that, at least for loss functions of certain types, the excess risk on it can be guaranteed after a period of training. Our technique relies on a non-asymptotic characterization of the empirical risk landscape. To be rigorous, under the condition that the local minima of population risk are non-degenerate, each local minimum of the smooth empirical risk is guaranteed to generalize well. The conclusion is independent of the convexity. Combining this with the classical optimization result, we derive converged upper bounds to the excess risk in both convex and non-convex regime.

Dynamic of Stochastic Gradient Descent with State-Dependent Noise

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and its variants are mainstream methods to train deep neural networks. Since neural networks are non-convex, more and more works study the dynamic behavior of SGD and the impact to its generalization, especially the escaping efficiency from local minima. However, these works take the over-simplified assumption that the covariance of the noise in SGD is (or can be upper bounded by) constant, although it is actually state-dependent. In this work, we conduct a formal study on the dynamic behavior of SGD with state-dependent noise. Specifically, we show that the covariance of the noise of SGD in the local region of the local minima is a quadratic function of the state. Thus, we propose a novel power-law dynamic with state-dependent diffusion to approximate the dynamic of SGD. We prove that, power-law dynamic can escape from sharp minima exponentially faster than flat minima, while the previous dynamics can only escape sharp minima polynomially faster than flat minima. Our experiments well verified our theoretical results. Inspired by our theory, we propose to add additional state-dependent noise into (large-batch) SGD to further improve its generalization ability. Experiments verify that our method is effective.

Off-policy Learning for Multiple Loggers

It is well known that the historical logs are used for evaluating and learning policies in interactive systems, e.g. recommendation, search, and online advertising. Since direct online policy learning usually harms user experiences, it is more crucial to apply off-policy learning in real-world applications instead. Though there have been some existing works, most are focusing on learning with one single historical policy. However, in practice, usually a number of parallel experiments, e.g. multiple AB tests, are performed simultaneously. To make full use of such historical data, learning policies from multiple loggers becomes necessary. Motivated by this, in this paper, we investigate off-policy learning when the training data coming from multiple historical policies. Specifically, policies, e.g. neural networks, can be learned directly from multi-logger data, with counterfactual estimators. In order to understand the generalization ability of such estimator better, we conduct generalization error analysis for the empirical risk minimization problem. We then introduce the generalization error bound as the new risk function, which can be reduced to a constrained optimization problem. Finally, we give the corresponding learning algorithm for the new constrained problem, where we can appeal to the minimax problems to control the constraints. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed methods achieve better performances than the state-of-the-arts.

$\mathcal{G}$-SGD: Optimizing ReLU Neural Networks in its Positively Scale-Invariant Space

It is well known that neural networks with rectified linear units (ReLU) activation functions are positively scale-invariant. Conventional algorithms like stochastic gradient descent optimize the neural networks in the vector space of weights, which is, however, not positively scale-invariant. This mismatch may lead to problems during the optimization process. Then, a natural question is: \emph{can we construct a new vector space that is positively scale-invariant and sufficient to represent ReLU neural networks so as to better facilitate the optimization process }? In this paper, we provide our positive answer to this question. First, we conduct a formal study on the positive scaling operators which forms a transformation group, denoted as $\mathcal{G}$. We show that the value of a path (i.e. the product of the weights along the path) in the neural network is invariant to positive scaling and prove that the value vector of all the paths is sufficient to represent the neural networks under mild conditions. Second, we show that one can identify some basis paths out of all the paths and prove that the linear span of their value vectors (denoted as $\mathcal{G}$-space) is an invariant space with lower dimension under the positive scaling group. Finally, we design stochastic gradient descent algorithm in $\mathcal{G}$-space (abbreviated as $\mathcal{G}$-SGD) to optimize the value vector of the basis paths of neural networks with little extra cost by leveraging back-propagation. Our experiments show that $\mathcal{G}$-SGD significantly outperforms the conventional SGD algorithm in optimizing ReLU networks on benchmark datasets.

Finite Sample Analysis of the GTD Policy Evaluation Algorithms in Markov Setting

In reinforcement learning (RL) , one of the key components is policy evaluation, which aims to estimate the value function (i.e., expected long-term accumulated reward) of a policy. With a good policy evaluation method, the RL algorithms will estimate the value function more accurately and find a better policy. When the state space is large or continuous \emph{Gradient-based Temporal Difference(GTD)} policy evaluation algorithms with linear function approximation are widely used. Considering that the collection of the evaluation data is both time and reward consuming, a clear understanding of the finite sample performance of the policy evaluation algorithms is very important to reinforcement learning. Under the assumption that data are i.i.d. generated, previous work provided the finite sample analysis of the GTD algorithms with constant step size by converting them into convex-concave saddle point problems. However, it is well-known that, the data are generated from Markov processes rather than i.i.d. in RL problems.. In this paper, in the realistic Markov setting, we derive the finite sample bounds for the general convex-concave saddle point problems, and hence for the GTD algorithms. We have the following discussions based on our bounds. (1) With variants of step size, GTD algorithms converge. (2) The convergence rate is determined by the step size, with the mixing time of the Markov process as the coefficient. The faster the Markov processes mix, the faster the convergence. (3) We explain that the experience replay trick is effective by improving the mixing property of the Markov process. To the best of our knowledge, our analysis is the first to provide finite sample bounds for the GTD algorithms in Markov setting.