From Attacks to Curricula: Learnability-Guided Adversarial Training for Safe Autonomous Driving

Closed-loop adversarial training improves autonomous driving safety by exposing policies to rare safety-critical scenarios. Standard pipelines first generate adversarial scenarios and then sample them for policy optimization. However, most existing frameworks remain attack-oriented: collision-driven generators often synthesize unsolvable extreme situations, which can degrade learning, while heuristic samplers ignore the evolving capability of the driving policy, causing sample inefficiency and delayed convergence. We propose AlignADV, a learnability-guided closed-loop adversarial training framework that converts adversarial scenarios into resolvable and capability-aligned curricula. First, we reformulate adversarial scenario generation as a preference alignment problem and employ direct preference optimization to guide the generator toward critical yet resolvable scenarios. Second, we introduce behavioral fingerprints to capture the intrinsic characteristics of the evolving policy and construct a multi-modal capability prediction model that estimates policy performance without expensive closed-loop simulations. By combining resolvability-aligned scenarios with capability predictions, AlignADV develops a dynamic curriculum sampling mechanism that prioritizes scenarios targeting the current policy's vulnerabilities. Experiments on the Waymo Open Motion Dataset demonstrate that AlignADV improves convergence efficiency and final performance, reducing training steps by up to 40.6 percent compared with baseline methods while lowering collision rate and improving route completion under both normal and adversarial traffic conditions. These results highlight a shift from attack-oriented scenario generation to learnability-guided policy improvement, offering a principled direction for safer and more efficient autonomous driving training. Project page: https://meiyuewen.github.io/AlignADV/.

UXBench: Benchmarking User Experience in AI Assistants

As AI assistants serve millions of users daily, evaluating user experience (UX) beyond general model capability has become increasingly important. We present UXBench, the first user-centric benchmark grounded in real user feedback signals for evaluating preference alignment and dialogue generation. The benchmark consists of three interconnected tasks, UX Judge, UX Eval, and UX Recovery, with 7,400 test instances extracted from over 70K interaction logs of a mainstream Chinese AI assistant. The dataset closely reflects real user distributions, covering 8 scenarios, 83 domains, and diverse failure patterns that pose severe challenges. Extensive experiments on 26 frontier language models provide novel insights into how well models perceive user experience and how improvements in model capability contribute to better dialogue engagement. Through comprehensive analysis of model behavior and performance gaps, we show that user feedback prediction is a learnable capability, where a reward model trained from in-the-wild feedback signals can achieve well-calibrated accuracy. We further document the systematic biases of LLM-as-a-judge evaluation protocols and compare typical response strategies that directly affect user experience. UXBench establishes a new evaluation landscape and calls for greater attention to tailored UX optimization, contributing to a user-centric scaling law that shapes the success of AI assistants.

EvoDrive: Pareto Evolution for Safety-Critical Autonomous Driving via Self-Improving LLM Agents

Generating safety-critical scenarios is essential for validating and improving autonomous driving systems, yet it inherently requires maximizing adversariality to expose failures while preserving realism. Existing methods usually manage this trade-off with handcrafted heuristics, confining generation to known priors and overlooking underexplored patterns. While recent open-ended agentic evolution can push this limit, unconstrained general agents lack strict simulator grounding and tend to collapse the multi-objective tension into single-scalar maximization. Here we present EvoDrive, the first automated, LLM-based agentic evolution framework for multi-objective scenario generation. EvoDrive employs a simulator-grounded actor-critic architecture where a memory-driven actor iteratively proposes improvements to the generators and critics filter out implausible candidates, and a self-evolving world evaluator routes promising proposals to optimize simulation budgets. EvoDrive further maintains a Pareto archive of evaluated candidates to preserve diverse attack-realism trade-offs and guide future evolution via simulation feedback. Benchmark results on MetaDrive and CARLA show that EvoDrive not only significantly expands the Pareto frontier across various generators, but also produces valuable scenarios for policy training.

MobEvolve: An Agentic Self-Evolving Heuristic System for Interpretable Human Mobility Generation

Human mobility generation aims to synthesize realistic trip chains for target populations based on individual features. Existing paradigms, including deep generative models, LLM-based methods, and traditional heuristics, struggle to satisfy the complex demands of this task while simultaneously maintaining interpretability, behavioral plausibility, population-level distributional alignment, and inference efficiency. To bridge this gap, we introduce MobEvolve, the first agentic self-evolving heuristic framework for human mobility generation. MobEvolve initializes a behavior-inspired heuristic system and employs an LLM agent to iteratively evolve its internal logic. By diagnosing empirical misalignments and failure cases on a validation set, the agent proposes targeted updates and accumulates evolution memory for cumulative self-improvement. Extensive evaluations on the Singapore and Montreal benchmarks demonstrate that MobEvolve significantly outperforms state-of-the-art deep generative and LLM-based methods in individual trajectory fidelity, population-level distribution alignment, and behavioral plausibility, while preserving interpretability and high inference efficiency.

Reasoning-preserved Efficient Distillation of Large Language Models via Activation-aware Initialization

Efficient Distillation (EDistill) compresses large language models (LLMs) by structured pruning parameters and tuning lightweight modules with high training efficiency. Although these EDistilled LLMs achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on general ability benchmarks relative to similarly sized LLMs, we identify a severe degradation in their multi-step reasoning ability, which we term reasoning collapse. We systematically analyze the geometric origins of reasoning collapse and show that the SOTA EDistill method based on width-reducing projection matrices suffers from eRank collapse, in which the effective rank (eRank) of hidden representations drops. We theoretically explain how singular values of randomly initialized projection matrices become unevenly distributed, leading to eRank collapse and thus token indistinguishability. To address this issue, we propose RED (Reasoning-preserved Efficient Distillation) for LLMs, which introduces activation-aware initialization to initialize projection matrices as channel-selection matrices, thus theoretically mitigating eRank collapse. Experiments on Llama and Qwen series demonstrate that RED substantially recovers reasoning while maintaining high training efficiency and SOTA general ability.

Same Signal, Different Semantics: A Cross-Framework Behavioral Analysis of Software Engineering Agents

Behavioral studies of LLM-based software engineering agents extract operational rules about which trajectory shapes correlate with higher resolution rates: that a test step follows a code modification, that error cascades are short, or that trajectories are compact. Each rule is typically derived from a single framework, and whether it transfers, in sign as well as magnitude, to structurally different agent designs has not been directly tested. We address this at ecosystem scale: 64,380 SWE-bench runs from 126 agent configurations spanning 43 frameworks, where each configuration pairs an LLM with a framework (e.g., SWE-Agent, OpenHands) that supplies its tools and workflow. We separate framework effects from LLM effects by holding each layer fixed in turn, then measure one behavior-outcome effect per configuration and examine how those effects agree or disagree. Swapping the framework while the LLM is held fixed produces large behavioral differences in every action feature. On most signals, configurations disagree not merely in magnitude but in direction. Error rate is the cleanest case: 47 configurations resolve more issues when their error rate is lower, while 48 resolve more when it is higher. Five other continuous features and three of seven binary patterns from prior SE literature show similar directional disagreement. Framework identity accounts for more of this variation than LLM family: for mean turns, framework explains 64% of the between-configuration variance against the LLM's 10%. The implication is that the same observable behavioral signal can carry opposite meaning for different agent configurations. Behavioral findings from any single framework therefore warrant cross-configuration validation before being claimed as general.

Validating Computational Markers of Depressive Behavior: Cross-Linguistic Speech-Based Depression Detection with Neurophysiological Validation

Speech-based depression detection has shown promise as an objective diagnostic tool, yet the cross-linguistic robustness of acoustic markers and their neurobiological underpinnings remain underexplored. This study extends Cross-Data Multilevel Attention (CDMA) framework, initially validated on Italian, to investigate these dimensions using a Chinese Mandarin dataset with Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. We systematically fuse read speech with spontaneous speech across different emotional valences (positive, neutral, negative) to investigate whether emotional arousal is a more critical factor than valence polarity in enhancing detection performance in speech. Additionally, we establish the first neurophysiological validation for a speech-based depression model by correlating its predictions with neural oscillatory patterns during emotional face processing. Our results demonstrate strong cross-linguistic generalizability of the CDMA framework, achieving state-of-the-art performance (F1-score up to 89.6%) on the Chinese dataset, which is comparable to the previous Italian validation. Critically, emotionally valenced speech (both positive and negative) significantly outperformed neutral speech. This comparable performance between positive and negative tasks supports the emotional arousal hypothesis. Most importantly, EEG analysis revealed significant correlations between the model's speech-derived depression estimates and neural oscillatory patterns (theta and alpha bands), demonstrating alignment with established neural markers of emotional dysregulation in depression. This alignment, combined with the model's cross-linguistic robustness, not only supports that the CDMA framework's approach is a universally applicable and neurobiologically validated strategy but also establishes a novel paradigm for the neurophysiological validation of computational mental health models.

ADV-0: Closed-Loop Min-Max Adversarial Training for Long-Tail Robustness in Autonomous Driving

Deploying autonomous driving systems requires robustness against long-tail scenarios that are rare but safety-critical. While adversarial training offers a promising solution, existing methods typically decouple scenario generation from policy optimization and rely on heuristic surrogates. This leads to objective misalignment and fails to capture the shifting failure modes of evolving policies. This paper presents ADV-0, a closed-loop min-max optimization framework that treats the interaction between driving policy (defender) and adversarial agent (attacker) as a zero-sum Markov game. By aligning the attacker's utility directly with the defender's objective, we reveal the optimal adversary distribution. To make this tractable, we cast dynamic adversary evolution as iterative preference learning, efficiently approximating this optimum and offering an algorithm-agnostic solution to the game. Theoretically, ADV-0 converges to a Nash Equilibrium and maximizes a certified lower bound on real-world performance. Experiments indicate that it effectively exposes diverse safety-critical failures and greatly enhances the generalizability of both learned policies and motion planners against unseen long-tail risks.

SUBTA: A Framework for Supported User-Guided Bimanual Teleoperation in Structured Assembly

In human-robot collaboration, shared autonomy enhances human performance through precise, intuitive support. Effective robotic assistance requires accurately inferring human intentions and understanding task structures to determine optimal support timing and methods. In this paper, we present SUBTA, a supported teleoperation system for bimanual assembly that couples learned intention estimation, scene-graph task planning, and context-dependent motion assists. We validate our approach through a user study (N=12) comparing standard teleoperation, motion-support only, and SUBTA. Linear mixed-effects analysis revealed that SUBTA significantly outperformed standard teleoperation in position accuracy (p<0.001, d=1.18) and orientation accuracy (p<0.001, d=1.75), while reducing mental demand (p=0.002, d=1.34). Post-experiment ratings indicate clearer, more trustworthy visual feedback and predictable interventions in SUBTA. The results demonstrate that SUBTA greatly improves both effectiveness and user experience in teleoperation.

From Shallow to Deep: Pinning Semantic Intent via Causal GRPO

Large Language Models remain vulnerable to adversarial prefix attacks (e.g., ``Sure, here is'') despite robust standard safety. We diagnose this vulnerability as Shallow Safety Alignment, stemming from a pathology we term semantic representation decay: as the model generates compliant prefixes, its internal malicious intent signal fades. To address this, we propose Two-Stage Causal-GRPO (TSC-GRPO), a framework designed to achieve intent pinning. First, grounded in causal identifiability theory, we train a causal intent probe to disentangle invariant intent from stylistic perturbations. Second, we internalize this causal awareness into the policy via Group Relative Policy Optimization. By employing a cumulative causal penalty within ``fork-in-the-road'' training scenarios, we force the model to learn that accumulating harmful tokens monotonically decreases reward, enabling robust late-stage refusals. Experiments show that TSC-GRPO significantly outperforms baselines in defending against jailbreak attacks while preserving general utility.