Bridging Talk and Thought: Understanding Dialogue Dynamics Across Collaborative Problem-Solving Contexts

We present a conceptual framework for analyzing dialogue in collaborative problem-solving contexts, with an emphasis on the emerging dynamics of human-AI and multi-agent collaboration. As intelligent systems become active agents capable of autonomous reasoning and strategic cooperation, understanding the dialogic interaction during collaborative problem solving is increasingly important for optimizing and evaluating such partnerships. Our framework addresses key limitations in current analytical approaches through a hierarchical two-layer coding scheme that integrates cognitive and non-cognitive problem solving with metacognitive regulatory mechanisms. We demonstrate its effectiveness and generalizability across nine datasets spanning multiple domains, and provide insights into how humans and agents coordinate their knowledge, skills, and efforts to solve complex problems, showing in particular that metacognitive regulation can be an essential discriminator of deeper collaboration.

The Deliberative Illusion: Diagnosing Factual Attrition and Stance Homogenization in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation

Multi-agent LLM systems often treat consensus as evidence of successful interaction. For deliberative problems, however, reliability depends on whether agents preserve the facts and viewpoints needed to interpret an issue. We identify the deliberative illusion: discussion produces (1) factual attrition, the progressive loss of issue-critical facts, alongside (2) stance homogenization, the collapse of diverse positions toward consensus. To measure this process, we introduce DelibTrace, a framework that decomposes each issue into atomic facts, labels issue-critical ones, distributes them across agents, and tracks their survival across discussion rounds. Across ethical and news-based deliberation with three representative LLM families, multi-agent discussion erases up to 72% of issue-critical facts. This loss is consequential: retained evidence can reconstruct the issue misleadingly, final stances remain anchored in base-model priors, and a single malicious agent can inject misinformation into the shrinking shared context. These results reveal a sharper risk: agents can agree more while knowing less. We call for evaluations that measure which facts, uncertainties, and legitimate disagreements survive interaction.

SagaQA: A Multi-hop Reasoning Benchmark for Long-form Narrative Understanding in TV Series

We introduce SagaQA, a long-form video benchmark for multi-hop reasoning over full-length TV series. Existing video reasoning benchmarks often emphasize local understanding of adjacent frames or clips. SagaQA addresses this gap by requiring high-level comprehension of extended multimodal narratives in entire TV shows. A distinguishing feature of SagaQA is the granularity of its reasoning steps. Our dataset necessitates long-range reasoning hops to connect information across completely different episodes. This requires models to reason over entire events and actions, demanding a deep understanding of the show's narration and progression at a multimodal level. Motivated by recent progress in agentic methods, we further study how different planning strategies handle such complex reasoning. We categorize these approaches into three classes-Parallel, Sequential, and Hybrid planners-and evaluate their ability to generate coherent and complete reasoning plans. Our results on SagaQA suggest that hybrid planners consistently produce higher-quality plans and exhibit stronger capabilities for complex, high-level narrative understanding in TV shows.

How Hard Can It Be? Hardness-Aware Multi-Objective Unlearning

Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific forget training data due to privacy, copyright or bias concerns while maintaining the model performance on the remaining retain data. Existing unlearning algorithms, such as optimizing a weighted combination of losses, have tried to achieve these objectives of improving forget quality and maintaining retain utility. However, they do not guarantee that these objectives can be improved by a specified extent for all forget and retain data. In this work, we address this limitation with a novel and theoretically-grounded approach from a constrained optimization perspective. Firstly, we identify that the hardness of reconciling both objectives can be quantified by the similarity between the forget data and the retain data. Next, we derive an unlearning algorithm (HAMU) with the overall goal of guaranteeing a specified improvement in forget quality while minimizing the retain utility cost/degradation by updating the model weights based on our hardness measure. Our hardness measure also informs users when retain utility degradation is unavoidable, i.e., both objectives cannot be improved simultaneously, and stopping should be considered. Our algorithm is applicable to non-convex models and is easily parallelizable, making it readily deployable in real-world scenarios. We empirically demonstrate HAMU's superior performance over baselines on both image and text datasets using large models. Our code is available at https://github.com/aoi3142/HAMU.

MeMo: Memory as a Model

Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across a wide range of tasks, but remain frozen after pretraining until subsequent updates. Many real-world applications require timely, domain-specific information, motivating the need for efficient mechanisms to incorporate new knowledge. In this paper, we introduce MeMo (Memory as a Model), a modular framework that encodes new knowledge into a dedicated memory model while keeping the LLM parameters unchanged. Compared to existing methods, MeMo offers several advantages: (a) it captures complex cross-document relationships, (b) it is robust to retrieval noise, (c) it avoids catastrophic forgetting in the LLM, (d) it does not require access to the LLM's weights or output logits, enabling plug-and-play integration with both open and proprietary closed-source LLMs, and (e) its retrieval cost is independent of corpus size at inference time. Our experimental results on three benchmarks, BrowseComp-Plus, NarrativeQA, and MuSiQue, show that MeMo achieves strong performance compared to existing methods across diverse settings.

Is Data Shapley Not Better than Random in Data Selection? Ask NASH

Data selection studies the problem of identifying high-quality subsets of training data. While some existing works have considered selecting the subset of data with top-$m$ Data Shapley or other semivalues as they account for the interaction among every subset of data, other works argue that Data Shapley can sometimes perform ineffectively in practice and select subsets that are no better than random. This raises the questions: (I) Are there certain "Shapley-informative" settings where Data Shapley consistently works well? (II) Can we strategically utilize these settings to select high-quality subsets consistently and efficiently? In this paper, we propose a novel data selection framework, NASH (Non-linear Aggregation of SHapley-informative components), which (I) decomposes the target utility function (e.g., validation accuracy) into simpler, Shapley-informative component functions, and selects data by optimizing an objective that (II) aggregates these components non-linearly. We demonstrate that NASH substantially boosts the effectiveness of Shapley/semivalue-based data selection with minimal additional runtime cost.

SemEval-2026 Task 7: Everyday Knowledge Across Diverse Languages and Cultures

We present our shared task on evaluating the adaptability of LLMs and NLP systems across multiple languages and cultures. The task data consist of an extended version of our manually constructed BLEnD benchmark (Myung et al. 2024), covering more than 30 language-culture pairs, predominantly representing low-resource languages spoken across multiple continents. As the task is designed strictly for evaluation, participants were not permitted to use the data for training, fine-tuning, few-shot learning, or any other form of model modification. Our task includes two tracks: (a) Short-Answer Questions (SAQ) and (b) Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ). Participants were required to predict labels and were allowed to submit any NLP system and adopt diverse modelling strategies, provided that the benchmark was used solely for evaluation. The task attracted more than 140 registered participants, and we received final submissions from 62 teams, along with 19 system description papers. We report the results and present an analysis of the best-performing systems and the most commonly adopted approaches. Furthermore, we discuss shared insights into open questions and challenges related to evaluation, misalignment, and methodological perspectives on model behaviour in low-resource languages and for under-represented cultures.

Goodness-of-pronunciation without phoneme time alignment

In speech evaluation, an Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) model often computes time boundaries and phoneme posteriors for input features. However, limited data for ASR training hinders expansion of speech evaluation to low-resource languages. Open-source weakly-supervised models are capable of ASR over many languages, but they are frame-asynchronous and not phonemic, hindering feature extraction for speech evaluation. This paper proposes to overcome incompatibilities for feature extraction with weakly-supervised models, easing expansion of speech evaluation to low-resource languages. Phoneme posteriors are computed by mapping ASR hypotheses to a phoneme confusion network. Word instead of phoneme-level speaking rate and duration are used. Phoneme and frame-level features are combined using a cross-attention architecture, obviating phoneme time alignment. This performs comparably with standard frame-synchronous features on English speechocean762 and low-resource Tamil datasets.

LoASR-Bench: Evaluating Large Speech Language Models on Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Across Language Families

Large language models (LLMs) have driven substantial advances in speech language models (SpeechLMs), yielding strong performance in automatic speech recognition (ASR) under high-resource conditions. However, existing benchmarks predominantly focus on high-resource languages, leaving the ASR behavior of SpeechLMs in low-resource languages insufficiently understood. This gap is critical, as practical ASR systems must reliably support low-resource languages and generalize across diverse language families, and it directly hinders the deployment of SpeechLM-based ASR in real-world multilingual scenarios. As a result, it is essential to evaluate SpeechLMs on low-resource languages to ensure their generalizability across different language families. To address this problem, we propose \textbf{LoASR-Bench}, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate \textbf{lo}w-resource \textbf{a}utomatic \textbf{s}peech \textbf{r}ecognition (\textbf{ASR}) of the latest SpeechLMs across diverse language families. LoASR-Bench comprises 25 languages from 9 language families, featuring both Latin and non-Latin scripts, enabling cross-linguistic and cross-script assessment of ASR performance of current SpeechLMs. Experimental results highlight the limitations of the latest SpeechLMs in handling real-world low-resource languages.

InfoDensity: Rewarding Information-Dense Traces for Efficient Reasoning

Large Language Models (LLMs) with extended reasoning capabilities often generate verbose and redundant reasoning traces, incurring unnecessary computational cost. While existing reinforcement learning approaches address this by optimizing final response length, they neglect the quality of intermediate reasoning steps, leaving models vulnerable to reward hacking. We argue that verbosity is not merely a length problem, but a symptom of poor intermediate reasoning quality. To investigate this, we conduct an empirical study tracking the conditional entropy of the answer distribution across reasoning steps. We find that high-quality reasoning traces exhibit two consistent properties: low uncertainty convergence and monotonic progress. These findings suggest that high-quality reasoning traces are informationally dense, that is, each step contributes meaningful entropy reduction relative to the total reasoning length. Motivated by this, we propose InfoDensity, a reward framework for RL training that combines an AUC-based reward and a monotonicity reward as a unified measure of reasoning quality, weighted by a length scaling term that favors achieving equivalent quality more concisely. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that InfoDensity matches or surpasses state-of-the-art baselines in accuracy while significantly reducing token usage, achieving a strong accuracy-efficiency trade-off.