Investigating White-Box Attacks for On-Device Models

Numerous mobile apps have leveraged deep learning capabilities. However, on-device models are vulnerable to attacks as they can be easily extracted from their corresponding mobile apps. Existing on-device attacking approaches only generate black-box attacks, which are far less effective and efficient than white-box strategies. This is because mobile deep learning frameworks like TFLite do not support gradient computing, which is necessary for white-box attacking algorithms. Thus, we argue that existing findings may underestimate the harmfulness of on-device attacks. To this end, we conduct a study to answer this research question: Can on-device models be directly attacked via white-box strategies? We first systematically analyze the difficulties of transforming the on-device model to its debuggable version, and propose a Reverse Engineering framework for On-device Models (REOM), which automatically reverses the compiled on-device TFLite model to the debuggable model. Specifically, REOM first transforms compiled on-device models into Open Neural Network Exchange format, then removes the non-debuggable parts, and converts them to the debuggable DL models format that allows attackers to exploit in a white-box setting. Our experimental results show that our approach is effective in achieving automated transformation among 244 TFLite models. Compared with previous attacks using surrogate models, REOM enables attackers to achieve higher attack success rates with a hundred times smaller attack perturbations. In addition, because the ONNX platform has plenty of tools for model format exchanging, the proposed method based on the ONNX platform can be adapted to other model formats. Our findings emphasize the need for developers to carefully consider their model deployment strategies, and use white-box methods to evaluate the vulnerability of on-device models.

Defense against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning

Federated Learning (FL) provides a promising distributed learning paradigm, since it seeks to protect users privacy by not sharing their private training data. Recent research has demonstrated, however, that FL is susceptible to model inversion attacks, which can reconstruct users' private data by eavesdropping on shared gradients. Existing defense solutions cannot survive stronger attacks and exhibit a poor trade-off between privacy and performance. In this paper, we present a straightforward yet effective defense strategy based on obfuscating the gradients of sensitive data with concealing data. Specifically, we alter a few samples within a mini batch to mimic the sensitive data at the gradient levels. Using a gradient projection technique, our method seeks to obscure sensitive data without sacrificing FL performance. Our extensive evaluations demonstrate that, compared to other defenses, our technique offers the highest level of protection while preserving FL performance. Our source code is located in the repository.

Performance Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks: Discrepancies and Solutions

Recently, adversarial attack methods have been developed to challenge the robustness of machine learning models. However, mainstream evaluation criteria experience limitations, even yielding discrepancies among results under different settings. By examining various attack algorithms, including gradient-based and query-based attacks, we notice the lack of a consensus on a uniform standard for unbiased performance evaluation. Accordingly, we propose a Piece-wise Sampling Curving (PSC) toolkit to effectively address the aforementioned discrepancy, by generating a comprehensive comparison among adversaries in a given range. In addition, the PSC toolkit offers options for balancing the computational cost and evaluation effectiveness. Experimental results demonstrate our PSC toolkit presents comprehensive comparisons of attack algorithms, significantly reducing discrepancies in practice.

Decision-based Universal Adversarial Attack

A single perturbation can pose the most natural images to be misclassified by classifiers. In black-box setting, current universal adversarial attack methods utilize substitute models to generate the perturbation, then apply the perturbation to the attacked model. However, this transfer often produces inferior results. In this study, we directly work in the black-box setting to generate the universal adversarial perturbation. Besides, we aim to design an adversary generating a single perturbation having texture like stripes based on orthogonal matrix, as the top convolutional layers are sensitive to stripes. To this end, we propose an efficient Decision-based Universal Attack (DUAttack). With few data, the proposed adversary computes the perturbation based solely on the final inferred labels, but good transferability has been realized not only across models but also span different vision tasks. The effectiveness of DUAttack is validated through comparisons with other state-of-the-art attacks. The efficiency of DUAttack is also demonstrated on real world settings including the Microsoft Azure. In addition, several representative defense methods are struggling with DUAttack, indicating the practicability of the proposed method.

ProbaNet: Proposal-balanced Network for Object Detection

Candidate object proposals generated by object detectors based on convolutional neural network (CNN) encounter easy-hard samples imbalance problem, which can affect overall performance. In this study, we propose a Proposal-balanced Network (ProbaNet) for alleviating the imbalance problem. Firstly, ProbaNet increases the probability of choosing hard samples for training by discarding easy samples through threshold truncation. Secondly, ProbaNet emphasizes foreground proposals by increasing their weights. To evaluate the effectiveness of ProbaNet, we train models based on different benchmarks. Mean Average Precision (mAP) of the model using ProbaNet achieves 1.2$\%$ higher than the baseline on PASCAL VOC 2007. Furthermore, it is compatible with existing two-stage detectors and offers a very small amount of additional computational cost.

DaST: Data-free Substitute Training for Adversarial Attacks

Machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples. For the black-box setting, current substitute attacks need pre-trained models to generate adversarial examples. However, pre-trained models are hard to obtain in real-world tasks. In this paper, we propose a data-free substitute training method (DaST) to obtain substitute models for adversarial black-box attacks without the requirement of any real data. To achieve this, DaST utilizes specially designed generative adversarial networks (GANs) to train the substitute models. In particular, we design a multi-branch architecture and label-control loss for the generative model to deal with the uneven distribution of synthetic samples. The substitute model is then trained by the synthetic samples generated by the generative model, which are labeled by the attacked model subsequently. The experiments demonstrate the substitute models produced by DaST can achieve competitive performance compared with the baseline models which are trained by the same train set with attacked models. Additionally, to evaluate the practicability of the proposed method on the real-world task, we attack an online machine learning model on the Microsoft Azure platform. The remote model misclassifies 98.35% of the adversarial examples crafted by our method. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to train a substitute model for adversarial attacks without any real data.

Adversarial Imitation Attack

Deep learning models are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. A practical adversarial attack should require as little as possible knowledge of attacked models. Current substitute attacks need pre-trained models to generate adversarial examples and their attack success rates heavily rely on the transferability of adversarial examples. Current score-based and decision-based attacks require lots of queries for the attacked models. In this study, we propose a novel adversarial imitation attack. First, it produces a replica of the attacked model by a two-player game like the generative adversarial networks (GANs). The objective of the generative model is to generate examples that lead the imitation model returning different outputs with the attacked model. The objective of the imitation model is to output the same labels with the attacked model under the same inputs. Then, the adversarial examples generated by the imitation model are utilized to fool the attacked model. Compared with the current substitute attacks, imitation attacks can use less training data to produce a replica of the attacked model and improve the transferability of adversarial examples. Experiments demonstrate that our imitation attack requires less training data than the black-box substitute attacks, but achieves an attack success rate close to the white-box attack on unseen data with no query.