Looped World Models

Current world models face a fundamental tension: faithful long-horizon simulation demands deep computation, but deeper models are expensive to deploy and prone to compounding errors. We resolve this by introducing Looped World Models (LoopWM), which are the first looped architectures for world modelling. Our method iteratively refines latent environment states through a parameter-shared transformer block. This yield up to 100x parameter efficiency over conventional approaches with adaptive computation that automatically scales depth to match the complexity of each prediction step. Orthogonal to scaling model size and training data, LoopWM establishes iterative latent depth as a new scaling axis for world simulation, which might significantly push the community forward.

Not All Skills Help: Measuring and Repairing Agent Knowledge

LLM agents can improve without weight updates by accumulating natural-language skills from experience, but current systems entrust every decision about which skills to keep and how to apply them to LLM judgment alone. We argue that this conflates two distinct roles: generating a skill from experience is a creative act that judgment handles well, while deciding whether that skill actually helps requires empirical evidence across many tasks. Measuring per-skill causal contributions via randomized masking, we find that skill libraries exhibit pervasive causal heterogeneity: individual skills routinely help on some task types while hurting on others, yet their opposing effects cancel in aggregate, making them invisible to global curation methods. We propose ASSAY, a framework that separates generation from curation: it computes a per-skill causal attribution on a small development set, restructures the library offline, and suppresses skills with negative predicted effect for each test task. Across seven base models spanning four providers and two benchmarks (AppWorld and tau-bench), ASSAY consistently improves over prior skill-curation approaches. On AppWorld's hardest split, DeepSeek-V3 achieves 69.3% task-goal completion (47.4% relative improvement), a new state of the art among all published methods including weight-tuned approaches. On tau-bench retail, GPT-4.1 improves by 8.7% relative, advancing past o4-mini, o1, and GPT-4.5 on the public leaderboard without any weight modification. Ablation traces the dominant gain to per-task masking, confirming that the bottleneck is matching skills to tasks at inference time, not removing bad skills globally. Code is available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/assay.

Flow-based Policy Adaptation without Policy Updates

Leveraging prior knowledge from pretrained policies, foundation models, or human operators offers an efficient alternative to learning robot skills from scratch. However, these agents often provide actions that are suboptimal, noisy, or misaligned with task-specific expert behavior. We propose GLOVES, a family of flow-based adaptation methods that correct non-expert actions by transporting them toward an expert action distribution. Rather than replacing agentic control with full autonomy, GLOVES performs selective action-level adaptation, improving task success while preserving agent intent. The learned flow also provides a natural in-distribution scoring mechanism through reverse flow evaluation. We use this signal as an intervention gate: actions that appear consistent with the expert distribution are passed through unchanged, while anomalous or out-of-distribution (OOD) actions are corrected. In this way, assistance is only provided when necessary. GLOVES requires only limited expert supervision, using a small number of demonstrations or reusable successful skill segments. By learning local expert action patterns and stitching them during execution, GLOVES provides a lightweight shared-control module for robust action adaptation across tasks and environments. Code and demos are available at ripl.github.io/GLOVES_web.

Evaluating Reasoning Fidelity in Visual Text Generation

Recent text-to-image (T2I) models can render highly legible and well-structured text within images, enabling applications including document generation and slide generation. However, it remains unclear whether such systems faithfully preserve reasoning ability when complex solutions must be expressed directly through rendered text, or whether they merely imitate surface-level patterns. We investigate this question by evaluating reasoning fidelity in visual text generation, where models must express complete reasoning processes as images. Our evaluation includes long text rendering, factual knowledge probing, context understanding, and multi-step reasoning. Across these settings, we find that current T2I models frequently produce semantic errors, logical inconsistencies, and incorrect intermediate steps, even when the rendered text appears visually clear. These failures contrast with the strong reasoning performance of text-only models on the same tasks. Our findings reveal a substantial gap between visual text generation and procedural reasoning, motivating more reliable visual text reasoning.

Capability Self-Assessment: Teaching LLMs to Know Their Limits

The ability to recognize one's own limitations and decide whether to solve a problem or delegate is fundamental for reliable intelligent systems. Yet we show that modern large language models systematically lack this ability: across diverse model families and scales, they overestimate their competence and attempt queries they cannot solve. We refer to this ability as Capability Self-Assessment (CSA) and formulate it as a policy-learning problem, aiming to improve self-assessment while preserving the model's original capabilities. Our results show that reinforcement learning teaches CSA effectively, significantly outperforming supervised fine-tuning while preserving original capabilities. In contrast, supervised fine-tuning severely degrades the capabilities the model is meant to assess. Moreover, learned self-assessment behavior generalizes well out of distribution, suggesting that CSA is a transferable model trait. Finally, CSA is practically useful: it improves local-cloud decision making at inference time and provides a signal for targeted data selection during training.

SPRINT: Efficient Spectral Priors for Humanoid Athletic Sprints

The pursuit of humanoid athletic sprints is hindered by a scarcity of humanoid-viable kinematic reference data and the inability of existing frameworks to maintain stability during sprints. To overcome these limitations, we introduce SPRINT, a novel framework driven by efficient, frequency-adaptive spectral priors. By characterizing the fundamental periodicity of human locomotion in the frequency domain using a reference library of five discrete motion sequences, these priors generate kinematically feasible joint trajectories across a broad velocity spectrum, successfully extrapolating to speeds that exceed the reference distribution. Guided by these pretrained priors, the SPRINT policy achieves zero-shot sim-to-real transfer in field experiments on the Unitree G1 platform, reaching a peak sprinting velocity of 6 m/s and demonstrating seamless gait transitions while preserving biomimetic naturalness. Ultimately, this work establishes frequency-adaptive spectral priors as a highly data-efficient foundation for humanoid athletic sprints. The project page is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/w/SPRINT-138A/.

Seeing without Looking: Do Vision-Language Benchmarks Really Test Vision?

Benchmark accuracy is often implicitly assumed to reflect grounded visual understanding in vision-language models (VLMs), yet it remains unclear to what extent such scores truly reflect reliance on visual evidence. Motivated by a surprising observation that removing a substantial fraction of image tokens only degrades model performance very slightly on a widely used hallucination benchmark, we systematically investigate this mismatch in a set of open-source VLMs. Our analysis spans multiple levels of granularity, spanning global visual degradation, localized occlusion, question reformulation, answer-space expansion, and decision-level analyses beyond standard accuracy. We further complement these behavioral results with a layer-wise analysis of vision-token geometry. Throughout the experiments, we find that although VLMs do incorporate visual input, their predictions are less sensitive to the loss of fine-grained visual evidence that standard accuracy should have suggested. Even when the final prediction remains unchanged, the model's internal support for the correct answer may already be weakened. We further complement a representation-level analysis, which shows increasing similarity among visual tokens in deeper layers, providing a possible explanation for our findings. Together, these results suggest that current benchmarks are not sufficient to reliably evaluate fine-grained visual grounding in VLMs.

AutoResearchClaw: Self-Reinforcing Autonomous Research with Human-AI Collaboration

Automating scientific discovery requires more than generating papers from ideas. Real research is iterative: hypotheses are challenged from multiple perspectives, experiments fail and inform the next attempt, and lessons accumulate across cycles. Existing autonomous research systems often model this process as a linear pipeline: they rely on single-agent reasoning, stop when execution fails, and do not carry experience across runs. We present AutoResearchClaw, a multi-agent autonomous research pipeline built on five mechanisms: structured multi-agent debate for hypothesis generation and result analysis, a self-healing executor with a \textsc{Pivot}/\textsc{Refine} decision loop that transforms failures into information, verifiable result reporting that prevents fabricated numbers and hallucinated citations, human-in-the-loop collaboration with seven intervention modes spanning full autonomy to step-by-step oversight, and cross-run evolution that converts past mistakes into future safeguards. On ARC-Bench, a 25-topic experiment-stage benchmark, AutoResearchClaw outperforms AI Scientist v2 by 54.7%. A human-in-the-loop ablation across seven intervention modes reveals that precise, targeted collaboration at high-leverage decision points consistently outperforms both full autonomy and exhaustive step-by-step oversight. We position AutoResearchClaw as a research amplifier that augments rather than replaces human scientific judgment. Code is available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw.

ORCE: Order-Aware Alignment of Verbalized Confidence in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) often produce answers with high certainty even when they are incorrect, making reliable confidence estimation essential for deployment in real-world scenarios. Verbalized confidence, where models explicitly state their confidence in natural language, provides a flexible and user-facing uncertainty signal that can be applied even when token logits are unavailable. However, existing verbalized-confidence methods often optimize answer generation and confidence generation jointly, which can cause confidence-alignment objectives to interfere with answer accuracy. In this work, we propose a decoupled and order-aware framework for verbalized confidence calibration. Our method first generates an answer and then estimates confidence conditioned on the fixed question--answer pair, allowing confidence optimization without directly perturbing the answer-generation process. To align confidence with correctness likelihood, we construct a sampling-based surrogate from multiple model completions and optimize rank-based reinforcement learning objectives that encourage responses with higher estimated correctness likelihood to receive higher verbalized confidence. Experiments on reasoning and knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that our method improves calibration and failure prediction performance while largely preserving answer accuracy. These results demonstrate that verbalized confidence can be more reliably aligned by decoupling confidence estimation from answer generation and optimizing the relative ordering of confidence across responses.

HintMR: Eliciting Stronger Mathematical Reasoning in Small Language Models

Small language models (SLMs) often struggle with complex mathematical reasoning due to limited capacity to maintain long chains of intermediate steps and to recover from early errors. We address this challenge by introducing a hint-assisted reasoning framework that incrementally guides SLMs through multi-step mathematical problem solving. Our approach decomposes solutions into sequential reasoning steps and provides context-aware hints, where hints are generated by a separate SLM trained via distillation from a strong large language model. While the hint-generating SLM alone is not capable of solving the problems, its collaboration with a reasoning SLM enables effective guidance, forming a cooperative two-model system for reasoning. Each hint is generated conditionally on the problem statement and the accumulated reasoning history, providing stepwise, localized guidance without revealing full solutions. This reduces error propagation and allows the reasoning model to focus on manageable subproblems. Experiments across diverse mathematical benchmarks and models demonstrate that hint assistance consistently improves reasoning accuracy for SLMs, yielding substantial gains over standard prompting while preserving model efficiency. These results highlight that structured collaboration between SLMs-via hint generation and reasoning-offers an effective and lightweight mechanism for enhancing mathematical reasoning.