AutoAIViz: Opening the Blackbox of Automated Artificial Intelligence with Conditional Parallel Coordinates

Artificial Intelligence (AI) can now automate the algorithm selection, feature engineering, and hyperparameter tuning steps in a machine learning workflow. Commonly known as AutoML or AutoAI, these technologies aim to relieve data scientists from the tedious manual work. However, today's AutoAI systems often present only limited to no information about the process of how they select and generate model results. Thus, users often do not understand the process, neither do they trust the outputs. In this short paper, we provide a first user evaluation by 10 data scientists of an experimental system, AutoAIViz, that aims to visualize AutoAI's model generation process. We find that the proposed system helps users to complete the data science tasks, and increases their understanding, toward the goal of increasing trust in the AutoAI system.

How can AI Automate End-to-End Data Science?

Data science is labor-intensive and human experts are scarce but heavily involved in every aspect of it. This makes data science time consuming and restricted to experts with the resulting quality heavily dependent on their experience and skills. To make data science more accessible and scalable, we need its democratization. Automated Data Science (AutoDS) is aimed towards that goal and is emerging as an important research and business topic. We introduce and define the AutoDS challenge, followed by a proposal of a general AutoDS framework that covers existing approaches but also provides guidance for the development of new methods. We categorize and review the existing literature from multiple aspects of the problem setup and employed techniques. Then we provide several views on how AI could succeed in automating end-to-end AutoDS. We hope this survey can serve as insightful guideline for the AutoDS field and provide inspiration for future research.

Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AI

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is changing our lives in many ways. One application domain is data science. New techniques in automating the creation of AI, known as AutoAI or AutoML, aim to automate the work practices of data scientists. AutoAI systems are capable of autonomously ingesting and pre-processing data, engineering new features, and creating and scoring models based on a target objectives (e.g. accuracy or run-time efficiency). Though not yet widely adopted, we are interested in understanding how AutoAI will impact the practice of data science. We conducted interviews with 20 data scientists who work at a large, multinational technology company and practice data science in various business settings. Our goal is to understand their current work practices and how these practices might change with AutoAI. Reactions were mixed: while informants expressed concerns about the trend of automating their jobs, they also strongly felt it was inevitable. Despite these concerns, they remained optimistic about their future job security due to a view that the future of data science work will be a collaboration between humans and AI systems, in which both automation and human expertise are indispensable.

Automated Machine Learning via ADMM

We study the automated machine learning (AutoML) problem of jointly selecting appropriate algorithms from an algorithm portfolio as well as optimizing their hyper-parameters for certain learning tasks. The main challenges include a) the coupling between algorithm selection and hyper-parameter optimization (HPO), and b) the black-box optimization nature of the problem where the optimizer cannot access the gradients of the loss function but may query function values. To circumvent these difficulties, we propose a new AutoML framework by leveraging the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) scheme. Due to the splitting properties of ADMM, algorithm selection and HPO can be decomposed through the augmented Lagrangian function. As a result, HPO with mixed continuous and integer constraints are efficiently handled through a query-efficient Bayesian optimization approach and Euclidean projection operator that yields a closed-form solution. Algorithm selection in ADMM is naturally interpreted as a combinatorial bandit problem. The effectiveness of our proposed methodology is compared to state-of-the-art AutoML schemes such as TPOT and Auto-sklearn on numerous benchmark data sets.

Local Support Vector Machines:Formulation and Analysis

We provide a formulation for Local Support Vector Machines (LSVMs) that generalizes previous formulations, and brings out the explicit connections to local polynomial learning used in nonparametric estimation literature. We investigate the simplest type of LSVMs called Local Linear Support Vector Machines (LLSVMs). For the first time we establish conditions under which LLSVMs make Bayes consistent predictions at each test point $x_0$. We also establish rates at which the local risk of LLSVMs converges to the minimum value of expected local risk at each point $x_0$. Using stability arguments we establish generalization error bounds for LLSVMs.

Stochastic ADMM for Nonsmooth Optimization

We present a stochastic setting for optimization problems with nonsmooth convex separable objective functions over linear equality constraints. To solve such problems, we propose a stochastic Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) algorithm. Our algorithm applies to a more general class of nonsmooth convex functions that does not necessarily have a closed-form solution by minimizing the augmented function directly. We also demonstrate the rates of convergence for our algorithm under various structural assumptions of the stochastic functions: $O(1/\sqrt{t})$ for convex functions and $O(\log t/t)$ for strongly convex functions. Compared to previous literature, we establish the convergence rate of ADMM algorithm, for the first time, in terms of both the objective value and the feasibility violation.

Stochastic Smoothing for Nonsmooth Minimizations: Accelerating SGD by Exploiting Structure

In this work we consider the stochastic minimization of nonsmooth convex loss functions, a central problem in machine learning. We propose a novel algorithm called Accelerated Nonsmooth Stochastic Gradient Descent (ANSGD), which exploits the structure of common nonsmooth loss functions to achieve optimal convergence rates for a class of problems including SVMs. It is the first stochastic algorithm that can achieve the optimal O(1/t) rate for minimizing nonsmooth loss functions (with strong convexity). The fast rates are confirmed by empirical comparisons, in which ANSGD significantly outperforms previous subgradient descent algorithms including SGD.

UPAL: Unbiased Pool Based Active Learning

In this paper we address the problem of pool based active learning, and provide an algorithm, called UPAL, that works by minimizing the unbiased estimator of the risk of a hypothesis in a given hypothesis space. For the space of linear classifiers and the squared loss we show that UPAL is equivalent to an exponentially weighted average forecaster. Exploiting some recent results regarding the spectra of random matrices allows us to establish consistency of UPAL when the true hypothesis is a linear hypothesis. Empirical comparison with an active learner implementation in Vowpal Wabbit, and a previously proposed pool based active learner implementation show good empirical performance and better scalability.

Data-Distributed Weighted Majority and Online Mirror Descent

In this paper, we focus on the question of the extent to which online learning can benefit from distributed computing. We focus on the setting in which $N$ agents online-learn cooperatively, where each agent only has access to its own data. We propose a generic data-distributed online learning meta-algorithm. We then introduce the Distributed Weighted Majority and Distributed Online Mirror Descent algorithms, as special cases. We show, using both theoretical analysis and experiments, that compared to a single agent: given the same computation time, these distributed algorithms achieve smaller generalization errors; and given the same generalization errors, they can be $N$ times faster.