I Want to Believe (but the Vocabulary Changed): Measuring the Semantic Structure and Evolution of Conspiracy Theories

Research on conspiracy theories has largely focused on belief formation, exposure, and diffusion, while paying less attention to how their meanings change over time. This gap persists partly because conspiracy-related terms are often treated as stable lexical markers, making it difficult to separate genuine semantic changes from surface-level vocabulary changes. In this paper, we measure the semantic structure and evolution of conspiracy theories in online political discourse. Using 169.9M comments from Reddit's r/politics subreddit spanning 2012--2022, we first demonstrate that conspiracy-related language forms coherent and semantically distinguishable regions of language space, allowing conspiracy theories to be treated as semantic objects. We then track how these objects evolve over time using aligned word embeddings, enabling comparisons of semantic neighborhoods across periods. Our analysis reveals that conspiracy theories evolve non-uniformly, exhibiting patterns of semantic stability, expansion, contraction, and replacement that are not captured by keyword-based approaches alone.

Reddit After Roe: A Computational Analysis of Abortion Narratives and Barriers in the Wake of Dobbs

The 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization reshaped the reproductive rights landscape, introducing new uncertainty and barriers to abortion access. We present a large-scale computational analysis of abortion discourse on Reddit, examining how barriers to access are articulated across information-seeking and information-sharing behaviors, different stages of abortion (before, during, after), and three phases of the Dobbs decision in 2022. Drawing on more than 17,000 posts from four abortion-related subreddits, we employed a multi-step pipeline to classify posts by information type, abortion stage, barrier category, and expressed emotions. Using a codebook of eight barrier types, including legal, financial, emotional, and social obstacles, we analyzed their associations with emotions and information behaviors. Topic modeling of model-generated barrier rationales further revealed how discourse evolved in response to shifting legal and cultural contexts. Our findings show that emotional and psychological barriers consistently dominate abortion narratives online, with emotions such as nervousness, confusion, fear, and sadness prevalent across discourse. By linking information behaviors, barriers, emotions, and temporal dynamics, this study provides a multi-dimensional account of how abortion is navigated in online communities.

EvoTaxo: Building and Evolving Taxonomy from Social Media Streams

Constructing taxonomies from social media corpora is challenging because posts are short, noisy, semantically entangled, and temporally dynamic. Existing taxonomy induction methods are largely designed for static corpora and often struggle to balance robustness, scalability, and sensitivity to evolving discourse. We propose EvoTaxo, a LLM-based framework for building and evolving taxonomies from temporally ordered social media streams. Rather than clustering raw posts directly, EvoTaxo converts each post into a structured draft action over the current taxonomy, accumulates structural evidence over time windows, and consolidates candidate edits through dual-view clustering that combines semantic similarity with temporal locality. A refinement-and-arbitration procedure then selects reliable edits before execution, while each node maintains a concept memory bank to preserve semantic boundaries over time. Experiments on two Reddit corpora show that EvoTaxo produces more balanced taxonomies than baselines, with clearer post-to-leaf assignment, better corpus coverage at comparable taxonomy size, and stronger structural quality. A case study on the Reddit community /r/ICE_Raids further shows that EvoTaxo captures meaningful temporal shifts in discourse. Our codebase is available here.

The Prosocial Ranking Challenge: Reducing Polarization on Social Media without Sacrificing Engagement

We report the first direct comparisons of multiple alternative social media algorithms on multiple platforms on outcomes of societal interest. We used a browser extension to modify which posts were shown to desktop social media users, randomly assigning 9,386 users to a control group or one of five alternative ranking algorithms which simultaneously altered content across three platforms for six months during the US 2024 presidential election. This reduced our preregistered index of affective polarization by an average of 0.03 standard deviations (p < 0.05), including a 1.5 degree decrease in differences between the 100 point inparty and outparty feeling thermometers. We saw reductions in active use time for Facebook (-0.37 min/day) and Reddit (-0.2 min/day), but an increase of 0.32 min/day (p < 0.01) for X/Twitter. We saw an increase in reports of negative social media experiences but found no effects on well-being, news knowledge, outgroup empathy, perceptions of and support for partisan violence. This implies that bridging content can improve some societal outcomes without necessarily conflicting with the engagement-driven business model of social media.

AI Psychosis: Does Conversational AI Amplify Delusion-Related Language?

Conversational AI systems are increasingly used for personal reflection and emotional disclosure, raising concerns about their effects on vulnerable users. Recent anecdotal reports suggest that prolonged interactions with AI may reinforce delusional thinking -- a phenomenon sometimes described as AI Psychosis. However, empirical evidence on this phenomenon remains limited. In this work, we examine how delusion-related language evolves during multi-turn interactions with conversational AI. We construct simulated users (SimUsers) from Reddit users' longitudinal posting histories and generate extended conversations with three model families (GPT, LLaMA, and Qwen). We develop DelusionScore, a linguistic measure that quantifies the intensity of delusion-related language across conversational turns. We find that SimUsers derived from users with prior delusion-related discourse (Treatment) exhibit progressively increasing DelusionScore trajectories, whereas those derived from users without such discourse (Control) remain stable or decline. We further find that this amplification varies across themes, with reality skepticism and compulsive reasoning showing the strongest increases. Finally, conditioning AI responses on current DelusionScore substantially reduces these trajectories. These findings provide empirical evidence that conversational AI interactions can amplify delusion-related language over extended use and highlight the importance of state-aware safety mechanisms for mitigating such risks.

Large-Scale Analysis of Political Propaganda on Moltbook

We present an NLP-based study of political propaganda on Moltbook, a Reddit-style platform for AI agents. To enable large-scale analysis, we develop LLM-based classifiers to detect political propaganda, validated against expert annotation (Cohen's $κ$= 0.64-0.74). Using a dataset of 673,127 posts and 879,606 comments, we find that political propaganda accounts for 1% of all posts and 42% of all political content. These posts are concentrated in a small set of communities, with 70% of such posts falling into five of them. 4% of agents produced 51% of these posts. We further find that a minority of these agents repeatedly post highly similar content within and across communities. Despite this, we find limited evidence that comments amplify political propaganda.

Social Simulacra in the Wild: AI Agent Communities on Moltbook

As autonomous LLM-based agents increasingly populate social platforms, understanding the dynamics of AI-agent communities becomes essential for both communication research and platform governance. We present the first large-scale empirical comparison of AI-agent and human online communities, analyzing 73,899 Moltbook and 189,838 Reddit posts across five matched communities. Structurally, we find that Moltbook exhibits extreme participation inequality (Gini = 0.84 vs. 0.47) and high cross-community author overlap (33.8\% vs. 0.5\%). In terms of linguistic attributes, content generated by AI-agents is emotionally flattened, cognitively shifted toward assertion over exploration, and socially detached. These differences give rise to apparent community-level homogenization, but we show this is primarily a structural artifact of shared authorship. At the author level, individual agents are more identifiable than human users, driven by outlier stylistic profiles amplified by their extreme posting volume. As AI-mediated communication reshapes online discourse, our work offers an empirical foundation for understanding how multi-agent interaction gives rise to collective communication dynamics distinct from those of human communities.

CMHL: Contrastive Multi-Head Learning for Emotionally Consistent Text Classification

Textual Emotion Classification (TEC) is one of the most difficult NLP tasks. State of the art approaches rely on Large language models (LLMs) and multi-model ensembles. In this study, we challenge the assumption that larger scale or more complex models are necessary for improved performance. In order to improve logical consistency, We introduce CMHL, a novel single-model architecture that explicitly models the logical structure of emotions through three key innovations: (1) multi-task learning that jointly predicts primary emotions, valence, and intensity, (2) psychologically-grounded auxiliary supervision derived from Russell's circumplex model, and (3) a novel contrastive contradiction loss that enforces emotional consistency by penalizing mutually incompatible predictions (e.g., simultaneous high confidence in joy and anger). With just 125M parameters, our model outperforms 56x larger LLMs and sLM ensembles with a new state-of-the-art F1 score of 93.75\% compared to (86.13\%-93.2\%) on the dair-ai Emotion dataset. We further show cross domain generalization on the Reddit Suicide Watch and Mental Health Collection dataset (SWMH), outperforming domain-specific models like MentalBERT and MentalRoBERTa with an F1 score of 72.50\% compared to (68.16\%-72.16\%) + a 73.30\% recall compared to (67.05\%-70.89\%) that translates to enhanced sensitivity for detecting mental health distress. Our work establishes that architectural intelligence (not parameter count) drives progress in TEC. By embedding psychological priors and explicit consistency constraints, a well-designed single model can outperform both massive LLMs and complex ensembles, offering a efficient, interpretable, and clinically-relevant paradigm for affective computing.

LLM-Augmented Therapy Normalization and Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis for Treatment-Resistant Depression on Reddit

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a severe form of major depressive disorder in which patients do not achieve remission despite multiple adequate treatment trials. Evidence across pharmacologic options for TRD remains limited, and trials often do not fully capture patient-reported tolerability. Large-scale online peer-support narratives therefore offer a complementary lens on how patients describe and evaluate medications in real-world use. In this study, we curated a corpus of 5,059 Reddit posts explicitly referencing TRD from 3,480 subscribers across 28 mental health-related subreddits from 2010 to 2025. Of these, 3,839 posts mentioned at least one medication, yielding 23,399 mentions of 81 generic-name medications after lexicon-based normalization of brand names, misspellings, and colloquialisms. We developed an aspect-based sentiment classifier by fine-tuning DeBERTa-v3 on the SMM4H 2023 therapy-sentiment Twitter corpus with large language model based data augmentation, achieving a micro-F1 score of 0.800 on the shared-task test set. Applying this classifier to Reddit, we quantified sentiment toward individual medications across three categories: positive, neutral, and negative, and tracked patterns by drug, subscriber, subreddit, and year. Overall, 72.1% of medication mentions were neutral, 14.8% negative, and 13.1% positive. Conventional antidepressants, especially SSRIs and SNRIs, showed consistently higher negative than positive proportions, whereas ketamine and esketamine showed comparatively more favorable sentiment profiles. These findings show that normalized medication extraction combined with aspect-based sentiment analysis can help characterize patient-perceived treatment experiences in TRD-related Reddit discourse, complementing clinical evidence with large-scale patient-generated perspectives.

LLMs Can Infer Political Alignment from Online Conversations

Due to the correlational structure in our traits such as identities, cultures, and political attitudes, seemingly innocuous preferences such as following a band or using a specific slang, can reveal private traits. This possibility, especially when combined with massive, public social data and advanced computational methods, poses a fundamental privacy risk. Given our increasing data exposure online and the rapid advancement of AI are increasing the misuse potential of such risk, it is therefore critical to understand capacity of large language models (LLMs) to exploit it. Here, using online discussions on Debate.org and Reddit, we show that LLMs can reliably infer hidden political alignment, significantly outperforming traditional machine learning models. Prediction accuracy further improves as we aggregate multiple text-level inferences into a user-level prediction, and as we use more politics-adjacent domains. We demonstrate that LLMs leverage the words that can be highly predictive of political alignment while not being explicitly political. Our findings underscore the capacity and risks of LLMs for exploiting socio-cultural correlates.