Adaptive Control Strategy for Quadruped Robots in Actuator Degradation Scenarios

Quadruped robots have strong adaptability to extreme environments but may also experience faults. Once these faults occur, robots must be repaired before returning to the task, reducing their practical feasibility. One prevalent concern among these faults is actuator degradation, stemming from factors like device aging or unexpected operational events. Traditionally, addressing this problem has relied heavily on intricate fault-tolerant design, which demands deep domain expertise from developers and lacks generalizability. Learning-based approaches offer effective ways to mitigate these limitations, but a research gap exists in effectively deploying such methods on real-world quadruped robots. This paper introduces a pioneering teacher-student framework rooted in reinforcement learning, named Actuator Degradation Adaptation Transformer (ADAPT), aimed at addressing this research gap. This framework produces a unified control strategy, enabling the robot to sustain its locomotion and perform tasks despite sudden joint actuator faults, relying exclusively on its internal sensors. Empirical evaluations on the Unitree A1 platform validate the deployability and effectiveness of Adapt on real-world quadruped robots, and affirm the robustness and practicality of our approach.

Quantifying Zero-shot Coordination Capability with Behavior Preferring Partners

Zero-shot coordination (ZSC) is a new challenge focusing on generalizing learned coordination skills to unseen partners. Existing methods train the ego agent with partners from pre-trained or evolving populations. The agent's ZSC capability is typically evaluated with a few evaluation partners, including human and agent, and reported by mean returns. Current evaluation methods for ZSC capability still need to improve in constructing diverse evaluation partners and comprehensively measuring the ZSC capability. We aim to create a reliable, comprehensive, and efficient evaluation method for ZSC capability. We formally define the ideal 'diversity-complete' evaluation partners and propose the best response (BR) diversity, which is the population diversity of the BRs to the partners, to approximate the ideal evaluation partners. We propose an evaluation workflow including 'diversity-complete' evaluation partners construction and a multi-dimensional metric, the Best Response Proximity (BR-Prox) metric. BR-Prox quantifies the ZSC capability as the performance similarity to each evaluation partner's approximate best response, demonstrating generalization capability and improvement potential. We re-evaluate strong ZSC methods in the Overcooked environment using the proposed evaluation workflow. Surprisingly, the results in some of the most used layouts fail to distinguish the performance of different ZSC methods. Moreover, the evaluated ZSC methods must produce more diverse and high-performing training partners. Our proposed evaluation workflow calls for a change in how we efficiently evaluate ZSC methods as a supplement to human evaluation.

Facke: a Survey on Generative Models for Face Swapping

In this work, we investigate into the performance of mainstream neural generative models on the very task of swapping faces. We have experimented on CVAE, CGAN, CVAE-GAN, and conditioned diffusion models. Existing finely trained models have already managed to produce fake faces (Facke) indistinguishable to the naked eye as well as achieve high objective metrics. We perform a comparison among them and analyze their pros and cons. Furthermore, we proposed some promising tricks though they do not apply to this task.