Alert button
Picture for Ryutaro Tanno

Ryutaro Tanno

Alert button

Consensus, dissensus and synergy between clinicians and specialist foundation models in radiology report generation

Dec 06, 2023
Ryutaro Tanno, David G. T. Barrett, Andrew Sellergren, Sumedh Ghaisas, Sumanth Dathathri, Abigail See, Johannes Welbl, Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, Mike Schaekermann, Rhys May, Roy Lee, SiWai Man, Zahra Ahmed, Sara Mahdavi, Danielle Belgrave, Vivek Natarajan, Shravya Shetty, Pushmeet Kohli, Po-Sen Huang, Alan Karthikesalingam, Ira Ktena

Radiology reports are an instrumental part of modern medicine, informing key clinical decisions such as diagnosis and treatment. The worldwide shortage of radiologists, however, restricts access to expert care and imposes heavy workloads, contributing to avoidable errors and delays in report delivery. While recent progress in automated report generation with vision-language models offer clear potential in ameliorating the situation, the path to real-world adoption has been stymied by the challenge of evaluating the clinical quality of AI-generated reports. In this study, we build a state-of-the-art report generation system for chest radiographs, \textit{Flamingo-CXR}, by fine-tuning a well-known vision-language foundation model on radiology data. To evaluate the quality of the AI-generated reports, a group of 16 certified radiologists provide detailed evaluations of AI-generated and human written reports for chest X-rays from an intensive care setting in the United States and an inpatient setting in India. At least one radiologist (out of two per case) preferred the AI report to the ground truth report in over 60$\%$ of cases for both datasets. Amongst the subset of AI-generated reports that contain errors, the most frequently cited reasons were related to the location and finding, whereas for human written reports, most mistakes were related to severity and finding. This disparity suggested potential complementarity between our AI system and human experts, prompting us to develop an assistive scenario in which \textit{Flamingo-CXR} generates a first-draft report, which is subsequently revised by a clinician. This is the first demonstration of clinician-AI collaboration for report writing, and the resultant reports are assessed to be equivalent or preferred by at least one radiologist to reports written by experts alone in 80$\%$ of in-patient cases and 60$\%$ of intensive care cases.

Viaarxiv icon

An Image is Worth Multiple Words: Learning Object Level Concepts using Multi-Concept Prompt Learning

Oct 18, 2023
Chen Jin, Ryutaro Tanno, Amrutha Saseendran, Tom Diethe, Philip Teare

Textural Inversion, a prompt learning method, learns a singular embedding for a new "word" to represent image style and appearance, allowing it to be integrated into natural language sentences to generate novel synthesised images. However, identifying and integrating multiple object-level concepts within one scene poses significant challenges even when embeddings for individual concepts are attainable. This is further confirmed by our empirical tests. To address this challenge, we introduce a framework for Multi-Concept Prompt Learning (MCPL), where multiple new "words" are simultaneously learned from a single sentence-image pair. To enhance the accuracy of word-concept correlation, we propose three regularisation techniques: Attention Masking (AttnMask) to concentrate learning on relevant areas; Prompts Contrastive Loss (PromptCL) to separate the embeddings of different concepts; and Bind adjective (Bind adj.) to associate new "words" with known words. We evaluate via image generation, editing, and attention visualisation with diverse images. Extensive quantitative comparisons demonstrate that our method can learn more semantically disentangled concepts with enhanced word-concept correlation. Additionally, we introduce a novel dataset and evaluation protocol tailored for this new task of learning object-level concepts.

* Project page: https://github.com/lxasqjc/MCPL 
Viaarxiv icon

Towards Generalist Biomedical AI

Jul 26, 2023
Tao Tu, Shekoofeh Azizi, Danny Driess, Mike Schaekermann, Mohamed Amin, Pi-Chuan Chang, Andrew Carroll, Chuck Lau, Ryutaro Tanno, Ira Ktena, Basil Mustafa, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Yun Liu, Simon Kornblith, David Fleet, Philip Mansfield, Sushant Prakash, Renee Wong, Sunny Virmani, Christopher Semturs, S Sara Mahdavi, Bradley Green, Ewa Dominowska, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, Joelle Barral, Dale Webster, Greg S. Corrado, Yossi Matias, Karan Singhal, Pete Florence, Alan Karthikesalingam, Vivek Natarajan

Figure 1 for Towards Generalist Biomedical AI
Figure 2 for Towards Generalist Biomedical AI
Figure 3 for Towards Generalist Biomedical AI
Figure 4 for Towards Generalist Biomedical AI

Medicine is inherently multimodal, with rich data modalities spanning text, imaging, genomics, and more. Generalist biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) systems that flexibly encode, integrate, and interpret this data at scale can potentially enable impactful applications ranging from scientific discovery to care delivery. To enable the development of these models, we first curate MultiMedBench, a new multimodal biomedical benchmark. MultiMedBench encompasses 14 diverse tasks such as medical question answering, mammography and dermatology image interpretation, radiology report generation and summarization, and genomic variant calling. We then introduce Med-PaLM Multimodal (Med-PaLM M), our proof of concept for a generalist biomedical AI system. Med-PaLM M is a large multimodal generative model that flexibly encodes and interprets biomedical data including clinical language, imaging, and genomics with the same set of model weights. Med-PaLM M reaches performance competitive with or exceeding the state of the art on all MultiMedBench tasks, often surpassing specialist models by a wide margin. We also report examples of zero-shot generalization to novel medical concepts and tasks, positive transfer learning across tasks, and emergent zero-shot medical reasoning. To further probe the capabilities and limitations of Med-PaLM M, we conduct a radiologist evaluation of model-generated (and human) chest X-ray reports and observe encouraging performance across model scales. In a side-by-side ranking on 246 retrospective chest X-rays, clinicians express a pairwise preference for Med-PaLM M reports over those produced by radiologists in up to 40.50% of cases, suggesting potential clinical utility. While considerable work is needed to validate these models in real-world use cases, our results represent a milestone towards the development of generalist biomedical AI systems.

Viaarxiv icon

Low-field magnetic resonance image enhancement via stochastic image quality transfer

Apr 26, 2023
Hongxiang Lin, Matteo Figini, Felice D'Arco, Godwin Ogbole, Ryutaro Tanno, Stefano B. Blumberg, Lisa Ronan, Biobele J. Brown, David W. Carmichael, Ikeoluwa Lagunju, Judith Helen Cross, Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes, Daniel C. Alexander

Figure 1 for Low-field magnetic resonance image enhancement via stochastic image quality transfer
Figure 2 for Low-field magnetic resonance image enhancement via stochastic image quality transfer
Figure 3 for Low-field magnetic resonance image enhancement via stochastic image quality transfer
Figure 4 for Low-field magnetic resonance image enhancement via stochastic image quality transfer

Low-field (<1T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners remain in widespread use in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and are commonly used for some applications in higher income countries e.g. for small child patients with obesity, claustrophobia, implants, or tattoos. However, low-field MR images commonly have lower resolution and poorer contrast than images from high field (1.5T, 3T, and above). Here, we present Image Quality Transfer (IQT) to enhance low-field structural MRI by estimating from a low-field image the image we would have obtained from the same subject at high field. Our approach uses (i) a stochastic low-field image simulator as the forward model to capture uncertainty and variation in the contrast of low-field images corresponding to a particular high-field image, and (ii) an anisotropic U-Net variant specifically designed for the IQT inverse problem. We evaluate the proposed algorithm both in simulation and using multi-contrast (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)) clinical low-field MRI data from an LMIC hospital. We show the efficacy of IQT in improving contrast and resolution of low-field MR images. We demonstrate that IQT-enhanced images have potential for enhancing visualisation of anatomical structures and pathological lesions of clinical relevance from the perspective of radiologists. IQT is proved to have capability of boosting the diagnostic value of low-field MRI, especially in low-resource settings.

* Accepted in Medical Image Analysis 
Viaarxiv icon

Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts

Apr 18, 2023
Ira Ktena, Olivia Wiles, Isabela Albuquerque, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Ryutaro Tanno, Abhijit Guha Roy, Shekoofeh Azizi, Danielle Belgrave, Pushmeet Kohli, Alan Karthikesalingam, Taylan Cemgil, Sven Gowal

Figure 1 for Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts
Figure 2 for Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts
Figure 3 for Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts
Figure 4 for Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts

A ubiquitous challenge in machine learning is the problem of domain generalisation. This can exacerbate bias against groups or labels that are underrepresented in the datasets used for model development. Model bias can lead to unintended harms, especially in safety-critical applications like healthcare. Furthermore, the challenge is compounded by the difficulty of obtaining labelled data due to high cost or lack of readily available domain expertise. In our work, we show that learning realistic augmentations automatically from data is possible in a label-efficient manner using generative models. In particular, we leverage the higher abundance of unlabelled data to capture the underlying data distribution of different conditions and subgroups for an imaging modality. By conditioning generative models on appropriate labels, we can steer the distribution of synthetic examples according to specific requirements. We demonstrate that these learned augmentations can surpass heuristic ones by making models more robust and statistically fair in- and out-of-distribution. To evaluate the generality of our approach, we study 3 distinct medical imaging contexts of varying difficulty: (i) histopathology images from a publicly available generalisation benchmark, (ii) chest X-rays from publicly available clinical datasets, and (iii) dermatology images characterised by complex shifts and imaging conditions. Complementing real training samples with synthetic ones improves the robustness of models in all three medical tasks and increases fairness by improving the accuracy of diagnosis within underrepresented groups. This approach leads to stark improvements OOD across modalities: 7.7% prediction accuracy improvement in histopathology, 5.2% in chest radiology with 44.6% lower fairness gap and a striking 63.5% improvement in high-risk sensitivity for dermatology with a 7.5x reduction in fairness gap.

Viaarxiv icon

Repairing Neural Networks by Leaving the Right Past Behind

Jul 11, 2022
Ryutaro Tanno, Melanie F. Pradier, Aditya Nori, Yingzhen Li

Figure 1 for Repairing Neural Networks by Leaving the Right Past Behind
Figure 2 for Repairing Neural Networks by Leaving the Right Past Behind
Figure 3 for Repairing Neural Networks by Leaving the Right Past Behind
Figure 4 for Repairing Neural Networks by Leaving the Right Past Behind

Prediction failures of machine learning models often arise from deficiencies in training data, such as incorrect labels, outliers, and selection biases. However, such data points that are responsible for a given failure mode are generally not known a priori, let alone a mechanism for repairing the failure. This work draws on the Bayesian view of continual learning, and develops a generic framework for both, identifying training examples that have given rise to the target failure, and fixing the model through erasing information about them. This framework naturally allows leveraging recent advances in continual learning to this new problem of model repairment, while subsuming the existing works on influence functions and data deletion as specific instances. Experimentally, the proposed approach outperforms the baselines for both identification of detrimental training data and fixing model failures in a generalisable manner.

* 19 pages, 9 figures 
Viaarxiv icon

A Principled Approach to Failure Analysis and Model Repairment: Demonstration in Medical Imaging

Sep 25, 2021
Thomas Henn, Yasukazu Sakamoto, Clément Jacquet, Shunsuke Yoshizawa, Masamichi Andou, Stephen Tchen, Ryosuke Saga, Hiroyuki Ishihara, Katsuhiko Shimizu, Yingzhen Li, Ryutaro Tanno

Figure 1 for A Principled Approach to Failure Analysis and Model Repairment: Demonstration in Medical Imaging
Figure 2 for A Principled Approach to Failure Analysis and Model Repairment: Demonstration in Medical Imaging
Figure 3 for A Principled Approach to Failure Analysis and Model Repairment: Demonstration in Medical Imaging
Figure 4 for A Principled Approach to Failure Analysis and Model Repairment: Demonstration in Medical Imaging

Machine learning models commonly exhibit unexpected failures post-deployment due to either data shifts or uncommon situations in the training environment. Domain experts typically go through the tedious process of inspecting the failure cases manually, identifying failure modes and then attempting to fix the model. In this work, we aim to standardise and bring principles to this process through answering two critical questions: (i) how do we know that we have identified meaningful and distinct failure types?; (ii) how can we validate that a model has, indeed, been repaired? We suggest that the quality of the identified failure types can be validated through measuring the intra- and inter-type generalisation after fine-tuning and introduce metrics to compare different subtyping methods. Furthermore, we argue that a model can be considered repaired if it achieves high accuracy on the failure types while retaining performance on the previously correct data. We combine these two ideas into a principled framework for evaluating the quality of both the identified failure subtypes and model repairment. We evaluate its utility on a classification and an object detection tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/Rokken-lab6/Failure-Analysis-and-Model-Repairment

* Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention MICCAI 2021 pp 509-518  
Viaarxiv icon

Learning to Downsample for Segmentation of Ultra-High Resolution Images

Sep 22, 2021
Chen Jin, Ryutaro Tanno, Thomy Mertzanidou, Eleftheria Panagiotaki, Daniel C. Alexander

Figure 1 for Learning to Downsample for Segmentation of Ultra-High Resolution Images
Figure 2 for Learning to Downsample for Segmentation of Ultra-High Resolution Images
Figure 3 for Learning to Downsample for Segmentation of Ultra-High Resolution Images
Figure 4 for Learning to Downsample for Segmentation of Ultra-High Resolution Images

Segmentation of ultra-high resolution images with deep learning is challenging because of their enormous size, often millions or even billions of pixels. Typical solutions drastically downsample the image uniformly to meet memory constraints, implicitly assuming all pixels equally important by sampling at the same density at all spatial locations. However this assumption is not true and compromises the performance of deep learning techniques that have proved powerful on standard-sized images. For example with uniform downsampling, see green boxed region in Fig.1, the rider and bike do not have enough corresponding samples while the trees and buildings are oversampled, and lead to a negative effect on the segmentation prediction from the low-resolution downsampled image. In this work we show that learning the spatially varying downsampling strategy jointly with segmentation offers advantages in segmenting large images with limited computational budget. Fig.1 shows that our method adapts the sampling density over different locations so that more samples are collected from the small important regions and less from the others, which in turn leads to better segmentation accuracy. We show on two public and one local high-resolution datasets that our method consistently learns sampling locations preserving more information and boosting segmentation accuracy over baseline methods.

* 19 pages, 17 figures 
Viaarxiv icon

Active label cleaning: Improving dataset quality under resource constraints

Sep 01, 2021
Melanie Bernhardt, Daniel C. Castro, Ryutaro Tanno, Anton Schwaighofer, Kerem C. Tezcan, Miguel Monteiro, Shruthi Bannur, Matthew Lungren, Aditya Nori, Ben Glocker, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Ozan Oktay

Figure 1 for Active label cleaning: Improving dataset quality under resource constraints
Figure 2 for Active label cleaning: Improving dataset quality under resource constraints
Figure 3 for Active label cleaning: Improving dataset quality under resource constraints
Figure 4 for Active label cleaning: Improving dataset quality under resource constraints

Imperfections in data annotation, known as label noise, are detrimental to the training of machine learning models and have an often-overlooked confounding effect on the assessment of model performance. Nevertheless, employing experts to remove label noise by fully re-annotating large datasets is infeasible in resource-constrained settings, such as healthcare. This work advocates for a data-driven approach to prioritising samples for re-annotation - which we term "active label cleaning". We propose to rank instances according to estimated label correctness and labelling difficulty of each sample, and introduce a simulation framework to evaluate relabelling efficacy. Our experiments on natural images and on a new medical imaging benchmark show that cleaning noisy labels mitigates their negative impact on model training, evaluation, and selection. Crucially, the proposed active label cleaning enables correcting labels up to 4 times more effectively than typical random selection in realistic conditions, making better use of experts' valuable time for improving dataset quality.

* Currently under peer-review 
Viaarxiv icon